Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Retina ; 42(4): 816-821, 2022 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35350052

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To characterize vision-related malpractice litigation involving prisoners. METHODS: Retrospective legal database review using the Westlaw database was performed to identify vision-related malpractice lawsuits involving prisoners in the United States from 1914 to 2020. Main outcomes and measurements were allegations of malpractice, verdicts, and settlements. RESULTS: Sixty-four vision-related malpractice lawsuits involving prisoners were identified. Mean defendant age was 49 years (range, 28-74 years). Fifty-seven percent of the defendants were ophthalmologists and 43% were optometrists. The cases were most commonly from the South and Midwest (n = 19 [30%] for each). Allegations of malpractice included inadequate medical care or treatment refusal (n = 21 [33%]), failure to treat fully leading to continued suffering (n = 18 [28%]), and delay in treatment or referral (n = 17 [27%]). Retina-related diagnoses were most common (n = 18 [28%]). Forty-six (72%) cases were closed, 14 (22%) were open, and four (6.3%) were partially closed. Only two (3.1%) cases were decided in favor of the plaintiff. The most common reason for an unsuccessful suit was lack of deliberate indifference by the eye care professional (n = 21 [46%]). CONCLUSION: The most common reasons for vision-related malpractice brought forth by prisoners were inadequate or incomplete eye care and treatment refusal. Retina was the most commonly involved subspecialty. However, the success rate of these suits was extremely low.


Assuntos
Imperícia , Oftalmologistas , Prisioneiros , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
BMJ Case Rep ; 13(6)2020 Jun 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32522719

RESUMO

This paper has two main purposes: (1) to report a rare case of paediatric gliosarcoma that invaded the surrounding orbit and (2) to demonstrate chlorpromazine injection as a potential treatment option for blind, painful eye caused by tumour invasion. A 12-year-old man who presented with headaches was found to have glioblastoma multiforme and it was excised and treated with radiation and chemotherapy. Seven months later, the tumour recurred as gliosarcoma, a rare variant of glioblastoma multiforme containing distinct gliomatous and sarcomatous components. In spite of treatment, the tumour progressed and eventually invaded into the right orbit. He subsequently developed a proptotic, blind, painful eye and was treated with retrobulbar chlorpromazine injection, which provided immediate symptomatic relief.


Assuntos
Cegueira , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Clorpromazina/administração & dosagem , Dor Ocular , Glioblastoma , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Órbita , Antipsicóticos/administração & dosagem , Cegueira/diagnóstico , Cegueira/etiologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Criança , Dor Ocular/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Ocular/etiologia , Evolução Fatal , Glioblastoma/patologia , Glioblastoma/cirurgia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Invasividade Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/fisiopatologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Órbita/diagnóstico por imagem , Órbita/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA