A comparison of colour micrographs obtained with a charged couple device (CCD) camera and a 35-mm camera.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if micrographs produced with a colour charged couple device (CCD) camera were comparable in quality to micrographs obtained with a 35-mm colour film camera. The Axiocam (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) CCD camera produced images of 3900 x 3090 pixels. METHODS: Each picture in a series of 50 pairs of film and digital micrographs was rated independently by each of three observers on the categories of colour, detail and overall impression. A total of 28 of the 50 pairs of micrographs were discarded due to colour differences. RESULTS: Digital micrographs were rated lower on colour and higher on detail compared to film micrographs. The film and digital micrographs were rated equally on overall impression. The difference in colour between film and digital micrographs can be compensated for using image processing software on the digital image. However, such manipulation was not carried out as part of the present study. The study originally included 50 digital micrographs and 50 film micrographs. The micrographs were paired and 22 of the 50 pairs of micrographs were assessed. Thus 28 pairs were not evaluated due to colour differences in the non-manipulated pictures. The interobserver difference on colour in the remaining 22 pairs given as mean square +/- standard error of the mean was - 0.27 +/- 0.10, 0.62 +/- 0.10 and 0.90 +/- 0.11. The interobserver difference on detail was - 0.48 +/- 0.10, 0.95 +/- 0.10 and 1.43 +/- 0.10. The interobserver difference on overall impression was - 0.70 +/- 0.10, 0.57 +/- 0.10 and 1.27 +/- 0.10. All the results differed significantly (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Digital micrographs are sufficient in detail, colour and overall impression to replace the traditional 35-mm film recordings for use in histopathology.

Metastases in the ophthalmic region in Denmark 1969-98. A histopathological study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the patterns of origin and anatomical localization of histologically verified metastases in the ophthalmic region in Denmark during 1969-98, and to compare the findings with those of a similar study for the period 1944-68. METHODS: All metastatic lesions presented at the Eye Pathology Institute, University of Copenhagen during the period 1968-98 were investigated. RESULTS: Metastases were found in 81 specimens from the eye and eye region in 76 patients (32 men, 44 women). Five patients had bilateral involvement. The most frequent site of involvement was the uvea (63%), followed by the orbit (26%) and the eyelids (10%). Breast cancer accounted for the most frequent primary tumour (38%), followed by lung cancer (24%) and skin melanoma (14%). CONCLUSION: The pattern of anatomical location of metastases in the ocular region has not changed since 1944. The incidence of metastases has fallen significantly throughout the period.