RESUMO
Purpose: This study aimed to review our experience with the explantation of infected endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) grafts. Methods: This single-center, retrospective, observational study analyzed the data of 12 consecutive patients who underwent infected aortic stent graft explantation following EVAR between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019, of which 11 underwent in situ graft reconstruction following graft removal. The presentation symptoms, infection route, original pathology of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), graft materials, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Six patients underwent total explantation, whereas 5 underwent removal of only the fabric portions. For in situ reconstructions, prosthetic grafts and banked allografts were used in 8 and 3 patients, respectively. Four mechanisms of graft infection were noted in 11 patients: 4 had bacteremia from systemic infections, 3 had persistent infections following EVAR of primary infected AAA, 3 had ascending infections from adjacent abscesses, and 1 had an aneurysm sac erosion resulting in an aortoenteric fistula. No infection-related postoperative complications or reinfections occurred during the mean 65.27-month (standard deviation, ±52.51) follow-up period. One patient died postoperatively because of the rupture of the proximal aortic wall pseudoaneurysm that had occurred during forceful bare stent removal. Conclusion: Regardless of graft material, in situ graft reconstruction is safe for interposition in treating an infected aortic stent graft following EVAR. In our experience, the residual bare stent is no longer a risk factor for reinfection. Therefore, it is important not to injure the proximal aortic wall when removing the bare stent by force.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Peritoneal metastasis (PM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with poor prognosis. We conducted this study to assess whether palliative resection (PR) of the primary tumor improved the overall survival (OS) of patients with PM-CRC. METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively, data collected prospectively from patients with CRC. PM was categorized into three subgroups according to the Japanese classification of PM. A propensity-score model was used to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent PR (PR group) and those who did not [non-resection (NR) group]. RESULTS: Among 1909 patients with metastatic CRC, 309 (16 %) had only peritoneal metastases and 255 of these patients who underwent palliative surgery (R2) were the subjects of our analysis: 161 in the PR group and 94 in the NR group. Median OS was significantly longer in the PR group than in the NR group (23 vs. 11 months, P < 0.001). Patients in the PR group had less extensive PM and a higher rate of receiving palliative chemotherapy than those in the NR group (P < 0.001). In a Cox multivariate analysis of 69 propensity-score matched pairs, PR resulted in significantly longer OS than NR (hazard ratio 0.496, 95 % confidence interval 0.268-0.919, P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that PR resulted in better OS than NR for patients with PM-CRC, when their overall condition permitted a more aggressive approach.
