Trends in the use of patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair: a quantitative systematic review.

PURPOSE: To quantitatively assess the use of patient-reported outcome measures in studies involving patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in Medline and EMBASE. We included all studies published between 2000 and 2019 that involved > 5 patients receiving inguinal hernia repair and evaluated a postoperative patient-reported outcome measure. Studies were stratified in 5-year intervals. We extracted data on which patient-reported outcome measure was used, its time of administration, study design, and the size and composition of the study population. Data were presented using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: We included 929 studies that covered 81 different patient-reported outcome measures. Of these, the Short-Form 36 was the most commonly used generic instrument (14%), the Carolinas Comfort Scale was the most commonly used hernia-specific instrument (5%), and the Visual Analogue Scale was the most commonly used domain-specific instrument (70%). There was a proportional decrease in the use of generic instruments, from 24% of studies in 2000-2004 to only 14% of studies in 2015-2019. Conversely, there was an increase in the use of hernia-specific instruments, from 0% in 2000-2004 to 18% in 2015-2019. CONCLUSIONS: There is heterogeneity in the use of patient-reported outcome measures in the field of inguinal hernia research. The use of hernia-specific instruments is increasing, the use of generic instruments is decreasing, and the use of domain-specific instruments remains consistently high. This study serves as a repository of all available patient-reported outcome measures relevant to patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

High complication rates during and after repeated Lichtenstein or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs in the same groin: a cohort study based on medical records.

PURPOSE: Performing two anterior or two posterior inguinal hernia repairs in the same groin contradict guidelines. Nevertheless, there can be indications for using the same approach at reoperation, and information on complications other than the risk of a third repair and chronic pain is lacking in the literature. The aim was to assess intraoperative events and postoperative complications after two Lichtenstein repairs or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs in the same groin. METHODS: This nationwide cohort study included patients that had received two Lichtenstein repairs (Lichtenstein-Lichtenstein) or two laparoscopic (Laparoscopy-Laparoscopy) inguinal hernia repairs in the same groin. Patients were identified in the Danish Hernia Database and outcomes were identified in medical records during a period of 6 years. Outcomes were intraoperative events that deviated from a standard repair and 1-year postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Outcomes were reported separately for the two cohorts. RESULTS: Among the included 102 Lichtenstein reoperations, 27% of the repairs had intraoperative events, with drain placement being most common (10%). Half of the reoperations resulted in complications where infection (15%) and hematoma (12%) were most frequent. Among the 58 laparoscopic reoperations, 16% had an intraoperative event where bleeding requiring clips was most common (10%). Half of the reoperations resulted in a complication with surgery in general anesthesia in the same groin area being the most frequent complication (9%). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative events and 1-year postoperative complications were high for both Lichtenstein-Lichtenstein and Laparoscopy-Laparoscopy, and the results therefore support guidelines that recommend another approach at reoperation.