Pre-diagnostic delays caused by gastrointestinal investigations do not affect outcomes in pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas are poor prognostic cancers accounting for 3% of all cancer cases in the UK. They often present late in the course of the disease process with non-specific symptoms, including gastro-intestinal(GI) symptoms. Delays in diagnosis occur when investigations are carried out in a primary care setting for GI symptoms. The aim of this study was to assess delays in pancreatic cancer diagnosis when patients were referred for GI investigations and evaluate its effect on survival. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a Scottish district general hospital over a seven year period from January 2010 to December 2016. Patients were divided into two groups, those who had a GI investigation 18 months prior to the pancreatic cancer diagnosis and those who did not have GI investigations. Data on demographics, symptoms on referral, stage of disease at diagnosis, treatment undergone and length of survival collected and analysed. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-three patients were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in the study period. Forty (26%) of the 153 underwent gastrointestinal investigations in the 18 months prior to diagnosis. The remaining 113 (74%) had no gastro-intestinal investigations in the same time period. Demographic data were comparable. Significant delays occurred from referral to diagnosis in the GI investigated group compared to those who did not have GI investigations. (64.5days vs 9 days, p = 0.001). No difference was noted in disease stage or treatments undergone between the groups. There was no difference in the average survival after diagnosis between the two groups with median of 108 days for those who underwent GI investigations to 97 days for those who did not.(U = 2079.5, p = 0.454). CONCLUSION: Delays caused by pre-diagnostic GI investigations do not appear to contribute to the poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Recently updated NICE Guidelines recommends early ultrasound or CT in patients with GI symptoms and weight loss which may reduce delays in diagnosis. Screening tests in future may become cost effective and diagnose this condition at a curable stage which in turn may improve survival rates.

Counteraction of perforated cecum lesions in rats: Effects of pentadecapeptide BPC 157, L-NAME and L-arginine.

AIM: To study the counteraction of perforated cecum lesion using BPC 157 and nitric oxide (NO) system agents. METHODS: Alongside with the agents' application (after 1 min, medication (/kg, 10 mL/2 min bath/rat) includes: BPC 157 (10 µg), L-NAME (5 mg), L-arginine (100mg) alone or combined, and saline baths (controls)) on the rat perforate cecum injury, we continuously assessed the gross reappearance of the vessels (USB microcamera) quickly propagating toward the defect at the cecum surface, defect contraction, bleeding attenuation, MDA- and NO-levels in cecum tissue at 15 min, and severity of cecum lesions and adhesions at 1 and 7 d. RESULTS: Post-injury, during/after a saline bath, the number of vessels was significantly reduced, the defect was slightly narrowed, bleeding was significant and MDA-levels increased and NO-levels decreased. BPC 157 bath: the vessel presentation was markedly increased, the defect was noticeably narrowed, the bleeding time was shortened and MDA- and NO-levels remained normal. L-NAME: reduced vessel presentation but not more than the control, did not change defect and shortened bleeding. L-arginine: exhibited less vessel reduction, did not change the defect and prolonged bleeding. In combination, mutual counteraction occurred (L-NAME + L-arginine) or the presentation was similar to that of BPC 157 rats (BPC 157 + L-NAME; BPC 157 + L-arginine; BPC 157 + L-NAME + L-arginine), except the defect did not change. Thereby at day 1 and 7, saline, L-NAME, L-arginine and L-NAME + L-arginine failed (defect was still open and large adhesions present). CONCLUSION: The therapeutic effect was achieved with BPC 157 alone or in combination with L-NAME and L-arginine as it was able to consolidate the stimulating and inhibiting effects of the NO-system towards more effective healing recruiting vessels.