Management of mixed urinary incontinence: IUGA committee opinion.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) is defined by the International Urogynecology Association (IUGA) and International Continence Society as the complaint of involuntary leakage of urine associated with urgency and also with exertion, effort, sneezing or coughing. It therefore implies the coexistence of both stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). MUI is a heterogeneous diagnosis that requires an assessment of its individual components of SUI and UUI. Management requires an individualised approach to the symptom components. The aim of this review is to identify the assessment/investigations and management options for MUI. METHODS: A working subcommittee from the IUGA Research & Development (R&D) Committee was created and volunteers invited from the IUGA membership. A literature review was performed to provide guidance focused on the recommended assessment and management of MUI. The document was then evaluated by the entire IUGA R&D Committee and IUGA Board of Directors and revisions made. The final document represents the IUGA R&D Committee Opinion. RESULTS: The R&D Committee MUI opinion paper provides guidance on the assessment and management of women with MUI and summarises the evidence-based recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed urinary incontinence is a complex problem and successful management requires alleviation of both the stress and urge components. Care should be individualised based on patient preferences. Further research is needed to guide patients in setting goals and to determine which component of MUI to treat first. The evidence for many of the surgical/procedural treatment options for MUI are limited and needs to be explored in more detail.

Effect of remineralizing agent on laser and nonlaser bleached enamel surfaces subjected to erosion: An in vitro study.

Aim: Assessment of remineralizing agent's effect on laser and nonlaser bleached enamel surfaces subjected to erosion. Materials and Methods: In this study, 80 extracted human permanent anteriors were collected and divided into 4 groups with 20 teeth per sample. Enamel specimen of 3 mm × 3 mm were made using polyvinyl chloride rings and acrylic and randomly divided into four groups. Then the specimens were subjected to initial microhardness test using Vicker's hardness tester (AVK-CO, Mitutoyo, Japan). Two indentations were placed at 100 mm from one another in the center of all the samples. Bleaching with laser and without laser using hydrogen peroxide was performed followed by remineralization in the groups (Groups 1a and 2a) and then were subjected to erosion. The final hardness was measured using the above method used for initial microhardness. Results: Microhardness in the remineralized groups showed least variation. The group in which laser bleaching was performed along with remineralization as compared with nonlaser bleaching group with remineralization showed improvement in microhardness but the data was not statistically significant. A significant difference was noted between the laser and remineralization group when compared with the groups in which no remineralization was done. Conclusion: After bleaching the enamel surface is more prone to erosion, so to improve the microhardness of bleached enamel a remineralizing agent should be used. A combination of diode laser bleaching and remineralizing agents leads to improved microhardness of the bleached enamel thus proving this combination to be efficacious.

Introduction to healthcare for transgender and gender-diverse people.

This editorial provides a broad introduction to transgender health for transgender and gender-diverse people. Following a brief description of the history of transgender and gender-diverse people, the development of medical treatment is discussed, together with the use of appropriate terminology and language. The content largely draws attention to the guidance in the Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People Version 8 developed by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) and published in 2022. Further key areas addressed are as follows. • The use of names and pronouns. • Population estimates of transgender and gender diverse people. • Diagnostic classification systems in transgender health. • A wide range of gender-affirming medical interventions, including hormones and surgeries. • Ethical considerations for research with transgender and gender diverse populations.

Factors that influence pregnant women's decision on mode of delivery after previous obstetric anal sphincter injury.

PURPOSE: Maternal request for caesarean section (CS) is increasing. One common reason is following a previous obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). We aim to understand which factors bear the greatest influence in driving this women's decision-making process once they are pregnant after having sustained an OASI. METHODS: Pregnant women with a previous OASIS who were attending their first antenatal appointment were deemed eligible and were asked to complete two questionnaires on their preferred mode of delivery (MoD) and ongoing pelvic floor symptomatology. Data were analysed with descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS, and results were presented both quanti- and qualitatively. RESULTS: Data from 63 participants was included in the final analysis. Most women had experienced 3A/3B OASIS (n = 49, 77.78 %), and they were more likely to report bladder pain and difficulties with voiding than those with major tears (p < 0.05). The type of tear did not impact directly on the preferred MoD. However, women still experiencing bladder pain were more likely to request a CS (p < 0.05). Even though all participants who attended a perineal trauma clinic postpartum found it helpful, they reported that ultimately the decision on how to deliver was theirs, and their ideas and concerns played the greatest influence. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with ongoing urinary symptoms rather than sexual or bowel dysfunction seem to favour a planned CS, regardless of the severity of their previous tear. Postpartum follow-up in a perineal trauma clinic is extremely valuable but even more is the need to understand women's motivations to support them make an informed decision.

What is the role of the multidisciplinary team meeting in primary prolapse surgery and are alternative formats acceptable?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: In 2019, the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended discussion of all primary prolapse cases at a multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting prior to surgery. However, following the COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face meetings were suspended. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of MDT meetings in an observational retrospective review of primary prolapse cases and determine whether alternatives to face-to-face MDT meetings such as virtual and remote paper result in different outcomes. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients with primary prolapse, who had already been through face-to-face MDT meetings in 2019, were subjected to remote paper (independent review by team members, who then submit a paper outcome to the MDT meeting chair) and a virtual MDT meeting by the same team (blinded). Outcomes included agree, minor amendment (changing the order of priority of the compartment, changing procedure from + to +/-), major amendment (adding/removing a compartment) and insufficient information. MDT outcomes were compared for remote paper, virtual, and face-to-face MDT options. RESULTS: In 88% of cases, face-to-face MDT meetings agreed to proceed unchanged (4% minor amendment, 7% major amendment, 1% insufficient information). This compared with 80% at virtual MDT (5% minor amendment, 11% major amendment, 4% insufficient information) and 74% when conducted by remote paper (5% minor amendment, 15% major amendment, 6% insufficient information). There was no significant difference in outcomes among the MDT meeting formats (Chi-squared 7.73, p=0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary team discussion changes management in a minority of primary prolapse cases. Similar MDT decisions are produced by virtual and remote paper formats, although the latter had the lowest concordance of opinions.

A pilot study to evaluate changes in pelvic floor muscle tone following pelvic organ prolapse surgery using a novel intra-vaginal pressure sensor device.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic floor muscle weakness is a common cause of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Surgical repair of prolapse is commonly undertaken; however, the impact on pelvic floor muscle tone is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of anterior and posterior colporrhaphy on pelvic floor activation. METHODS: Patients aged under 70 undergoing primary anterior or posterior colporrhaphy were recruited. Intra-vaginal pressure was measured at rest and during pelvic floor contraction using the Femfit® device (an intra-vaginal pressure sensor device [IVPSD]). Peak pressure and mean pressure over 3 s were measured in millimetres of mercury. The pre- and post-operative measurements were compared. The difference between the means was assessed using Cohen's D test, with significance set at p<0.05 RESULTS: A total of 37 patients completed pre- and post-operative analysis, 25 in the anterior colporrhaphy group and 12 in the posterior colporrhaphy group. Anterior colporrhaphy showed no significant change in pelvic floor tone. Change in peak pressure was -1.71mmHg (-5.75 to 2.33; p=0.16) and change in mean pressure was -0.86 mmHg (-4.38 to 2.66; p=0.31). Posterior colporrhaphy showed a significant increase in peak pelvic floor muscle tone of 7.2 mmHg (0.82 to 13.58; p=0.005) and mean pressure of 4.19 mmHg (-0.09 to 8.47; p=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Posterior colporrhaphy significantly improves pelvic floor muscle tone, whereas anterior colporrhaphy does not. Improved understanding of the impact of pelvic floor surgery may guide future management options for other pelvic floor disorders. Further work is needed to confirm the association of this improvement in pelvic floor disorders.

A Case Report and Literature Review on Argatroban Refractory Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is characterized by low platelets and thrombosis after exposure to Heparin products. It is classically characterized by a rapid and significant drop in platelets and life-threatening thrombosis. Thrombosis can occur up to 50% of the cases if left untreated. It requires immediate discontinuation of all heparin products and switching to a non-heparin anticoagulant to prevent further thrombosis. Here we present a case of a 56-year-old male who presented to the Emergency Department with sudden onset of severe left leg pain. Duplex study showed arterial thrombosis in the common iliac and distal iliac arteries. He received TPA at once and underwent thrombectomy while his platelet continued to drop. He used Low Molecular Weight Heparin (enoxaparin) for bridging after his tonsil surgery a week prior to this hospital admission. His HIT assay was found to be positive and despite the Argatroban therapy his clinical condition continued to worsen while his platelet count continued to drop. Given the refractory nature of the thrombosis and thrombocytopenia; Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy was introduced. The patient showed a great response and his platelet count improved to 150,000/µ. He was discharged on warfarin with a closer follow-up. Few case reports have described the treatment of such refractory cases using intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), resulting in stabilized platelet counts, reduced platelet activation, and reduced thrombotic complications, the exact mechanism of which is unknown. It is thought that IVIG inhibits platelet activation by binding as platelet receptors, which would otherwise bind with heparin-platelet factor 4 complexes and HIT antibodies.

International Urogynecology Consultation: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Patient-reported outcome measure instruments include patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported goals (PRGs), which allow practitioners to measure symptoms and determine outcomes of treatment that matter to patients. METHODS: This is a structured review completed by the International Urogynecology Consultation (IUC), sponsored by the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA). The aim of this working group was to evaluate and synthesize the existing evidence for PROs and PRGs in the initial clinical work-up/evaluation and research arena for patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). RESULTS: The initial search generated 3589 non-duplicated studies. After abstract review by 4 authors, 211 full texts were assessed for eligibility by 2 writing group members, and 199 studies were reviewed in detail. Any disagreements on abstract or full-text articles were resolved by a third reviewer or during video meetings as a group. The list of POP PROs and information on PRGs was developed from these articles. Tables were generated to describe the validation of each PRO and to provide currently available, validated translations. CONCLUSIONS: All patients presenting for POP should be evaluated for vaginal, bladder, bowel and sexual symptoms including their goals for symptom treatment. This screening can be facilitated by a validated PRO; however, most PROs provide more information than needed to provide clinical care and were designed for research purposes.

Mediolateral/lateral episiotomy with operative vaginal delivery and the risk reduction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: OASI complicates approximately 6% of vaginal deliveries. This risk is increased with operative vaginal deliveries (OVDs), particularly forceps. However, there is conflicting evidence supporting the use of mediolateral/lateral episiotomy (MLE/LE) with OVD. The aim of this study was to assess whether MLE/LE affects the incidence of OASI in OVD. METHODS: Electronic searches were performed in OVID Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Randomised and non-randomised observational studies investigating the risk of OASI in OVD with/without MLE/LE were eligible for inclusion. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using Revman 5.3. Risk of bias of was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 and ROBINS-I tool. The quality of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: A total of 703,977 patients from 31 studies were pooled for meta-analysis. MLE/LE significantly reduced the rate of OASI in OVD (OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.42-0.84]). On sub-group analysis, MLE/LE significantly reduced the rate in nulliparous ventouse (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.42-0.84]) and forceps deliveries (OR 0.32 [95% CI 0.29-0.61]). In multiparous women, although the incidence of OASI was lower when a ventouse or forceps delivery was performed with an MLE/LE, this was not statistically significant. Heterogeneity remained significant across all studies (I2 > 50). The quality of all evidence was downgraded to "very low" because of the critical risk of bias across many studies. CONCLUSIONS: MLE/LE may reduce the incidence of OASI in OVDs, particularly in nulliparous ventouse or forceps deliveries. This information will be useful in aiding clinical decision-making and counselling in the antenatal period and during labour.

Do vaginal pessaries used to treat pelvic organ prolapse impact on sexual function? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is common and associated with sexual dysfunction. Vaginal pessaries are an effective treatment for POP, but their impact on sexual function is not well established. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to establish the impact of vaginal pessaries used for POP on female sexual function. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and checklist. A comprehensive search was conducted across Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov , The WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, Open Grey and Scopus Citation Database. Randomised controlled trials and cohort studies that assessed sexual function in women pre- and post-pessary treatment for POP were included, assessed for risk of bias and their results synthesised. RESULTS: A total of 1,945 titles and abstracts were screened, 104 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, 14 studies were included in the narrative analysis and 7 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results suggest that, in sexually active women, there is no evidence of a deterioration in sexual function and some evidence of an improvement. DISCUSSION: This review offers reassurance that in sexually active women who successfully use a pessary for treatment of their prolapse, there is no deterioration in sexual function. There is some evidence of an improvement in sexual function, but given the clinical heterogeneity in the studies included, caution should be taken in generalising these findings.

Risk of reoperation 10 years after surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a national population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is a debate about the safety and effectiveness of surgical treatments for stress urinary incontinence. Controversy about the use of synthetic mesh sling insertion has led to an increased uptake of retropubic colposuspension and autologous sling procedures. Comparative evidence on the long-term outcomes from these procedures is needed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of reoperation at 10 years after operation between women treated for stress urinary incontinence with retropubic colposuspension, mesh sling insertion, and autologous sling procedures. STUDY DESIGN: The records of admissions to National Health Service hosptials were used to identify women who had first-time stress incontinence surgery between 2006 and 2013 in England. The first incidence of the following outcomes was assessed: further stress incontinence surgery, surgery for a complication (either mesh removal, prolapse repair, or incisional hernia repair), and any reoperation (either further stress incontinence surgery, mesh removal, prolapse repair, or incisional hernia repair). The cumulative incidence of each of these outcomes up to 10 years after surgery was calculated, considering death as a competing event. Multivariable modeling was then used to estimate the reoperation hazard ratios for the different initial surgery types with adjustments for patient characteristics and concurrent prolapse surgery or hysterectomy. RESULTS: The analysis included 2262 women treated with retropubic colposuspension, 92,524 treated with mesh sling insertion, and 1234 treated with autologous sling. The cumulative incidence of any first reoperation at 10 years was 21.3% (95% confidence interval, 19.5-23.0) after retropubic colposuspension, 10.9% (10.7-11.1) after mesh sling insertion, and 12.0% (10.2-13.9) after autologous sling procedures. The women who had a retropubic colposuspension were significantly more likely to have a reoperation than women who had an autologous sling (adjusted hazard ratio for any reoperation: 1.79 [1.47-2.17]; for further stress incontinence surgery: 1.64 [1.19-2.26]; for surgery for complications: 1.89 [1.49-2.40]), whereas the women who had mesh slings had a similar hazard (for any reoperation: 0.90 [0.76-1.07]; for further stress incontinence surgery: 0.75 [0.57-0.99]; for surgery for complications: 1.11 [0.89-1.36]). A sensitivity analysis excluding the women who had concurrent prolapse surgery or hysterectomy produced similar results. CONCLUSION: Retropubic colposuspension is associated with higher risk of reoperation at 10 years after surgery than mesh sling insertion or autologous sling procedures, with 1 in 5 women requiring reoperation.

The impact of risk reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on sexual function in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women with Lynch syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: In the absence of an effective screening test, women with a high genetic predisposition for ovarian cancer are recommended to undergo risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO) once childbearing is complete. This reduces the risk of ovarian cancer by up to 96%, but can result in undesirable side effects, including menopausal symptoms and sexual dysfunction. We have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of RRBSO on sexual function in women at high risk of breast/and or ovarian cancer. METHODS: A literature search of the AMED (Allied and complementary medicine), Embase and Medline databases was performed, using search terms including sexual function, risk reducing and oophorectomy. Results were filtered according to the PRISMA protocol. Quality assessment of studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Data were pooled in meta-analysis. RESULTS: There were 21 eligible studies, 10 of which reported sufficient data for meta-analysis. Most studies were retrospective cohort or observational studies. Fifteen of the 21 studies (71%) reported a negative impact of RRBSO on sexual function. Participant numbers ranged from 37 to 1522. Meta-analysis was performed with studies including 3201 patients. This demonstrated that RRBSO has a statistically significant negative impact on sexual function (SMD -0.63, [-0.82, -0.44], p = 0.03). There was a trend towards reduced sexual pleasure and increased discomfort but this did not reach statistical significance. There was minimal change in the frequency of sex. There was a significant increase in vaginal dryness post-RRBSO (SMD 9.25, [3.66, 14.83], p < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in sexual function between pre-menopausal and post-menopausal RRBSO. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) did not abolish this negative impact. CONCLUSION: Sexual function declines post RRBSO, independent of menopausal status. Comprehensive pre-operative counselling regarding anticipated menopausal and sexual symptoms is key to setting realistic patient expectations and minimising post-operative distress. Information and support regarding management of these side effects should be available to all patients.

Which symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction does physiotherapy improve after an OASI?

OBJECTIVES: Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury (OASI) is associated with significant morbidity in the form of pelvic floor dysfunction, both in the immediate period of healing and long term. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of urinary, anorectal and sexual symptoms arising from OASI within 6 weeks after delivery at their first physiotherapy appointment (immediate postnatal) and 3-6 months after delivery following completion of physiotherapy (intermediate postnatal). Symptom prevalence were compared between the two time periods and the impact of pelvic floor physiotherapy analysed to determine any changes in symptomology. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective observational study, conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital, involved completion of a paper questionnaire by pelvic floor physiotherapists at the immediate postnatal review and by consultant gynaecologists at the intermediate postnatal review. Data were then compared to determine changes in symptoms using Fisher Exact tests and Mann Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Of the 131 women seen within 6 weeks of delivery, follow-up data at 3-6 months were collected for 96. There was a significant improvement in pain on defecation (P = 0.008), rectal bleeding on wiping (P = 0.0233) and women's ability to defer a bowel motion (P = 0.0001) however faecal incontinence did not improve significantly even with supervised physiotherapy. Urinary symptoms including stress incontinence, urgency and nocturia also significantly improved at P = 0.0097, P = 0.0045 and P < 0.0001, respectively. For the sexual domain, significantly more women had resumed intercourse (P < 0.0001) and started using contraception (P < 0.0001) by the follow up appointment. CONCLUSION: This study shows that physiotherapy is valuable in the treatment of urinary symptoms after delivery but does not have the same impact on faecal incontinence. Further investigation is required to confirm if early anal symptomology may be a predictor of long-term adverse outcomes.

A systematic review of English language patient-reported outcome measures for use in urogynaecology and female pelvic medicine.

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used in clinical practice and research in urogynaecology. There is no consensus on which PROMs should be used. No unifying document identifies all available PROMs and compares the psychometric properties of these. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature following PRISMA guidelines. Studies where women had been administered an English-language PROM which assessed pelvic-floor symptomatology and psychometric properties had been reported were included. RESULTS: 85 PROMs assessing pelvic-floor symptoms in a urogynaecology population were identified. 43 PROMs assessed lower urinary tract symptoms in 95 studies, four PROMS assessed vaginal symptoms in seven studies, 20 PROMs assessed bowel symptoms in 27 studies and three PROMs assessed sexual symptoms in seven studies. 15 PROMs assessed two or more of these symptom areas in 60 studies. PROMs with the with the best available psychometric evidence within these five areas were (urinary symptoms) the Incontinence Quality-of-Life questionnaire (I-QOL aka ICIQ-UIqol) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-UI-SF), (bowel symptoms) the Accidental Bowel Leakage Evaluation (ABLE) questionnaire and the International Consultation on Incontinence Bowel questionnaire (ICIQ-B), (vaginal symptoms) the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POPSS), (sexual symptoms) the Pelvic organ prolapse- urinary Incontinence Sexual function Questionnaire- IUGA revised (PISQ-IR) and (comprehensive PROMs) the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire and the Electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire-Pelvic-Floor (ePAQ-PF). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple PROMs with robust psychometric properties are available. Some widely used PROMs have weak evidence. Formal recommendations on which English-language PROMs to use within clinical practice and research in urogynaecology are required.

Stage of ovarian cancer at diagnosis. Does presentation as an emergency make a difference?

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether presentation of ovarian cancer as an emergency compared to presentation via referral to diagnostic clinic has an impact on stage of disease at diagnosis. Secondary outcomes include the relationship between stage of diagnosis and age as well as socioeconomic status and type of presentation (emergency or clinic referral). STUDY DESIGN: Data were obtained from the central database for all new diagnoses of ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal malignancy at a tertiary teaching hospital for 2016-2018 (n = 147). The electronic patient records were manually reviewed to determine the patient's presentation. Age and stage at diagnosis were from the central records. Socioeconomic status was determined by the multiple deprivation index deciles obtained from patient postcode data. Non parametric chi squared analysis was used to assess for any significant results. RESULTS: 51 % of women presented through a gynaecology two-week wait service; 27 % presented as an emergency admission; 12 % through a routine gynaecology outpatient clinic and 10 % after initial referral to a non-gynaecological two-week wait service. There was a significant (p = 0.008) association with later stage disease and emergency presentation. Increased age was also strongly linked to later stage at diagnosis (p = 0.00001). There was no association between stage at diagnosis and socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency presentations account for just over a quarter of new diagnoses and are significantly associated with later stage disease with increased morbidity and mortality. Older women were also more likely to present at an advanced stage. Socioeconomic status did not impact on staging at diagnosis.

The psychosexual effects of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: A systematic review of qualitative studies.

INTRODUCTION: It is estimated that up to 20% of ovarian cancers have an inherited genetic etiology with the most common being BRCA1/2 mutations. For women with these mutations risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO) to reduce the risk of primary ovarian cancer is often performed, however the surgery results in immediate onset of surgical menopause. AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to explore the psychosexual impacts of risk reducing bilateral salpingo oophorectomy in the published qualitative literature. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Web of Science and PsycInfo were searched for qualitative papers that looked at the psychosexual impact of RRBSO on individuals who were pre-menopausal at the time of surgery. Studies were quality assessed using Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT) and Standard for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) checklists and data were extracted. Thematic synthesis of the results was performed. RESULTS: Of 143 papers identified in searching, 5 qualitative papers were identified relating to interviews with 115 women after RRBSO published between 2000 and 2020. The quality of the papers was moderate. Five different themes were identified related to individual experiences with RRBSO: (1) information needs, (2) psychological impact, (3) psychosexual impact, (4) partner support and (5) hormone replacement therapy (HRT). CONCLUSION: Individual experiences of RRBSO were varied and influenced by multiple factors but psychosexual problems were common, often caused significant distress to the women and their partners and were often poorly explained before surgery. Women do not feel adequately prepared for the psychological and sexual side effects of RRBSO. The qualitative data provides invaluable insight into the individual experiences of women and can be used to better help women mitigate the effects of the surgery.