RESUMO
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of ivabradine on vascular endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS PubMed， Embase， the Cochrane Library， Web of Science， CNKI， Wanfang Data， VIP and CBM databases were retrieved to collect randomized controlled trials （RCTs） about ivabradine （intervention group） versus placebo or β-blocker （control group） from the inception to Mar. 20th 2023. The meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.4 software after literature screening， data extraction and quality evaluation. RESULTS A total of 12 RCTs were included， involving 1 206 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that the levels of flow-mediated dilation （FMD） [MD＝1.71， 95%CI （0.96， 2.46）， P＜0.000 01] and nitric oxide （NO） [MD＝5.80， 95%CI （5.02， 6.59）， P＜0.000 01] in the intervention group were significantly higher than control group， while endothelin-1（ET-1） level was significantly lower than control group [MD＝－7.45， 95%CI （－8.42， －6.47）， P＜0.000 01]. There was no statistical significance in nitroglycerin-mediated dilation （NMD） level between 2 groups [MD＝0.13， 95%CI（－0.74， 1.00）， P＝0.77]. Subgroup analyses based on the different medications and intervention time in the control group showed better improvement in FMD level of patients receiving ivabradine， compared with placebo （P＜0.05）； compared with placebo and β-blocker， the level of NO in patients receiving ivabradine was improved significantly （P＜0.05）， while ET-1 level was decreased significantly （P＜0.05）. Regardless of the duration of the intervention， the levels of FMD， NO， and ET-1 in the intervention group were significantly improved compared to the control group （P＜0.01）， while the difference in NMD was not statistically significant （P＞0.05）. CONCLUSIONS Ivabradine can improve vascular endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease.
RESUMO
Objectives:To assess the effectiveness and safety of ivabradine for the treatment of chronic heart failure in the context of the new quadruple combination. Methods:Clinical data of 656 chronic heart failure patients hospitalized in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from March 2021 to June 2022 were retrospectively collected,and the patients were divided into control group(n=361)and observation group(n=295)according to ivabradine use,and both groups were treated with the new quadruple drug therapy.Propensity score matching was performed,268 patients in the observation group and 268 patients in the control group were successfully matched.The effectiveness(primary endpoint was the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death and rehospitalisation for worsening heart failure within 1 year of discharge;secondary endpoints were rehospitalisation for worsening heart failure,all-cause rehospitalisation,cardiovascular death,and all-cause death)and safety outcome measures(including bradycardia,atrial fibrillation,blurred vision,renal impairment,and hypertension)were compared between the two groups at 1 year after treatment. Results:After matching,there were no statistically significant differences at baseline characteristics between the two groups.Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the occurrence rates of primary endpoints(P=0.031),readmission for worsening heart failure(P=0.020),and all-cause readmission(P=0.036)were lower in the observation group than in the control group.Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that the occurrence rates of primary endpoint events(P=0.045)and readmission for heart failure worsening(P=0.028)were lower in the observation group than in the control group. Conclusions:The ivabradine use on top of the new quadruple therapy regimen in patients with chronic heart failure is beneficial to improve one-year prognosis with favorable safety profile.