Analgesic efficacy of an opioid-free postoperative pain management strategy versus a conventional opioid-based strategy following open major hepatectomy: an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

Background: Convincing clinical evidence regarding completely opioid-free postoperative pain management using erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in patients undergoing open major hepatectomy (OMH) is lacking. Herein, we aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the visualised continuous opioid-free ESPB (VC-ESPB) and conventional intravenous opioid-based postoperative pain management in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing OMH. Methods: This open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial enrolled patients with HCC undergone open major hepatectomy in Fujian Provincial Hospital and compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of VC-ESPB (VC-ESPB group) and conventional intravenous opioid-based pain management regimen (conventional group). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to VC-ESPB group and conventional group. Patients were not masked to treatment allocation. The VC-ESPB group was treated with intermittent injections of 0.25% ropivacaine (bilateral, 30 mL each side) given every 12 h through catheters placed in the space of erector spinae and an opioid-free intravenous pump (10-mg tropisetron diluted to 100 mL with 0.9% normal saline [NS]) for postoperative pain management. The conventional group did not receive ESPB and was treated with a conventional intravenous opioid-based pump (2.5-µg/kg sufentanil and 10-mg tropisetron diluted to 100 mL with 0.9% NS). Patients in the VC-ESPB group underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify local anaesthetic diffusion after ESPB was performed under ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome was postoperative analgesic efficacy, which was indicated by the cumulative area under the curve (AUC) of the pain visual analogue scale scores (range, 0-10; a higher score indicates more pain) obtained at rest and at movement until 48 h postoperatively after leaving the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Herein, an AUC of 26.5 was set as the noninferiority margin, which needed to be satisfied for both cumulative AUCPACU-48 h at rest and cumulative AUCPACU-48 h at movement. Per protocol participants were included in primary and safety analyses. This trial was registered with ChiCTR.org.cn (ChiCTR1900026583). Findings: Between October 30, 2019, and May 1, 2023, 106 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the VC-ESPB group (n = 53) and the conventional group (n = 53). After the dropout (n = 5), a total of 101 patients (VC-ESPB group, n = 50; conventional group, n = 51) were analysed. Both the level of cumulative AUCPACU-48 h (at rest: 160.08 ± 38.00 vs. 164.94 ± 31.00; difference [90% CI], -4.861 [-16.308, 6.585]) and cumulative AUCPACU-48 h (at movement: 209.64 ± 28.98 vs. 212.59 ± 33.11; difference [90% CI], -2.948 [-13.236, 7.339]) were similar between the VC-ESPB and control groups within the first postoperative 48 h. The upper limit of the 90% CIs for the difference in cumulative ACUPACU-48 h at rest and at movement did not reach the upper inferiority margin (26.5). During the first postoperative 48 h, the rate of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug rescue analgesia was similar between the VC-ESPB group and conventional group (n = 16, 32.0% vs. n = 11, 21.6%; P = 0.236). Treatment-related death was not observed in the VC-ESPB group (n = 0, 0%) and conventional group (n = 0, 0%). In VC-ESPB group, local site paralysis (n = 1, 2.0%) was observed in one patient and rash (n = 1, 2.0%) was observed in another patient. One patient in the conventional group was observed with rash preoperatively (n = 1, 2.0%). The VC-ESPB group had significantly lower rates of postoperative nausea (n = 2, 4.0%, vs. n = 9, 17.6%, P = 0.028), vomiting (n = 1, 2.0% vs. n = 8, 15.7%, P = 0.031) and lower incidence of major complications (n = 4, 8.0% vs. n = 6, 11.8%; P = 0.033). Interpretation: This study demonstrates the noninferiority of VC-ESPB when compared with the conventional opioid-based approach for postoperative pain management after OMH, suggesting that it is feasible to achieve opioid-free postoperative pain management for OMH. Funding: The Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian Province, China; the Youth Scientific Research Project of Fujian Provincial Health Commission; the Fujian Research and Training Grants for Young and Middle-aged Leaders in Healthcare; and the Key Clinical Specialty Discipline Construction Program of Fujian, China.

Recognition and management of hemorrhaging in combination with emerging enterogenic sepsis during a hepatectomy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hemorrhagic shock may develop emerging enterogenic sepsis due to damage to the intestinal mucosal barrier and translocation of intestinal bacteria and endotoxins caused by ischemic injury. Because of the dual effects of anesthesia state and hemorrhagic shock, perioperative emerging enterogenic sepsis is even more rare and insidious. CASE PRESENTATION: We reported a case of 56-year-old man who underwent right hepatectomy for intrahepatic bile duct stones. Severe hemorrhage occurred during the procedure and the hemodynamics neither improved nor worsened after rehydration therapy and vasoactive drug administration. Based on the patient's history and clinical presentation, a possible enterogenic sepsis was considered. After anti-infective treatment and hormone supplementation, the patient's circulation improved significantly and he had an uneventful recovery. CONCLUSION: The possibility of emerging enterogenic sepsis in hemorrhagic shock must always be taken into consideration. Familiarity with the risk factors and pathophysiological alterations of enterogenic sepsis is a prerequisite for early recognition and sound clinical decision making.

Upregulation of Nav1.6 Mediated by the p38 MAPK Pathway in the Dorsal Root Ganglia Contributes to Cancer-Induced Bone Pain in Rats.

Cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) occurs frequently among advanced cancer patients. Voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) have been associated with chronic pain, but how VGSCs function in CIBP is poorly understood. Here, we aimed to investigate the specific role of VGSCs in the dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) in CIBP. A CIBP rat model was generated by the intratibial inoculation of MRMT-1 breast carcinoma cells. Transcriptome sequencing was conducted to assess the gene expression profiles. The expression levels of key genes and differentiated genes related to activated pathways were measured by Western blotting and qPCR. We implanted a catheter intrathecally for the administration of lentivirus and drugs. Then, the changes in the mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT) were measured. We identified 149 differentially expressed mRNAs (DEmRNAs) in the DRGs of CIBP model rats. The expression of Nav1.6, which was among these DEmRNAs, was significantly upregulated. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis of the DEmRNAs showed that they were mainly enriched in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. The decrease in MWT induced by bone cancer was attenuated by Nav1.6 knockdown. Western blot analysis revealed that a p38 inhibitor decreased the expression of Nav1.6 and attenuated pain behavior. Our study shows that the upregulation of Nav1.6 expression by p38 MAPK in the DRGs of rats contributes to CIBP.

Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Quality of Recovery Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Erector spinae plane block, a novel ultrasound-guided fascial plane block, has become popular for perioperative pain management. This randomized controlled trial tested the hypothesis that preoperative bilateral erector spinae plane block improves the quality of recovery in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: Eighty-four patients scheduled for elective posterior lumbar interbody fusion were enrolled. Patients were randomly administered either ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane blocks using 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine on each side (ESPB group, n = 42) or no block (control group, n = 42) after anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was the quality of recovery 24 h postoperatively, assessed using the 15-item quality of recovery questionnaire. RESULTS: The global postoperative 24-h quality of recovery-15 score was 117 [114-121] in the erector spinae plane block group and 108 [105-111] in the control group, with a median difference of 9 (95% confidence interval 7-12, P < 0.001). Compared with the control group, preoperative bilateral erector spinae plane blocks reduced the area under the curve of the numeric rating scale pain scores over 48 h, prolonged the time to first rescue analgesia, lessened postoperative 24 h morphine consumption, decreased the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and improved patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia. There were no block-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: We found that preoperative bilateral erector spinae plane blocks provided superior early quality of recovery, postoperative analgesia, and patient satisfaction scores in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900027186, 4/11/2019.

Efficacy of systemic lidocaine on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative systemic lidocaine has become widely accepted as an adjunct to general anesthesia, associated with opioid-sparing and enhanced recovery. We hypothesized that perioperative systemic lidocaine improves postoperative pain and enhances the quality of recovery (QoR) in patients following video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). DESIGN: Prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Single institution, tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients aged 18 to 65 undergoing VATS were eligible for participation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients enrolled in this study were randomized to receive either system lidocaine (a bolus of 1.5 mg kg-1, followed by an infusion of 2 mg kg-1 h-1 until the end of the surgical procedure) or identical volumes and rates of 0.9% saline. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a global QoR-15 score 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain score, cumulative opioid consumption, emergence time, length of PACU stay, adverse events, and patient satisfaction. MAIN RESULTS: There was no difference in the global QoR-15 scores at 24 h postoperatively between the lidocaine and saline groups (median 117, IQR 113.5-124, vs. median 116, IQR 111-120, P = 0.067), with a median difference of 3 (95% CI 0 to 6, P = 0.507). Similarly, postoperative pain scores, postoperative cumulative opioid consumption, PACU length of stay, the occurrence of PONV, and patient satisfaction were comparable between the two groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our current findings do not support using perioperative systemic lidocaine as a potential strategy to improve postoperative pain and enhance QoR in patients undergoing VATS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (identifier: ChiCTR1900027515).