Postoperative protocols for older adults undergoing emergency surgery: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: As the population of older adults expands, it is becoming increasingly crucial to develop perioperative protocols to meet their physiologic, functional, and cognitive demands after emergency surgery. We sought to identify protocols that improve the disposition, length of stay, and overall health outcomes of older adults undergoing emergency intracavitary, noncardiac surgery. METHODS: Embase, Cochrane, and MEDLINE databases were searched, and results were deduplicated and uploaded to Covidence. We reviewed studies for postoperative interventions that reduced delirium, maintained functional status, and reduced length of stay in older patients undergoing emergency surgery. We included studies involving patients aged 65 years and older undergoing emergency intracavitary, noncardiac surgeries. Abstracts and full texts were reviewed by 2 reviewers. Data were extracted on the postoperative interventions used and the resulting patient outcomes. RESULTS: We included 6 studies, which involved patients undergoing emergency general, urology, and vascular surgery. Interventions included a multidisciplinary approach, early involvement of a geriatrician or hospitalist, targeted geriatric-led ward rounds, unique postoperative order sets, and volunteer-driven activities. Standard care included early removal of lines, early mobility, optimal hydration, and medication review. These interventions were associated with decreased length of stay, decreased postoperative complications, and increased likelihood of disposition to home and previous functional status. Frailty was correlated with worse outcomes. CONCLUSION: Through multidisciplinary interventions, a successful postoperative protocol for older patients undergoing emergency surgery is helpful for improving patient outcomes. The implications of these findings will help guide our own quality-improvement initiative to improve these outcomes in this patient population at our institution.

A Cyclical Model of Barriers to Healthcare for the Hispanic/Latinx Population.

As the Hispanic/Latinx population in the United States continues to grow, disparities in health outcomes for this population continue to widen. Worse health outcomes can be attributed to a variety of barriers to healthcare specific to this population, but scant literature exists that presents the connections among them. Many of these barriers to healthcare stem from institutional racism, disparities in socioeconomic status, and xenophobia. To synthesize barriers that hinder the Hispanic/Latinx population from receiving quality healthcare, we propose a cyclical model. The model begins with obstacles present before even visiting a healthcare provider, including structural inequalities, cultural beliefs, documentation status, scheduling, and transportation. Next, the model poses barriers during the visit with a healthcare provider, including problems with provider bias, cultural barriers, and interpretation services. Finally, the model presents barriers that occur after the medical encounter, including payment, medication adherence, indigent care, and follow-up appointments or referrals. Once the patient needs to schedule a follow-up appointment or referral, the cycle restarts with the barriers present before accessing care. All of these barriers to healthcare are areas for potential mitigation of the healthcare disparities that currently disadvantage the Hispanic/Latinx population. The proposed Hispanic Cyclical Healthcare Barrier (HCHB) model helps organize solutions to the barriers, illustrating the need for multiple interventions due to the interconnectedness of the barriers.

Recurrent Catatonia and Demyelinating Disorders.

Catatonia, a neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by psychomotor and behavioral symptoms, can be associated with various underlying conditions, including demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis. This paper presents a case study of a 47-year-old female with recurrent catatonic relapses and an underlying demyelinating disease. The patient exhibited symptoms of confusion, decreased oral intake, and difficulty with movement and speech. Neurological examinations, brain imaging, and laboratory tests were conducted to evaluate the etiology and guide treatment. The patient showed improvement with lorazepam and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). However, relapses occurred after the abrupt withdrawal of medication. The case study highlights the potential connection between demyelinating diseases and catatonia and emphasizes the importance of considering demyelinating diseases in the workup, treatment, and relapse prevention of catatonia. Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms underlying the relationship between demyelination and catatonia and to investigate how different etiologies may impact the recurrence rates of catatonic episodes.

Postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for infective endocarditis in a patient with intravenous drug use and COVID-19 infection: An ethical dilemma.

In this report, we present a case of native valve infective endocarditis due to active intravenous drug use in a 29-yearold female patient that presented during the peak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The patient underwent a complex cardiac surgical intervention with aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair. Postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support was required due to severe biventricular dysfunction. In this unprecedented situation, multiple ethical dilemmas arose at different stages in the management of this patient. These dilemmas stemmed from the lack of evidence supporting the use of postcardiotomy ECMO in patients with active intravenous drug use and the scarcity of resources due to the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in pressure put on our healthcare system. In this case report, we present the decisions made by our team, taking into account both the patient"s best interests and the available resources. We hope this decision-making process will serve as a valuable learning experience for other teams and will act as an antecedent for similar situations in the future.

Lung transplantation and concomitant cardiac surgical procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is an effective treatment option for end-stage lung diseases. In some cases, these patients may also have underlying cardiac disease which may require surgical intervention before or during transplantation. Concomitant cardiac surgery may often be preferred, as reduced lung function precludes these patients from pre-transplant surgery. Our meta-analysis sought to examine the impact of lung transplantation paired with concomitant cardiac surgery on long-term mortality. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Our primary outcome was overall mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) in hospital and serious postoperative complication rates. We used a meta-analytic model to determine the differences in the above outcomes between patients who underwent lung transplantation with or without concomitant cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Out of the 1876 articles screened, 7 met our pre-determined inclusion criteria. Lung transplantation with concomitant cardiac surgery was not associated with increased mortality compared to lung transplantation alone (hazard ratio = 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80-1.31; I2 = 0%; p = .99). LOS in hospital was not significantly different between groups (standardized mean difference = 0.32; 95% CI = -0.91 to 1.55). Postoperative complication rates were also reported but not analyzed due to missing data. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in mortality rates in patients undergoing lung transplantation with or without concomitant cardiac surgery at 1, 3, and 5 years. However, postoperative complication rates were higher in the concomitant group. The decision to perform concomitant procedures should be tailored to each patient's clinical condition.

CABG in patients with liver cirrhosis: to pump or not to pump?

INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with established liver cirrhosis is generally associated with poor outcomes. Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in these patients has not demonstrated any advantage over the use of CPB. We review the current available literature that compared the outcome of both on-pump (ONCABG) and off-pump (OPCAB) techniques in cirrhotic patients in terms of morbidity and mortality. AREAS COVERED: A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases in January 2021. Articles that reported outcomes of OPCAB and/or ONCABG in cirrhotic patients with no concomitant surgical procedures were included. 829 unique abstracts were retrieved with title and abstract screening completed independently by two reviewers. Two case studies and six retrospective cohort studies were included. The largest study comprised more than 98% of the total population, showing some survival benefit for OPCAB over ONCABG. However, it was population-based and did not report the severity of liver. The remaining studies reported no clear difference in outcome between the two techniques. EXPERT OPINION: Surgical myocardial revascularisation carries high perioperative risk in patients with liver cirrhosis irrespective of the surgical technique. There is a lack of evidence to suggest that avoiding CPB in these patients may be beneficial.

The anatomy of enjoyment: the flow experience and cardiac surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In a time of record levels of physician burnout coupled with a global pandemic, protecting physician wellness is critical. The experience of cognitive flow has been found to enhance both wellness and performance. Although flow has been vastly explored in other fields including elite sport, it has not been deeply investigated or applied in cardiac surgery. Here we discuss flow and flow-promoting techniques employed in other fields that may be beneficial within cardiac surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Flow is a prevalent experience among surgeons, amplified during operations. Possible strategies to cultivate flow may be separated into individual skills training, such as mindfulness practice and stress management, institutional changes, such as ensuring adequate resources and protected spaces, and strategies targeting the intersectionality of individuals and systems, such as how workplace culture shapes an individual's experience. These techniques may be applicable within cardiac surgery, especially in training. SUMMARY: Flow has been identified as a key component of a happy and meaningful life, and a potential protector against burnout. Harnessing the benefits of flow may help promote flourishing, particularly in demanding fields, such as cardiac surgery.

Zone 0 frozen elephant trunk for type A retrograde acute aortic dissection following endovascular stenting of the arch.

A 70-year-old man underwent the frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure with zone 0 debranching following a failed endovascular repair for type B aortic dissection and a stent-graft deployment in zone 1 for a retrograde type A aortic dissection. Zone 0 deployment is a novel approach that is valuable as a bailout strategy in urgent cases and it can potentially improve the technical feasibility of the FET while minimizing its ischemic complications.

Cognitive flow in health care settings: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The state of cognitive flow, colloquially known as being 'in the zone', has been linked with enhanced performance, happiness, career satisfaction and decreased burnout. However, the concept has not been adopted strongly in health care training, continuing professional development, or daily practice. A systematic review with a narrative synthesis was undertaken to map the evidence for flow in health care. METHODS: A search was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and EMBASE in July 2019 and updated in October 2020 for manuscripts discussing flow in all health care disciplines. Articles published between 1806 and 13 October 2020 were included. Two authors independently reviewed titles and abstracts (and subsequently full texts where necessary) for inclusion. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Data were extracted on location, manuscript type, population and context, measures, and key findings. RESULTS: A total of 4923 unique abstracts were initially retrieved, and 15 articles were included in the final review. We report on the experience, benefits and strategies to support flow in health care. Flow may benefit providers by enhancing career enjoyment, wellness and performance, while mitigating exhaustion, burnout, and stress. Although research from other domains has focused on supporting flow through individualised training, our results highlight the importance of system and environmental factors. CONCLUSIONS: Supporting professional and trainee flow in health care requires a holistic approach, including individual training and system-level interventions.