Non-invasive diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Current status and future perspective.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease throughout the world. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver cirrhosis can result from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the severe stage of NAFLD progression. By some estimates, NAFLD affects almost one-third of the world's population, which is completely new and serious public health issue. Unfortunately, NAFLD is diagnosed by exclusion, and the gold standard for identifying NAFLD/NASH and reliably measuring liver fibrosis remains liver biopsy, which is an invasive, costly, time-consuming procedure and involves variable inter-observer diagnosis. With the progress of omics and imaging techniques, numerous non-invasive serological assays have been generated and developed. On the basis of these developments, non-invasive biomarkers and imaging techniques have been combined to increase diagnostic accuracy. This review provides information for the diagnosis and assessment of NAFLD/NASH in clinical practice going forward and may assist the clinician in making an early and accurate diagnosis and in proposing a cost-effective patient surveillance. We discuss newly identified and validated non-invasive diagnostic methods from biopsy-confirmed NAFLD patient studies and their implementation in clinical practice, encompassing NAFLD/NASH diagnosis and differentiation, fibrosis assessment, and disease progression monitoring. A series of tests, including 20-carboxy arachidonic acid (20-COOH AA) and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto prostaglandin D2 (dhk PGD2), were found to be potentially the most accurate non-invasive tests for diagnosing NAFLD. Additionally, the Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3D-MRE), combination of the FM-fibro index and Liver stiffness measurement (FM-fibro LSM index) and the machine learning algorithm (MLA) tests are more accurate than other tests in assessing liver fibrosis. However, it is essential to use bigger cohort studies to corroborate a number of non-invasive diagnostic tests with extremely elevated diagnostic values.

Liver histopathological lesions is severe in patients with normal alanine transaminase and low to moderate hepatitis B virus DNA replication.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major global public health problem. Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients can be divided into treatment indication and non-treatment indication individuals according to alanine transaminase (ALT), HBV DNA, serum hepatitis B e antigen status, disease status [liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or liver failure], liver necroinflammation or fibrosis, patients' age, and family history of HCC or cirrhosis. For example, normal ALT patients in 'immune-tolerant' phase with HBV DNA higher than 107 or 2 × 107 IU/mL, and those in 'inactive-carrier' phase with HBV DNA lower than 2 × 103 IU/mL do not require antiviral therapy. However, is it reasonable to set the defined values of HBV DNA as the fundamental basis to estimate the disease state and to determine whether to start treatment? In fact, we should pay more attention to those who do not match the treatment indications (gray-zone patients both in the indeterminate phase and in the 'inactive-carrier' phase). AIM: To analyze the correlation of HBV DNA level and liver histopathological severity, and to explore the significance of HBV DNA for CHB with normal ALT. METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2021, a retrospective cross-sectional set of 1299 patients with chronic HBV infection (HBV DNA > 30 IU/mL) who underwent liver biopsy from four hospitals, including 634 with ALT less than 40 U/L. None of the patients had received anti-HBV treatment. The degrees of liver necroinflammatory activity and liver fibrosis were evaluated according to the Metavir system. On the basis of the HBV DNA level, patients were divided into two groups: Low/moderate replication group, HBV DNA ≤ 107 IU/mL [7.00 Log IU/mL, the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines] or ≤ 2 × 107 IU/mL [7.30 Log IU/mL, the Chinese Medical Association (CMA) guidelines]; high replication group, HBV DNA > 107 IU/mL or > 2 × 107 IU/mL. Relevant factors (demographic characteristics, laboratory parameters and noninvasive models) for liver histopathological severity were analyzed by univariate analysis, logistics analysis and propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: At entry, there were 21.45%, 24.29%, and 30.28% of the patients had liver histopathological severities with ≥ A2, ≥ F2, and ≥ A2 or/and ≥ F2, respectively. HBV DNA level (negative correlation) and noninvasive model liver fibrosis 5 value (positive correlation) were independent risk factors for liver histopathological severities (liver necroinflammation, liver fibrosis, and treatment indication). The AUROCs of the prediction probabilities (PRE_) of the models mentioned above (< A2 vs ≥ A2, < F2 vs ≥ F2, < A2 and < F2 vs ≥ A2 or/and ≥ F2) were 0.814 (95%CI: 0.770-0.859), 0.824 (95%CI: 0.785-0.863), and 0.799 (95%CI: 0.760-0.838), respectively. HBV DNA level (negative correlation) was still an independent risk factor when diagnostic models were excluded, the P values (< A2 vs ≥ A2, < F2 vs ≥ F2, < A2 and < F2 vs ≥ A2 or/and ≥ F2) were 0.011, 0.000, and 0.000, respectively. For the propensity score-matched pairs, whether based on EASL guidelines or CMA guidelines, the group with significant liver histology damage (≥ A2 or/and ≥ F2) showed much lower HBV DNA level than the group with non- significant liver histology damage (< A2 and < F2). Patients in the moderate replication group (with indeterminate phase) had the most serious liver disease pathologically and hematologically, followed by patients in the low replication group (with 'inactive-carrier' phase) and then the high replication group (with 'immune-tolerant' phase). CONCLUSION: HBV DNA level is a negative risk factor for liver disease progression. The phase definition of CHB may be revised by whether the level of HBV DNA exceeds the detection low limit value. Patients who are in the indeterminate phase or 'inactive carriers' should receive antiviral therapy.

Resistant mutants induced by adefovir dipivoxil in hepatitis B virus isolates.

AIM: To investigate the loci of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV)-induced resistance in hepatitis B virus (HBV) isolates and optimize the management of ADV-treated patients. METHODS: Between June 2008 and August 2010, a cross-sectional control study was conducted comprising 79 patients with chronic HBV infection-related liver disease who had been administered ADV monotherapy. Patients underwent liver imaging. Serum DNA extracts were analyzed for HBV DNA levels, genotypes, and serology markers, and deep sequencing of the HBV P gene was performed. RESULTS: ADV-resistant patients were found either with a single mutated locus, or with coexisting mutated loci. The most prevalent mutations were rtA181T, rtV214A, and rtN236T. Twenty-six patients had more than two mutated loci. The mutants were distributed among the patients without any significant affinity for gender, age, end-stage of liver disease, complications of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, or HBV DNA levels. Patients with the rtA181T mutant were primarily infected with genotype C and e-antigen negative HBV, while patients with the rtN236T mutant were primarily infected by genotype B HBV (χ(2) = 6.004, 7.159; P = 0.023, 0.007). The duration of treatment with ADV was shorter in the single mutant group compared with the multi-mutant group (t = 2.426, P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Drug-resistant HBV mutants are complex and diverse. Patients should receive the standard and first-line antiviral treatment, strictly comply with medication dosage, and avoid short-term withdrawal.

[Clinical analysis of hepatitis B virus mutations related to adefovir dipivoxil among patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection in eastern Zhejiang province].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical characteristics of hepatic B virus (HBV) mutations related to adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) among patients with chronic HBV infection in eastern Zhejiang province and provide some reference values on normative usage of antiviral drugs. METHODS: The data of chronic HBV-infected patients with HBV mutations related to ADV (n = 88) and non-mutation (n = 202) from June 2008 to August 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. The gene resistance mutations of HBV P region were analyzed by gene sequencing. And the HBV genotypes, HBV serum markers, HBV DNA levels and liver imaging findings were also analyzed. RESULTS: There were 9 cases with pre-existing mutations in 88 patients. The mutated sites were multiple and complicated. And the mutated sites related to other antiviral drugs were all accompanied by ADV-related mutations. The single mutated site was mostly at rtA181T (46.59%) and at rtV214A (11.36%). There were 27 cases (30.68%) with ≥ two mutated sites. The constituent ratios of males, end-stage liver diseases, complicated nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and HBV genotype C infection in the mutation group were higher than those in the non-mutation group (P < 0.01, < 0.01, 0.019, 0.045). The average ages in the mutation group were also higher than those in the non-mutation group (P < 0.001). But the constituent ratios of HBeAg positivity and the levels of HBV DNA were lower (P = 0.002, 0.02). CONCLUSION: There may be some cases with pre-existing ADV-related mutations in ADV treatment-naive patients. The mutated sites occur at multiple loci, mostly at rtA181T and rtV214A. The male patients and those with a longer history of HBV infection, HBeAg negativity, HBV genotype C infection, illness progression and complicated NAFLD may be more susceptible to mutation. It is important for patients to accept and implement standardized regimens of antiviral drugs so as to prevent resistance and avoid salvage therapy.

Clinicopathologic features and molecular analysis of enterovirus 71 infection: report of an autopsy case from the epidemic of hand, foot and mouth disease in China.

A 15-month boy with fatal hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) exhibited atypical symptoms and progressed rapidly to death. An autopsy was performed the next day and tissue sections were stained for histopathological examination. His intestinal samples were tested for enterovirus 71 (EV71), and the whole-genome sequence of EV71 was analyzed. An autopsy revealed that the central nervous system, lungs, and gut displayed severe meningitis and brainstem encephalitis, remarkable pulmonary congestion, edema, moderate inflammatory infiltration, and hemorrhage as well as intestinal mucosal congestion, epithelial necrosis, thinning intestinal wall, and submucosal lymphoid follicular hyperplasia. The heart showed myocardial interstitial congestion, myocardial edema, and some inflammatory infiltrates. There were no significant alterations in the architecture of other organs. EV71 antigen and apoptotic cells were detected in brain, lung and intestine by immunohistochemical staining and TUNEL (TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling) respectively. Intestinal contents and intestinal autopsy samples of this case were positive for EV71, and the EV71 strain was classified as subgenogroup C4. In China, the severe forms of HFMD were mostly caused by EV71 subgenogroup C4 infection. Severe intestinal damages may relate to EV71 subgenogroup C4 infection. Thus, children with severe EV71 HFMD may have serious pathological changes in their central nervous system, lungs, and gut. Physicians should pay special attention to infants with atypical symptoms, particularly in EV71 epidemic areas for early diagnosis and treatment.