Intermittent fasting attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice by modulating macrophage polarization.

Acute lung injury (ALI) is a spectrum of acute and life-threatening pulmonary inflammatory conditions. Treatment of ALI remains a clinical challenge. Recently, intermittent fasting (IF) has been shown to improve health and alleviate many diseases. In this study, we tested whether IF attenuated ALI and investigated the mechanism underlying this process. In vivo, the effects of IF on ALI were evaluated in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced murine ALI model. We found that two times of 24-h fasting in a week before ALI efficiently ameliorated LPS-induced lung injury in mice, characterized by alleviated lung lesions, wet-to-dry weight ratio, myeloperoxidase activity, malondialdehyde content, and lower levels of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1ß. In vitro, functional assays were conducted to assess IF on the inflammatory response and macrophage polarization of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) treated with LPS or IL-4. And PPARγ antagonist GW9662 and AMPK siRNA were used to test the role of PPARγ and AMPK in the IF-mediated improvement of ALI. The results showed that IF (serum deprivation) suppressed macrophage M1 activation and promoted M2 activation in LPS-treated BMDMs. While, IF also augmented macrophage M2 polarization in IL-4-treated BMDMs. Further mechanistic studies showed that the promotive effect of IF on M2 polarization was related to the activation of the PPARγ and AMPK pathways. In conclusion, this study suggests that IF enhances M2 polarization by activating the AMPK and PPARγ pathways, thus facilitating anti-inflammatory response and ameliorating ALI.

Establishment of a novel scoring model for mortality risk prediction in HIV-infected patients with cryptococcal meningitis.

BACKGROUND: Cryptococcal meningitis (CM) remains a leading cause of death in HIV-infected patients, despite advances in CM diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. This study was performed with the aim to develop and validate a novel scoring model to predict mortality risk in HIV-infected patients with CM (HIV/CM). METHODS: Data on HIV/CM inpatients were obtained from a Multicenter Cohort study in China. Independent risk factors associated with mortality were identified based on data from 2013 to 2017, and a novel scoring model for mortality risk prediction was established. The bootstrapping statistical method was used for internal validation. External validation was performed using data from 2018 to 2020. RESULTS: We found that six predictors, including age, stiff neck, impaired consciousness, intracranial pressure, CD4+ T-cell count, and urea levels, were associated with poor prognosis in HIV/CM patients. The novel scoring model could effectively identify HIV/CM patients at high risk of death on admission (area under curve 0.876; p<0.001). When the cut-off value of 5.5 points or more was applied, the sensitivity and specificity was 74.1 and 83.8%, respectively. Our scoring model showed a good discriminatory ability, with an area under the curve of 0.879 for internal validation via bootstrapping, and an area under the curve of 0.886 for external validation. CONCLUSIONS: Our developed scoring model of six variables is simple, convenient, and accurate for screening high-risk patients with HIV/CM, which may be a useful tool for physicians to assess prognosis in HIV/CM inpatients.

Development of a risk scoring system for prognostication in HIV-related toxoplasma encephalitis.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate specific risk factors influencing prognosis of HIV-infected patients with toxoplasma encephalitis (TE) in order to develop a prognostic risk scoring system for them. METHODS: This is a six-center retrospective study of hospitalized HIV/TE patients. Data including six-week mortality after diagnosis, baseline characteristics, clinical features, laboratory tests and radiological characteristics of eligible patients were assimilated for risk model establishing. RESULTS: In this study, the six-week mortality among 94 retrospective cases was 11.7% (11/94). Seven specific risk factors, viz. time from symptom onset to presentation, fever, dizziness, CD4+ T-cell counts, memory deficits, patchy brain lesions, and disorders of consciousness were calculated to be statistically associated with mortality. A criterion value of '9' was selected as the optimal cut-off value of the established model. The AUC of the ROC curve of this scoring model was 0.976 (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the risk scoring model was 100.0 and 86.9%, respectively, which were 81.8 and 94.1% of this scoring model in the verification cohort, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The developed scoring system was established with simple risk factors, which also allows expeditious implementation of accurate prognostication, and appropriate therapeutic interventions in HIV-infected patients with TE.

[A comparison between clinical value of the liver transplantation standard mathematical model score and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score in evaluating the prognosis of liver failure].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical value of the liver transplantation standard (LTS) mathematical model score and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score in evaluating the prognosis of liver failure. METHODS: The clinical data of 150 liver failure patients were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients who were admitted from January 2004 to December 2008 were divided into survival group (n=48) and death group (n=102) in regard to their 90-day survival after their admission. LTS score and CTP score were calculated according to their respective clinical data within 24 hours after their admission. Comparison between LTS score and CTP score was conducted respectively between the survival group and death group. The correlation between LTS score/CTP score and the prognosis of liver failure was made by Spearman rank correlation. The ability of LTS score and CTP score to predict the outcome of liver failure was compared with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The LTS score and CTP score of survival group were 38.88+/-4.27 and 11.25+/-0.97, respectively, which were lower than those of death group (52.63+/-10.65 and 12.18+/-1.22, both P<0.01). The correlation coefficient of LTS score and the prognosis of liver failure (r(s)=0.651, P<0.01) was higher than that of CTP score (r(s)=0.366, P<0.01). The area under ROC curve (AUC) of LTS score was 0.897, sensitivity (SN) was 76.52%, specificity (SP) was 91.18%, positive predictive value (PV+) was 94.39%, negative predictive value (PV-) was 66.67%, and Youden index was 0.677, respectively. The AUC of CTP score was 0.716, those of SN, SP, PV+, PV- and Youden index were 40.91%, 92.65%, 91.53%, 44.68% and 0.336, respectively. CONCLUSION: The LTS score is better than the CTP score in evaluating the prognosis of liver failure.

[Clinical value of Child-Turcotte-Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease score to predict the prognosis of chronic severe hepatitis].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical value in predicting the prognosis of chronic severe hepatitis between the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. METHODS: Fifty-five cases with chronic severe hepatitis were scored by CTP and MELD score systems based on their biochemical and coagulation parameters, and related signs within 24 hours after their admission. The termination date of observation was the 90th day after their admission. The actual survival time were recorded. The comparison scores of CTP/MELD were conducted respectively and compared between the survival group and death group, among different clinical stages of chronic severe hepatitis. The correlation of CTP/MELD score with the clinical stages was analyzed respectively. The survival time, mortality and survival rate were compared respectively among the groups classified by CTP/MELD score according to Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curve. RESULTS: The CTP score and the MELD score in death group were higher than those in survival group (both P<0.01). The CTP and MELD scores in the advanced stage group were also higher than those in the early and middle stage (both P<0.01). The correlation of the MELD score with the stage was higher (r(s) =0.689,P<0.01) than that of the CTP score (r(s)=0.428, P<0.01). The survival time of patients with CTP<12 scores, was longer than with CTP>or=12 scores, and their survival rate was also higher(both P<0.01). When the MELD score lowered, survival time was longer, and survival rate was higher. The survival time, mortality and survival rate showed significant difference among the groups classified by MELD score (or=40 points, all P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The parameters employed in MELD score system are more OBJECTIVE: and easy to achieve, the score range for patients classification is wider and more practical, and the correlation with the clinical stage is higher than CTP score system, suggesting the MELD score system is better in predicting the prognosis of patients with chronic severe hepatitis than the CTP score system.