[MIA 2021, Comprehensive Asthma Management. Guidelines for Mexico]. / MIA 2021, Manejo Integral del Asma. Lineamientos para México.

BACKGROUND: Asthma continues to be one of the most frequent chronic respiratory diseases in our country. New methods for diagnosis and treatment have been described; accordingly, the international guidelines were renewed. OBJECTIVE: To create a national platform for the development of updated guidelines, solidly based on evidence: Comprehensive Asthma Management (Spanish acronym: MIA). METHODS: MIA uses the ADAPTE method. The MIA development group consists of experts in pulmonology-allergology-methodology and representatives of 13 institutions and societies of specialties that manage asthma. The international reference guidelines (selected with AGREE-II): GINA 2020, GEMA 5.0, BTS/SIGN 2019 and ATS/ERS consensus document 2014-2019 on severe asthma. MIA covers suspected asthma, diagnosis, treatment, and special groups. Key clinical questions were formulated on treatment steps 1-3, biomarkers and severe asthma. RESULTS: Based on evidence, safety, cost and local reality, the core group developed responses. Through a Delphi process the broad MIA development group suggested adjustments until consensus was reached. CONCLUSION: A document was generated with multiple figures and algorithms, solidly based on evidence about asthma management, adjusted for Mexico with a broad base among different societies that participated in its development. It does not include guidelines for acute asthma.

Antecedentes: El asma sigue siendo una patología respiratoria crónica frecuente en México. Se han descrito nuevos métodos para el diagnóstico y tratamiento conforme se renuevan las guías internacionales. Objetivo: Crear la plataforma nacional Manejo Integral del Asma (MIA), para el desarrollo de lineamientos actualizados con base en evidencia. Métodos: Se utilizó el método ADAPTE. El grupo de desarrollo de MIA estuvo integrado por expertos en neumología, alergología y metodología y representantes de 13 instituciones y sociedades de especialidades que manejan asma. Las guías internacionales de referencia (seleccionadas con AGREE-II) fueron GINA 2020, GEMA 5.0, BTS/SIGN 2019 y consenso ATS/ERS 2014-2019. En MIA se aborda sospecha de asma, diagnóstico, tratamiento y grupos especiales. Se formularon preguntas clínicas clave sobre tratamiento en los pasos 1 a 3, biomarcadores y asma grave. Resultados: Con base en evidencia, seguridad, costo y realidad local, el grupo nuclear desarrolló respuestas. Mediante proceso Delphi, el grupo amplio de desarrollo sugirió ajustes hasta que se logró el consenso. Conclusión: El documento generado contiene múltiples figuras y algoritmos, está sólidamente basado en evidencia acerca del manejo del asma y fue ajustado para México con participación de diferentes sociedades para su desarrollo; no se incluyeron lineamientos para la crisis asmática.

Prevalence and triggers of self-reported nasal hyperreactivity in adults with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Nasal hyperreactivity (NHR) is a common feature of various rhinitis subtypes and represents a novel phenotype of rhinitis. It is being reported in two-thirds of adult rhinitis patients irrespective of the atopic status. Data on the prevalence of NHR in patients with asthma are lacking, as well as the nature of evoking triggers. METHODS: Postal questionnaires were distributed to an unselected group of asthmatic patients in Leuven (Belgium, n = 190) and completed by 114 patients. In Mexico City (Mexico) and Brasov (Romania), respectively, 97 out of 110 and 80 out of 100 asthmatic patients attending the outpatient clinic completed the questionnaire. Non-asthmatic volunteers were recruited amongst university and hospital co-workers in Leuven (n = 53). The presence of self-reported NHR, the type of triggers evoking nasal and bronchial symptoms, medication use, self-reported allergy, and environmental factors were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 69% of asthma patients reported NHR, with 32% having more than 4 triggers evoking NHR. These triggers included mainly exposure to temperature and humidity changes, cigarette smoke, and strong odours. A higher prevalence of NHR was detected in allergic compared to non-allergic asthma patients (73% vs. 53% p < 0.01). The prevalence of NHR correlated with asthma severity, ranging from 63% (VAS ≤3) to 81% (VAS ≥7). BHR was found more frequently in patients with NHR compared to without NHR (89% vs. 53%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: NHR represents a clinical phenotype of upper airway disease affecting over two-thirds of asthma patients and correlates with asthma severity. Targeting NHR in patients with asthma is often overlooked and should be reinforced in the future to achieve better symptom control.