Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 14(6): 664-668, 2020 06 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32683359

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: GBS colonization is an important risk factor for maternal and neonatal infection morbidity and mortality. Intrapartum antibiotics may prevent vertical transmission of GBS from colonized mothers to their babies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cefazolin prophylactic regimen for GBS disease, comparing it to the established penicillin-based protocols, given the opportunity provided by the temporary unavailability of first-choice antibiotics in Brazil. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective analysis was conducted at the Hospital Femina Obstetrics Service between January and December 2015. Ninety-eight pregnant women received standard penicillin (70 patients) or ampicillin (28 patients) antibiotic prophylaxis, and 251 pregnant women received an alternative prophylaxis with cefazolin during the study period. Risk factor, Maternal and neonatal outcomes were evaluated and compared between groups. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in maternal (RR = 0.71; IC 95%:0.30-1.68; p = 0.709) and neonatal (RR = 0.84; IC 95%:0.61-1.15; p = 0.271) outcomes between those patients using the alternative antibiotic prophylaxis in comparison to the standard antibiotics, with the dependent variable of maternal and neonatal outcomes grouped and controlled for potential confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: The antibiotics used as alternatives to penicillin and ampicillin for the prevention of maternal-fetal GBS disease are poorly studied, and this study indicate that cefazolin can be an optimal choice, offering safety in the use of this antibiotic in situations where penicillins are contraindicated or unavailable.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/microbiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/prevenção & controle , Streptococcus agalactiae/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Streptococcus agalactiae/fisiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Infect Dis ; 221(3): 356-366, 2020 01 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31314899

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The effect of neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) treatment on length of stay (LoS) in patients hospitalized with influenza is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a one-stage individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis exploring the association between NAI treatment and LoS in patients hospitalized with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus (A[H1N1]pdm09) infection. Using mixed-effects negative binomial regression and adjusting for the propensity to receive NAI, antibiotic, and corticosteroid treatment, we calculated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Patients with a LoS of <1 day and those who died while hospitalized were excluded. RESULTS: We analyzed data on 18 309 patients from 70 clinical centers. After adjustment, NAI treatment initiated at hospitalization was associated with a 19% reduction in the LoS among patients with clinically suspected or laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection (IRR, 0.81; 95% CI, .78-.85), compared with later or no initiation of NAI treatment. Similar statistically significant associations were seen in all clinical subgroups. NAI treatment (at any time), compared with no NAI treatment, and NAI treatment initiated <2 days after symptom onset, compared with later or no initiation of NAI treatment, showed mixed patterns of association with the LoS. CONCLUSIONS: When patients hospitalized with influenza are treated with NAIs, treatment initiated on admission, regardless of time since symptom onset, is associated with a reduced LoS, compared with later or no initiation of treatment.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação , Neuraminidase/antagonistas & inibidores , Pandemias , Adolescente , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Inibidores Enzimáticos/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Int J STD AIDS ; 28(9): 876-880, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27810981

RESUMO

Congenital syphilis (CS) is a preventable epidemic disease for which control is hindered by socioeconomic and health system issues. Inadequately treated maternal syphilis (MaS) commonly has serious adverse obstetric outcomes. This study - which is a cross-sectional study in a Brazilian large urban public Mother and Child hospital, making use of secondary data - evaluated the occurrence of treatment of sexual partners (SP) among women with MaS. The results showed that 771 MaS cases were identified from 2007 to 2014. No information on SP treatment was available in 570 (73.9%) cases. Of the 201 cases presenting information, 25 (12.4%) SP were treated. Out of 164 women having six or more prenatal visits, 25 (15.2%) SP received treatment. Data analyzed biennially have shown a growing trend of cases without collected information, ranging from 27.2% in 2007-2008 to 87.5% in 2013-2014. No linear trend in proportions of treated SP (maximum 7.4% SP treated) was found. Thus, in this study, it has been concluded that the proportion of SP adequately treated was consistently low, and the quality of information deteriorated during the studied period. Prenatal care per se, as provided, was not effective in delivering adequate treatment of SP. Creative integrated services with SP active participation are greatly needed if CS is to be controlled.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Busca de Comunicante , Mães/estatística & dados numéricos , Parceiros Sexuais , Sífilis/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/epidemiologia , Sífilis/terapia
4.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 132(3): 302-4, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26674319

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics of women presenting with acute gastroenteritis due to infection with Salmonella spp. or Shigella spp. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted using data for patients with specimens positive for Shigella spp. and Salmonella spp. attending two major women's hospitals in Porto Alegre, Brazil, between January 2003 and July 2014. Women were included if they had symptoms compatible with bacterial acute diarrhea. Isolates were evaluated to determine antimicrobial susceptibility and patient clinical profile. RESULTS: Among 45 eligible patients, Salmonella spp. was identified in 32 (71%) and Shigella spp. in 13 (29%). The highest antimicrobial sensitivity rates were observed for ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone (n=44, 98% for both) whereas the greatest resistance rate was seen for ampicillin (n=20, 44%). Seven (16%) of the women were pregnant. CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim are suitable choices for the treatment of bacterial acute diarrhea. However, the maternal and fetal safety profile of prescribed medications should be considered when treating pregnant patients.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Diarreia/microbiologia , Disenteria Bacilar/epidemiologia , Infecções por Salmonella/epidemiologia , Salmonella/isolamento & purificação , Shigella/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Ampicilina/uso terapêutico , Brasil , Ceftriaxona/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Disenteria Bacilar/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções por Salmonella/tratamento farmacológico , Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico , Trimetoprima/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
5.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 10(3): 192-204, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26602067

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The impact of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) on influenza-related pneumonia (IRP) is not established. Our objective was to investigate the association between NAI treatment and IRP incidence and outcomes in patients hospitalised with A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection. METHODS: A worldwide meta-analysis of individual participant data from 20 634 hospitalised patients with laboratory-confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 (n = 20 021) or clinically diagnosed (n = 613) 'pandemic influenza'. The primary outcome was radiologically confirmed IRP. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated using generalised linear mixed modelling, adjusting for NAI treatment propensity, antibiotics and corticosteroids. RESULTS: Of 20 634 included participants, 5978 (29·0%) had IRP; conversely, 3349 (16·2%) had confirmed the absence of radiographic pneumonia (the comparator). Early NAI treatment (within 2 days of symptom onset) versus no NAI was not significantly associated with IRP [adj. OR 0·83 (95% CI 0·64-1·06; P = 0·136)]. Among the 5978 patients with IRP, early NAI treatment versus none did not impact on mortality [adj. OR = 0·72 (0·44-1·17; P = 0·180)] or likelihood of requiring ventilatory support [adj. OR = 1·17 (0·71-1·92; P = 0·537)], but early treatment versus later significantly reduced mortality [adj. OR = 0·70 (0·55-0·88; P = 0·003)] and likelihood of requiring ventilatory support [adj. OR = 0·68 (0·54-0·85; P = 0·001)]. CONCLUSIONS: Early NAI treatment of patients hospitalised with A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection versus no treatment did not reduce the likelihood of IRP. However, in patients who developed IRP, early NAI treatment versus later reduced the likelihood of mortality and needing ventilatory support.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Neuraminidase/antagonistas & inibidores , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Adolescente , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/efeitos dos fármacos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/enzimologia , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/mortalidade , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
6.
Lancet Respir Med ; 2(5): 395-404, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24815805

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Neuraminidase inhibitors were widely used during the 2009-10 influenza A H1N1 pandemic, but evidence for their effectiveness in reducing mortality is uncertain. We did a meta-analysis of individual participant data to investigate the association between use of neuraminidase inhibitors and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with pandemic influenza A H1N1pdm09 virus infection. METHODS: We assembled data for patients (all ages) admitted to hospital worldwide with laboratory confirmed or clinically diagnosed pandemic influenza A H1N1pdm09 virus infection. We identified potential data contributors from an earlier systematic review of reported studies addressing the same research question. In our systematic review, eligible studies were done between March 1, 2009 (Mexico), or April 1, 2009 (rest of the world), until the WHO declaration of the end of the pandemic (Aug 10, 2010); however, we continued to receive data up to March 14, 2011, from ongoing studies. We did a meta-analysis of individual participant data to assess the association between neuraminidase inhibitor treatment and mortality (primary outcome), adjusting for both treatment propensity and potential confounders, using generalised linear mixed modelling. We assessed the association with time to treatment using time-dependent Cox regression shared frailty modelling. FINDINGS: We included data for 29,234 patients from 78 studies of patients admitted to hospital between Jan 2, 2009, and March 14, 2011. Compared with no treatment, neuraminidase inhibitor treatment (irrespective of timing) was associated with a reduction in mortality risk (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·81; 95% CI 0·70-0·93; p=0·0024). Compared with later treatment, early treatment (within 2 days of symptom onset) was associated with a reduction in mortality risk (adjusted OR 0·48; 95% CI 0·41-0·56; p<0·0001). Early treatment versus no treatment was also associated with a reduction in mortality (adjusted OR 0·50; 95% CI 0·37-0·67; p<0·0001). These associations with reduced mortality risk were less pronounced and not significant in children. There was an increase in the mortality hazard rate with each day's delay in initiation of treatment up to day 5 as compared with treatment initiated within 2 days of symptom onset (adjusted hazard ratio [HR 1·23] [95% CI 1·18-1·28]; p<0·0001 for the increasing HR with each day's delay). INTERPRETATION: We advocate early instigation of neuraminidase inhibitor treatment in adults admitted to hospital with suspected or proven influenza infection. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Neuraminidase/antagonistas & inibidores , Oseltamivir/uso terapêutico , Pandemias , Zanamivir/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Influenza Humana/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
7.
Contraception ; 78(4): 324-7, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18847582

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of the uterine and endometrial vascularization in intrauterine device (IUD)-induced side effects is clearly of paramount importance in terms of both physiological and pathophysiological changes and may permit assessment for future therapeutic treatments. The aim of the study was to quantify the subendometrial microvascularization and uterine artery blood flow in IUD-induced side effects using power Doppler analysis as well as pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) in the exact midluteal phase 3 months after IUD insertion. There were 27 patients using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and 25 patients using TCu 380A. STUDY DESIGN: This study has a prospective clinical trial design. RESULTS: There is an increased subendometrial blood flow in patients with severe dysmenorrhea and/or bleeding, after controlling for IUD type, age and parity. Moreover, the PI and RI were not different in such women. CONCLUSION: The results provide new data on the bleeding patterns related to these IUD types that may be relevant during contraception use. This method could be used as a prognostic factor to better evaluate women for the risk of developing dysmenorrhea and/or bleeding after IUD insertion.


Assuntos
Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre/efeitos adversos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados/efeitos adversos , Microvasos/fisiopatologia , Útero/irrigação sanguínea , Adulto , Amenorreia/etiologia , Artérias/diagnóstico por imagem , Dismenorreia/diagnóstico por imagem , Dismenorreia/etiologia , Dismenorreia/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Hemorreologia , Humanos , Menorragia/diagnóstico por imagem , Menorragia/etiologia , Menorragia/fisiopatologia , Microvasos/diagnóstico por imagem , Fluxo Pulsátil , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...