The carcinoembryonic antigen ratio is a potential predictor of survival in recurrent colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) "value" itself is often useless in patients with a normal CEA level at initial presentation and those with tumor-irrelevant elevated CEA. Although the unified marker using CEA has been desirable for recurrent tumor staging as well as for primary tumor staging, little is known concerning its relationship with the survival of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer in particular. METHODS: This retrospective historical study included patients who experienced disease relapse after curative surgery for stage I-III colorectal cancer between 2006 and 2018. A total of 129 patients with recurrent disease after curative surgery for colorectal cancer were included. We focused on the CEA "ratio" (CEA-R: the ratio of the CEA level at the time of recurrence to that measured 3 months before recurrence) and aimed to evaluate the correlation between CEA-R and survival in recurrent colorectal cancer. RESULTS: Patients with a high CEA-R (≥ 2) exhibited significantly worse 2 year survival than those with a low CEA-R (< 2) (88.1% vs. 44.9%, P < 0.001), irrespective of the CEA value before primary resection. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the CEA-R (HR; 3.270, 95% CI 1.646-6.497, P = 0.001) was a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: The CEA-R is a potential marker stratifying the survival of patients with disease relapse who exhibit aggressive biology at recurrent disease foci. As a novel marker, the CEA-R would serve as a clinical guide for tailoring treatment strategies at the time of disease relapse in patients with colorectal cancer.

[A Case Report on a Successful Resection after FOLFIRI plus Cetuximab Therapy for Unresectable Colorectal Cancer with Multiple Liver Metastases].

The patient was a 66-year-old woman with a history of right breast cancer 20 years prior. Her chief complaint was hematochezia, and she was diagnosed as having rectal cancer. She underwent laparoscopic high anterior resection. We made a diagnosis of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, type 2, 25×20 mm, pMP, pN0, Stage I, KRAS being wild-type. Multiple liver metastases were detected 6 months after the surgery. Tumor contacted with grison. The tumor was not completely resected as evidenced by the small liver remnant volume. Conversion therapy was administered, and the patient received 6 courses of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab therapy. Alopecia and grade 1 eruption were observed as adverse effects of the chemotherapy. The tumor size was reduced, and we resected the tumor by performing right lobectomy and partial hepatectomy. At 1 year 3 months after surgery, no recurrence was observed.

[Two Cases of ER-Positive Postmenopausal Breast Cancer That Increased in Size during Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy].

The first patient was a 62-year-old woman who was referred to our hospital with the complaint of a left breast tumor. She was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma(T1N0M0, stage I). The tumor was ER-positive, PgR-negative, and HER2- negative. She was treated with toremifene, letrozole, and anastrozole as neoadjuvant hormone therapy for 4 months, but the tumor increased in size. The clinical response was judged as progressive disease, and a left partial mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection were performed. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy were performed after surgery. The second patient was a 68-year-old woman who was referred to our hospital with the complaint of a right breast tumor. She was diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma(T1N0M0, stage I). The tumor was ER-positive, PgR-negative, and HER2-negative. She was treated with letrozole as neoadjuvant hormone therapy for 4 months, but the tumor increased in size. The clinical response was judged as progressive disease, and a right partial mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection were performed. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy were performed after surgery. Although the evidence is still insufficient, with neoadjuvant hormone therapy for hormone-sensitive breast cancer, improved tumor shrinkage and breast conservation have been reported. We experienced two cases in which the tumor increased in size during neoadjuvant hormone therapy; however, even though these cases showed no apparent effect, chemotherapy may be effective in future cases.