Toward personalized medicine in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (TRL) are clearly affected by genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes, which lead to large interindividual differences in dose-response relations. In addition, TRL has a narrow therapeutic index requiring monitoring of blood levels. The objective of the present observational, retrospective study was to associate maintenance TRL doses with various genetic markers seeking to guide optimization of the initial dose. METHODS: Results of DNA samples from 15 kidney transplant patients were correlated retrospectively with clinical information from medical records. Samples were genotyped using PHARMAchip. Association studies were performed with χ2 and Pearson tests and by analysis of variance. The study was carried out in accordance with international ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration and approved by our ethics committee. RESULTS: Two patient groups were identified to show a difference in TRL dose requirements: a control (0.014-0.10 mg/kg/per day) and an high-dose group (0.14-0.15 mg/kg/per day). The presence of CYP3A5*1 and the null allele in GSTM1 were significantly associated (P=.01 and P=.04) with the need for higher immunosuppressive doses (>0.10 mg/kg/per day). There were no differences in plasma levels of TRL or other clinical variables between the patient groups. CONCLUSION: Determination of the CYP3A5 genotype might be used to predict initial TRL requirements, although other genetic variants also provide important information to adjust the drug dose.

ApoE genotype, cardiovascular risk and responsiveness to dietary fat manipulation.

Cardiovascular risk is determined by the complex interactions between genetic and environmental factors. The apoE genotype represents the most-widely-studied single nucleotide polymorphism in relation to CVD risk, with >3600 publications cited in PubMed. Although originally described as a mediator of lipoprotein metabolism, the lipoprotein-independent functions of apoE are being increasingly recognised, with limited data available on the potential impact of genotype on these metabolic processes. Furthermore, although meta-analyses suggest that apoE4 carriers may have a 40-50% increased CVD risk, the associations reported in individual studies are highly heterogeneous and it is recognised that environmental factors such as smoking status and dietary fat composition influence genotype-phenotype associations. However, information is often derived from observational studies or small intervention trials in which retrospective genotyping of the cohort results in small group sizes in the rarer E2 and E4 subgroups. Either larger well-standardised intervention trials or smaller trials with prospective recruitment according to apoE genotype are needed to fully establish the impact of diet on genotype-CVD associations and to establish the potential of dietary strategies such as reduced total fat, saturated fat, or increased antioxidant intakes to counteract the increased CVD burden in apoE4 carriers.

Effect of apoE genotype and vitamin E on biomarkers of oxidative stress in cultured neuronal cells and the brain of targeted replacement mice.

The aetiology of apoE4 genotype-Alzheimer's disease (AD) association are complex. The current study emphasizes the impact of apoE genotype and potential beneficial effects of vitamin E (VE) in relation to oxidative stress. Agonist induced neuronal cell death was examined 1) in the presence of conditioned media containing equal amounts of apoE3 or apoE4 obtained from stably transfected macrophages, and 2) after pretreatment with alpha- and gamma-tocopherol, and -tocotrienol. ApoE3 and apoE4 transgenic mice were fed a diet poor or rich in VE to study the interplay of both apoE genotype and VE status, on membrane lipid peroxidation, antioxidative enzyme activity and glutathione levels in the brain. Cytotoxicity of hydrogen peroxide and glutamate was higher in neuronal cells cultured with apoE4 than apoE3 conditioned media. VE pre-treatment of neurons counteracted the cytotoxicity of a peroxide challenge but not of nitric oxide. No significant effects of apoE genotype or VE supplementation were observed on lipid peroxidation or antioxidative status in the brain of apoE3 and apoE4 mice. VE protects against oxidative insults in vitro, however, no differences in brain oxidative status were observed in mice. Unlike in cultured cells, apoE4 may not contribute to higher neuronal oxidative stress in the brain of young targeted replacement mice.