Pharmacokinetic Variability of Rufinamide and Stiripentol in Children with Refractory Epilepsy: A Retrospective Study of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring from the National Epilepsy Centers in Denmark and Norway.

BACKGROUND: Rufinamide and stiripentol, orphan drugs used in Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndromes, respectively, are antiseizure medications (ASMs), often administered to children; however, pharmacokinetic studies are lacking. The authors compared the pharmacokinetic variability of these drugs with respect to the dose, serum concentrations, comedication, age, and duration of treatment. METHODS: Children and adolescents (<18 years) whose serum concentrations were measured were retrospectively identified from the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) databases at 2 national epilepsy centers in Norway and Denmark (2012-2021). RESULTS: Data from 165 patients (56% boys/44% girls) treated with rufinamide and 52 patients (50% boys/50% girls) treated with stiripentol were included. For rufinamide, the median age was 10 (range 2-17) years, dose 23 (3-73) mg/d, and serum concentration 34 (3-227) µmol/L [8.1 mg/L (0.71-54.0 mg/L)]. For stiripentol, the median age was 8.5 (range 1-17) years, dose 37 (18-76) mg/d, and serum concentration 33 (4-113) µmol/L [7.7 mg/L (0.93-26.3 mg/L)]. The concomitant use of 1-9 other ASMs during the data collection was noted. Pharmacokinetic variability, calculated as the concentration/(dose/kg) ratio, ranged from 0.26 to 11.31 (µmol/L)/(mg/kg) for rufinamide and 0.17-1.52 (µmol/L)/(mg/kg) for stiripentol. The intraindividual coefficients of variation ranged widely, from 5% to 110% for rufinamide and 11%-117% for stiripentol. The treatment period was at least 5 years in 50% of patients. No statistically significant effects of age, sex, or ASM comedication were observed, possibly due to the small sample size and heterogeneous groups with variable seizure situations, comorbidities, and changes in comedication and physiology. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates considerable pharmacokinetic variability in and between patients for both drugs and similar use in terms of age, burden of comedication and retention rates. TDM may be useful in the clinical setting to monitor and optimize treatment in this vulnerable patient group.

Access to a tailored mobile application enhances medication adherence among young users of antidepressants.

Introduction: Patients' adherence to antidepressants is generally reported to be poor. This study examined whether users of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) enhance medication adherence following access to a mobile application (app) tailored for this patient group. The study addresses the implementation phase of medication adherence. Methods: The study was a single group pre-post intervention design. Data were collected using the validated OsloMet Adherence-to-medication Survey tool (OMAS-37) before and after app access. Pre-app access survey (Survey 1) was conducted via social media and online newspapers, encompassing 445 SSRI/SNRI users aged 18 years and above. Post-app access survey (Survey 2) was sent to 103 SSRI/SNRI users from Survey 1. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test compared pre- and post-intervention adherence measurements. Pearson's chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests compared study population categories. Results: Forty-two SSRI/SNRI users, median age 26 (IQR 17), 93% identifying as female, used the app while using the same antidepressant during the 2-month period between gaining access to the app and Survey 2. There was a statistically significant reduction in non-adherence score post-app access (z = 3.57, n = 42, p < 0.001) with medium effect size (r = 0.39), indicating enhanced adherence. Total non-adherence score decreased by 39% from pre-to post-access, and there was a 12% decrease in users scoring equivalent with poor adherence (score <2) post-access. Twenty-nine of 37 non-adherence causes improved, with three showing statistical significance. Of 42 responders, 50% (n = 21) indicated using the app one to two times, while 50% (n = 21) more than three times. Approximately 69% (n = 28) found it useful, and 43% (n = 18) felt safer in their use of antidepressants after access to the app. No significant preference was observed for the app over alternative sources of information. Discussion: Enhanced medication adherence was observed among antidepressant users following access to the tailored app. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the app applicability to a broader range of antidepressants users or other patient groups, encompassing those in the initiation phase of medication adherence. The app is intended as an easily accessible supplement to the information and advice provided by prescribing physicians and dispensing pharmacists.

Interactions between antiseizure medications and foods and drinks: A systematic review.

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) constitute the principal of treatment for patients with epilepsy, where long-term treatment is usually necessary. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide practical and useful information regarding various aspects of the interactions between ASMs and foods and drinks. MEDLINE and ScienceDirect, from the inception to July 15, 2023, were searched for related publications. In both electronic databases, the following search strategy was applied, and the following keywords were used (in title/abstract): "food OR drink" AND "antiepileptic OR antiseizure." The primary search yielded 738 studies. After implementing our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we could identify 19 studies on the issue of interest for our endeavor. Four studies were identified in the recheck process and not by the primary search. All studies provided low level of evidence. Interactions between foods and ASMs are a common phenomenon. Many factors may play a role for such an interaction to come to play; these include drug properties, administration route, and administration schedule, among others. Drugs-foods (-drinks) interactions may change the drug exposure or plasma levels of drugs (e.g., grapefruit juice increases carbamazepine concentrations and the bioavailability of cannabidiol is increased 4-5 folds with concomitant intake of fat-rich food); this may require dosage adjustments. Interactions between ASMs and foods and drinks may be important. This should be taken seriously into consideration when consulting patients and their caregivers about ASMs. Future well-designed investigations should explore the specific interactions between foods (and drinks) and ASMs to clarify whether they are clinically important. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Interactions between antiseizure medications and foods and drinks may be important. This should be taken into consideration in patients with epilepsy.

Pharmacokinetic Variability of Sulthiame: The Impact of Age, Drug-Drug Interactions, and Biochemical Markers of Toxicity in Patients with Epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Sulthiame is an antiseizure medication increasingly used for epilepsy. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic variability of sulthiame in children and adults with epilepsy with respect to age, comedication, dose, serum concentration, and biochemical markers of toxicity in a clinical setting. METHOD: Retrospective quantitative data from the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database at the Section for Clinical Pharmacology, the National Center for Epilepsy, Norway (2015-2021), were used. RESULTS: TDM data from 326 patients (127 female/199 male) were included [mean age, 11.4 (range 2-44) years; mean weight, 41 (range 14-109) kg]. Interindividual pharmacokinetic variability in the concentration/(dose/body weight) (C/(D/kg)) ratio was 16-fold; intraindividual variability was up to 8-fold (coefficient of variation = 10%-78%). Young children (younger than 6 years) had a significantly lower C/(D/kg) ratio than older age groups ( P < 0.05). Various comedications did not significantly affect the C/(D/kg) ratio, possibly owing to the small sample size. However, CYP2C19-mediated inhibition by sulthiame was indicated because patients using clobazam and sulthiame (n = 28) had a 3.5-fold higher N-desmethylclobazam C/(D/kg) ratio than those using neutral comedication (n = 45; P < 0.001). Patients with pH values below the adjusted normal range (7.32-7.42; n = 15) had a 33% higher sulthiame concentration than those with normal pH values (n = 22; P < 0.05). Blood gas measurements, especially pH, may serve as markers of toxicity and can be used in combination with clinical data when toxicity is suspected. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the extensive intraindividual and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability of sulthiame, with age as a contributing factor. Sulthiame has clinically relevant interactions with clobazam. The use of TDM and pH as a biochemical marker may contribute to individualized and safe sulthiame treatment.

Effectiveness and safety of everolimus treatment in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex in real-world clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: The randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled EXIST-1-3 studies have showed everolimus effective with adverse effects reported as acceptable in treatment of symptoms in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), although evidence of outcomes in clinical practice remains limited. This study aimed to investigate, in clinical practice, the effectiveness and safety of everolimus for epilepsy, renal angiomyolipoma (rAML), and subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA) in patients with TSC. RESULTS: The study included 64 patients with TSC (median age: 19, range 0.9-54 years) receiving everolimus treatment (Norway: n = 35; Denmark: n = 29). Among 45 patients with epilepsy, 14 (31%) were responders experiencing ≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency in the last 3 months of treatment compared with the last 3 months before treatment. Nineteen (42%) patients changed their anti-seizure medications (ASMs). Responders were more common among patients < 18 years (46%) than among patients ≥ 18 years (14%, p = 0.03). In 29 patients with rAML, everolimus reduced (≥ 30% decrease) and stabilized (< 20% increase, ≤ 30% decrease) longest diameter of rAML in 38% and 59%, respectively, after a mean treatment duration of 37 months. SEGA volume was reduced in three patients by 71%, 43%, and 48% after 39, 34, and 82 months. Adverse effects were reported in 61 of 64 patients (95%) after a median treatment duration of 31 months (range 0-106), with oral ulceration/stomatitis (63%) and upper respiratory tract infections (38%) being the most common. The most common laboratory abnormalities were increased cholesterol (41%), anaemia (30%), and leucopoenia (25%). Grade 3-4 adverse effects were reported in 36% of cases, and life-threatening conditions were reported in two patients. Nine patients discontinued everolimus treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Seizure reduction in this study sample was consistent with results from EXIST, but might be lower than expected, given that changes in concomitant ASMs are part of clinical practice. Seizure reduction was associated with younger age. As with EXIST, everolimus reduced or stabilised rAML size in most patients. SEGA volume was reduced in all three patients. Close follow-up is needed for this group, especially for children and patients who may not be able to report adverse effects.

Therapeutic Salivary Monitoring of Perampanel in Patients with Epilepsy Using a Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling Technique.

The objective of this study was to validate a novel assay using the volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) technique combined with liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for the determination of the antiseizure medication perampanel in saliva and its clinical applicability in patients with epilepsy. VAMS tips were loaded with 30 µL of saliva and dried for 60 min. Analytes were extracted with methanol. The supernatant was evaporated under a gentle stream of nitrogen and reconstituted with 60 µL of methanol. Separation and quantification were achieved on a monolithic column connected to a mass spectrometer. Calibration curves were linear between 0.5 and 300 ng/mL. Intra- and inter-day accuracy was within 85.6-103.2% and intra-day and inter-day precision did not exceed 12.1%. Perampanel was stable in samples collected by VAMS and stored under different storage conditions. The VAMS-LC-MS/MS method was validated according to internationally accepted criteria and tested in patients with epilepsy who were receiving a combination of perampanel and other antiseizure medications. The method showed adequate bioanalytical performances, holding great potential as an alternative strategy to support domiciliary TDM in patients with epilepsy treated with perampanel according to the simplicity of sample collection.

Pharmacological aspects of antiseizure medications: From basic mechanisms to clinical considerations of drug interactions and use of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are the cornerstone of treatment for patients with epilepsy. Several new ASMs have recently been introduced to the market, making it possible to better tailor the treatment of epilepsy, as well as other indications (psychiatry and pain disorders). For this group of drugs there are numerous pharmacological challenges, and updated knowledge on their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties is, therefore, crucial for an optimal treatment outcome. This review focuses on educational approaches to the following learning outcomes as described by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE): To demonstrate knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, drug interactions with ASMs and with concomitant medications, and appropriate monitoring of ASM serum levels (therapeutic drug monitoring, TDM). Basic principles in pharmacology, pharmacokinetic variability, and clinically relevant approaches to manage drug interactions are discussed. Furthermore, recent improvements in analytical technology and sampling are described. Future directions point to the combined implementation of TDM with genetic panels for proper diagnosis, pharmacogenetic tests where relevant, and the use of biochemical markers that will all contribute to personalized treatment. These approaches are clinically relevant for an optimal treatment outcome with ASMs in various patient groups.

Development and validation of a new non-disease-specific survey tool to assess self-reported adherence to medication.

Background: Patients' non-adherence to medication affects both patients themselves and healthcare systems. Consequences include higher mortality, worsening of disease, patient injuries, and increased healthcare costs. Many existing survey tools for assessing adherence are linked to specific diseases and assessing medication-taking behavior or identifying barriers or beliefs. This study aimed to develop and validate a new non-disease-specific survey tool to assess self-reported medication-taking behavior, barriers, and beliefs in order to quantify the causes of non-adherence and measure adherence. Methods: The survey tool was developed after literature searches and pilot testing. Validation was conducted by assessing the psychometric properties of content, construct, reliability, and feasibility. Content validity was assessed by subject matter experts and construct validity by performing exploratory factor analysis. Reliability assessment was performed by calculating internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha and test/retest reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and standard error of measurement (SEm). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the Lui method were used to calculate the statistical cut-off score for good versus poor adherence. Survey responses from Norwegian medication users over 18 years recruited via social media were used for the factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha. Results: The final survey tool contains 37 causes of non-adherence connected to medication-taking behavior and barriers to adherence and beliefs associated with adherence. The overall result for all 37 items demonstrated reliable internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha = 0.91. The factor analysis identified ten latent variables for 29 items, explaining 61.7% of the variance. Seven of the latent variables showed reliable internal consistency: medication fear and lack of effect, conditional practical issues, pregnancy/breastfeeding, information issues, needlessness, lifestyle, and avoiding stigmatization (Cronbach's alpha = 0.72-0.86). Shortage showed low internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.59). Impact issues and personal practical issues showed poor internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.51 and 0.48, respectively). The test/retest reliability ICC = 0.89 and SEm = 1.11, indicating good reliability. The statistical cut-off score for good versus poor adherence was 10, but the clinical cut-off score was found to be 2. Conclusion: This survey tool, OMAS-37 (OsloMet Adherence to medication Survey tool, 37 items), demonstrated to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing adherence. Further studies will examine the ability of the tool for measuring adherence enhancing effect following interventions.

Use of screening tools to assess comorbidities and adverse events in patients with epilepsy. A European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies (EpiCARE) survey.

PURPOSE: As comorbidities can affect treatment decisions, quality of life, and prognosis in epilepsy, it is important that they are detected and addressed as soon as possible. Screening tools can help by rapidly assessing various additional challenges in epilepsy. METHODS: To map the use and perceived benefit of different screening instruments for quality of life, psychiatric comorbidity, and cognition, along with side effects from anti-seizure medication in Europe, we sent an online questionnaire to dedicated epilepsy centres departments within the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies (EpiCARE). RESULTS: Among the 40 hospitals in the EpiCARE network, we received responses from 25 (63%), with 28 individual respondents. Most respondents reported using screening for quality of life (86%) and psychiatric comorbidity (82%), but relatively few (14%) screen for sexual problems. Many (47) different tools were used for evaluation of cognitive dysfunction, but just a few (5) different tools were used to screen for adverse events. The optimization of individual patient care was one main reason given for using screening tools (58%-100% - depending on purpose of tool), another was research (50% - 88% - depending on purpose of tool). A major benefit of using screening tools perceived by the respondents is the detection of "hidden" comorbidity (67% - 90% - depending on purpose of tool). CONCLUSION: In the absence of a broad consensus regarding use of screening tools, practices vary considerably among epilepsy centres. Greater emphasis should be directed towards harmonizing use of screening tools. Future research should address how screening results influence treatment choices, and how these might affect clinical care.

Changes in the use of antiseizure medications in children and adolescents in Norway, 2009-2018.

BACKGROUND: The use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in the pediatric population is poorly studied. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in the use of ASMs in children and adolescents compared to adults, and to elucidate safety considerations of certain drugs. METHOD: In this population-based pharmacoepidemiological study we used the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD), 2009-2018. The use of ASMs is presented as 1-year prevalence per 1000: number of ASM users in a year * 1000 / number of inhabitants that year. Variables included predetermined 5-year age groups, gender, ASMs, diagnosis-specific reimbursement codes, user, and population numbers. Selected ASMs used for specific indications or subgroups included ethosuximide, sulthiame, rufinamide, stiripentol, and clobazam. Gender differences in the use of valproate was examined due to safety considerations in girls/women. RESULTS: The total number of ASM users (all indications) for the age groups 0-19 and 20-59 years was 5807 and 47,481 respectively in 2009, and 5906 and 61,447 respectively in 2018. The 1-year prevalence for children/adolescents (0-19 years) using ASMs in epilepsy remained stable from 2008 to 2018, 4.3-4.2/1000 inhabitants, as compared to 8.2-7.6/1000 in adults (20-59 years). Valproate, lamotrigine, and levetiracetam were the three most used ASMs in epilepsy in children/adolescents, similar to adults. The selected ASMs were mainly used in children/ adolescents, accounting for 0.74/1000 in 2018 versus 0.17/1000 in adults. A significant increase was seen for sulthiame (8-fold), ethosuximide (4-fold), clobazam (3-fold), and stiripentol (2-fold). The use of ASMs in non-epilepsy indications was limited and stable (17% in 2018); mainly lamotrigine in psychiatry in adolescents (15-19 years). This finding was in contrast to extensive non-epilepsy use in adults (71% in 2018). CONCLUSION: Changes in the use of ASMs in children/adolescents differ as compared to adults, most notably extensive and increasing use of selected ASMs and limited non-epilepsy. This is an important part of pharmacovigilance and patient safety evaluations.

Association Between Antiseizure Drug Monotherapy and Mortality for Patients With Poststroke Epilepsy.

Importance: There is little evidence to guide the choice of antiseizure medication (ASM) for patients with poststroke epilepsy. Theoretical concerns about detrimental effects of ASMs on survival exist. Enzyme-inducing drugs could interfere with secondary stroke prevention. The US Food and Drug Administration recently issued a safety announcement about the potential proarrhythmic properties of lamotrigine. Objective: To investigate whether mortality varies with specific ASMs among patients with poststroke epilepsy. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cohort study was conducted using individual-level data from linked registers on all adults in Sweden with acute stroke from July 1, 2005, to December 31, 2010, and subsequent onset of epilepsy before December 31, 2014. A total of 2577 patients receiving continuous ASM monotherapy were eligible for the study. Data were analyzed between May 27, 2019, and April 8, 2021. Exposures: The dispensed ASM (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code N03A) determined exposure status, and the first dispensation date marked the start of treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome, all-cause death, was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression with carbamazepine as the reference. Cardiovascular death (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes I0-I99 as the underlying cause) was assessed using Fine-Gray competing risk regression models. Results: A total of 2577 patients (1400 men [54%]; median age, 78 years [IQR, 69-85 years]) were included. The adjusted hazard ratio of all-cause death compared with carbamazepine was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60-0.86) for lamotrigine, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.80-1.15) for levetiracetam, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.23-1.59) for valproic acid, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.88-1.51) for phenytoin, and 1.16 (95% CI, 0.81-1.66) for oxcarbazepine. The adjusted hazard ratio of cardiovascular death compared with carbamazepine was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.61-0.95) for lamotrigine, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60-0.99) for levetiracetam, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.19-1.64) for valproic acid, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.71-1.47) for phenytoin, and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.42-1.18) for oxcarbazepine. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study's findings suggest differences in survival between patients treated with different ASMs for poststroke epilepsy. Patients receiving lamotrigine monotherapy had significantly lower mortality compared with those receiving carbamazepine. The opposite applied to patients prescribed valproic acid, who had a higher risk of cardiovascular and all-cause death. Levetiracetam was associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular death compared with carbamazepine, but there was no significant difference in overall mortality.

A survey of the European Reference Network EpiCARE on clinical practice for selected rare epilepsies.

Objective: Clinical care of rare and complex epilepsies is challenging, because evidence-based treatment guidelines are scarce, the experience of many physicians is limited, and interdisciplinary treatment of comorbidities is required. The pathomechanisms of rare epilepsies are, however, increasingly understood, which potentially fosters novel targeted therapies. The objectives of our survey were to obtain an overview of the clinical practice in European tertiary epilepsy centers treating patients with 5 arbitrarily selected rare epilepsies and to get an estimate of potentially available patients for future studies. Methods: Members of the European Reference Network for rare and complex epilepsies (EpiCARE) were invited to participate in a web-based survey on clinical practice of patients with Dravet syndrome, tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), autoimmune encephalitis, and progressive myoclonic epilepsies including Unverricht Lundborg and Unverricht-like diseases. A consensus-based questionnaire was generated for each disease. Results: Twenty-six of 30 invited epilepsy centers participated. Cohorts were present in most responding centers for TSC (87%), Dravet syndrome (85%), and autoimmune encephalitis (71%). Patients with TSC and Dravet syndrome represented the largest cohorts in these centers. The antiseizure drug treatments were rather consistent across the centers especially with regard to Dravet syndrome, infantile spasms in TSC, and Unverricht Lundborg / Unverricht-like disease. Available, widely used targeted therapies included everolimus in TSC and immunosuppressive therapies in autoimmune encephalitis. Screening for comorbidities was routinely done, but specific treatment protocols were lacking in most centers. Significance: The survey summarizes the current clinical practice for selected rare epilepsies in tertiary European epilepsy centers and demonstrates consistency as well as heterogeneity in the treatment, underscoring the need for controlled trials and recommendations. The survey also provides estimates for potential participants of clinical trials recruited via EpiCARE, emphasizing the great potential of Reference Networks for future studies to evaluate new targeted therapies and to identify novel biomarkers.

The role of new medical treatments for the management of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies: Novel concepts and results.

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are among the most challenging of all epilepsies to manage, given the exceedingly frequent and often severe seizure types, pharmacoresistance to conventional antiseizure medications, and numerous comorbidities. During the past decade, efforts have focused on development of new treatment options for DEEs, with several recently approved in the United States or Europe, including cannabidiol as an orphan drug in Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes and everolimus as a possible antiepileptogenic and precision drug for tuberous sclerosis complex, with its impact on the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. Furthermore, fenfluramine, an old drug, was repurposed as a novel therapy in the treatment of Dravet syndrome. The evolution of new insights into pathophysiological processes of various DEEs provides possibilities to investigate novel and repurposed drugs and to place them into the context of their role in future management of these patients. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of these new medical treatment options for the DEEs and to discuss the clinical implications of these results for improved treatment.

A retrospective review of changes and challenges in the use of antiseizure medicines in Dravet syndrome in Norway.

OBJECTIVE: Dravet syndrome is a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterized by severe and drug-resistant seizures in early childhood, followed by developmental delay. The purpose of this study was to investigate aspects of pharmacological treatment of Norwegian patients with Dravet syndrome, focusing on the use of antiseizure medicines (ASMs) and identifying treatment challenges. METHODS: Patients were identified through medical registries at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway and National Center for Rare Epilepsy Related Disorders during 2008-2018. Additional clinical data were obtained from medical records and laboratory request forms. RESULTS: We identified 53 patients with Dravet syndrome, 30/23 males/females, aged 2-50 years. The majority of patients with known seizure frequency experienced frequent seizures, 80% (n = 35/44). Only two patients were seizure-free. Valproate (n = 48), clobazam (n = 45), levetiracetam (n = 30), and stiripentol (n = 38) were most commonly used, previous or current use. More than one-third (n = 20) had tried sodium channel blockers (including lamotrigine), but these drugs were used less during the last decade. Polytherapy was common, 81% (n = 43) used two or more ASMs, and eight of these patients used 4-5 drugs (15%). Several challenges were identified: high seizure frequency, comorbidities, treatment changes with a wide range of ASMs, common use of oral gastro-tubes, extensive polypharmacy, and drug interactions. SIGNIFICANCE: The use of ASMs has changed over the last decade, in accordance with updated international recommendations. Various treatment challenges were identified. This vulnerable group of patients needs close follow-up for an optimal treatment outcome.

Relationship between saliva and plasma rufinamide concentrations in patients with epilepsy.

The assay of saliva samples provides a valuable alternative to the use of blood samples for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), at least for certain categories of patients. To determine the feasibility of using saliva sampling for the TDM of rufinamide, we compared rufinamide concentrations in paired samples of saliva and plasma collected from 26 patients with epilepsy at steady state. Within-patient relationships between plasma rufinamide concentrations and dose, and the influence of comedication were also investigated. Assay results in the two tested fluids showed a good correlation (r2  = .78, P < .0001), but concentrations in saliva were moderately lower than those in plasma (mean saliva to plasma ratio = 0.7 ± 0.2). In eight patients evaluated at three different dose levels, plasma rufinamide concentrations increased linearly with increasing dose. Patients receiving valproic acid comedication had higher dose-normalized plasma rufinamide levels than patients comedicated with drugs devoid of strong enzyme-inducing or enzyme-inhibiting activity. Overall, these findings indicate that use of saliva represents a feasible option for the application of TDM in patients treated with rufinamide. Because rufinamide concentrations are lower in saliva than in plasma, a correction factor is needed if measurements made in saliva are used as a surrogate for plasma concentrations.

Pharmacokinetic Variability During Long-Term Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Valproate, Clobazam, and Levetiracetam in Patients With Dravet Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antiseizure medications (ASMs) may contribute to treatment optimization in individual patients. This study included patients with Dravet syndrome as they often require close monitoring because of polypharmacy with various ASMs. The aim was to use long-term TDM to investigate pharmacokinetic variability of ASMs in these patients. METHODS: Retrospective data from patients with Dravet syndrome were collected from the TDM database at the Section for Clinical Pharmacology, National Center for Epilepsy in Norway (2008-2018). Concentration/(dose/kg)ratios (C/D ratios) were calculated for the ASMs and the concentration (C/C ratio) for N-desmethylclobazam. In patients with at least 3 measurements, the CV for C/D ratios for intrapatient and interpatient variability was calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (30 male patients/23 female patients) between 2 and 50 years of age (mean, 16 years) were included. Pharmacokinetic variability of the total number of measurements of valproate (n = 417), clobazam and N-desmethylclobazam (n = 328), and levetiracetam (n = 238) was determined. Interpatient variability was more pronounced than intrapatient variability (coefficient of variations: valproate, 65% vs. 24%; levetiracetam, 71% vs. 27%; and clobazam/N-desmethylclobazam, 47%/77% vs. 35%/55%) (P < 0.01). Comedication with stiripentol (n = 16) increased the C/D ratio of valproate by 63% and of clobazam by 133% and the C/C ratio of N-desmethylclobazam/clobazam by 104% (P < 0.05). Younger age also contributed to pharmacokinetic variability. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term TDM revealed extensive variability in serum concentrations over time; the variability was lowest for levetiracetam, moderate for valproate, and highest for clobazam. Pharmacokinetic variability and interactions can thus be identified and adjusted to facilitate decision making to achieve the optimal treatment outcome.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs: current status and future prospects.

Introduction: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the cornerstone of treatment of patients with epilepsy, and there are presently 27 licensed AEDs making AEDs among the most common medications for which therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is performed. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current evidence of the use and implementation of AED TDM in patients with epilepsy and other non-epilepsy conditions.Areas covered: The pharmacokinetic variability of AEDs is extensive, resulting in pronounced variability in serum concentrations between patients. TDM may thus be useful to individualize the treatment of patients with epilepsy and also in non-epilepsy conditions. Indications for TDM include settings where pharmacokinetic variability is anticipated (e.g. in children, the elderly, during pregnancy, and patients prescribed polytherapy resulting in drug interactions) and drug adherence. TDM contributes to provide a quality assurance of the treatment. Patient management is, therefore, best guided by the determination of individual therapeutic concentrations.Expert opinion: Because of pharmacokinetic variability is prevalent among AEDs, TDM allows a bespoke approach to epilepsy care allowing dose adjustments based on measured drug concentrations so as to optimize clinical outcome. Future advances include the use of additional markers of toxicity and genetic variability so as to further aid individualization and optimize AED treatment.

Clinical experience combined with therapeutic drug monitoring of lacosamide.

OBJECTIVE: Lacosamide (LCM) is an antiepileptic drug (AED) with insufficient clinical experience in patients with intellectual disability (ID). They often have more severe epilepsy with comorbidities. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) in patients with refractory epilepsy with and without ID in a real-life setting, taking drug monitoring (TDM) data into account therapeutic. METHODS: Retrospectively, we identified 344 patients using LCM from the TDM service covering the majority of the country, at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway (2013-2018). Clinical and TDM data were available for 132 patients. RESULTS: Forty-four of the 132 patients (33%) had ID. The retention rate was significantly higher in the ID vs the non-ID group after 1 year (84% vs 68%, P < .05). By combining clinical and TDM data, we demonstrated that 37/38 responding patients had serum concentrations above the lower limit of the reference range (>10 µmol/L), and 16/17 with lower concentrations were non-responders. Mean serum concentration/dose ratios were similar in both groups, 0.06 and 0.07 µmol/L/mg. There were no significant differences regarding efficacy and tolerability. The risk of LCM withdrawal was significantly higher when LCM was added to sodium channel blockers, even if the latter was discontinued. SIGNIFICANCE: Lacosamide was generally well tolerated in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, where one third had ID, and in these patients the retention rate was higher. The combination of clinical and TDM data could possibly facilitate LCM therapy in these vulnerable patients.

Refractory epilepsy and nonadherence to drug treatment.

In patients with epilepsy, nonadherence to agreed antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment may result in seizure relapse, and at worst sudden unexpected death. The aim of this study was to examine the extent of both unintentional and intentional nonadherence among Norwegian patients with refractory epilepsy and try to identify possible risk factors. At the National Centre for Epilepsy in Norway, 333 consecutive adult in- and outpatients with refractory epilepsy participated in an anonymous survey about adherence to drug treatment. Twenty-two percentages admitted that they sometimes or often forgot to take their drugs as scheduled, and 19% reported that they, rarely, sometimes or often intentionally did not follow the AED treatment plan agreed upon with their physician. Young age and depression were significantly correlated with unintentional nonadherence. Intentional nonadherence was associated with young age (36 years or younger). We found nonadherence not to be associated with any specific AED. In conclusion, about one-fifth of patients with refractory epilepsy admitted that they did not adhere to the agreed drug treatment plan, either intentionally or unintentionally. Measures to reduce nonadherence in this patient group may improve seizure control and should be tailored to address both unintentional and intentional lack of adherence.

Interdisciplinary medication review to improve pharmacotherapy for patients with intellectual disabilities.

Background Patients with intellectual disabilities is an underserved patient group that have poor abilities to express their health complaints. Objective The aim of this study was to improve pharmacotherapy in patients with intellectual disability, by the use of medication reviews and interdisciplinary case conferences. Setting Patients with intellectual disabilities receiving home care services in Oslo, Norway. Method Patients receiving home care services were recruited by a nurse. A clinical pharmacist conducted medication reviews, and thereafter, the patients' general practitioner, nurse/social educator and clinical pharmacist discussed the pharmacotherapy at an interdisciplinary case conference. Patient demographics, prescribed drugs (strength, dose, indication) and drug-related problems (DRPs) were recorded. Main outcome measure Patient outcomes and actions taken to resolve DRPs 6 weeks after the case conference. Results Forty patients (34-77 years) with intellectual disabilities consented to medication reviews. They used on average 12 different drugs (range 5-23). The most commonly prescribed drugs were CNS-active drugs: analgesics (25 patients), antiepileptics (23 patients) and anxiolytics (21 patients). In total, 27 patients used between 3 and 7 different CNS-active drugs. The clinical pharmacist identified 178 DRPs in 39/40 patients (average 4.5 DRPs, range 0-13). DRPs for 30% of all prescribed drugs were resolved (145/481). Overall, 11% of drugs were deprescribed, 8% required therapeutic monitoring/follow-up, and either the dosage, formulation or route of administration were changed for 7% of the drugs. Conclusions Patients with intellectual disabilities receiving home care services were prescribed many unnecessary drugs and needed adjustment of pharmacotherapy for about one third of their prescribed drugs. The interdisciplinary case conferences improved pharmacotherapy for this vulnerable patient group.