Variations in the use of oxytocin for augmentation of labour in Sweden: a population-based cohort study.

National Swedish data shows substantial variation in the use of oxytocin for augmentation of spontaneous labour between obstetric units. This study aimed to investigate if variations in the use of oxytocin augmentation are associated with maternal and infant characteristics or clinical factors. We used a cohort design including women allocated to Robson group 1 (nulliparous women, gestational week ≥ 37 + 0, with singleton births in cephalic presentation and spontaneous onset of labour) and 3 (parous women, gestational week ≥ 37 + 0, with singleton births in cephalic presentation, spontaneous onset of labour, and no previous caesarean birth). Crude and adjusted logistic regression models with marginal standardisation were used to estimate risk ratios (RR) and risk differences (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for oxytocin use by obstetric unit. An interaction analysis was performed to investigate the potential modifying effect of epidural. The use of oxytocin varied between 47 and 73% in Robson group 1, and 10% and 33% in Robson group 3. Compared to the remainder of Sweden, the risk of oxytocin augmentation ranged from 13% lower (RD - 13.0, 95% CI - 15.5 to - 10.6) to 14% higher (RD 14.0, 95% CI 12.3-15.8) in Robson group 1, and from 6% lower (RD - 5.6, 95% CI - 6.8 to - 4.5) to 18% higher (RD 17.9, 95% CI 16.5-19.4) in Robson group 3. The most notable differences in risk estimates were observed among women in Robson group 3 with epidural. In conclusion, variations in oxytocin use remained despite adjusting for risk factors. This indicates unjustified differences in use of oxytocin in clinical practice.

Gestational weight gain below recommendations and adverse maternal and child health outcomes for pregnancies with overweight or obesity: a United States cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The current Institute of Medicine (IOM) pregnancy weight gain guidelines were developed using the best available evidence but were limited by substantial knowledge gaps. Some have raised concern that the guidelines for individuals affected by overweight or obesity are too high and contribute to short- and long-term complications for the mother and child. OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between pregnancy weight gain below the lower limit of the current IOM recommendations and risk of 10 adverse maternal and child health outcomes among individuals with overweight and obesity. METHODS: We used data from a prospective cohort study of United States nulliparae with prepregnancy overweight (n = 955) or obesity (n = 897) followed from the first trimester to 2-7 y postpartum. We used multivariable Poisson regression to relate pregnancy weight gain z-scores with a severity-weighted composite outcome consisting of ≥1 of 10 adverse outcomes (gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, unplanned cesarean delivery, maternal postpartum weight increase >10 kg, maternal postpartum metabolic syndrome, infant death, stillbirth, preterm birth, small-for-gestational age birth, and childhood obesity). RESULTS: Pregnancy weight gain z-scores below, within, and above the IOM-recommended ranges occurred in 5%, 13%, and 80% of pregnancies with overweight and 17%, 13%, and 70% of pregnancies with obesity. There was a positive association between pregnancy weight gain z-scores and all adverse maternal outcomes, childhood obesity, and the composite outcome. Pregnancy weight gain z-scores below the lower limit of the recommended ranges (<6.8 kg for overweight, <5 kg for obesity) were not associated with the severity-weighted composite outcome. For example, compared with the lower limit, adjusted rate ratios (95% confidence interval) for z-scores of -2 standard deviations in pregnancies with overweight (equivalent to 3.6 kg at 40 wk) and obesity (-2.8 kg at 40 wk) were 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91, 1.06) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.07). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support arguments to decrease the lower limit of recommended weight gain ranges in these prepregnancy body mass index groups.

Should gestational weight gain charts exclude individuals with excess postpartum weight retention?

BACKGROUND: High gestational weight gain is associated with excess postpartum weight retention, yet excess postpartum weight retention is not an exclusion criterion for current gestational weight gain charts. We aimed to assess the impact of excluding individuals with high interpregnancy weight change (a proxy for excess postpartum weight retention) on gestational weight gain distributions. METHODS: We included individuals with an index birth from 2008 to 2014 and a subsequent birth before 2019, in the population-based Stockholm-Gotland Perinatal Cohort. We estimated gestational weight gain (kg) at 25 and 37 weeks, using weight at first prenatal visit (<14 weeks) as the reference. We calculated high interpregnancy weight change (≥10 kg and ≥5 kg) using the difference between weight at the start of an index and subsequent pregnancy. We compared gestational weight gain distributions and percentiles (stratified by early-pregnancy body mass index) before and after excluding participants with high interpregnancy weight change. RESULTS: Among 55,723 participants, 17% had ≥10 kg and 34% had ≥5 kg interpregnancy weight change. The third, tenth, 50th, 90th and 97th percentiles of gestational weight gain were similar (largely within 1 kg) before versus after excluding participants with high interpregnancy weight change, at both 25 and 37 weeks. For example, among normal weight participants at 37 weeks, the 50th and 97th percentiles were 14 kg and 23 kg including versus 13 kg and 23 kg excluding participants with ≥5 kg interpregnancy weight change. CONCLUSIONS: Excluding individuals with excess postpartum weight retention from normative gestational weight gain charts may not meaningfully impact the charts' percentiles.

Safety of low weight gain or weight loss in pregnancies with class 1, 2, and 3 obesity: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There are concerns that current gestational weight gain recommendations for women with obesity are too high and that guidelines should differ on the basis of severity of obesity. In this study we investigated the safety of gestational weight gain below current recommendations or weight loss in pregnancies with obesity, and evaluated whether separate guidelines are needed for different obesity classes. METHODS: In this population-based cohort study, we used electronic medical records from the Stockholm-Gotland Perinatal Cohort study to identify pregnancies with obesity (early pregnancy BMI before 14 weeks' gestation ≥30 kg/m2) among singleton pregnancies that delivered between Jan 1, 2008, and Dec 31, 2015. The pregnancy records were linked with Swedish national health-care register data up to Dec 31, 2019. Gestational weight gain was calculated as the last measured weight before or at delivery minus early pregnancy weight (at <14 weeks' gestation), and standardised for gestational age into z-scores. We used Poisson regression to assess the association of gestational weight gain z-score with a composite outcome of: stillbirth, infant death, large for gestational age and small for gestational age at birth, preterm birth, unplanned caesarean delivery, gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, excess postpartum weight retention, and new-onset longer-term maternal cardiometabolic disease after pregnancy, weighted to account for event severity. We calculated rate ratios (RRs) for our composite adverse outcome along the weight gain z-score continuum, compared with a reference of the current lower limit for gestational weight gain recommended by the US Institute of Medicine (IOM; 5 kg at term). RRs were adjusted for confounding factors (maternal age, height, parity, early pregnancy BMI, early pregnancy smoking status, prepregnancy cardiovascular disease or diabetes, education, cohabitation status, and Nordic country of birth). FINDINGS: Our cohort comprised 15 760 pregnancies with obesity, followed up for a median of 7·9 years (IQR 5·8-9·4). 11 667 (74·0%) pregnancies had class 1 obesity, 3160 (20·1%) had class 2 obesity, and 933 (5·9%) had class 3 obesity. Among these pregnancies, 1623 (13·9%), 786 (24·9%), and 310 (33·2%), respectively, had weight gain during pregnancy below the lower limit of the IOM recommendation (5 kg). In pregnancies with class 1 or 2 obesity, gestational weight gain values below the lower limit of the IOM recommendation or weight loss did not increase risk of the adverse composite outcome (eg, at weight gain z-score -2·4, corresponding to 0 kg at 40 weeks: adjusted RR 0·97 [95% CI 0·89-1·06] in obesity class 1 and 0·96 [0·86-1·08] in obesity class 2). In pregnancies with class 3 obesity, weight gain values below the IOM limit or weight loss were associated with reduced risk of the adverse composite outcome (eg, adjusted RR 0·81 [0·71-0·89] at weight gain z-score -2·4, or 0 kg). INTERPRETATION: Our findings support calls to lower or remove the lower limit of current IOM recommendations for pregnant women with obesity, and suggest that separate guidelines for class 3 obesity might be warranted. FUNDING: Karolinska Institutet and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Do current pregnancy weight gain guidelines balance risks of adverse maternal and child health in a United States cohort?

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine pregnancy weight gain guidelines were developed without evidence linking high weight gain to maternal cardiometabolic disease and child obesity. The upper limit of current recommendations may be too high for the health of the pregnant individual and child. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify the range of pregnancy weight gain for pregnancies within a normal body mass index (BMI) range that balances the risks of high and low weight gain by simultaneously considering 10 different health conditions. METHODS: We used data from an United States prospective cohort study of nulliparae followed until 2 to 7 y postpartum (N = 2344 participants with a normal BMI). Pregnancy weight gain z-score was the main exposure. The outcome was a composite consisting of the occurrence of ≥1 of 10 adverse health conditions that were weighted for their seriousness. We used multivariable Poisson regression to relate weight gain z-scores with the weighted composite outcome. RESULTS: The lowest risk of the composite outcome was at a pregnancy weight gain z-score of -0.6 SD (standard deviation) (equivalent to 13.1 kg at 40 wk). The weight gain ranges associated with no more than 5%, 10%, and 20% increase in risks were -1.0 to -0.2 SD (11.2-15.3 kg), -1.4 to 0 SD (9.4-16.4 kg), and -2.0 to 0.4 SD (7.0-18.9 kg). When we used a lower threshold to define postpartum weight increase in the composite outcome (>5 kg compared with >10 kg), the ranges were 1.6 to -0.7 SD (8.9-12.6 kg), -2.2 to -0.3 SD (6.3-14.7 kg), and ≤0.2 SD (≤17.6 kg). Compared with the ranges of the current weight gain guidelines (-0.9 to -0.1 SD, 11.5-16 kg), the lower limits from our data tended to be lower while upper limits were similar or lower. CONCLUSIONS: If replicated, our results suggest that policy makers should revisit the recommended pregnancy weight gain range for individuals within a normal BMI range.

Labor unit culture and attitudes toward supporting vaginal birth-The Swedish version of the labor culture survey (S-LCS)-Psychometric properties.

BACKGROUND: In order to evaluate interventions aimed at reducing cesarean births, care practitioners' attitudes are important to measure. The Labor Culture Survey (LCS) is a scale that measures individual and unit attitudes towards supporting vaginal birth. As no equivalent scale exists in Sweden, the aim was to translate, adapt, and validate the LCS and to investigate whether there were differences in attitudes toward supporting vaginal birth between maternity care practitioners. METHODS: A cross-sectional study including midwives, physicians, and nurse assistants working with intrapartum care in five labor wards in Sweden. The original LCS was translated into Swedish, and six context-specific items were developed for the Swedish setting (SLCS). The translation was tested for face validity. Psychometric analysis was conducted using exploratory factor analysis with principal component analysis, parallel analysis, and principal axis factoring. Reliability was estimated using Cronbach's alpha. One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD were calculated to analyze differences in attitudes between professions on the subscales of the S-LCS. RESULTS: A total of 539 midwives, physicians, and nurse assistants participated. The final S-LCS showed a five-factor solution with the following subscales: Best Practices to reduce cesarean overuse, Unpredictability of vaginal birth, Unit Microculture, Maternal Agency, and Organizational Oversight. Chronbach alpha values varied from 0.60 to 0.83. Midwives were more supportive towards vaginal birth and less fearful of potential consequences of vaginal birth compared with physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The S-LCS demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties for use in Swedish maternity care. Further work to improve the scale should include additional items reflecting the subscale Maternal Agency.

Pregnancy Weight Gain After Gastric Bypass or Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Importance: Pregnancy weight gain may affect the association of bariatric surgery with postsurgery pregnancy outcomes. However, the association of pregnancy weight gain with bariatric surgery is unclear. Objective: To compare pregnancy weight gain among women with a history of bariatric surgery vs those without and to investigate whether pregnancy weight gain differs by surgical procedure, surgery-to-conception interval, and/or surgery-to-conception weight loss. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, population-based matched cohort study was conducted in Sweden from 2014 to 2021. Singleton pregnancies with a history of bariatric surgery were propensity score matched (1:1) to pregnancies without such a history according to early-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), prepregnancy diabetes, prepregnancy hypertension, maternal age, smoking status, education level, height, country of birth, and delivery year. In addition, post-gastric bypass pregnancies were matched to post-sleeve gastrectomy pregnancies using the same matching strategy. Data analysis was performed from November 2022 to May 2023. Exposure: History of bariatric surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pregnancy weight gain was standardized by gestational age into early-pregnancy BMI-specific z scores. Results: This study included 12 776 pregnancies, of which 6388 had a history of bariatric surgery and 6388 were matched controls. The mean (SD) age was 31.6 (4.9) years for the surgery group and 31.4 (5.2) for the matched controls, with an early-pregnancy mean (SD) BMI of 29.4 (5.2) in both groups. Across all early-pregnancy BMI strata, women with a history of bariatric surgery had lower pregnancy weight gain than matched controls. The differences in pregnancy weight gain z score values between the 2 groups were -0.33 (95% CI, -0.43 to -0.23) for normal weight, -0.33 (95% CI, -0.40 to -0.27) for overweight, -0.21 (95% CI, -0.29 to -0.13) for obese class I, -0.16 (95% CI, -0.29 to -0.03) for obese class II, and -0.08 (95% CI, -0.28 to 0.13) for obese class III. Pregnancy weight gain did not differ by surgical procedure. A shorter surgery-to-conception interval (particularly within 1 year) or lower surgery-to-conception weight loss was associated with lower pregnancy weight gain. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nationwide matched cohort study, women with a history of bariatric surgery had lower pregnancy weight gain than matched controls with similar early-pregnancy characteristics. Pregnancy weight gain was lower in those with a shorter surgery-to-conception interval or lower surgery-to-conception weight loss, but did not differ by surgical procedure.

Association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and newly diagnosed hypertension during pregnancy: prospective, population based cohort study.

Objective: To study the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and newly diagnosed hypertension during pregnancy. Design: Prospective, population based cohort study. Setting: All singleton pregnancies after 22 completed gestational weeks registered in the Swedish Pregnancy Register and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, from 1 March 2020 to 24 May 2022. Participants: 312 456 individuals available for analysis (201 770 in Sweden and 110 686 in Norway), with pregnancies that reached 42 completed gestational weeks by the end of follow-up in the pregnancy registries, excluding individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection before pregnancy and those with a diagnosis of pre-existing hypertension or onset of hypertension before 20 gestational weeks. Main outcome measures: Newly diagnosed hypertension during pregnancy was defined as a composite outcome of a diagnosis of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, HELLP (haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) syndrome, or eclampsia, from gestational week 20 to one week after delivery. The association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and hypertension during pregnancy was investigated with a stratified Cox proportional hazard model, adjusting for maternal age, body mass index, parity, smoking, region of birth, education, income, coexisting medical conditions, previous hypertension during pregnancy, number of healthcare visits during the past year, and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Pre-eclampsia was also analysed as a separate outcome. Results: Of 312 456 individuals available for analysis, 8% (n=24 566) had SARS-CoV-2 infection any time during pregnancy, 6% (n=18 051) had a diagnosis of hypertension during pregnancy, and 3% (9899) had pre-eclampsia. SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of hypertension during pregnancy (adjusted hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.04) or pre-eclampsia (0.98, 0.87 to 1.10). The results were similar for SARS-CoV-2 infection in all gestational trimesters and in different time periods that corresponded to dominance of different variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Conclusions: This population based study did not find any evidence of an association between SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and an increased risk of hypertension during pregnancy or pre-eclampsia.

The association between undetected small-for-gestational age and abnormal admission cardiotocography: A registry-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between undetected small-for-gestational age (SGA) fetuses and abnormal admission cardiotocography (admCTG) in a low-risk population. DESIGN: An observational study. SETTING: Four hospitals in Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden. SAMPLE: A cohort of 127 461 deliveries between 1 February 2012 and 15 June 2020. METHODS: This cohort was linked to the Swedish Neonatal Quality Register. Pregnancies were designated as high or low risk at the time of admission to the labour ward according to pre-defined risk measures. SGA was defined as a birthweight at or below the tenth centile and at or below the third centile for gestational age. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was the proportion of undetected SGA by admCTG (normal or abnormal). The secondary outcome was a composite severe adverse neonatal outcome for fetuses born less than 6 hours after admission (Apgar score <4 at 5 minutes, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy grade of 2-3, neonatal seizures and neonatal death). RESULTS: The rate of abnormal admCTG was 4.9%. The proportion of SGA at or below the tenth centile was higher in the abnormal admCTG group than in the normal admCTG group, 18.6% versus 9.7% (odds ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.9-2.3). Abnormal admCTG and SGA (≤10th) was associated with a more than 20-fold increased risk of an adverse outcome compared with normal admCTG and non-SGA (adjusted odds ratio 23.7, 95% CI 9.8-57.3). The latter had a risk of 1/2000 of an adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In this low-risk population, undetected SGA fetuses were more prone to having abnormal admCTG and had a substantially higher risk of severe adverse neonatal outcomes.

The effect of organizational belonging and profession on clinicians' attitudes toward supporting vaginal birth and interprofessional teamwork-a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of organizational belonging and profession on clinicians' attitudes toward supporting vaginal birth and interprofessional teamwork in Swedish maternity care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study used a cross-sectional design, with a web-based survey sent to midwives, physicians and nurse assistants at five labor wards in Sweden. The survey consisted of two validated scales: the Swedish version of the Labor Culture Survey (S-LCS), measuring attitudes toward supporting vaginal birth, and the Assessment of Collaborative Environments (ACE-15), measuring attitudes toward interprofessional teamwork. Two-way ANOVA was conducted to assess the main effect of and interaction effect between organizational belonging and profession for the different subscales of the S-LCS and the ACE-15, together with Tukey's honest significant difference post-hoc analysis and partial eta squared to determine effect size. The relation between the subscales was assessed using the Pearson's correlation analysis. RESULTS: A total of 539 midwives, physicians and nurse assistants completed the survey. Organizational belonging significantly influenced attitudes toward supporting vaginal birth and interprofessional teamwork, with the largest effect for Positive team culture (F = 38.88, effect size = 0.25, p < 0.001). The effect of profession was strongest for the subscale Best practices (F = 59.43, effect size = 0.20, p < 0.001), with midwives being more supportive of strategies proposed to support vaginal birth than physicians and nurse assistants. A significant interaction effect was found for four of the subscales of the S-LCS, with the strongest effect for items reflecting the Unpredictability of vaginal birth (F = 4.49, effect size = 0.07, p < 0.001). Labor ward culture (unit microculture) specifically related to supporting vaginal birth was strongly correlated to interprofessional teamwork (r = 0.598, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, both organizational belonging and profession influenced attitudes toward supporting vaginal birth and interprofessional teamwork. Positive team culture was positively correlated to an organizational culture supportive of vaginal birth. Interventions to support vaginal births should include efforts to strengthen teamwork between professions, as well as considering women's values, preferences and informed choices.

The Stockholm-Gotland perinatal cohort-A population-based cohort including longitudinal data throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period.

BACKGROUND: Register-based reproductive and perinatal databases rarely contain detailed information from medical records or repeated measurements throughout pregnancy and delivery. This lack of enriched pregnancy and birth data led to the initiation of the Swedish Stockholm-Gotland Perinatal Cohort (SGPC). OBJECTIVES: To describe the strengths of the SGPC, as well as the unique research questions that can be addressed using this cohort. POPULATION: The SGPC is a prospectively collected, population-based cohort that includes all births (from 22 completed gestational weeks onwards) between 1 January 2008 and 15 June 2020 in the Stockholm and Gotland regions of Sweden (335,153 singleton and 11,025 multiple pregnancies). DESIGN: Descriptive study. METHODS: The SGPC is based on the electronic medical records of women and their infants. The medical record system is used for all antenatal clinic visits and admissions, delivery and neonatal admissions, as well as postpartum clinical visits. SGPC has been further enriched with data linkages to 10 Swedish National Health Care and Quality Registers. PRELIMINARY RESULTS: In contrast to other reproductive and perinatal databases available in Sweden, including the Medical Birth Register and the Pregnancy Register, SGPC contains highly detailed medical record data, including time-varying serial measurements for physiological parameters throughout pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum, for both mother and infant. These strengths have enabled studies that were previously inconceivable; the effects of serial measurements of pregnancy weight gain, changes in haemoglobin counts and blood pressure during pregnancy, fetal weight estimations by ultrasound, duration of stages and phases of labour, cervical dilatation and oxytocin use during delivery, and constructing reference curves for umbilical cord pH. CONCLUSIONS: The SGPC-with its rich content, repeated measurements and linkages to numerous health care and quality registers-is a unique cohort that enables high-quality perinatal studies that would otherwise not be possible.

Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in relation to early pregnancy and gestational weight gain before diagnosis: A population-based cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy complication associated with adverse consequences for the mother and offspring in both short and long term. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between risk of GDM and gestational weight gain in early pregnancy and before diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our population-based cohort study included 131 164 singleton pregnancies in the Stockholm-Gotland region in Sweden from 2008 through 2013. The exposures were weight gain in early pregnancy (<22 weeks) and weight gain before diagnosis, standardized into gestational age-specific z scores. The outcome was GDM. We used logistic regression models with a generalized estimating equations method to estimate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for GDM, stratified by early-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) category. RESULTS: Above average weight gain before diagnosis (z score >0) was associated with increased risk of GDM among all BMI groups except for obese III. Early gestational weight gain above average was associated with increased risk for GDM in overweight women. Below average weight gain before diagnosis (z score <0) was only associated with decreased risk of GDM in obese III. Early gestational weight gain below average was associated with reduced risks of GDM in obese class I, II, and III women. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of GDM increased with higher weight gain before diagnosis in all BMI groups except obese class III, whereas the risk was reduced with lower weight gain before diagnosis in obese III women only. The risk of GDM increased with higher early gestational weight gain in overweight women, while the risk was reduced with lower early gestational weight gain among obese women. Obese women may benefit from lower weight gain, especially in early pregnancy.

Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Psoriatic Arthritis in Relation to Presence and Timing of Antirheumatic Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pregnancy outcomes in relation to antirheumatic treatment before and during pregnancy, as a proxy of disease severity in pregnant women with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), compared to those without PsA. METHODS: Our study focused on a Swedish nationwide registry-based cohort study that included 921 PsA pregnancies and 9,210 non-PsA pregnancies occurring between 2007 and 2017 (matched 1:10 based on maternal age, year of delivery, and parity). We estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) overall, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and stratified by presence, timing, and type of antirheumatic treatment. Adjustments were made for maternal body mass index, smoking, education level, and country of birth. The outcome of preterm birth was also stratified by parity. RESULTS: Pregnant women with PsA versus those without PsA were more obese, more often smokers, and more frequently had a diagnosis of pregestational hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Increased risks in PsA pregnancies versus non-PsA pregnancies were primarily preterm birth (adjusted OR 1.69 [95% CI 1.27-2.24]) and cesarean delivery (adjusted OR 1.77 [95% CI 1.43-2.20] for elective delivery, and adjusted OR 1.42 [95% CI 1.10-1.84] for emergency delivery). The risks differed according to the presence, timing, and type of antirheumatic treatment, with the most increased risk in PsA pregnancies (versus non-PsA) occurring with antirheumatic treatment during pregnancy (adjusted OR 2.30 [95% CI 1.49-3.56] for preterm birth). The corresponding adjusted OR for preterm birth in women with PsA who were exposed specifically to biologic treatment during pregnancy was 4.49 [95% CI 2.60-7.79]. Risk of preterm birth was primarily increased in first pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Compared to non-PsA pregnancies, risks of preterm birth and cesarean delivery were mostly increased in those exposed to antirheumatic treatment during pregnancy, especially biologic treatments. As parity influences the risk of preterm birth in women with PsA, special attention to first pregnancies is warranted. Women with PsA should receive individualized monitoring during pregnancy.

Long-term risk of anaemia after bariatric surgery: results from the Swedish Obese Subjects study.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional deficiencies, such as iron and vitamin B12 deficiencies, are potential adverse consequences of bariatric surgery. Long-term data on anaemia after bariatric surgery are largely lacking. We aimed to investigate the risk of anaemia, iron and vitamin B12 deficiency anaemia, and vitamin B12 deficiency over 20 years in individuals who had bariatric surgery or received usual obesity care. METHODS: The prospective, controlled Swedish Obese Subjects study recruited people with obesity via recruitment campaigns in the mass media and at primary health-care centres, and was done at 480 primary health-care centres and in 25 surgical departments in Sweden. Eligible participants were aged 37-60 years and had a BMI of either 34 kg/m2 or more (for men) or 38 kg/m2 or more (for women). Participants were excluded if they had undergone previous bariatric surgery or had contraindicating conditions. Two main groups were formed: those who chose bariatric surgery, the type of which was determined by the operating surgeon, and a contemporaneously matched control group, created by use of 18 matching variables, who received usual non-surgical obesity care that ranged from lifestyle advice to no treatment. Haemoglobin concentration was measured during examination visits at baseline and at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 6 years, 8 years, 10 years, 15 years, and 20 years of follow-up. Anaemia was defined as a haemoglobin concentration of less than 120 g/L for women and 130 g/L for men. The primary, non-specified outcome was the incidence of anaemia, and was assessed in the as-treated population, which comprised only patients who received the actual treatment. The associations between treatment type and anaemia are expressed as unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and HRs adjusted for age, sex, BMI, menopausal status, education, diabetes, and hypertension, with 95% CIs. This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01479452, and is closed to new participants, with follow-up ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Sept 1, 1987, and Jan 31, 2001, 6905 individuals were assessed for eligibility, of whom 5335 were eligible. Of these, we included 2007 patients who chose bariatric surgery (266 in the gastric bypass group, 1365 in the vertical-banded gastroplasty group, and 376 in the gastric banding group) and 2040 matched controls who received usual obesity care. During a maximum of 20 years and a median of 10 years (IQR 3-20) of follow-up, there were 133 anaemia events in the gastric bypass group, 359 in the vertical-banded gastroplasty group, 101 in the gastric banding group, and 261 in the control group. Compared with the control group (13 cases per 1000 person-years, 95% CI 11-14), the incidence of anaemia was higher in the gastric bypass group (64 cases per 1000 person-years, 53-74; HR 5·05, 95% CI 3·94-6·48; p<0·0001), the vertical-banded gastroplasty group (23 cases per 1000 person-years, 21-26; 2·67, 2·25-3·18; p<0·0001), and the gastric banding group (26 per 1000 person-years, 21-31; 2·76, 2·15-3·52; p<0·0001). These associations remained after adjustment. INTERPRETATION: Our findings highlight the increased risk of anaemia after bariatric surgery and the importance of long-term compliance to nutritional supplementation and monitoring to enable prevention and early detection of serious nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery. FUNDING: Swedish Research Council, the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish Government and the county councils, the Swedish Diabetes Foundation, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, and the Novo Nordisk Foundation.

Gestational weight gain and delivery outcomes: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Gestational weight gain is a modifiable factor that could impact maternal and infant health. However, its effect on delivery outcomes is not well established. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the associations between gestational weight gain and delivery outcomes stratified by early-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). METHODS: The study population included singleton livebirths in the Stockholm-Gotland obstetric cohort (January 2008 to October 2014; n = 174 953). The exposure was total gestational weight gain standardised into gestational-age-specific z-scores by using previously defined Swedish pregnancy weight gain-for-gestational age charts. The outcomes included caesarean delivery (overall, elective, and emergency), instrumental vaginal delivery, induction of labour, and postpartum haemorrhage. Confounders included maternal age, maternal height, parity, smoking status, cohabitation status, chronic hypertension, and pre-pregnancy diabetes. Logistic regression models with marginal standardisation were used to estimate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each delivery outcome stratified by early-pregnancy BMI. RESULTS: Above average weight gain (z-score ≥ 0.50 SD) increased risks of caesarean delivery (from RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00, 1.15 to RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.35, 1.55 across BMI groups), induction of labour (from RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04, 1.23 to RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.25, 1.51 across BMI groups except underweight), and postpartum haemorrhage (from RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07, 1.19 to RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09, 1.41 among normal and overweight). Below average weight gain (z-score <-0.50 SD) decreased caesarean delivery risk (from RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61, 0.93 to RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84, 0.95 across BMI groups except underweight). CONCLUSIONS: In normal and overweight women, the risks of caesarean delivery, induction of labour, and postpartum haemorrhage increased with gestational weight gain. In obese women, higher gestational weight gain increased risks of caesarean delivery and induction of labour. Low gestational weight gain reduced risk of caesarean delivery in all BMI groups except underweight.

Violent crime among Swedish military veterans after deployment to Afghanistan: a population-based matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of violent crime conviction among Swedish military veterans after deployment to Afghanistan versus non-deployed comparators. The main outcome was first conviction of a violent crime, retrieved from the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention Register until December 31, 2013. METHODS: This was a cohort study of military veterans identified through personnel registers regarding deployment to Afghanistan between 2002 and 2013 (n = 5894). To each military veteran, up to five non-deployed comparators identified via the Military Service Conscription Register were matched by age, sex, conscription year, cognitive ability, psychological assessment, self-reported mental health, body mass index, antidepressants/anxiolytics prescriptions and self-harm (fully matched comparators; n = 28 895). Multivariable adjustment was made for substance abuse and previous health care visits with psychiatric diagnoses. An additional comparator group matched only for age, sex and conscription year was also used (age-sex-matched comparators; n = 29 410). RESULTS: During 21 898 person-years of follow-up (median = 3.6 years) there were 26 events among deployed military veterans compared with 98 in non-deployed fully matched comparators [12 vs 9 per 10 000 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.36; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-2.10]. Among non-deployed age-sex-matched comparators there were 170 violent crime convictions (16 per 10 000 person-years; aHR 0.85; 95% CI 0.56-1.29). Factors associated with greater risk of violent crime convictions were younger age, lower scores on cognitive ability tests and psychological assessment, and convictions preceding deployment. CONCLUSION: The violent crime conviction rate after returning from military deployment to Afghanistan was not different compared with non-deployed comparators in individuals without history of violent crime convictions.