Standardized Criteria Increases Palliative Care Consultation Utilization in Patients With End-Stage Liver Disease: A Pilot Study.

Context: Patients with end-stage liver disease have high symptom burden and high healthcare utilization, which may be improved by palliative care consultation. Objectives: We sought to determine if implementing standardized palliative care consultation criteria in hospitalized patients with end-stage liver disease would increase palliative care utilization and improve patient outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with end-stage liver disease. Patients under the age of 18, received a previous liver transplant, or admitted for liver transplantation were not included. Patients with end-stage liver disease meeting two or more of the following criteria were included: (i)Child Pugh C cirrhosis, (ii)2 or more liver related hospitalizations within 6 months, (iii) current alcohol use with alcoholic cirrhosis, and (iv) unsuitable for transplantation work up. We compared consults before and after implementation of the criteria, and we compared outcomes in patients who did and did not see palliative care. Results: With implementation, consults increased (2/25 (8%) vs 11/33 (33%), p = .020). Palliative care was associated with higher completion of health care representative documentation (66.7% vs 35.7%, P = .20) and physician orders for scope of treatment forms (16.7% vs 0%, P = 0.13). Patients seen by palliative care had a higher rate of discharges with hospice (30.8% vs 0, P = .002). Conclusions: Implementation of standardized palliative care consultation criteria for patients with end-stage liver disease increased palliative care utilization. Patients seen by palliative care had increased discharges with hospice services and a trend towards higher completion rates of advanced directives.

Hospital Opioid Usage and Adverse Events in Patients With End-Stage Liver Disease.

CONTEXT: Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) commonly experience pain and other symptoms that result in a poor quality of life. Few studies have examined opioid usage, adverse events (AEs), and other outcomes in ESLD patients receiving opioid analgesia. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare outcomes in ESLD patients who received opioids to those who did not and to determine risk factors for AEs. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-cohort study of 270 hospitalized patients with ESLD that used administrative and clinical data from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: Two-thirds of patients with ESLD admitted during the study period received at least one opioid analgesic. Patients who received opioids presented with a greater number of liver related complications and higher rates of anxiety (32% vs. 17%, P= 0.007), had substantially worse initial and average pain scores (both P< 0.001), and received more palliative care consultations. The opioid group had somewhat more respiratory (22.2% vs. 11.1%, P= 0.02) and gastrointestinal (38.5% vs. 25.2%, P= 0.03) AEs, but no increase in CNS adverse events which included hepatic encephalopathy. Anxiety and disease severity (i.e., the number of liver related complications) but not opioid administration were risk factors for the number of AEs. CONCLUSION: Opioid administration was not an independent risk factor for the number of AEs in hospitalized patients with ESLD, whereas anxiety and more liver-related complications increased AE risk. Our findings suggest that opioids have an appropriate and reasonably safe role in alleviation of pain in patients with ESLD.

Palliative Care, Patient-Reported Measures, and Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Cirrhosis.

CONTEXT: Studies of palliative care (PC) in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis have been retrospective, with limited evaluation of patient-reported measures and outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between PC, patient-reported measures (quality of life and functional status), and outcomes. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis hospitalized from 2014 to 2019. We recorded PC consultation details, quality of life (chronic liver disease questionnaire), and functional status (functional status questionnaire). Patients were followed for 90 days to assess readmissions, costs, and mortality. RESULTS: Seventy-four of 679 patients saw PC, often later in the hospitalization (median hospital day 8; IQR 4-16). Those who saw PC had greater Charlson comorbidity index (mean 6.8 vs. 5.9), MELD (mean 25 vs. 20), and prior 30-day admission (47% vs. 35%). Compared to those who did not see PC, PC patients had greater impairments in intermediate activities of daily living (83% vs. 72%), social activity (72% vs. 59%), quality of interactions (49% vs. 36%), abdominal symptoms (mean score 3.1 vs. 3.6), activity (mean 3.3 vs. 3.6), and overall quality of life (mean 3.6 vs. 3.8). PC was associated with fewer transfusions and upper endoscopies and with greater completion of advanced directives. After multivariable adjustment, PC was not associated with intensive care, 30-day readmissions, 90-day costs, or mortality. CONCLUSION: PC occurs infrequently and late in those with more severe liver disease and functional impairment. PC may be associated with reduction in utilization and greater completion of advanced directives. Randomized trials are needed to evaluate PC for this population.

Hospice care for end stage liver disease in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) have impaired physical, psychological, and social functions, which can diminish patient quality of life, burden family caregivers, and increase health-care utilization. For those with a life expectancy of less than six months, these impairments and their downstream effects can be addressed effectively through high-quality hospice care, delivered by multidisciplinary teams and focused on the physical, emotional, social, and spiritual wellbeing of patients and caregivers, with a goal of improving quality of life. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we examine the evidence supporting hospice for ESLD, we compare this evidence to that supporting hospice more broadly, and we identify potential criteria that may be useful in determining hospice appropriateness. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the potential for hospice to improve care for those at the end of life, it is underutilized for patients with ESLD. Increasing the appropriate utilization of hospice for ESLD requires a better understanding of patient eligibility, which can be based on predictors of high short-term mortality and liver transplant ineligibility. Such hospice criteria should be data-driven and should accommodate the uncertainty faced by patients and physicians.

The Impact of Obesity in End of Life Care in Patients With End Stage Liver Disease: An Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Both obesity and end stage liver disease (ESLD) are increasing. Obesity's impact on hospice and palliative care in patients with ESLD is unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients admitted to an academic, Midwestern, tertiary center between January 2016 and May 2019 with a diagnosis of ESLD. Body Mass Index and MELD Na were calculated for each patient's first admission during the study period. Patients with MELD Na scores ≥ 21 or 18-20 with additional criteria were considered potentially eligible for hospice and palliative care referrals. RESULTS: Of 3863 patients admitted with ESLD, 1556 (40%) were potentially eligible for hospice and palliative care referrals. Of these, 703 (45%) were obese. Comorbidity burden was higher in obese patients (15.6% of obese patients had a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 5, while 5% of non-obese patients had a comorbidity index of ≥ 5 (p < 0.001). Referral rates to hospice and palliative services in obese patients were 10.1% and 16.4% respectively. Hospice and palliative referral rates among non-obese patients were similar (10.1% and 15.5%). Among patients who died within 6 months of the first hospitalization, the mean time to referral to hospice or palliative care from index admission was longer in obese patients. CONCLUSION: Obesity is common in patients hospitalized with ESLD who may be approaching the end of life. Referral rates to hospice and palliative care services are low and similar regardless of BMI and despite higher co-morbidity burdens in obese patients. Obesity may delay referrals to hospice and palliative care.

Palliative Care and Hospice Referrals in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis: What Factors Are Important?

Background: Palliative care (PC) and hospice care are underutilized for patients with end-stage liver disease, but factors associated with these patterns of utilization are not well understood. Objective: We examined patient-level factors associated with both PC and hospice referrals in patients with decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting/Subjects: Patients with DC hospitalized at a single tertiary center and followed for one year. Measurements: We assessed PC and hospice referrals during follow-up and examined patient-level factors associated with the receipt of PC and/or hospice, as well as associated clinical outcomes. We also examined late referrals (within one week of death). Results: Of 397 patients, 61 (15.4%) were referred to PC, 71 (17.9%) were referred to hospice, and 99 (24.9%) were referred to PC and/or hospice. Two hundred patients (50.4%) died during the one-year follow-up. In multivariable logistic regression, referral to PC was associated with increased comorbidity burden, ascites, increased MELD (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease)-Na score, lack of listing for liver transplant, and unmarried status. Hospice referral was associated with increased comorbidities, portal vein thrombosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. PC referrals were late in 68.5% of cases, and hospice referrals were late in 62.7%. Late PC referrals were associated with younger age and married status. Late hospice referrals were associated with younger age and recent alcohol use. Conclusions: PC and hospice is underutilized in patients with DC, and most referrals are late. Patient-level factors associated with these referrals differ between PC and hospice.

Role of osteopathic structural diagnosis and osteopathic manipulative treatment for diabetes mellitus and its complications.

Osteopathic physicians have a unique opportunity to affect the US epidemic of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Osteopathic physicians make up a disproportionately high number of primary care physicians who are on the front lines of managing T2DM. In addition, the unique training of osteopathic physicians allows them to direct additional diagnostic and treatment modalities toward the musculoskeletal complications of diabetes. The present review surveys the literature that explores the effects of osteopathic structural diagnosis of and osteopathic manipulative treatment for T2DM, as well as the management and prevention of complications. The authors reviewed the databases for PubMed, Google Scholar, and The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. Although the available literature is limited, the authors identify areas in which osteopathic-focused research has shown benefits and in which future research should be directed.

An osteopathic approach to type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has reached epidemic proportions in the United States, the impact of which is seen in all medical practices. The tenets of osteopathic medicine are readily applicable to a proactive approach to patients with T2DM and are (1) the body is a unit; the person is a unit of body, mind, and spirit; (2) the body is capable of self-regulation, self-healing, and health maintenance; (3) structure and function are reciprocally interrelated; and (4) rational treatment is based upon an understanding of these basic principles. The authors examine the evidence that supports the application of these tenets to the prevention and management of T2DM and cover topics including the removal of noxious stimuli to help the body function optimally; the musculoskeletal system's role in disease prevention and management; the dynamic interaction of body, mind, and spirit, all 3 of which must be addressed to maintain health and limit disease; and intrinsic and extrinsic forces that can either promote or provoke a person's health.