Prevalence of Epilepsy in People of Sexual and Gender Minoritized Groups.

Importance: Epilepsy is a highly treatable condition for many people, but there are large treatment gaps with suboptimal seizure control in minoritized groups. The sexual and gender minority (SGM) community is at risk for health disparities, yet the burden of epilepsy in this community is not known. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of active epilepsy among SGM people in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey study of community-dwelling US adults who answered questions about epilepsy, sexual orientation, and gender identity in the 2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Exposure: Self-identification of transgender or gender-diverse identity, or sexual orientation including gay, lesbian, bisexual, or other orientation, excluding straight (ie, heterosexual). Main Outcomes and Measures: Participants self-reported epilepsy status, medical treatment, seizure frequency, demographic characteristics, sexual orientation, and gender identity. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association of epilepsy with SGM identification. Results: A total of 27 624 participants (15 050 [54%] women; 3231 [12%] Black; mean [SD] age, 48.2 [18.5] years) completed the NHIS and were included. Active epilepsy was present in 1.2% (95% CI, 1.0%-1.3%) of the population. A higher proportion of SGM adults than non-SGM adults reported active epilepsy (2.4% [95% CI, 1.4%-3.3%] vs 1.1% [95% CI, 1.0%-1.3%], respectively). After adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, income, and education, SGM people were more than twice as likely to report active epilepsy than were non-SGM adults (adjusted odds ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.35-3.37). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that SGM adults in the United States have a disproportionate prevalence of epilepsy. The reasons for this disparity are likely complex and may be associated with biological and psychosocial determinants of health unique to this population; as such, these individuals are in need of protected access to medical care.

Guidelines for Seizure Prophylaxis in Adults Hospitalized with Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Clinical Practice Guideline for Health Care Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society.

BACKGROUND: There is practice heterogeneity in the use, type, and duration of prophylactic antiseizure medications (ASMs) in patients with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles assessing ASM prophylaxis in adults with moderate-severe TBI (acute radiographic findings and requiring hospitalization). The population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) questions were as follows: (1) Should ASM versus no ASM be used in patients with moderate-severe TBI and no history of clinical or electrographic seizures? (2) If an ASM is used, should levetiracetam (LEV) or phenytoin/fosphenytoin (PHT/fPHT) be preferentially used? (3) If an ASM is used, should a long versus short (> 7 vs. ≤ 7 days) duration of prophylaxis be used? The main outcomes were early seizure, late seizure, adverse events, mortality, and functional outcomes. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to generate recommendations. RESULTS: The initial literature search yielded 1998 articles, of which 33 formed the basis of the recommendations: PICO 1: We did not detect any significant positive or negative effect of ASM compared to no ASM on the outcomes of early seizure, late seizure, adverse events, or mortality. PICO 2: We did not detect any significant positive or negative effect of PHT/fPHT compared to LEV for early seizures or mortality, though point estimates suggest fewer late seizures and fewer adverse events with LEV. PICO 3: There were no significant differences in early or late seizures with longer versus shorter ASM use, though cognitive outcomes and adverse events appear worse with protracted use. CONCLUSIONS: Based on GRADE criteria, we suggest that ASM or no ASM may be used in patients hospitalized with moderate-severe TBI (weak recommendation, low quality of evidence). If used, we suggest LEV over PHT/fPHT (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence) for a short duration (≤ 7 days, weak recommendation, low quality of evidence).

Guidelines for seizure prophylaxis in adults hospitalized with moderate­severe traumatic brain injury: a clinical practice guideline for health care professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society

There is practice heterogeneity in the use, type, and duration of prophylactic antiseizure medications (ASMs) in patients with moderate­severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles assessing ASM prophylaxis in adults with moderate­severe TBI (acute radiographic findings and requiring hospitalization). The population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) questions were as follows: (1) Should ASM versus no ASM be used in patients with moderate­severe TBI and no history of clinical or electrographic seizures? (2) If an ASM is used, should levetiracetam (LEV) or phenytoin/fosphenytoin (PHT/fPHT) be preferentially used? (3) If an ASM is used, should a long versus short (> 7 vs. ≤ 7 days) duration of prophylaxis be used? The main outcomes were early seizure, late seizure, adverse events, mortality, and functional outcomes. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to generate recommendations. The initial literature search yielded 1998 articles, of which 33 formed the basis of the recommendations: PICO 1: We did not detect any significant positive or negative effect of ASM compared to no ASM on the outcomes of early seizure, late seizure, adverse events, or mortality. PICO 2: We did not detect any significant positive or negative effect of PHT/fPHT compared to LEV for early seizures or mortality, though point estimates suggest fewer late seizures and fewer adverse events with LEV. PICO 3: There were no significant differences in early or late seizures with longer versus shorter ASM use, though cognitive outcomes and adverse events appear worse with protracted use. Based on GRADE criteria, we suggest that ASM or no ASM may be used in patients hospitalized with moderate­severe TBI (weak recommendation, low quality of evidence). If used, we suggest LEV over PHT/fPHT (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence) for a short duration (≤ 7 days, weak recommendation, low quality of evidence).

Posttraumatic Epilepsy and Dementia Risk.

Importance: Although both head injury and epilepsy are associated with long-term dementia risk, posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) has only been evaluated in association with short-term cognitive outcomes. Objective: To investigate associations of PTE with dementia risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study initially enrolled participants from 1987 to 1989 and this prospective cohort study uses data through December 31, 2019, with a median follow-up of 25 years. Data were analyzed between March 14, 2023, and January 2, 2024. The study took place in 4 US communities in Minnesota, Maryland, North Carolina, and Mississippi. Of 15 792 ARIC study participants initially enrolled, 2061 were ineligible and 1173 were excluded for missing data, resulting in 12 558 included participants. Exposures: Head injury was defined by self-report and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic codes. Seizure/epilepsy was defined using ICD codes. PTE was defined as a diagnosis of seizure/epilepsy occurring more than 7 days after head injury. Head injury, seizure/epilepsy, and PTE were analyzed as time-varying exposures. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dementia was defined using cognitive assessments, informant interviews, and ICD and death certificate codes. Adjusted Cox and Fine and Gray proportional hazards models were used to estimate dementia risk. Results: Participants had a mean (SD) age of 54.3 (5.8) years at baseline, 57.7% were female, 28.2% were of self-reported Black race, 14.4% were ultimately categorized as having head injury, 5.1% as having seizure/epilepsy, and 1.2% as having PTE. Over a median follow-up of 25 (25th to 75th percentile, 17-30) years, 19.9% developed dementia. In fully adjusted models, compared with no head injury and no seizure/epilepsy, PTE was associated with 4.56 (95% CI, 4.49-5.95) times the risk of dementia, while seizure/epilepsy was associated with 2.61 (95% CI, 2.21-3.07) times the risk and head injury with 1.63 (95% CI, 1.47-1.80) times the risk. The risk of dementia associated with PTE was significantly higher than the risk associated with head injury alone and with nontraumatic seizure/epilepsy alone. Results were slightly attenuated in models accounting for the competing risks of mortality and stroke, but patterns of association remained similar. In secondary analyses, the increased dementia risk associated with PTE occurring after first vs second head injury and after mild vs moderate/severe injury was similar. Conclusions and Relevance: In this community-based cohort, there was an increased risk of dementia associated with PTE that was significantly higher than the risk associated with head injury or seizure/epilepsy alone. These findings provide evidence that PTE is associated with long-term outcomes and supports both the prevention of head injuries via public health measures and further research into the underlying mechanisms and the risk factors for the development of PTE, so that efforts can also be focused on the prevention of PTE after a head injury.

Association between structural brain MRI abnormalities and epilepsy in older adults.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between brain MRI abnormalities and incident epilepsy in older adults. METHODS: Men and women (ages 45-64 years) from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study were followed up from 1987 to 2018 with brain MRI performed between 2011 and 2013. We identified cases of incident late-onset epilepsy (LOE) with onset of seizures occurring after the acquisition of brain MRI. We evaluated the relative pattern of cortical thickness, subcortical volume, and white matter integrity among participants with incident LOE after MRI in comparison with participants without seizures. We examined the association between MRI abnormalities and incident LOE using Cox proportional hazards regression. Models were adjusted for demographics, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, stroke, and dementia status. RESULTS: Among 1251 participants with brain MRI data, 27 (2.2%) developed LOE after MRI over a median of 6.4 years (25-75 percentile 5.8-6.9) of follow-up. Participants with incident LOE after MRI had higher levels of cortical thinning and white matter microstructural abnormalities before seizure onset compared to those without seizures. In longitudinal analyses, greater number of abnormalities was associated with incident LOE after controlling for demographic factors, risk factors for cardiovascular disease, stroke, and dementia (gray matter: hazard ratio [HR]: 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-4.9; white matter diffusivity: HR: 3.0, 95% CI: 1.2-7.3). INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrates considerable gray and white matter pathology among individuals with LOE, which is present prior to the onset of seizures and provides important insights into the role of neurodegeneration, both of gray and white matter, and the risk of LOE.