Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Ann Deaf ; 157(5): 439-49, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23505839

RESUMO

The effective initial preparation and ongoing support of teachers of students who are deaf and hard of hearing has always been a difficult and controversial task. Changes in student demographic characteristics and educational settings, combined with the rapidly diminishing number and diversity of deaf education teacher preparation (DETP) programs, indicate that the field of deaf education may be at a tipping point. In the present article, the author establishes the dimensions of the current problems and proposes specific solutions to increase the accessibility and effectiveness of DETP programs that would simultaneously enhance the supply, retention, and instructional effectiveness of teachers of students who are deaf and hard of hearing.


Assuntos
Surdez/reabilitação , Educação de Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/organização & administração , Educação de Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/tendências , Docentes/organização & administração , Docentes/provisão & distribuição , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Organizacionais , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Tecnologia/tendências , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am Ann Deaf ; 157(4): 326-39, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23259352

RESUMO

Choosing a method of communication for a child with hearing loss is a complex process that must occur early to prevent developmental consequences. Research shows that parents' decisions are influenced by professionals; parental attitudes and knowledge also may be influential. The present study investigated additional influences on parents' choices; data were collected via an online survey (N = 36). Results indicated no effects of parents' knowledge of development on their communication choices, but did indicate an effect of parents' values and priorities for their children. Further, parents who chose speech only received information from education or speech/audiology professionals more often. However, there were no group differences in sources parents cited as influential; all parents relied on their own judgment. Results suggest that parents internalize the opinions of professionals. Thus, accurate information from professionals is necessary for parents to make informed decisions about their children's communication.


Assuntos
Comportamento de Escolha , Comunicação , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva , Perda Auditiva/reabilitação , Pais/psicologia , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/reabilitação , Acesso à Informação , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Atitude , Criança , Desenvolvimento Infantil , Pré-Escolar , Implante Coclear , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia , Intervenção Médica Precoce , Feminino , Auxiliares de Audição , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva/psicologia , Humanos , Lactente , Internet , Julgamento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Pais-Filho , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia , Relações Profissional-Família , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Língua de Sinais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fala , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Clin Oncol ; 26(32): 5248-53, 2008 Nov 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18768432

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of depot octreotide for the prevention of diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy (planned minimum dose, 45 Gy; 1.7 to 2.1 Gy daily) were eligible for the study. From May 10, 2002, through October 14, 2005, 125 patients were randomly allocated in a double-blind fashion to receive octreotide (100 microg, administered subcutaneously on day 1, followed by depot octreotide, 20 mg, administered intramuscularly on days 2 and 29; n = 62) or to receive a placebo (n = 63). RESULTS: Grade 0, 1, 2, and 3 diarrhea were observed in 18%, 31%, 31%, and 21% of patients in the octreotide arm, respectively, and in 25%, 32%, 22%, and 21% of patients in the placebo arm, respectively (P = .64). Grade 0, 1, 2, and 3 abdominal cramps were observed in 32%, 45%, 21%, and 2% of patients receiving octreotide, respectively, and in 51%, 24%, 21%, and 5% of patients receiving the placebo, respectively (P = .053). Some patient-reported symptoms were worse in the octreotide group, including nocturnal bowel movements (70% v 45%; P = .004), clustering of bowel movements (90% v 69%; P = .004), and bleeding with bowel movements (57% v 35%; P = .01). CONCLUSION: As administered in this study, octreotide did not decrease diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy. Some gastrointestinal symptoms were worse in patients treated with octreotide. Octreotide is not indicated for prevention of diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy.


Assuntos
Antidiarreicos/administração & dosagem , Diarreia/prevenção & controle , Octreotida/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Pélvicas/radioterapia , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Doença Aguda , Antidiarreicos/efeitos adversos , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Diarreia/etiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino , Octreotida/efeitos adversos , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de Tratamento
6.
Phytopathology ; 93(4): 380, 2003 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18944349
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...