Clinical Efforts Double Disparity for Nonphysician URiM Faculty: Implications for Academic Family Medicine.

With a new definition of high-quality primary care and the shift in nonphysician faculty's role as core faculty members in family medicine residency programs, new attention is needed on the delineation of clinical efforts and clinical efforts disparities across disciplines (eg, psychology, marriage and family therapy, pharmacy) within departments of family medicine. Additionally, those who identify as underrepresented in medicine (URiM), specifically those who are nonphysician faculty, are dually impacted by the clinical efforts double disparity. This paper examines the current landscape of clinical efforts in academic family medicine for physician faculty and nonphysician faculty as well as discusses how to build equity in clinical efforts for nonphysician faculty and URiM faculty within academic family medicine impacted by the double disparity.

Current Practices in Clinical Supervision in Primary Care.

The purpose of this study was to examine current clinical supervision practices within primary care settings. We used a descriptive survey design, which blends quantitative and qualitative data, and examined the current state of clinical supervision practices and approaches in primary care and the type of training the behavioral health consultants received to provide supervision to pre-licensure level behavioral health trainees. Ninety-four participants completed the survey in 2022. Seventy-one percent of respondents felt they had adequate training to be an effective integrated behavioral health (IBH) supervisor; however, most training came from sources, such as workshops, continuing education, or supervision of supervision. Further efforts to establish universal competencies and formal training programs are needed to meet the growing need for IBH services in primary care.

Measurement-based care in integrated health care: A randomized clinical trial.

Introduction: Many suggest that the next step for integrated care is widespread implementation of measurement-based care (MBC). Although the measures most associated with MBC are standardized, no randomized clinical trial has demonstrated their use to improve psychotherapeutic outcomes with embedded behavioral health providers in integrated care. Two evidence-based MBC systems have been studied in a variety of behavioral health environments, but neither system has been investigated in integrated health care. Addressing this gap in the literature, the present study evaluated the use of MBC, specifically the Partners for Change Outcome Management System, in three integrated care sites. Method: Using a randomized design within routine care, treatment as usual (TAU; n = 133) was compared using the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) with a feedback condition (n = 147) in which behavioral health providers had access to patient-generated outcome (ORS only) and alliance information at each session. Results: Patients in the feedback condition demonstrated significantly more improvement than those in the TAU condition posttreatment on the ORS. Patients in the feedback condition also achieved significantly more clinically significant change as measured by both the ORS and PHQ-9. Feedback condition patients also attended significantly more sessions and dropped out significantly less that TAU patients. Discussion: Although our findings need to be replicated, this study offers evidence that the improved outcomes and reduced dropouts associated with MBC in traditional behavioral health centers also occur in integrated care settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Social Support Protects Against Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression: Key Variations in Latinx and Non-Latinx White College Students.

Social support protects against perceived stress and its harmful effects on psychological well-being. College students in general are at high risk for mental health disorders, and Latinx college students face unique stressors placing them at greater risk of psychological distress. Social support may be a key construct in improving outcomes for college students; however, few studies have empirically tested whether the protective effect of social support is equivalent across racial/ethnic groups. Using a series of regression models, we investigated whether social support moderates the relationship between perceived stress and endorsement of depression and anxiety symptoms in Latinx (n = 265) and non-Latinx White college students (n = 216) and whether this moderating effect varied by group membership. Participants completed a series of questionnaires measuring social support, perceived stress, and depression and anxiety symptoms. The moderating effects of social support varied by group membership and outcomes (i.e., depression and anxiety). Social support moderated the relationship between perceived stress and depression symptoms for both Latinx and non-Latinx White students. However, social support only buffered the effect of perceived stress on anxiety symptom endorsement for Latinx college students. These findings suggest that social support does not function uniformly across racial/ethnic groups or the endorsement of depression and anxiety symptoms. Social support may be particularly important for Latinx students by providing a buffer between perceived stress and symptoms of anxiety.

El apoyo social protege contra el estrés y sus efectos en el bienestar psicológico. El riesgo de desarrollar trastornos psicológicos es elevado en estudiantes universitarios. Estudiantes universitarios Latinxs enfrentan situaciones relacionadas con identificatión de minoría que pueden contribuir a una elevación en el riesgo de desarrollar problemas psicológicos. Como tal, el apoyo social es un área clave para la preventión y mejoría del bienestar psicológico. Sin embargo, pocas investigaciones han comparado los efectos protectores del apoyo social a través de raza y etnia. Usamos una serie de modelos de regresión para investigar si el apoyo social modera la relación entre la percepción de estrés y el reporte de síntomas de depresión y ansiedad en estudiantes universitarios Latinxs y anglosajones. Además, investigamos si este efecto de moderación varia en dependencia de la membresía etnia. Participantes completaron una serie de cuestionarios midiendo variables de interés, incluyendo apoyo social, percepcicón de estrés, síntomas de depresión y ansiedad. El apoyo social modera la relación entre la percepcición de estrés y síntomas de depresión en los dos grupos étnicos, Latinxs y anglosajones. Sin embargo, para los síntomas de ansiedad, el efecto protector del apoyo social fue distinto para los estudiantes Latinxs. Estos resultados sugieren que la función del apoyo social no es uniforme a través de grupos étnicos o en términos de protectión contra diferentes problemas psicológicos. El apoyo social es particularmente importante para los estudiantes Latinxs en términos de proveer protectión contra síntomas de ansiedad en la presencia de la perceptión del estrés.

Methodology for task-shifting evidence-based psychological treatments to non-licenced/lay health workers: protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: 'Task-shifting' or 'task-sharing' is an effective strategy for delivering behavioural healthcare in lower resource communities. However, little is known regarding the actual steps (methods) in carrying out a task-shifting project. This paper presents a protocol for a systematic review that will identify steps in adapting an evidence-based psychological treatment for delivery by lay/non-licenced personnel. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review of peer-reviewed, published studies involving a non-licenced, non-specialist (eg, community health worker, promotor/a, peer and lay person) delivering an evidence-based psychological treatment for adults will be conducted. Study design of selected articles must include a statistical comparison (eg, randomised controlled trials, quasiexperimental trials, pre-post designs and pragmatic trials). Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, APA PsycInfo and Google Scholar will be searched from 2000 to 2020. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias (RoB 2) tool, and publication bias will be evaluated with the Cochrane GRADE approach. A narrative synthesis will be conducted for all included studies, and a summary table following Proctor's framework for operationalising implementation strategies will be included. This protocol was developed following the 2015 guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will analyse data from published studies only; thus, it will not require institutional board review. Findings will be presented at conferences, to the broader community via the Community Health Worker Translational Advisory Board and social media, and the final systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.