Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in Asian patients: A pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, has been demonstrated predominantly in Western populations. This study examined the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from eight Phase IIb/III double-blind trials of up to 24 weeks, treated with placebo (n = 497) or dapagliflozin 5 mg (n = 491) or 10 mg (n = 465). METHODS: Efficacy was assessed in the pooled population receiving dapagliflozin 5, 10 mg or placebo over 24 weeks. Safety and tolerability were assessed by collating data for overall adverse events (AEs) and AEs of special interest over the 24-week period. RESULTS: Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable across treatment groups. Placebo-corrected adjusted mean changes from baseline at 24 weeks in the dapagliflozin 5 and 10 mg groups, respectively, were -0.52% and -0.58% for HbA1c and -1.34 and -1.80 kg for body weight. Modest reductions in blood pressure were also noted with dapagliflozin. Overall, 56.5%, 53.6%, and 58.7% of patients in the placebo and dapagliflozin 5 and 10 mg groups, respectively, experienced AEs, compared with 2.8%, 4.1%, and 2.4% experiencing serious AEs. Genital infections were more frequent with dapagliflozin 10 mg than placebo, whereas the pattern for urinary tract infections was less clear. A transient reduction in mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was noted with dapagliflozin, but was not associated with an increased frequency of serious renal AEs. In contrast, placebo-corrected reductions in urinary albumin : creatinine ratio in patients with albuminuria at baseline suggest a potential renoprotective effect of dapagliflozin. CONCLUSION: Dapagliflozin was efficacious and well tolerated in Asian patients with T2DM.

Safety profile of dapagliflozin for type 2 diabetes: pooled analysis of clinical studies for overall safety and rare events.

BACKGROUND: Dapagliflozin reduces hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by increasing urinary glucose excretion. OBJECTIVES: This study determined the overall safety profile of dapagliflozin in T2DM. METHODS: Safety of dapagliflozin in pooled analyses of phase IIb/III studies was evaluated. Patients received comparator or dapagliflozin as monotherapy, add-on to antidiabetic therapy, or as initial combination with metformin. Proportions of patients with adverse events (AEs) and prespecified parameters related to previous clinical observations and dapagliflozin's action were assessed. The principal analysis used data from 12 placebo-controlled studies. Rare events were assessed across phase IIb/III studies, including special populations, comparator-controlled trials and ongoing long-term extensions. RESULTS: In placebo-controlled studies, hypoglycaemia was more common with dapagliflozin (11.8 %) than placebo (7.0 %), with imbalance driven by add-on of dapagliflozin to sulfonylurea or insulin. Urinary tract infections (4.8 vs 3.7 %), vulvovaginitis/balanitis and related infections (5.1 vs 0.9 %), and non-serious volume-related events (0.8 vs 0.4 %) occurred more often with dapagliflozin than placebo. No substantial AEs were seen on electrolytes or renal function. Pyelonephritis was rare and balanced among treatments; there were no imbalances in fractures or liver test elevations. Overall incidence of malignancies was balanced between groups. The incidence rate ratios of malignancy in certain organ systems were slightly lower for dapagliflozin (renal tract, female reproductive) and in others were slightly lower for control (breast, prostate, bladder). Most AEs associated with dapagliflozin were mild/moderate and related to the mechanism of action. CONCLUSION: Dapagliflozin has a favourable and predictable tolerability profile, with reported events related to its mechanism of action.

Urinary tract infections in patients with diabetes treated with dapagliflozin.

AIMS: Urinary tract infection is common in patients with type 2 diabetes. Possible causative factors include glucosuria, which is a result of treatment with sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. Dapagliflozin is an investigative SGLT2 inhibitor with demonstrated glycemic benefits in patients with diabetes. Data from dapagliflozin multi-trial safety data were analyzed to clarify the association between glucosuria and urinary tract infection. METHODS: Safety data from 12 randomized, placebo-controlled trials were pooled to evaluate the relationship between glucosuria and urinary tract infection in patients with inadequately controlled diabetes (HbA1c >6.5%-12%). Patients were treated with dapagliflozin (2.5, 5, or 10mg) or placebo once daily, either as monotherapy or add-on to metformin, insulin, sulfonylurea, or thiazolidinedione for 12-24weeks. The incidence of clinical diagnoses and events suggestive of urinary tract infection were quantified. RESULTS: This analysis included 3152 patients who received once-daily dapagliflozin (2.5mg [n=814], 5mg [n=1145], or 10mg [n=1193]) as monotherapy or add-on treatment, and 1393 placebo-treated patients. For dapagliflozin 2.5mg, 5mg, 10mg, and placebo, diagnosed infections were reported in 3.6%, 5.7%, 4.3%, and 3.7%, respectively. Urinary glucose levels, but not the incidence of urinary tract infection, increased progressively with dapagliflozin dosage. Most identified infections were those considered typical for patients with diabetes. Discontinuations due to urinary tract infection were rare: 8 (0.3%) dapagliflozin-treated patients and 1 (0.1%) placebo-treated patient. Most diagnosed infections were mild to moderate and responded to standard antimicrobial treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of type 2 diabetes with once-daily dapagliflozin 5 or 10mg is accompanied by a slightly increased risk of urinary tract infection. Infections were generally mild to moderate and clinically manageable. This analysis did not demonstrate a definitive dose relationship between glucosuria and urinary tract infection.

Vulvovaginitis and balanitis in patients with diabetes treated with dapagliflozin.

BACKGROUND: Vulvovaginitis, balanitis, and related genital infections are common in patients with type 2 diabetes. Glucosuria, which is an outcome of treatment with sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, is among the possible causes. Dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor with demonstrated glycemic benefits in patients with diabetes, has been studied across a broad spectrum of patients. Analysis of multi-trial safety data may better define the relationship between glucosuria and genital infection. METHODS: Safety data were pooled from 12 randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2b/3 trials to analyze the association of glucosuria with genital infection in patients with suboptimally controlled diabetes (HbA1c >6.5%-12%). Patients were randomized to receive dapagliflozin (2.5mg, 5mg, or 10mg) or placebo once daily, either as monotherapy or add-on to metformin, insulin, sulfonylurea, or thiazolidinedione for 12-24weeks. The incidence of clinical diagnoses and of events suggestive of genital infection was evaluated. RESULTS: The pooled safety data included 4545 patients: 3152 who received once-daily dapagliflozin (2.5mg [n=814], 5mg [n=1145], or 10mg [n=1193]) as monotherapy or add-on treatment, and 1393 placebo-treated patients. For dapagliflozin 2.5mg, 5mg, 10mg, and placebo, diagnosed infections were reported in 4.1%, 5.7%, 4.8%, and 0.9%, respectively. Most infections were mild or moderate and responded to standard antimicrobial treatment. Discontinuation due to these events was rare. No clear dose-response relationship between dapagliflozin and genital infection was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with dapagliflozin 2.5mg, 5mg, or 10mg once daily is accompanied by an increased risk of vulvovaginitis or balanitis, related to the induction of glucosuria. Events were generally mild to moderate, clinically manageable, and rarely led to discontinuation of treatment.

Medical support during the European Union Summit in Gothenburg, Sweden, June 2001.

INTRODUCTION: Several factors are important for the number and severity of medical emergencies during mass-gatherings. The risk of violence, the size and mobility of the crowd, the type of event, weather, and duration of the event all influence the outcome. During the European Union (EU) Summit, from 15-16 June 2001 in Gothenburg, Sweden, approximately 50,000 people participated in 43 protest marches, some which included 15,000 participants. Clashes between police and the protesters occurred. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the amount and character of injuries as well as the medical complaints in relation to the EU Summit. In addition, the aim of this study was to describe the organization and function of the healthcare services provided during the meeting. METHODS: This study is based on the medical records of patients presenting with injuries and other types of medical emergencies at the healthcare stations during the Summit. RESULTS: In total, 143 patients sought medical care. Fifty-three (37.1%) were police officers. Most patients had minor complaints, but a few were seriously injured. The Patient Presentation Rate (PPR) was 2.7. Nine victims were hospitalized as high priority. CONCLUSION: The PPR for the EU Summit was 2.7, which is in the same range as previously reported from other mass-gatherings.