User-centered design of central venous access device documentation.

Objective: Safe care of central venous access devices (CVAD) requires clinicians be able to identify key CVAD properties from insertion until safe removal. Our objective was to design and evaluate interfaces to improve CVAD documentation quality and information retrieval. Materials and Methods: We applied user-centered design (UCD) to CVAD property documentation interfaces. We measured expert agreement and front-line clinician accuracy in retrieving key properties in CVADs documented pre- and postimplementation. Results: The new approach (1) optimized searches for line types, (2) enabled discrete entry of key properties which propagated to the display name, and (3) facilitated error correction by experts. Expert agreement on key CVAD properties improved from 42% to 83% (P < 0.01). Frontline nurses' perception of key CVAD properties improved from 31% to 86% (P < 0.01). Ease of use scores improved from 15/100 to 80/100 (P < 0.01). Conclusions: UCD significantly improved data quality and nurse perception of CVAD properties to guide subsequent care.

Patients with isolated laryngopharyngeal reflux are not obese.

OBJECTIVES: The gastroenterology literature suggests that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is often associated with obesity. The National Institutes of Health uses body mass index (BMI) to identify patients who are overweight (BMI 25-30) or obese (BMI > 30). The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and elevated BMI. STUDY DESIGN: The study involved a retrospective review of 500 pH-probe studies performed consecutively within the department. METHODS: Studies performed on antireflux medication or after fundoplication were excluded. From the included study reports, age, sex, height, weight, use of tobacco or alcohol, and pharyngeal and esophageal probe findings were recorded. After controlling for other factors, the relationship between LPR and BMI was determined and statistical analysis performed. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-five of the 500 pH studies met inclusion criteria. The overall mean BMI was 27.9 +/- 6.42. The mean BMI for patients with normal studies was 25.6 +/- 5.07, for those with isolated LPR 25.9 +/- 6.44, for those with isolated GERD 28.3 +/- 6.81, and for those with globally abnormal studies (LPR and GERD) 28.8 +/- 6.55. Abnormal pharyngeal reflux did not correlate with increasing BMI; however, abnormal esophageal reflux events correlated with increasing BMI (P = .002). The mean number of pharyngeal reflux events was not elevated in obese patients, whereas the mean number of esophageal reflux events was significantly elevated in obese (P = .02) when compared with nonobese patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that pharyngeal reflux is not associated with increasing BMI or obesity in LPR patients. In contrast, abnormal esophageal reflux (GERD) is associated with increasing BMI and obesity. Because of the LPR patient selection bias of this study, these findings may not be applicable to the GERD populations routinely seen by gastroenterologists.