Supramarginal resection of skull base chordomas: proof of concept and preliminary outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The mainstay of treatment for skull base chordoma (SBC) is maximal safe resection followed by radiotherapy. However, even after gross-total resection (GTR), the recurrence rate is high due to microscopic disease in the resection margins. Therefore, supramarginal resection (SMR) could be beneficial, as has been shown for sacral chordoma. The paradigm of postoperative radiation therapy for every patient has also begun to change, as molecular profiling has shown variability in the risk of recurrence. The aim of this study was to present the concept of SMR applied to SBC, along with an individualized decision for postoperative radiation therapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all SBCs operated on by the senior author between 2018 and 2023. SMR was defined as negative histological margins of bone and/or dura mater, along with evidence of bone resection beyond the tumor margins in the craniocaudal and lateral planes on postoperative imaging. Tumors were classified into 3 molecular recurrence risk groups (group A, low risk; group B, intermediate risk; and group C, high risk). Postoperative radiation therapy was indicated in group C tumors, in group B chordomas without SMR, or in cases of patient preference. RESULTS: Twenty-two cases of SBC fulfilled the inclusion criteria. SMR was achieved in 12 (55%) cases, with a mean (range) amount of bone resection beyond the tumor margins of 10 (2-20) mm (+40%) in the craniocaudal axis and 6 (1-15) mm (+31%) in the lateral plane. GTR and near-total resection were each achieved in 5 (23%) cases. Three (19%) tumors were classified as group A, 12 (75%) as group B, and 1 (6%) as group C. Although nonsignificant due to the small sample size, the trends showed that patients in the SMR group had smaller tumor volumes (13.9 vs 19.6 cm3, p = 0.35), fewer previous treatments (33% vs 60% of patients, p = 0.39), and less use of postoperative radiotherapy (25% vs 60%, p = 0.19) compared to patients in the non-SMR group. There were no significant differences in postoperative CSF leak (0% vs 10%, p = 0.45), persistent cranial nerve palsy (8% vs 20%, p = 0.57), and tumor recurrence (8% vs 10%, p = 0.99; mean follow-up 15 months) rates between the SMR and non-SMR groups. CONCLUSIONS: In select cases, SMR of SBC appears to be feasible and safe. Larger cohorts and longer follow-up evaluations are necessary to explore the benefit of SMR and individualized postoperative radiation therapy on progression-free survival.

Screws or Sutures? A Pediatric Cadaveric Study of Tibial Spine Fracture Repairs.

BACKGROUND: Tibial spine fractures are common in the pediatric population because of the biomechanical properties of children's subchondral epiphyseal bone. Most studies in porcine or adult human bone suggest that suture fixation performs better than screw fixation, but these tissues may be poor surrogates for pediatric bone. No previous study has evaluated fixation methods in human pediatric knees. PURPOSE: To quantify the biomechanical properties of 2-screw and 2-suture repair of tibial spine fracture in human pediatric knees. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Cadaveric specimens were randomly assigned to either 2-screw or 2-suture fixation. A standardized Meyers-Mckeever type 3 tibial spine fracture was induced. Screw-fixation fractures were reduced with two 4.0-mm cannulated screws and washers. Suture-fixation fractures were reduced by passing 2 No. 2 FiberWire sutures through the fracture fragment and the base of the anterior cruciate ligament. Sutures were secured through bony tunnels over a 1-cm tibial cortical bridge. Each specimen was mounted at 30° of flexion. A cyclic loading protocol was applied to each specimen, followed by a load-to-failure test. Outcome measures were ultimate failure load, stiffness, and fixation elongation. RESULTS: Twelve matched pediatric cadaveric knees were tested. Repair groups had identical mean (8.3 years) and median (8.5 years) ages and an identical number of samples of each laterality. Ultimate failure load did not significantly differ between screw (mean ± SD, 143.52 ± 41.9 7 N) and suture (135.35 ± 47.94 N) fixations (P = .760). Screws demonstrated increased stiffness and decreased elongation, although neither result was statistically significant at the .05 level (21.79 vs 13.83 N/mm and 5.02 vs 8.46 mm; P = .076 and P = .069, respectively). CONCLUSION: Screw fixation and suture fixation of tibial spine fractures in human pediatric tissue were biomechanically comparable. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Suture fixations are not biomechanically superior to screw fixations in pediatric bone. Pediatric bone fails at lower loads, and in different modes, compared with adult cadaveric bone and porcine bone. Further investigation into optimal repair is warranted, including techniques that may reduce suture pullout and "cheese-wiring" through softer pediatric bone. This study provides new biomechanical data regarding the properties of different fixation types in pediatric tibial spine fractures to inform clinical management of these injuries.

How Postoperative Infection Affects Reoperations after Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A National Claims Analysis of Abandonment of Reconstruction.

Infection after implant-based breast reconstruction adversely affects surgical outcomes and increases healthcare utilization. This study aimed to quantify how postimplant breast reconstruction infections impact unplanned reoperations, hospital length of stay, and discontinuation of initially desired breast reconstruction. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Optum's de-identifed Clinformatics Data Mart Database to analyze women undergoing implant breast reconstruction from 2003 to 2019. Unplanned reoperations were identified via Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Outcomes were analyzed via multivariate linear regression with Poisson distribution to determine statistical significance at P < 0.00625 (Bonferroni correction). Results: In our national claims-based dataset, post-IBR infection rate was 8.53%. Subsequently, 31.2% patients had an implant removed, 6.9% had an implant replaced, 3.6% underwent autologous salvage, and 20.7% discontinued further reconstruction. Patients with a postoperative infection were significantly associated with increased incidence rate of total reoperations (IRR, 3.11; 95% CI, 2.92-3.31; P < 0.001) and total hospital length of stay (IRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.48-1.63; P < 0.001). Postoperative infections were associated with significantly increased odds of abandoning reconstruction (OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 0.081-0.11; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Unplanned reoperations impact patients and healthcare systems. This national, claims-level study shows that post-IBR infection was associated with a 3.11× and 1.55× increase in the incidence rate of unplanned reoperations and length of stay. Post-IBR infection was associated with 2.92× increased odds of abandoning further reconstruction after implant removal.