Utilizing kinematic analysis of postural instability as an objective measure to aid in distinguishing between normal pressure hydrocephalus and Parkinson's disease.

Objective: Patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) and Parkinson's Disease (PD) can clinically appear quite similar at baseline evaluation. We sought to investigate the use of kinematic assessment of postural instability (PI) using inertial measurement units (IMUs) as a mechanism of differentiation between the two disease processes. Methods: 20 patients with NPH, 55 patients with PD, and 56 age-matched, healthy controls underwent quantitative pull test examinations while wearing IMUs at baseline. Center of mass and foot position data were used to compare velocity and acceleration profiles, pull test step length, and reaction times between groups and as a function of Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale Pull Test (UPDRSPT) score. Results: Overall, the reactive postural response of NPH patients was characterized by slower reaction times and smaller steps compared to both PD patients and healthy controls. However, when patients were grouped by UPDRSPT scores, no reliable objective difference between groups was detected. Conclusion: At their initial evaluation, very few NPH patients demonstrate "normal" or "mild" PI as they appear to be older upon presentation compared to PD patients. As a result, kinematic assessment utilizing IMUs may not be helpful for differentiating between NPH and PD as a function of UPDRSPT score, but rather as a more fine-tuned method to define disease progression. We emphasize the need for further evaluation of incorporating objective kinematic data collection as a way to evaluate PI and improve patient outcomes.

System-Identification-Based Activity Recognition Algorithms With Inertial Sensors.

This paper focuses on activity recognition using a single wearable inertial measurement sensor placed on the subject's chest. The ten activities that need to be identified include lying down, standing, sitting, bending and walking, among others. The activity recognition approach is based on using and identifying a transfer function associated with each activity. The appropriate input and output signals for each transfer function are first determined based on the norms of the sensor signals excited by that specific activity. Then the transfer function is identified using training data and a Wiener filter based on the auto-correlation and cross-correlation of the output and input signals. The activity occurring in real-time is recognized by computing and comparing the input-output errors associated with all the transfer functions. The performance of the developed system is evaluated using data from a group of Parkinson's disease subjects, including data obtained in a clinical setting and data obtained through remote home monitoring. On average, the developed system provides better than 90% accuracy in identifying each activity as it occurs. Activity recognition is particularly useful for PD patients in order to monitor their level of activity, characterize their postural instability and recognize high risk-activities in real-time that could lead to falls.

Real world validation of activity recognition algorithm and development of novel behavioral biomarkers of falls in aged control and movement disorder patients.

The use of wearable sensors in movement disorder patients such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is becoming more widespread, but most studies are limited to characterizing general aspects of mobility using smartphones. There is a need to accurately identify specific activities at home in order to properly evaluate gait and balance at home, where most falls occur. We developed an activity recognition algorithm to classify multiple daily living activities including high fall risk activities such as sit to stand transfers, turns and near-falls using data from 5 inertial sensors placed on the chest, upper-legs and lower-legs of the subjects. The algorithm is then verified with ground truth by collecting video footage of our patients wearing the sensors at home. Our activity recognition algorithm showed >95% sensitivity in detection of activities. Extracted features from our home monitoring system showed significantly better correlation (~69%) with prospectively measured fall frequency of our subjects compared to the standard clinical tests (~30%) or other quantitative gait metrics used in past studies when attempting to predict future falls over 1 year of prospective follow-up. Although detecting near-falls at home is difficult, our proposed model suggests that near-fall frequency is the most predictive criterion in fall detection through correlation analysis and fitting regression models.

Rates of operative intervention for infection after synthetic or autologous cranioplasty: a National Readmissions Database analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical utilization and associated charges of autologous bone flap (ABF) versus synthetic flap (SF) cranioplasty and to characterize the postoperative infection risk of SF versus ABF using the National Readmissions Database (NRD). METHODS: The authors used the publicly available NRD to identify index hospitalizations from October 2015 to December 2018 involving elective ABF or SF cranioplasty after traumatic brain injury (TBI) or stroke. Subsequent readmissions were further characterized if patients underwent neurosurgical intervention for treatment of infection or suspected infection. Survey Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess risk of readmission. RESULTS: An estimated 2295 SF and 2072 ABF cranioplasties were performed from October 2015 to December 2018 in the United States. While the total number of cranioplasty operations decreased during the study period, the proportion of cranioplasties utilizing SF increased (p < 0.001), particularly in male patients (p = 0.011) and those with TBI (vs stroke, p = 0.012). The median total hospital charge for SF cranioplasty was $31,200 more costly than ABF cranioplasty (p < 0.001). Of all first-time readmissions, 20% involved surgical treatment for infectious reasons. Overall, 122 SF patients (5.3%) underwent surgical treatment of infection compared with 70 ABF patients (3.4%) on readmission. After accounting for confounders using a multivariable Cox model, female patients (vs male, p = 0.003), those discharged nonroutinely (vs discharge to home or self-care, p < 0.001), and patients who underwent SF cranioplasty (vs ABF, p = 0.011) were more likely to be readmitted for reoperation. Patients undergoing cranioplasty during more recent years (e.g., 2018 vs 2015) were less likely to be readmitted for reoperation because of infection (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: SFs are increasingly replacing ABFs as the material of choice for cranioplasty, despite their association with increased hospital charges. Female sex, nonroutine discharge, and SF cranioplasty are associated with increased risk for reoperation after cranioplasty.

Readmission risk of malignant brain tumor patients undergoing laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and stereotactic needle biopsy (SNB): a covariate balancing weights analysis of the National Readmissions Database (NRD).

PURPOSE: Despite procedural similarities between laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and stereotactic needle biopsy (SNB), LITT induces delayed, pro-inflammatory responses not associated with SNB that may increase the risk of readmission within 30- or 90- days. Here, we explore this hypothesis. METHODS: We queried the National Readmissions Database (NRD, 2010-18) for malignant brain tumor patients who underwent elective LITT or SNB using International Classification of Diseases codes. Readmissions were defined as non-elective inpatient hospitalizations. Survey regression methods and a weighted analysis were utilized to adjust for demographic and clinical differences between LITT and SNB cohorts. RESULTS: During the study period, an estimated 685 malignant brain patients underwent elective LITT and 15,177 underwent elective SNB. Patients undergoing LITT and SNB exhibited comparable median lengths of hospital stay [IQR; LITT = 2 (1, 3); SNB = 1 (1, 2); p = 0.820]. Likelihood of routine discharge was not significantly different between the two procedures (p = 0.263). No significant differences were observed in the odds of 30- or 90-day unplanned readmission between the LITT and SNB cohorts after multivariable adjustment (all p ≥ 0.177). The covariate balancing weighted analysis confirmed comparable 30 or 90-day readmission risk between LITT and SNB treated patients (all p ≥ 0.201). CONCLUSION: The likelihood of 30- and 90-day readmission for malignant brain tumor patients who underwent LITT or SNB are comparable, supporting the safety profile of LITT as therapy for malignant brain cancers.

Using kinematics to re-define the pull test as a quantitative biomarker of the postural response in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients.

Quantitative biomarkers are needed for the diagnosis, monitoring and therapeutic assessment of postural instability in movement disorder patients. The goal of this study was to create a practical, objective measure of postural instability using kinematic measurements of the pull test. Twenty-one patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus and 20 age-matched control subjects were fitted with inertial measurement units and underwent 10-20 pull tests of varying intensities performed by a trained clinician. Kinematic data were extracted for each pull test and aggregated. Patients participated in 103 sessions for a total of 1555 trials while controls participated in 20 sessions for a total of 299 trials. Patients were separated into groups by MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) pull test score. The center of mass velocity profile easily distinguished between patient groups such that score increases correlated with decreases in peak velocity and later peak velocity onset. All patients except those scored as "3" demonstrated an increase in step length and decrease in reaction time with increasing pull intensity. Groups were distinguished by differences in the relationship of step length to pull intensity (slope) and their overall step length or reaction time regardless of pull intensity (y-intercept). NPH patients scored as "normal" on the MDS-UPDRS scale were kinematically indistinguishable from age-matched control subjects during a standardized perturbation, but could be distinguished from controls by their response to a range of pull intensities. An instrumented, purposefully varied pull test produces kinematic metrics useful for distinguishing clinically meaningful differences within hydrocephalus patients as well as distinguishing these patients from healthy, control subjects.

Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and confabulation in psycholegal settings: A beginner's guide for criminal justice, forensic mental health, and legal interviewers.

Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) are neurodevelopmental/neurobehavioral conditions caused by prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE). Impairments caused by PAE contribute to the over-representation of individuals with FASD in the United States juvenile and adult criminal justice systems. These same impairments can equally impact on individuals with FASD who are witnesses to or victims of crime who also have to navigate the complexities of the criminal justice system. Difficulties include increased susceptibility to confabulation throughout the legal process that, in turn, can contribute to increased rates of poor outcomes including false confessions and wrongful convictions. Individuals with FASD are particularity at risk of confabulation when they are subjected to tactics, such as stressful and anxiety-provoking situations, threats, and leading, suggestive, or coercive questioning. Many professionals in the forensic context are unfamiliar with FASD or related confabulation risk and may unintentionally utilize tactics that intensify impacts of pre-existing impairment. This article serves as a beginner's guide for professionals working in criminal justice settings by (a) providing research-based overviews of FASD and confabulation, (b) describing how FASD may lead to confabulation, and (c) suggesting ways that professionals can modify protocols when interacting with individuals with FASD. Suggestions in this article hold the potential to decrease the risk of confabulation in the criminal justice system and decrease problematic outcomes, such as false confessions and wrongful convictions among individuals with FASD.