Phase I/II randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study of processed amniotic fluid drops after PRK.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of processed amniotic fluid (pAF) used postoperatively after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: University of Utah, Moran Eye Center, Salt Lake City, Utah. DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled prospective study. METHODS: 61 participants were randomized to receive either placebo or pAF drops, which were instilled 4 times per day for 1 week after PRK along with routine postoperative medications. The primary outcome measure was time to full re-epithelialization in days. Secondary measures included visual acuity at 30 days and postoperative pain scores during the first week. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in time to re-epithelialization, with a median of 5 days for both groups. There were no difference in pain indicator scores during the first week and no difference in corneal staining scores at day 30 between the 2 groups. There were no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of pAF as an additional postoperative topical medication for PRK demonstrated that pAF did not improve the rate of epithelial healing after PRK. pAF may be safely studied in other ocular conditions to determine its effect on epithelial healing.

Autoimmune retinopathy with associated anti-retinal antibodies as a potential immune-related adverse event associated with immunotherapy in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma: case series and systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the spectrum of autoimmune retinopathy (AIR) associated with immunotherapy for advanced cutaneous melanoma. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Retrospective chart review on patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma who developed AIR after initiating immunotherapy. Complete ophthalmic examination and relevant ancillary testing were performed on each patient. The presence of AIR-associated anti-retinal antibodies was confirmed by western blot and/or immunohistochemical staining. Ophthalmic and systemic outcomes after treatment for AIR were followed over time. A systematic review of AIR associated with immunotherapy for cutaneous or non-ocular mucosal melanoma was carried out in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Case 1 developed photopsia and nyctalopia with electroretinographic findings characteristic for melanoma-associated retinopathy 1 week after initiating ipilimumab/nivolumab immunotherapy. Case 2 experienced new severe bilateral visual field loss associated with anti-retinal and anti-optic nerve antibodies while on maintenance nivolumab immunotherapy. Case 3 developed decreased visual acuity due to acute exudative polymorphous vitelliform maculopathy within 2 weeks of initiating ipilimumab/nivolumab immunotherapy. All patients had concurrent extraocular immune-related adverse events in addition to the presence of anti-retinal antibodies on serological testing. 14 published cases of AIR associated with immunotherapy for cutaneous or non-ocular mucosal melanoma were identified and reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Immune checkpoint inhibition can trigger the development of AIR with varied clinical manifestations in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma. This study highlights the need for close monitoring in cutaneous melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy who develop new visual symptoms with or without funduscopic changes, as well as the potential role for screening of patients prior to initiating immunotherapy.