Frequency of and associations with alterations of medical emergency team calling criteria in a teaching hospital emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Medical emergency team (METs), activated by vital sign-based calling criteria respond to deteriorating patients in the hospital setting. Calling criteria may be altered where clinicians feel this is appropriate. Altered calling criteria (ACC) has not previously been evaluated in the emergency department (ED) setting. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to (i) describe the frequency of ACC in a teaching hospital ED and the number and type of vital signs that were modified and (ii) associations between ACC in the ED and differences in the baseline patient characteristics and adverse outcomes including subsequent MET activations, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and death within 72 h of admission. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of patients presenting to an academic, tertiary hospital ED in Melbourne, Australia between January 1st, 2019 and December 31st, 2019. The primary outcome was frequency and nature of ACC in the ED. Secondary outcomes included differences in baseline patient characteristics, frequency of MET activation, unplanned ICU admission, and mortality in the first 72 h of admission between those with and without ACC in the ED. RESULTS: Amongst 14 159 ED admissions, 725 (5.1%) had ACC, most frequently for increased heart or respiratory rate. ACC was associated with older age and increased comorbidity. Such patients had a higher adjusted risk of MET activation (odds ratio [OR]: 3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.50-3.91, p = <0.001), unplanned ICU admission (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.17-3.14, p = 0.016), and death (OR: 3.87, 95% CI: 2.08-6.70, p = 0.020) within 72 h. CONCLUSIONS: ACC occurs commonly in the ED, most frequently for elevated heart and respiratory rates and is associated with worse patient outcomes. In some cases, ACC requires consultant involvement, more frequent vital sign monitoring, expeditious inpatient team review, or ICU referral.

Low tidal volume ventilation for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: a secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: We recently reported the results for a large randomized controlled trial of low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) versus conventional tidal volume (CTVV) during major surgery when positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) was equal between groups. We found no difference in postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients who received LTVV. However, in the subgroup of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, LTVV was associated with a numerically lower rate of PPCs after surgery. We aimed to further assess the relationship between LTVV versus CTVV during laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of this pre-specified subgroup. All patients received volume-controlled ventilation with an applied PEEP of 5 cmH2O and either LTVV (6 mL/kg predicted body weight [PBW]) or CTVV (10 mL/kg PBW). The primary outcome was the incidence of a composite of PPCs within seven days. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-eight patients (27.2%) underwent laparoscopic surgeries, with 158 (48.2%) randomised to LTVV. Fifty two of 157 patients (33.1%) assigned to LTVV and 72 of 169 (42.6%) assigned to conventional tidal volume developed PPCs within 7 days (unadjusted absolute difference, - 9.48 [95% CI, - 19.86 to 1.05]; p = 0.076). After adjusting for pre-specified confounders, the LTVV group had a lower incidence of the primary outcome than patients receiving CTVV (adjusted absolute difference, - 10.36 [95% CI, - 20.52 to - 0.20]; p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: In this post-hoc analysis of a large, randomised trial of LTVV we found that during laparoscopic surgeries, LTVV was associated with a significantly reduced PPCs compared to CTVV when PEEP was applied equally between both groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry no: 12614000790640.

Medication-related Medical Emergency Team activations: a case review study of frequency and preventability.

OBJECTIVES: Despite recognition of clinical deterioration and medication-related harm as patient safety risks, the frequency of medication-related Rapid Response System activations is undefined. We aimed to estimate the incidence and preventability of medication-related Medical Emergency Team (MET) activations and describe the associated adverse medication events. METHODS: A case review study of consecutive MET activations at two acute, academic teaching hospitals in Melbourne, Australia with mature Rapid Response Systems was conducted. All MET activations during a 3-week study period were assessed for a medication cause including identification of the contributing adverse medication event and its preventability, using validated tools and recognised classification systems. RESULTS: There were 9439 admissions and 628 MET activations during the study period. Of these, 146 (23.2%) MET activations were medication related: an incidence of 15.5 medication-related MET activation per 1000 admissions. Medication-related MET activations occurred a median of 46.6 hours earlier (IQR 22-165) in an admission than non-medication-related activations (p=0.001). Furthermore, this group also had more repeat MET activations during their admission (p=0.021, OR=1.68, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.59). A total of 92 of 146 (63%) medication-related MET activations were potentially preventable. Tachycardia due to omission of beta-blocking agents (10.9%, n=10 of 92) and hypotension due to cumulative toxicity (9.8%, n=9 of 92) or inappropriate use (10.9%, n=10 of 92) of antihypertensives were the most common adverse medication events leading to potentially preventable medication-related MET activations. CONCLUSIONS: Medications contributed to almost a quarter of MET activations, often early in a patient's admission. One in seven MET activations were due to potentially preventable adverse medication events. The most common of these were omission of beta-blockers and clinically inappropriate antihypertensive use. Strategies to prevent these events would increase patient safety and reduce burden on the MET.

The epidemiology of rapid response team activation amongst patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Clinical deterioration requiring rapid response team (RRT) review is associated with increased morbidity amongst hospitalised patients. The frequency of and association with RRT calls in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery is unknown. Understanding the epidemiology of RRT calls might identify areas for quality improvement in this cohort. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to identify perioperative risks and outcome associations with RRT review following major gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic databases at a large Australian university hospital. We included adult patients admitted for major gastrointestinal surgery between 1 January 2015 and 31 March 2018. RESULTS: Of 7158 patients, 514 (7.4%) required RRT activation postoperatively. After adjustment, variables associated with RRT activation included the following: hemiplegia/paraplegia (odds ratio [OR]: 8.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3 to 27.8, p = 0.001), heart failure (OR: 6.9, 95% CI: 3.3 to 14.6, p < 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (OR: 5.3, 95% CI: 2.7 to 10.4, p < 0.001), peptic ulcer disease (OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 2.2 to 8.0, p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 4.0, 95% CI: 2.2 to 7.2, p < 0.001), and emergency admission status (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 2.1 to 3.3, p < 0.001). Following the index operation, 46% of first RRT activations occurred within 24 h of surgery and 61% had occurred within 48 h. The most common triggers for RRT activation were tachycardia, hypotension, and tachypnoea. Postoperative RRT activation was associated with in-hospital mortality (OR: 6.7, 95% CI: 3.8 to 11.8, p < 0.001), critical care admission (incidence rate ratio: 8.18, 95% CI: 5.23 to 12.77, p < 0.001), and longer median length of hospital stay (12 days vs. 2 days, p < 0.001) compared to no RRT activation. CONCLUSION: After major gastrointestinal surgery, one in 14 patients had an RRT activation, almost half within 24 h of surgery. Such activation was independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Identified associations may guide more pre-emptive management for those at an increased risk of RRT activation.

Characteristics and outcomes of surgical patients admitted to an overnight intensive recovery unit: A retrospective observational study.

Postoperative 'enhanced care' models that sit between critical care and ward-based care may allow for more cost-effective and efficient utilisation of resources for high-risk surgical patients. In this retrospective observational study, we describe an overnight intensive recovery model in a tertiary hospital, termed 'recovery high dependency unit', and the characteristics, treatment, disposition at discharge and in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted to this unit. We included all adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the recovery high dependency unit for at least one hour between July 2017 and June 2020. Over this three-year period, 1257 patients were included in the study. The median length of stay in the recovery high dependency unit was 12.6 (interquartile range 9.1-15.9) hours and the median length of hospital stay was 8.3 (interquartile range 5.0-17.3) days. Hospital discharge data showed that 1027 (81.7%) patients were discharged home and that 37 (2.9%) patients died. Non-invasive ventilation was delivered to 59 (4.7%) patients and 290 (23.1%) required vasopressor support. A total of 164 patients (13.0%) were admitted to the intensive care unit following their recovery high dependency unit admission. Of the 1093 patients who were discharged to the ward, 70 patients (6.4%) had a medical emergency team call within 24 hours of discharge from the recovery high dependency unit. In this study of a recovery high dependency unit patient cohort, there was a relatively low need for intensive care unit admission postoperatively and a very low incidence of medical emergency team calls post-discharge to the ward. Other institutions may consider the introduction and evaluation of this model in the care of their higher risk surgical patients.

Improving the quality of family meeting documentation in the ICU at the end of life.

Objective: Improve documentation quality of end-of-life family meetings in a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU). Design: Before-and-after interventional quality improvement project between October 2018 and February 2020 utilising an electronic pro-forma record. Setting: Australian, University affiliated, mixed medical-surgical 22 bed adult ICU. Participants: Patients who were admitted to the ICU for active management and subsequently died during that ICU admission. We enrolled 50 patients who died before and 50 patients after the introduction of the electronic family meeting pro-forma record. Intervention: Through collaboration with ICU medical and nursing staff, End-of-life Special Interest Group and Clinical Documentation Committee we developed the ICU Family Meeting Discussion Note as an electronic pro-forma record with multiple key fields of entry. Main outcome measures: Patient records were examined for the presence of documented details around patient's admission, family meetings and specific elements surrounding the patient's death. Results: The introduction of a pro-forma record markedly improved the quality of documentation of end-of-life care related family meetings. Documentation increased in recording hospital admission date/time (6% vs 84%), meeting location (14% vs 70%), the reason patients were absent from the meeting (34% vs 72%), the Medical Treatment Decision Maker (MTDM) (10% vs 44%), the patient's resuscitation status (22% vs 54%), and treatment options discussed (78% vs 94%) (p ⩽ 0.005 for all). Conclusion: Introducing an electronic pro-forma record to facilitate family meeting documentation increased the frequency of important recorded information. Further studies are required to assess whether documentation quality improvements are sustainable and whether they affect patient- or relative-centred outcomes.

Intraoperative low tidal volume ventilation and the risk of ICD-10 coded delirium and the use for antipsychotic medications.

BACKGROUND: Low tidal volume (VT) ventilation and its associated increase in arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) may affect postoperative neurologic function. We aimed to test the hypothesis that intraoperative low VT ventilation affect the incidence of postoperative ICD-10 coded delirium and/or the need for antipsychotic medications. METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of a large randomized controlled trial evaluating low vs. conventional VT ventilation during major non-cardiothoracic, non-intracranial surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of ICD-10 delirium and/or the use of antipsychotic medications during hospital stay, and the absolute difference with its 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. RESULTS: We studied 1206 patients (median age of 64 [55-72] years, 59.0% males, median ARISCAT of 26 [19-37], and 47.6% of ASA 3). ICD-10 coded delirium and /or antipsychotic medication use was diagnosed in 11.2% with similar incidence between low and conventional VT ventilation (11.1% vs. 11.3%; absolute difference, -0.24 [95%CI, -3.82 to 3.32]; p = 0.894). There was no interaction between allocation group and type of surgery. CONCLUSION: In adult patients undergoing major surgery, low VT ventilation was not associated with increased risk of ICD-10 delirium and/or the use of antipsychotic medications during hospital stay. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12614000790640 .

An audit of perioperative end-of-life care practices and documentation relating to patients who died in a surgical unit in three Victorian hospitals.

The number of older, frail patients undergoing surgery is increasing, prompting consideration of the benefits of intensive treatment. Despite collaborative decision-making processes such as advance care planning being supported by recent Australian legislation, their role in perioperative care is yet to be defined. Furthermore, there has been little evaluation of the quality of end-of-life care in the surgical population. We investigated documentation of the premorbid functional status, severity of illness, intensity of treatment, operative management and quality of end-of-life care in patients who died in a surgical unit, with a retrospective study of surgical mortality which was performed across three hospitals over a 23-month period in Victoria, Australia. Among 99 deceased patients in the study cohort, 68 had a surgical operation. Preoperative functional risk assessment by medical staff was infrequently documented in the medical notes (5%) compared with activities of daily living (69%) documented by nursing staff. Documented preoperative discussions regarding the risk of death were rarely and inconsistently done, but when done were extensive. Documented end-of-life care discussions were identified in 71%, but were frequently brief, inconsistent, and in 60% did not occur until 48 hours from death. In 35.4% of instances, documented discussions involved junior staff (registrars or residents), and 43.4% involved intensive care unit staff. Palliative or terminal care referrals also occurred late (1-2 days prior to death). Not-for-resuscitation orders were frequently changed when approaching the end of life. Overall, 57% of deceased patients had a documented opportunity for farewell with family. We conclude that discussions and documentation of end-of-life care practices could be improved and recommend that all surgical units undertake similar audits to ensure that end-of-life care discussions occur for high-risk and palliative care surgical patients and are documented appropriately.

Midodrine use in critically ill patients: a narrative review.

Midodrine is a peripherally acting, oral α-agonist that is increasingly used in intensive care units despite conflicting evidence for its effectiveness. It has pharmacological effects on blood vessels as well as pupillary, cardiac, renal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, lymphatic and skin tissue. It has approval for use as a treatment for orthostatic hypotension, but a surge in interest over the past decade has prompted its use for a growing number of off-label indications. In critically ill patients, midodrine has been used as either an adjunctive oral therapy to wean vasoplegic patients off low dose intravenous vasopressor infusions, or as an oral vasopressor agent to prevent or minimise the need for intravenous infusion. Clinical trials have mostly focused on midodrine as an intravenous vasopressor weaning agent. Early retrospective studies supported its use for this indication, but more recent randomised controlled trials have largely refuted this practice. Key questions remain on its role in managing critically ill patients before intensive care admission, during intensive care stay, and following discharge. This narrative review presents a comprehensive overview of midodrine use for the critical care physician and highlights why lingering questions around ideal patient selection, dosing, timing of initiation, and efficacy of midodrine for critically ill patients remain unanswered.

Intensive care unit trainee perception of end-of-life care provided during medical emergency team activation events.

BACKGROUND: Hospital medical emergency team (MET) activation events involving end-of-life care (EOLC) are common. The issues faced by medical staff attending these events are incompletely described. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to measure the perceptions of Victorian hospital medical staff, training in the speciality of intensive care, about multiple aspects of EOLC MET calls. We sought to determine the overall extent of formal training in MET and EOLC and assess the domains of self-perceived confidence, barriers to communication, frequency of clinician agreement and trainee distress. METHODS: We conducted an anonymous, voluntary, Internet-based survey of registered trainees of the College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand in May 2019. The participants eligible were those trainees working in an adult intensive care unit in Victoria, Australia, during the study period. The main outcome measures were self-reported levels of confidence, barriers to communication, frequency of conflict and distress, senior support, supervision and access to training. RESULTS: Of 124 trainees surveyed, 75 (60%) responded. Overall, 78% of respondents felt confident to manage EOLC MET calls, but the frequently reported barriers to effective patient/next of kin communication included: (i) lack of private meeting rooms; (ii) resource and time constraints; and (iii) lack of patient and family availability during a MET call to discuss medical treatment limitations. Two-thirds of respondents reported emotional distress at least occasionally, this being frequent in one in five. Most (68%) trainees experienced conflict with other medical teams at least occasionally. Factors associated with experiencing distress at least occasionally include greater trainee age, patients' being unable to participate in discussion due to illness, resource and time constraints and negative encounters with other medical teams. CONCLUSIONS: Victorian intensive care trainees were confident managing EOLC MET activation events. However, distress was reported commonly and strategies are required to address the areas of concern.

Evaluation of medical emergency team medication management practices in acute hospitals: A multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Medical emergency teams use medications to rescue deteriorating patients. Medication management is the system of steps and processes, including prescribing, distribution, administration, and monitoring, to achieve the best outcomes from medication use. Systems or standards for medication management by medical emergency teams have not been defined. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to propose potential solutions to improve medical emergency team medication management by evaluating medication supply and related medication management practices during medical emergency team activations and understanding clinicians' perceptions about medical emergency team medication management in acute hospitals. METHODS: A prospective multicentre audit of intensive care unit-equipped hospitals in Victoria, Australia, was conducted. After advertisement and invitation via scheduled email newsletters to hospitals, a representative of the medical emergency team from each hospital self-administered an online audit tool during December 2019 and January 2020. Audit data were analysed descriptively, and perceptions were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: Responses were received from 32 of the 44 (72.7%) eligible hospitals. At 17 of the 32 (53.1%) hospitals, arrest trolleys provided medications for medical emergency team activations, in addition to arrest calls. At 15 of the 32 (46.9%) hospitals, separate, dedicated medical emergency team medication supplies were used to care for deteriorating patients. Dedicated medical emergency team supplies contained a median of 20 (range = 8-37) medications, predominantly cardiovascular (median = 8, mode = 7, range = 4-16) and neurological medications (median and mode = 6, range = 0-11). Variation was observed in all storage and other supply-related medication management practices studied. The four most frequent categories of clinicians' perceptions described systematic challenges with availability of the right medication in the right place at the right time. CONCLUSIONS: Current supply and related medication management practices and clinicians' perceptions demonstrated further development is necessary for medication management to meet the needs of medical emergency team clinicians and their patients.

Intra-operative ventilator mechanical power as a predictor of postoperative pulmonary complications in surgical patients: A secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Studies in critically ill patients suggest a relationship between mechanical power (an index of the energy delivered by the ventilator, which includes driving pressure, respiratory rate, tidal volume and inspiratory pressure) and complications. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the association between intra-operative mechanical power and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a large randomised clinical trial. SETTING: University-affiliated academic tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia, from February 2015 to February 2019. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing major noncardiothoracic, nonintracranial surgery. INTERVENTION: Dynamic mechanical power was calculated using the power equation adjusted by the respiratory system compliance (CRS). Multivariable models were used to assess the independent association between mechanical power and outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs within the first seven postoperative days. The secondary outcome was the incidence of acute respiratory failure. RESULTS: We studied 1156 patients (median age [IQR]: 64 [55 to 72] years, 59.5% men). Median mechanical power adjusted by CRS was 0.32 [0.22 to 0.51] (J min-1)/(ml cmH2O-1). A higher mechanical power was also independently associated with increased risk of PPCs [odds ratio (OR 1.34, 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.52); P < 0.001) and acute respiratory failure (OR 1.40, 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.61; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving ventilation during major noncardiothoracic, nonintracranial surgery, exposure to a higher mechanical power was independently associated with an increased risk of PPCs and acute respiratory failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry no: 12614000790640.

Effect of Intraoperative Low Tidal Volume vs Conventional Tidal Volume on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: In patients who undergo mechanical ventilation during surgery, the ideal tidal volume is unclear. Objective: To determine whether low-tidal-volume ventilation compared with conventional ventilation during major surgery decreases postoperative pulmonary complications. Design, Setting, and Participants: Single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized clinical trial of 1236 patients older than 40 years undergoing major noncardiothoracic, nonintracranial surgery under general anesthesia lasting more than 2 hours in a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia, from February 2015 to February 2019. The last date of follow-up was February 17, 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg predicted body weight (n = 614; low tidal volume group) or a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg predicted body weight (n = 592; conventional tidal volume group). All patients received positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at 5 cm H2O. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications within the first 7 postoperative days, including pneumonia, bronchospasm, atelectasis, pulmonary congestion, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, or unplanned requirement for postoperative invasive or noninvasive ventilation. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pulmonary complications including development of pulmonary embolism, acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, acute kidney injury, wound infection (superficial and deep), rate of intraoperative need for vasopressor, incidence of unplanned intensive care unit admission, rate of need for rapid response team call, intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Results: Among 1236 patients who were randomized, 1206 (98.9%) completed the trial (mean age, 63.5 years; 494 [40.9%] women; 681 [56.4%] undergoing abdominal surgery). The primary outcome occurred in 231 of 608 patients (38%) in the low tidal volume group compared with 232 of 590 patients (39%) in the conventional tidal volume group (difference, -1.3% [95% CI, -6.8% to 4.2%]; risk ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.84-1.11]; P = .64). There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adult patients undergoing major surgery, intraoperative ventilation with low tidal volume compared with conventional tidal volume, with PEEP applied equally between groups, did not significantly reduce pulmonary complications within the first 7 postoperative days. Trial Registration: ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12614000790640.

Low tidal volume ventilation during anaesthesia for major surgery: protocol and statistical analysis plan.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation is mandatory in patients undergoing general anaesthesia for major surgery. Tidal volumes higher than 10 mL/kg of predicted body weight have been advocated for intraoperative ventilation, but recent evidence suggests that low tidal volumes may benefit surgical patients. To date, the impact of low tidal volume compared with conventional tidal volume during surgery has only been assessed in clinical trials that also combine different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in each arm. We aimed to assess the impact of low tidal volume compared with conventional tidal volume during general anaesthesia for surgery on the incidence of postoperative respiratory complications in adult patients receiving moderate levels of PEEP. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Single-centre, two-arm, randomised clinical trial. In total, 1240 adult patients older than 40 years scheduled for at least 2 hours of surgery under general anaesthesia and routinely monitored with an arterial line were included. Patients were ventilated intraoperatively with a moderate level of PEEP (5 cmH2O) and randomly assigned to tidal volume of 6 mL/kg predicted body weight (low tidal volume) or 10 mL/kg predicted body weight (conventional tidal volume in Australia). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome is the occurrence of postoperative respiratory complications, recorded as a composite endpoint of adverse respiratory events during the first 7 postoperative days. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This is the first well powered study comparing the effect of low tidal volume ventilation versus high tidal volume ventilation during surgery on the incidence of postoperative respiratory complications in adult patients receiving moderate levels of PEEP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12614000790640).

The frequency and nature of clinician identified medication-related rapid response system calls.

AIM: The contribution of adverse medication events to clinical deterioration is unknown. This study aimed to determine the frequency and nature of rapid response system (RRS) calls that clinicians perceived were medication-related using RRS quality arm data. METHODS: Analysis of routine data prospectively collected by clinicians responding to RRS calls in an Australian acute tertiary academic hospital. RESULTS: Between January 2013 and June 2017, 12,221 adult patients triggered the RRS for 25,906 medical emergency team (MET) and 512 code blue calls. Clinicians identified 433 medication-related RRS calls (1.6%) involving 406 patients (3.3%). These included 418 MET calls (1.3 medication-related MET calls per 1000 admissions) and 15 code blue calls (0.045 medication-related code blue calls per 1000 admissions). Medication-related calls occurred earlier in the admission (p = 0.002) and were more common for patients triggering multiple calls during the same admission (p < 0.001), compared to non-medication-related calls. Medication-related calls most commonly were triggered by low blood pressure (38.3%) and involved cardiovascular (43.0%) and nervous system medications (36.0%). Dose-related toxicity (n = 178) was the most frequent adverse medication event contributing to medication-related calls. CONCLUSION: One in 30 patients triggering a RRS call experienced medication-related clinical deterioration, most often due to dose related toxicity of cardiovascular system medications. The perceived frequency and potential preventability of this medication-related harm suggest further research is required to increase recognition of medication-related RRS calls by responding clinicians and to reduce the incidence.