Correction to: Immunogenicity of Biosimilars for Rheumatic Diseases, Plaque Psoriasis, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review from Clinical Trials and Regulatory Documents.

The article Immunogenicity of Biosimilars for Rheumatic Diseases, Plaque Psoriasis, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review from Clinical Trials and Regulatory Documents, written by Vibeke Strand, Joao Gonçalves, Timothy P. Hickling, Heather E. Jones, Lisa Marshall and John D. Isaacs, was originally published Online First without Open Access.

Does psoriatic axial spondyloarthritis phenotype correlate with imaging morphotype?

OBJECTIVES: To compare the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) morphology of inflammatory and chronic lesions in the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) and spine between patients with non-psoriatic and psoriatic non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA and p-axSpA, respectively). METHODS: Patients from the EMBARK trial (NCT01258738) with axSpA (n=179) and p-axSpA (n=24) who had MRI data available were compared in terms of baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and the frequency (n/N [%]) and distribution of inflammatory and structural SIJ and spinal lesions. RESULTS: Patients with p-axSpA were on average older (35.1 years vs. 31.7 years, p=0.047), had a higher occurrence of asymmetric sacroiliitis (54.2% vs. 29.6%, p=0.042), and a lower occurrence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 positivity (41.7% vs. 73.7%, p=0.010) than patients with axSpA. There were no significant differences in the frequency of lesions in any of the SIJ or spinal quadrants between the two subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that differences between axSpA and p-axSpA extend beyond presence of psoriasis, and include age, SI symmetry, and HLAB27 status. These findings may help explain the morphotype-phenotype relationship across axSpA, similar to those described in older radiographic studies.

Longterm Drug Survival of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate longterm drug survival (proportion of patients still receiving treatment) and discontinuation of etanercept (ETN), infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab pegol (CZP), and golimumab (GOL) using observational data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Following a systematic literature review, drug survival at 12 and 12-24 months of followup was estimated by summing proportions of patients continuing treatment and dividing by number of studies. Drug survival at ≥ 36 months of followup was estimated through Metaprop. RESULTS: There were 170 publications included. In the first-line setting, drug survival at 12 months with ETN, IFX, or ADA was 71%, 69%, and 70%, respectively, while at 12-24 months the corresponding rates were 63%, 57%, and 59%. In the second-line setting, drug survival at 12 months with ETN, IFX, or ADA was 61%, 69%, and 55%, respectively, while at 12-24 months the corresponding rates were 53%, 39%, and 43%. Drug survival at ≥ 36 months with ETN, IFX, or ADA in the first-line setting was 59% (95% CI 46-72%), 49% (95% CI 43-54%), and 51% (95% CI 41-60%), respectively, while in the second-line setting the corresponding rates were 56% (95% CI 52-61%), 48% (95% CI 40-55%), and 41% (95% CI 36-47%). Discontinuation of ETN, IFX, and ADA at 36 months of followup was 38-48%, 42-62%, and 38-59%, respectively. Data on CZP and GOL were scarce. CONCLUSION: After > 12 months of followup, more patients with RA receiving ETN remain on treatment compared with other tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

Immunogenicity of Biosimilars for Rheumatic Diseases, Plaque Psoriasis, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review from Clinical Trials and Regulatory Documents.

The goal of this narrative review was to summarize immunogenicity data of biosimilars or biosimilar candidates for rheumatic diseases, plaque psoriasis, or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), available in peer-reviewed publications or regulatory documents. PubMed records and regulatory documents were searched for immunogenicity data of TNFα or CD20 inhibitor biosimilars or biosimilar candidates. Data collected included the proportion of patients positive for anti-drug antibodies (ADAbs), proportion with neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) among ADAb-positive patients, ADAb/nAb assay characteristics, cross-reactivity, and the effects of ADAbs on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety. We identified eight biosimilars or biosimilar candidates for adalimumab (BI 695501, SB5, ABP 501, GP2017, PF-06410293, MSB-11022, FKB-327, ZRC-3197) four for etanercept (SB4, GP2015, CHS-0214, LBEC0101), and three each for infliximab (SB2, CT-P13, GP1111) and rituximab (CT-P10, GP2013, PF-05280586) with immunogenicity data. Randomized, head-to-head trials with reference products varied in design and methodology of ADAb/nAb detection. The lowest proportions of ADAb-positive (0-13%) and nAb-positive patients (0-3%) were observed in the trials of etanercept and its biosimilars, and the highest with adalimumab, infliximab, and their biosimilars (ADAbs: ≤ 64%; nAbs: ≤ 100%). The most common method of ADAb detection was electrochemiluminescence, and ADAb positivity was associated with nominally inferior efficacy and safety. Overall, there were no significant immunogenicity differences between biosimilars and reference products. However, there are many discrepancies in assessing and reporting clinical immunogenicity. In conclusion, immunogenicity data of biosimilars or biosimilar candidates for TNFα or CD20 inhibitors were collected in trials that varied in design and procedures for ADAb/nAb detection. In general, immunogenicity parameters of biosimilars are similar to those of their reference products.

An Analysis of Real-World Data on the Safety of Etanercept in Older Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to use real-world data to evaluate potential interactions between age, treatment, and the risk of developing four adverse events (AEs) common in the elderly: congestive heart failure, serious infections, non-melanoma skin cancer, and interstitial lung disease. These AEs were identified as important in a prior age-based analysis (≤ 65 vs > 65 years) of etanercept- or placebo-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in controlled clinical trials. METHODS: Real-world data (1 January 2013 to 31 January 2018) were obtained from the IBM Watson Health MarketScan® Database. Patients were included if aged ≥ 18 years, enrolled for ≥ 1 year prior to RA diagnosis, and without any of the four AEs of interest prior to RA diagnosis or between RA diagnosis and first etanercept exposure. Logistic regression analysis was applied following propensity matching of patients receiving or not receiving etanercept based on age at diagnosis, age status at the beginning of observation (> 65 years or not), sex, geographic region, and follow-up duration. RESULTS: The overall cohort comprised 403,689 patients. The absolute risk of each of the four AEs increased with age. In propensity-matched cohorts, etanercept was associated with significantly higher odds of developing each of the four AEs (p < 0.001 for all). However, the relative risk of experiencing the four AEs in patients who received etanercept versus those who did not was similar between patients ≤ 65 years of age and those > 65 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RA, the relative increase in etanercept-associated risk of experiencing congestive heart failure, serious infection, non-melanoma skin cancer, or interstitial lung disease was similar between elderly and non-elderly.

Practical Guidance on Biosimilars, With a Focus on Latin America: What Do Rheumatologists Need to Know?

BACKGROUND/HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE: Availability of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) has improved clinical outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis, but it also increased the cost of treatment. Biosimilars, the regulated copies of biologic products, have a potential to reduce health care costs and expand access to treatment. However, because of a complex development process, biosimilars can be considered only those noninnovator biologics with satisfactory supporting evidence (ranging from structural to clinical), as outlined in the recommendations by the World Health Organization (WHO). In Latin America, a heterogeneous regulatory landscape and nonconsistent approval practices for biosimilars create decision-making challenges for practicing rheumatologists. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE: Most Latin American countries either have adopted or are in the process of adopting guidelines for the approval of biosimilars. However, among several marketed bDMARDs in the region, currently there are only 2 products that could be considered true biosimilars, based on the WHO criteria. The rest can be considered only intended copies, whose safety and efficacy are not fully established. One such product had to be withdrawn from the market because of safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Practicing rheumatologists in Latin America need to understand the regulatory situation for biosimilars in their countries. When considering bDMARDs that are not innovator products, clinicians should use only those that have been approved according to the WHO recommendations. For clarification, local health authorities or professional associations should be contacted.

Maintenance of Remission with Etanercept-DMARD Combination Therapy Compared with DMARDs Alone in African and Middle Eastern Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: To compare etanercept (ETN) and placebo (PBO) for maintaining low disease activity (LDA) achieved with ETN in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from Africa and the Middle East. METHODS: In this subset analysis of the Treat-to-Target trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01981473), 53 adult patients with moderate-to-severe RA nonresponsive to methotrexate were treated with 50 mg ETN/week for 24 weeks (Period 1). Patients achieving LDA were randomized to continue ETN treatment or switched to PBO for an additional 28 weeks (Period 2). The proportion of patients maintaining LDA or remission in each arm at the end of Period 2 was determined. Additional efficacy and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were also evaluated. RESULTS: During Period 1, 51 patients achieved LDA according to the disease activity score-28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR LDA) and 30 achieved remission. At week 52, nine of 22 and eight of 29 in the ETN and PBO groups, respectively, remained in DAS28-ESR LDA without experiencing a flare. Additionally, six of 14 and five of 16 in the ETN and PBO groups, respectively, remained in remission. Among patients experiencing a flare during Period 2, 13 of 22 and 21 of 29 received ETN or PBO, respectively. The median time to flare was 193 and 87 days in the ETN and PBO groups, respectively. At week 52, consistently more patients in the ETN group than in the PBO group achieved predetermined efficacy and PRO endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest continuing ETN maintenance therapy is beneficial to patients after they have achieved their treatment target. However, this subset analysis is limited by the small patient population and must be interpreted with caution. FUNDING: Pfizer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT0198147.

A Pilot Dose-Finding Study of Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

A randomized, parallel-dose study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of etanercept in 61 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received doses from 10 mg once-weekly to 50 mg twice-weekly for 4 weeks. Empiric application of a maximal-effect (Emax ) model to pooled steady-state concentrations (Css ) and PD markers provided half-maximal-effect concentration estimates of 567, 573, 465, 87, and 159 ng/mL for change from baseline in number of swollen joints, number of painful joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, interleukin-6, and matrix metalloproteinase-3, respectively. Css >∼2,000 ng/mL did not appear to offer additional benefit. It was concluded that the middle doses, 10 mg twice-weekly, 50 mg every 2 weeks, and 50 mg once-weekly, would provide Css in the target range of 500-2,000 ng/mL. The revised US Food and Drug Administration guideline for development of medicines for treatment of RA encourages a study design incorporating PK/PD assessment to inform later studies.

Modification of structural lesions on MRI of the sacroiliac joints by etanercept in the EMBARK trial: a 12-week randomised placebo-controlled trial in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on structural lesions observed on MRI in the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) at 12 weeks in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) receiving etanercept or placebo in EMBARK (Effect of Etanercept on Symptoms and Objective Inflammation in nr-axSpA, a 104 week study). METHODS: Patients were randomised to double-blind etanercept 50 mg/week or placebo for 12 weeks. Structural lesions at baseline and 12 weeks were scored by two independent readers using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) SIJ structural score (SSS) on T1-weighted MRI. Change in SPARCC SSS and correlation with improvement in clinical outcomes was evaluated. RESULTS: MRI scans from 185 patients (etanercept, n=88; placebo, n=97) were reviewed. At baseline, there were no significant differences in mean SPARCC SSS between etanercept and placebo. From baseline to 12 weeks, change in mean SPARCC SSS was significantly greater for etanercept than placebo for erosion (-0.57 vs -0.08, respectively, adjusted p value=0.017) and backfill (0.36 vs 0.06, adjusted p value=0.022). A treatment difference was also present for the subgroup of patients with SIJ inflammation on MRI (SPARCC bone marrow oedema ≥2): erosion: -0.81 versus -0.13 for etanercept versus placebo, respectively, p=0.007; backfill: 0.48 versus 0.08, respectively, p=0.032. Decrease in erosion and increase in backfill correlated with improvement in more clinical outcomes for etanercept than placebo. CONCLUSION: Treatment with etanercept was associated with significantly greater reduction in erosions and increase in backfill at 12 weeks compared with placebo, consistent with a very early reparative response to antitumour necrosis factor therapy. The impact on disease progression in spondyloarthritis should be studied further. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01258738; Post-results.

Evaluation of the change in structural radiographic sacroiliac joint damage after 2 years of etanercept therapy (EMBARK trial) in comparison to a contemporary control cohort (DESIR cohort) in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 years of radiographic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) changes in patients with recent onset axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) receiving etanercept in a clinical trial (EMBARK) to similar patients not receiving biologics in a cohort study (DESIR). METHODS: Endpoints were changes at week 104 per the modified New York (mNY) grading system in total SIJ score (primary endpoint) and net percentage of patients with progression defined three ways. Treatment effect was analysed with and without adjustment for baseline covariates. RESULTS: At 104 weeks, total SIJ score improved in the etanercept group (n=154, adjusted least-squares mean change: -0.14) and worsened in the control group (n=182, change: 0.08). The adjusted difference between groups (etanercept minus control) was -0.22 (95% CI -0.38 to -0.06), p=0.008. The net percentage of patients with progression was significantly lower in the etanercept versus the control group for two of three binary endpoints: -1.9% versus 1.6% (adjusted difference for etanercept minus control: -4.7%,95% CI -9.9 to 0.5, p=0.07) for change in mNY criteria; -1.9% versus 7.8% (adjusted difference: -18.2%,95% CI -30.9 to -5.6, p=0.005) for change ≥1 grade in ≥1 SIJ; and -0.6% versus 6.7% (adjusted difference: -16.4%,95% CI -27.9 to -5.0, p=0.005) for change ≥1 grade in ≥1 SIJ, with shift from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 considered no change. CONCLUSION: Despite the slow radiographic SIJ progression rate over 2 years in axSpA, this study suggests a lower rate of progression in the SIJ with etanercept than without anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT01258738, NCT01648907; Post-results.