A 3D-Printed Externally Adjustable Symmetrically Extensible (EASE) Aortic Annuloplasty Ring for Root Repair and Aortic Valve Regurgitation.

PURPOSE: The valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) procedure was developed to preserve the aortic valve apparatus to replace aneurysmal aortic roots with synthetic grafts and to eliminate associated aortic regurgitation (AR). However, residual post-repair AR is not uncommon and has been found to be associated with recurrent AR and future reoperation. METHODS: We designed and manufactured a 3D-printed, external adjustable symmetrically extensible (EASE) aortic annuloplasty ring that can symmetrically reduce the aortic annulus diameter via a radial constriction, compliant mechanism. An ex vivo porcine VSARR model with annular dilation and AR was developed (n = 4) and used for hemodynamic, echocardiography, and high-speed videography data collection. RESULTS: After ring annuloplasty repair using the EASE aortic ring, the regurgitant fraction decreased from 23.6 ± 6.9% from the VSARR model to 7.4 ± 5.6% (p = 0.05), which was similar to that measured from baseline with a regurgitant fraction of 10.2 ± 3.9% (p = 0.34). The leaflet coaptation height after annuloplasty repair also significantly increased from that measured in VSARR model (0.4 ± 0.1 cm) to 0.9 ± 0.1 cm (p = 0.0004), a level similar to that measured in baseline (1.1 ± 0.1 cm, p = 0.28). CONCLUSION: Using an ex vivo VSARR model, the EASE ring successfully reduced AR by reducing the annular diameter and improving leaflet coaptation. With its broad applicability and ease of use, this device has the potential to have a significant impact on patients suffering worldwide from AR due to root aneurysms.

Effects of Residual Arch Tears on Late Outcomes After Hemiarch Replacement for DeBakey I Dissection.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effect of residual arch tears on late reinterventions and arch dilatation after hemiarch replacement for patients with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. METHODS: Between January 1995 and October 2018, 160 consecutive patients who underwent hemiarch replacement for DeBakey type I dissection were retrospectively enrolled. They were divided into patients with (n = 73) and without (n = 87) residual arch tears. The arch tears group was subdivided into the proximal/middle arch (n = 26) and distal arch (n = 47) groups to evaluate arch growth rates according to the locations of residual arch tears. The endpoints were arch growth rate and late arch and composite events. RESULTS: The arch diameter increased significantly over time in patients with residual arch tears (1.620 mm/y, P < .001). The increase occurred more rapidly when residual tears occurred at the distal arch than at the proximal/middle arch level (2.101 vs 1.001 mm/y). In the adjusted linear mixed model, residual arch tears or luminal communications at the distal arch level were significant factors associated with increases in the arch diameter over time. The 10-year freedom from late arch and composite event rate was significantly lower for patients with residual arch tears than for those without (82.4% vs 95.5%, P = .001; and 68.0% vs 89.3%, P = .002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Residual arch tears are significant factors associated with late arch dilatation and reinterventions, especially for patients with distal arch tears. Extensive arch replacement during the initial surgery to avoid residual arch tears may improve long-term outcomes.

Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years: Analysis using Korean National Big Data.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and long-term survival in patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) with mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves. METHODS: Patients aged 50-69 years who had undergone AVR from 2002 to 2018 were identified and their characteristics were collected from Korean National Health Information Database formed by the National Health Insurance Service, Republic of Korea. Of the 5792 patients, 1060 patients were excluded due to missing values on characteristics. Of the 4732 study patients, 1945 patients (41.1%) had received bioprosthetic valves (Group B) and 2787 patients (58.9%) had received mechanical valves (Group M). A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to match 1429 patients in each group. Data on mortality, cardiac mortality, reoperations, cerebrovascular accidents, and bleeding complications were obtained. RESULTS: The overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years postoperatively were 87.8% and 75.2% in the matched Group B and 91.2% and 76.7% in the matched Group M, respectively (p = .140). Freedom from cardiac death rates at postoperative 5 and 10 years were 95.6% and 92.4% in the matched Group B and 96.0% and 92.1% in the matched Group M, respectively (p = .540). The cumulative incidence of reoperation was higher in the matched Group B than in the matched Group M (p = .007), and the cumulative incidence of major bleeding was higher in the matched Group M than in the matched Group B (p = .039). CONCLUSION: In patients aged 50-69 years who underwent isolated AVR, the patients who received bioprosthetic valves showed similar cardiac mortality-free survival and long-term survival rates to the patients who received mechanical valves.

Long-Term Outcomes of Preoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (Afib) is a marker of increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Owing to the increased prevalence of Afib in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, assessing the effect of Afib on postsurgical outcomes is important. We aimed to analyze the effect of preoperative Afib on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery using a large surgical database. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was based on the national health claims database established by the National Health Insurance Service of the Republic of Korea from 2009 to 2015. Diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify diseases according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th revision. Results: We included 1,037 patients (0.1%) who had undergone cardiac surgery from a randomized 1,000,000-patient cohort, and 15 patients (1.5%) treated with isolated surgical Afib ablation were excluded. Of these 1,022 patients, 412 (39.7%), 303 (29.2%), and 92 (9.0%) underwent coronary artery bypass, heart valve surgery, and Cox-maze surgery, respectively. Preoperative Afib was associated with higher patient mortality (p=0.028), regardless of the surgical procedure. Patients with preoperative Afib (n=190, 18.6%) experienced a higher cumulative risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.435; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.263-2.107; p=0.034). Subgroup analysis revealed a reduced risk of overall mortality with Cox-maze surgery in Afib patients (HR, 0.500; 95% CI, 0.266-0.938; p=0.031). Postoperative cerebral ischemia or hemorrhage events were not related to Afib. Conclusion: Preoperative Afib was independently associated with worse long-term postoperative outcomes after cardiac surgery. Concomitant Cox-maze surgery may improve the survival rate.

Role of False Lumen Area Ratio in Late Aortic Events After Acute Type I Aortic Dissection Repair.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate whether distal aortic maximum false lumen area (MFLA) ratio predicts late aortic dilation and reintervention after open repair of acute type I aortic dissection. METHODS: We analyzed 309 nonsyndromic acute type I aortic dissection patients who were treated with a repair to the proximal aorta between 1994 and 2017. In 230 patients who did not show completely thrombosed false lumen on postoperative computed tomography, the MFLA ratio (MFLA/aortic area) on the descending thoracic aorta (DTA) was measured with postoperative computed tomography. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the quartile range of MFLA ratio: low MFLA, <0.62 (n = 57); intermediate MFLA, 0.62 to 0.81 (n = 116); and high MFLA, ≥0.82 (n = 57). RESULTS: The aortic expansion rate was significantly higher in the high MFLA group (11.1 ± 21.2 mm/y) compared with intermediate (3.0 ± 7.4 mm/y; P < .01) and low (0.6 ± 6.6 mm/y; P < .01) MFLA groups. High MFLA was found to be an independent risk factor for significant aortic expansion (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.26; 95% CI, 1.53-18.12; P < .01) and aorta-related reintervention (hazard ratio, 4.99; 95% CI, 2.23-11.13; P < .01), and the MFLA ratio was significantly related to proximal DTA reentry tears (adjusted odds ratio, 12974.3; P < .001; area under curve, 0.807). CONCLUSIONS: A high MFLA ratio on the DTA after acute type I aortic dissection repair is associated with increased risk of late aortic reintervention and distal aortic dilation. A high MFLA ratio is strongly associated with proximal DTA reentry tears.

Human Tissue Analysis of Left Atrial Adipose Tissue and Atrial Fibrillation after Cox Maze Procedure.

Cardiac adipose tissue is a well-known risk factor for the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after radiofrequency catheter ablation, but its correlation with maze surgery remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the recurrence of AF and the adipose component of the left atrium (LA) in patients who underwent a modified Cox maze (CM) III procedure. We reviewed the pathology data of resected LA tissues from 115 patients, including the adipose tissue from CM-III procedures. The mean follow-up duration was 30.05 ± 23.96 months. The mean adipose tissue component in the AF recurrence group was 16.17% ± 14.32%, while in the non-recurrence group, it was 9.48% ± 10.79% (p = 0.021), and the cut-off value for the adipose component for AF recurrence was 10% (p = 0.010). The rates of freedom from AF recurrence at 1, 3, and 5 years were 84.8%, 68.8%, and 38.6%, respectively, in the high-adipose group (≥10%), and 96.3%, 89.7%, and 80.3%, respectively, in the low-adipose group (<10%; p = 0.002). A high adipose component (≥10%) in the LA is a significant risk factor for AF recurrence after CM-III procedures. Thus, it may be necessary to attempt to reduce the perioperative adipose portion of the cardiac tissue using a statin in a randomized study.

Surgical Findings and Outcomes of Endotension Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Endotension is one of the detrimental complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and surgical management has been considered as standard of care. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the findings, and outcomes of such surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to investigate intraoperative findings and outcomes of surgical treatment for endotension after EVAR. METHODS: Between January 2005 and October 2018, of the 708 patients who underwent EVAR for aneurysm aortic aneurysm; 12 patients (mean age of 76.1; range 66-88) who underwent open repair for endotension were retrospectively analyzed. The anatomical characteristics of the aorta and surgical findings were reviewed. The rates of early and late procedural complications, and overall mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: The median interval between the EVAR and surgical conversion was 45.9 months (range 17.1-46.9). Three of the twelve patients underwent emergency surgery due to aneurysm rupture. The median aneurysm sac size, the proximal neck diameter, and the proximal neck length before EVAR were 64 mm, 23.5 mm, and 30.5 mm, respectively, that changed before open repair to 93.5 mm (P = 0.02), 25 mm (P = 0.011), and 23 mm (P = 0.003), respectively. In four of the twelve patients, radiographically undetected endoleak was identified during surgery to be Type Ia, Ib, II, and III, respectively. The rates of early and late procedural complications, and overall mortality were 8.3%, 8.3% and 8.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with endotension have a risk of delayed endoleak and aneurysm rupture; secondary intervention should be performed in such cases to prevent fatal complications. Surgical treatment appears to be a curative treatment for endotension with favorable outcomes. In addition, the possibility of an undetected endoleak should be considered as a potential cause of endotension.

The long-term fate of ascending aorta aneurysm after wrapping versus replacement.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to examine the long-term fate of aortic diameter expansion at 4 cardiac regions (annulus, sinus, ascending aorta, and proximal arch) after wrapping or replacement during aortic valve surgery of the moderately dilated ascending aorta. METHODS: From January 1995 to December 2018, 964 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement at our institution were reviewed. Of them, 204 (mean age, 60.7 ± 7.4 years) underwent ascending aorta wrapping (n = 96) or replacement (n = 108) for a moderately dilated ascending aorta (40 to 55 mm). The overall fate of the aortic diameter was analyzed with a linear mixed-effect model. The median follow-up duration was 7.1 years. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, the baseline maximal ascending aortic diameter median value was 47.3 ± 3.1 mm and 49.4 ± 13.5 mm in the wrapping and replacement groups, respectively. The annulus, sinus, and ascending aorta did not redilate in either group. The proximal aortic arch diameter significantly increased over time (0.343 mm/year; P = .006) in the wrapping group but not in the replacement group (0.066 mm/year; P = .649). Multivariable competing risk analysis identified the initial ascending aorta diameter at the wrapping procedure as an independent risk factor of proximal arch redilation (0.071 ± 0.037, P < .001). The cutoff value was an initial ascending aorta diameter of 47.2 mm for the prediction proximal arch redilation (area under the curve, 0.703; P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic wrapping and replacement may be long-term durable treatment options in patients with a moderately enlarged ascending aorta. We suggest careful evaluation of redilation in the proximal arch after an aorta wrapping procedure.

Increase of Vδ2+ T Cells That Robustly Produce IL-17A in Advanced Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Tissues.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a chronic dilation of the aorta with a tendency to enlarge and eventually rupture, which constitutes a major cause of cardiovascular mortality. Although T-cell infiltrates have been observed in AAA, the cellular, phenotypic, and functional characteristics of these tissue-infiltrating T cells are not fully understood. Here, we investigated the proportional changes of T-cell subsets-including CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and γδ T cells-and their effector functions in AAAs. We found that Vδ2+ T cells were presented at a higher frequency in aortic aneurysmal tissue compared to normal aortic tissue and PBMCs from patients with AAA. In contrast, no differences were observed in the frequencies of CD4+, CD8+, and Vδ1+ T cells. Moreover, we observed that the Vδ2+ T cells from AAA tissue displayed immunophenotypes indicative of CCR5+ non-exhausted effector memory cells, with a decreased proportion of CD16+ cells. Finally, we found that these Vδ2+ T cells were the main source of IL-17A in abdominal aortic aneurysmal tissue. In conclusion, our results suggest that increased Vδ2+ T cells that robustly produce IL-17A in aortic aneurysmal tissue may contribute to AAA pathogenesis and progression.

Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes in 121 Patients Who Underwent Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve Implantation　- Early Results From a Single Korean Institution.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the early outcomes of Perceval sutureless valves in the Korean population and to introduce a modified technique of guiding suture placement during valve deployment.Methods and Results:From December 2014 to April 2019, 121 patients (mean age: 74.7±6.2 years; 53.7% female) received a Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement. To prevent conduction system injury, the depth of guiding suture placement (1 mm below the nadir of the annulus) was modified. All patients underwent echocardiographic evaluation at discharge and 6-12 months postoperatively, with a mean follow up of 13.7±11.2 months. Concomitant surgeries, such as coronary artery bypass grafting, and other valvular surgeries, were performed in 45.5% of cases. The mean aortic cross-clamp times for isolated and minimal procedures were 32.8±7.9, and 41.2±8.0 min, respectively. The overall transvalvular mean gradients were 13.1±3.8 mmHg at discharge and 11.5±4.7 mmHg at the last follow up. After modifying the guiding suture placement, permanent pacemaker implantation risk decreased from 9.9% to 2.5%. Cardiac-related mortality was 0.8%, with no patient developing valvular or paravalvular aortic regurgitation, valve thrombosis, or endocarditis. CONCLUSIONS: Perceval valve implantation provided a significant cardiac-related survival benefit with excellent early hemodynamic and clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to determine whether adjusting the implantation depth, such as modification of the guiding suture technique, can reduce the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation.

A Retrospective Comparison of Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes between Two Differently Designed Aortic Bioprostheses for Small Aortic Annuli.

The Trifecta valve has externally mounted leaflets; it differs from classic internally mounted valves (e.g., Carpentier-Edwards [C-E]). We evaluated post-implantation hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of these bioprostheses in small aortic annuli. From January 2015 to April 2019, 490 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) were reviewed retrospectively. Altogether, 183 patients received 19 or 21 mm diameter C-E (n = 121) or Trifecta (n = 62) prostheses. To minimize confounding variables, we performed propensity-score matching analysis. The mean transvalvular pressure gradient (TVPG) was significantly lower in the Trifecta than in the C-E group at discharge (12.9 ± 4.8 vs. 15.0 ± 5.3 mmHg, p = 0.044). TVPG change over time was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.357). Left ventricular mass index decreased postoperatively (reduction: C-E, 28.1%; Trifecta, 30.1%, p = 0.879). No late mortality, severe patient-prosthesis mismatch, moderate-to-severe paravalvular leakage, structural valve degeneration, or valve thromboses were observed. Freedom from valve-related events at 3 years were similar for C-E (97.9% ± 2.1%) and Trifecta (97.7% ± 2.2%) patients (log-rank p = 0.993). Bioprosthesis design for small annuli significantly affected TVPG immediately after AVR. However, hemodynamics over time and clinical outcomes did not differ between the two designs.

Long-term Clinical Impacts of Functional Mitral Stenosis After Mitral Valve Repair.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between functional mitral stenosis (MS) after mitral valve (MV) repair and long-term clinical outcomes is not fully understood. Therefore, we reviewed an institutional series to identify the determinants of functional MS and its effect on long-term clinical outcomes after MV repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation. METHODS: Between January 1990 and December 2015, 792 patients who underwent MV repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation were retrospectively enrolled and divided into 2 groups: functional MS (n = 192) (≥5 mm Hg mean diastolic pressure gradient across the MV) and nonfunctional MS (n = 600) (<5 mm Hg mean diastolic pressure gradient). Mean follow-up was 11.6 ± 5.8 years. RESULTS: After propensity-score matching, patients' characteristics were comparable between groups (n = 192/group). At 20 years, the functional MS group had significantly lower rates of freedom from new-onset atrial fibrillation (73.0% ± 5.6% versus 93.2% ± 2.3%; P = .003), overall survival (72.1% ± 4.6% versus 85.6% ± 4.3%; P = .010), and freedom from MV reoperation (82.8% ± 4.1% versus 92.5% ± 4.2%; P = .019) than the nonfunctional group. The functional MS group also had a significantly greater postoperative left atrial volume index and tricuspid regurgitation grade. A small left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (hazard ratio = 0.975; 95% confidence interval, 0.955-0.996; P = .022) and annuloplasty ring (hazard ratio = 0.757; 95% confidence interval, 0.685-0.837; P < .001) were independent risk factors for functional MS. CONCLUSIONS: A small left ventricle and annuloplasty ring increased the risk for functional MS after MV repair and was associated with progressive left atrial enlargement and tricuspid regurgitation exacerbation. As a result, functional MS increased the risk for new-onset atrial fibrillation, MV reoperation, and decreased long-term survival.

Comparative Outcome Analysis of N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Embolization of the False Lumen Versus Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Aortic Dissection.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) embolization for the treatment of aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study conducted from February 2003 to June 2019, NBCA embolization of an aortic false lumen was attempted in 12 patients (median age, 59 y; range, 41-68 y) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed in 53 patients (median age, 59 y; range, 37-70 y) for aortic dissection with one or more indications of persisting pain, malperfusion, rupture or impending rupture, maximal aortic diameter ≥ 55 mm, and/or rapid aortic enlargement. The main exclusion criterion for embolization was the presence of fast blood flow in the aortic false lumen on aortography. The efficacy of NBCA embolization and TEVAR was compared by evaluating technical and clinical outcomes, repeat intervention-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 11 of the 12 patients treated with NBCA embolization (91.7%), and clinical success was achieved in 9 of these 11 (81.8%). No significant difference was found between embolization and TEVAR in clinical success rates (embolization, 81.8%; TEVAR, 84.9%; P = .409) or procedure-related complications (embolization, 1 patient [8.3%]; TEVAR, 4 patients [7.5%]; P = .701). In addition, embolization showed comparable 5-y RFS (embolization, 82.5% ± 9.3; TEVAR, 85.5% ± 4.8; P = .641) and 5-y OS (embolization, 100%; TEVAR, 95.4% ± 3.2; P = .744) rates to TEVAR. CONCLUSIONS: NBCA embolization of the false lumen in aortic dissection seems to be a safe and effective treatment modality for the closure of false lumen in selected patients.

Prognostic Markers and Long-Term Outcomes After Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Chronic Aortic Regurgitation.

Background The objectives of the present study were (1) to evaluate the echocardiographic prognostic factors associated with improved left ventricular (LV) systolic function after aortic valve replacement, and (2) to compare the long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement in chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) patients with or without LV dysfunction. Methods and Results A total of 280 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement because of chronic aortic regurgitation were studied. Patients with reduced LV systolic function (LV ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%; group reduced LVEF [rEF]; N=80) were compared with those with preserved LV systolic function (LVEF ≥50%; group preserved LVEF; N=200). Postoperative clinical outcomes, overall survival, and freedom from cardiac death were compared. Postoperative echocardiographic examinations were reviewed, and changes in echocardiographic parameters were analyzed. The parameters related to LVEF improvement or normalization were evaluated, and risk factors affecting long-term survival were identified. Follow-up was complete in 100% of patients, with a median follow-up of 104.8 months. Overall and cardiac mortality-free survival rates at postoperative 10 years were 80.1% and 92.9% and 87.3% and 97.2% in groups rEF and preserved LVEF, respectively (P=0.036 and P=0.058, respectively). LVEF tended to decrease in the early postoperative period but improved thereafter in both groups. Preoperative early diastolic transmitral flow velocity/mitral annular tissue velocity ratio was a parameter of postoperative improvement or normalization of LVEF in all patients (area under the curve, 0.719; P=0.003) and in group rEF patients (area under the curve, 0.726; P=0.011) with a cutoff value of 12.73. Preoperative early diastolic transmitral flow velocity/mitral annular tissue velocity ratio also was the parameter of overall survival in all patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; P=0.001) and in group rEF patients (HR, 1.08; P=0.005). Conclusions Long-term outcomes and survival after aortic valve replacement were related to preoperative LV function in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Preoperative early diastolic transmitral flow velocity/mitral annular tissue velocity ratio was correlated with the postoperative improvement or normalization of LVEF and long-term survival, especially in group rEF patients.

Long-term Fate of Dilated Ascending Aorta after Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Disease.

We compared the long-term outcomes and difference in dilatation rates of the ascending aorta after aortic valve (AV) replacement (AVR) between bicuspid and tricuspid AV patients, and evaluated risk factors associated with ascending aorta dilatation and aortic events during the follow-up. Of 1,127 patients who underwent AVR from 1995 to 2015, 259 patients with a dilated ascending aorta (≥40 mm in diameter) were included. The patients were divided into those with bicuspid (group bicuspid aortic valve [BAV], n = 105) and with tricuspid (group tricuspid aortic valve [TAV], n = 154) AV, and a propensity score-matched analysis was performed to match 98 patients in each group. The differences in the dilation rate of the ascending aorta and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Risk factors for ascending aorta dilatation, mortality, and aortic events were identified. Follow-up was completed in 100% of patients with a median follow-up duration of 106.1 [68.8, 163.0] months. The early clinical outcomes and dilation rate of the ascending aorta were similar between the groups. Overall survivals up to 15 years postoperatively were similar between groups BAV and TAV (p = 0.223). Aortic events occurred in 6 patients (groups BAV vs TAV, 2 vs 4;p = 0.678). Preoperative ascending aorta diameter showed a linear relationship with the dilatation rate of ascending aorta (p <0.001) and was related to progressive aortic dilatation and aortic events (odds ratio: 1.25, p <0.001 and hazard ratio = 1.56, p <0.001, respectively). In conclusion, the long-term outcomes and ascending aorta dilatation rate were similar between the BAV and TAV patients up to 15 years after AVR. Bicuspid AV was not a risk factor of mortality or aortic events.

The fate of residual aortic regurgitation after ascending aorta replacement in type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the changes in postoperative aortic regurgitation (AR) and determine the predictors of significant AR and root reoperation after ascending aortic replacement (AAR) in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: From January 1995 to December 2017, 271 consecutive patients underwent valve/root-preserving AAR (n = 225) and root replacement (n = 46). AR grade trend over time was analyzed by the ordinal mixed-effects model. Significant AR was defined as AR grade ≥3+ during the follow-up period. Predischarge and follow-up echocardiograms were obtained in 95.6% and 88.8% of enrolled patients, respectively. RESULTS: At predischarge, postoperative ≥2+ AR was present in 20 (9.3%) and 1 (2.3%) patients in the AAR and root replacement groups, respectively. With increasing time after surgery, the grade of AR increased. At 10 years, 4.6% of patients had developed 3+ or 4+ AR. Considering death as the competing risk, the 10-year cumulative incidence of significant AR was significantly higher in the AAR than in the root replacement group (12.3% vs 2.2%; P = .047). The risk of root reoperation at 10 years was not different between the groups (P = .118). On Cox analysis, preoperative ≥3+ AR (P = .002), postoperative ≥2+ AR (P = .040), and false to true lumen ratio (P = .005) were associated predictors of significant AR. CONCLUSIONS: Although valve/root-preserving AAR demonstrated reasonable long-term outcomes when compared with root replacement, preoperative ≥3+ AR, postoperative ≥2+ AR, and high false to true lumen ratio significantly increased the risk of significant AR. Therefore, careful echocardiographic surveillance may be warranted in patients with postoperative ≥2+ AR and small true lumen.