Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Allergy ; 51(28 Suppl): 20-7, 1996.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8651473

RESUMO

This multicentre double-blind, placebo controlled study had a practical objective, based on the expectation that many patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis will be prescribed oral antihistamine monotherapy by their primary care physician, whereas allergy specialists are more likely to prescribe combination therapy including antiinflammatories. The specific question was, "Will the addition of nedocromil sodium 1% nasal spray to astemizole tablets improve control of symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis induced by ragweed pollen, as compared to astemizole therapy alone?'. Following a one-week baseline, planned to coincide with the start of the local ragweed pollen season, patients (aged 12-64) were randomly assigned to four weeks' double-blind test treatment with either nedocromil sodium 1% nasal spray four times daily (QID) + astemizole (n = 146) or placebo nasal spray + astemizole (n = 148) or double-dummy (nasal spray + capsules) placebo (n = 71). Patient diary cards were kept throughout the five weeks, and clinic visits were made before and after baseline and after one and four weeks' treatment. During the 10-day peak pollen period, the diary card rhinitis symptom summary score (0-4 severity scale) was significantly reduced in patients receiving either astemizole alone (p < 0.001) or the combination therapy (p < 0.001) as compared with placebo. Direct comparison of the active treatments further showed that symptoms were significantly less severe (p < 0.01) with the combined therapy than with astemizole alone, and this despite significantly greater reliance on permitted rescue medications (p < 0.05 for pseudoephedrine usage) in the astemizole group. Clinical assessments of rhinitis made during the peak pollen visit, after the first week of test treatment, were also significantly (p < 0.05 - p < 0.01) in favour of combined therapy with nedocromil sodium 1% nasal spray + astemizole rather than astemizole alone, and at the same time this preference was confirmed by physician (p = 0.011) and patient (p = 0.003) opinions of symptom control. In conclusion, this antiinflammatory + antihistamine treatment proved superior to antihistamine alone for effective management of allergic rhinitis. The combined therapy worked quickly and was well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events or untoward effects on blood or urine variables.


Assuntos
Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Astemizol/uso terapêutico , Nedocromil/uso terapêutico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intranasal , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 86(4 Pt 1): 554-61, 1990 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2172349

RESUMO

This study was a double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate a new medication, nedocromil sodium, 1%, in comparison with placebo and cromolyn sodium, 4%, for treatment of ragweed seasonal allergic rhinitis. Two hundred thirty-three patients (aged 12 to 65 years) from eight centers were randomized to treatment, one spray per nostril, four times daily, with nedocromil sodium, cromolyn sodium, or matched placebo (80, 76, and 77 patients, respectively). All patients had at least a 2-year history of ragweed seasonal allergic rhinitis. Treatment was for 8 weeks during the ragweed season, and daily pollen counts were used to identify the peak 3-week period. Clinic examinations were made before and after the 1-week baseline and after 1, 3, 5, and 8 weeks of treatment. Rhinitis symptoms were recorded each day by the patients. Nedocromil sodium was more effective than placebo (p less than 0.05) in relieving symptoms as recorded by the patients. Cromolyn sodium was also more effective than placebo, but the difference was not usually significant. Similarly, the active treatments were both better than placebo for clinical parameters measured at visits and for global opinions of treatment, and more rescue therapy was used by the placebo-treated group. There was no significant difference between the two active treatments, but the trend throughout was in favor of nedocromil sodium. Our findings demonstrated nedocromil sodium to be at least as effective as an established therapy (cromolyn sodium) in reducing symptoms of rhinitis during the peak ragweed pollen season.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Cromolina Sódica/uso terapêutico , Quinolonas/uso terapêutico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Criança , Cromolina Sódica/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nedocromil , Placebos , Quinolonas/efeitos adversos , Soluções , Fatores de Tempo
6.
Pediatrics ; 45(3): 511, 1970 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5445545
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...