Human progesterone receptor A and B isoforms in CHO cells. II. Comparison of binding, transactivation and ED50 values of several synthetic (anti)progestagens in vitro in CHO and MCF-7 cells and in vivo in rabbits and rats.

The human progesterone receptor A and B isoforms (hPR-A and hPR-B) were stably transfected in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells in the presence or absence of the mouse mamma tumor virus (MMTV) promoter and luciferase (LUC) reporter gene. In this way four stably transfected CHO cell lines, i.e. hPR-A, hPR-B, hPR-A-MMTV-LUC and hPR-B-MMTV-LUC cells, were prepared. hPR-A and -B isoforms were compared by binding and transactivation analysis for 14 progestagens and 7 antiprogestagens. Thereby Org 2058 was used as standard in both agonistic and binding assays and Org 31710 in antagonistic assays. The obtained data were compared with relative binding affinities (RBA) for both hPR-A and -B, which are present in human breast tumor MCF-7 cells, and with biopotency estimations with McPhail tests in rabbits and ovulation inhibition and pregnancy interruption tests in rats. The relative binding affinities of 14 progestagens and 7 antiprogestagens towards hPR-A, hPR-B or hPR-A/B of either CHO or MCF-7 cells were highly correlated with respect to ranking. This was also shown by the high correlation coefficients between the RBA's of hPR-B and hPR-A in CHO cells (r = 0.983) and between those of hPR-B of CHO and hPR A/B of MCF-7 cells (r = 0.957). The transactivation data of the 14 progestagens and 7 antiprogestagens for the hPR-B-MMTV-LUC cells were compared with those for hPR-A-MMTV-LUC cells and showed no differences between both cell lines with exception of the progestagens Org 32704 and 33766 and the antiprogestagen Org 33245. Therefore only the relative agonistic activities (RAA) and relative antagonistic activities (RANTA) of hPR-B-MMTV-LUC cells were compared with RBA values of hPR-B, showing a high similarity in ranking for the tested compounds, and high correlation coefficients of r = 0.91 and r = 0.97, respectively. Remarkably, RBA's were 1.6 fold higher than RAA's and RANTA's. These in vitro RBA, RAA and RANTA values for hPR-B were checked for their pharmacological relevance by in vivo biopotency measurements with the 14 progestagens and 7 antiprogestagens in rabbits and rats. The in vitro binding and transactivation potencies of progestagens appeared to be very predictive for in vivo analysis on endometrium proliferation in rabbits in the McPhail test with correlation coefficients of r = 0.81 and r = 0.87, while ovulation inhibition in rats correlated less well with r = 0.516 and r = 0.65. On the other hand, the antiprogestagenic potencies found with binding and transactivation assays had a good correlation with the potencies in the pregnancy interruption test in rats for all antiprogestagens tested, being r = 0.849 and r = 0.744, respectively. In conclusion, the binding and transactivation potencies for the tested compounds in hPR-A and -B containing cell lines showed in general a good resemblance. The transactivation studies with hPR-B-MMTV-LUC cells indicated that ranking of compounds was fairly identical to binding analysis and could be used for pre-screening of the (anti)-progestagenic bioactivity in the McPhail test in rabbits, the ovulation inhibition test and the pregnancy interruption test in rats. Therefore this transactivation assay can replace binding assays. Moreover, direct pre-screening of agonists, antagonists and partial antagonists is even possible in this in vitro bioassay, making transactivation assays for a particular class of chemical compounds to a valuable pre-screening tool for in vivo studies.

Effects of two classes of progestagens, pregnane and 19-nortestosterone derivatives, on cell growth of human breast tumor cells: I. MCF-7 cell lines.

The effects of two classes of progestagens, e.g. pregnane [Org 2058, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), R5020, progesterone (PROG)] and 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens [3-ketodesogestrel (KDG), levonorgestrel (LNG), gestodene (GES), norethisterone (NE), Org 30659] on proliferation of three estradiol (E2)-dependent human breast tumor MCF-7 cell lines of different origin [Van der Burg (B), Litton bionetics (L) and McGrath (M)] were studied. The pregnane derivatives hardly stimulated cell growth at 10(-6) M in MCF-7 B and L cells except for Org 2058 in B cells, whereas in M cells a statistically significant growth induction was observed except for PROG. The 19-nortestosterone derivatives induced cell growth at doses at 10(-7) M or higher in all three cell lines. NE, GES and Org 30659 were more potent stimulators than KDG and LNG at 10(-7) M. E2 already showed maximal stimulation at 10(-10) M. For all three cell lines, the effects and ranking of the individual progestagens were similar. Antiprogestagens, like RU 38486 and Org 31710 could not block these stimulatory effects while antiestrogens like 4-hydroxytamoxifen and ICI 164,384 could. This suggests that cell growth by the above-mentioned progestagens occurs via an interaction with the estrogen receptor. Indeed, displacement studies with cytosol from MCF-7 M cells revealed that at very high concentrations NE, GES and Org 30659 were able to displace 50% of the radiolabelled E2, while KDG and LNG could not. Relative binding affinities (RBAs) were 0.010, 0.025 and 0.015% for NE, GES and Org 30659, respectively. The effect of the two classes of progestagens on cell proliferation was also investigated at several dose levels in combination with E2 (10(-10) M) in the MCF-7 B cell line. This resulted in a statistically significant inhibition of cell growth with R5020, MPA and most of the 19-nortestosterone derivatives at concentrations of 10(-8) M. Org 2058 and NE did not have any influence on E2-induced growth. The inhibitory effects could not be blocked by antiprogestagens. In summary these studies with 3 subclones of MCF-7 cells show that the pregnane derived progestagens stimulate growth only in one subclone, whereas the 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens do so in all three subclones. The progestagens possess estrogenic activity only at high pharmacological doses, being 10,000 times weaker than estradiol. In combination with estrogens most progestagens gave a reduction of E2-stimulated growth in the B subclone.

Effects of two classes of progestagens, pregnane and 19-nortestosterone derivatives, on cell growth of human breast tumor cells: II. T47D cell lines.

Two classes of progestagens, e.g. pregnane [Org 2058, progesterone (PROG), R5020, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)] and 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens [norethisterone (NE), levonorgestrel (LNG), 3-ketodesogestrel (KDG), gestodene (GES), Org 30659] were studied for their effect on cell growth of two human breast tumor T47D cell lines of different origin, i.e. from ATCC (A) and Sutherland (S) et al. [Sutherland et al., Cancer Res. 48 (1988) 5084-5091]. The effect of estradiol (E2) and progestagens alone as well as the combined effect of E2 (10(-10) M) and progestagens were investigated at several dose levels. Compared with E2-induced growth at 10(-10) M, pregnane and 19-nortestosterone derived progestagens at 10(-6) M alone did enhance cell growth in T47D-A cells up to 25 and 100% respectively, whereas in T47D-S cells they did not influence growth. All these progestagens at 10(-6) M did not affect E2-induced growth in T47D-A cells, whereas in T47D-S cells they completely reduced cell proliferation at doses between 10(-10) and 10(-8) M. The involvement of progestagen (PR) and estrogen (ER) receptors with respect to growth stimulation was studied by using specific antihormones. In T47D-A cells, the antiprogestagens RU 38486 and Org 31710 could not block progestagen-induced growth. Antiestrogens, like 4-hydroxytamoxifen and ICI 164,384, inhibited the 19-nortestosterone derivative-induced cell growth by approx. 50%. Remarkably, both antiprogestagens alone could also inhibit E2-induced growth in T47D-A cells by about 50%. In T47D-S cells, E2-induced cell growth was completely blocked by both antiprogestagens and antiestrogens. Both antiprogestagens in T47D-S cells were equipotent to 4-hydroxytamoxifen and 10-fold more potent than ICI 164,384. In conclusion pregnane and 19-nortestosterone-derived progestagens stimulated cell growth in T47D-A cells at high unphysiological concentrations, whereas they did not affect cell growth in T47D-S cells. The 19-nortestosterone derivative induced growth in T47D-A cells could partially be inhibited by antiestrogens. In T47D-A cells, E2-induced cell growth was not influenced by both classes of progestagens, whereas in T47D-S cells all tested progestagens, antiprogestagens, and antiestrogens inhibited E2-induced cell growth completely. These results with T47D cells as well as those obtained previously with MCF-7 cells show that subclones of cell lines may respond differently to various types of progestagens in the presence and absence of estrogens.