The effects of remifentanil and sufentanil on the quality of recovery after day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized blinded trial.

BACKGROUND: Duration of hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is mainly determined by temporary side effects such as pain, nausea, and vomiting. In this study we compared remifentanil, a short acting opioid, and sufentanil, a longer acting opioid, on their ability to reduce these postoperative effects and facilitate LC in day case surgery. METHOD: Seventy patients scheduled for elective LC were randomized in two groups. Remifentanil was used in group 1 as part of the anesthetic protocol, sufentanil was used in group 2. After surgery, patients were asked to evaluate pain and nausea on a verbal rate scale (VRS). Frequency of vomiting and analgesic medication consumption was registered. Time between surgery and to the start of micturition, drinking, mobilization, dressing, and discharge was recorded. Patients registered their satisfaction on a VRS. Details of any other adverse events throughout the study were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (63%) of group 1 were treated as day cases vs. 27 (77%) in group 2 (P = NS). All patients who were not discharged as day cases left the hospital one day postoperatively. Immediately after surgery, patients in group 2 reported significantly less pain. There were no other significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients scheduled for LC can be safely discharged on the day of surgery. Reported satisfaction one week postoperatively was high for all patients. We found no major relevant differences between the two anesthetic protocols.

A haemodynamic comparison of intrathecal morphine and sufentanil supplemented with general anaesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery.

The haemodynamic changes associated with intrathecal morphine (IM) compared to intrathecal sufentanil (IS) as a supplement to general anaesthesia for elective bypass grafting in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease were studied. Thirty-six, ASA Grade 2, patients randomly received morphine hydrochloride (0.1%) 50 micrograms kg-1 (n = 18) or undiluted sufentanil, 150 micrograms (n = 18) intrathecally at T12-L1, combined with light general anaesthesia. Haemodynamics were measured before and after endotracheal intubation, abdominal incision, aortic cross-clamping and the first revascularisation. The major differences were recorded after abdominal incision. Heart rate, systemic blood pressure and coronary perfusion pressure were significantly lower in the IS group. The probable cause was greater systemic absorption of sufentanil and its faster binding to the specific opiate receptors, resulting in a more efficacious supraspinal and spinal blockade during the first surgical period. However, both opioids provided adequate analgesia during the whole surgical procedure.