Anti-apoptotic phenotype is associated with decreased locoregional recurrence rate in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Tumor stage and nodal status are the most important factors predicting locoregional recurrence in breast cancer. We wanted to investigate the prognostic value of some newer molecular genetic markers for the occurrence of a locoregional recurrence, in order to improve the selection of patients for locoregional adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Bcl-2, p53, MIB-1, pS2 and CD44v6 were determined immunohistochemically on formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tumour tissues of 163 patients treated by modified radical mastectomy between 1982 and 1987. Postoperative irradiation was given to 35 patients to the intermammary chain only and to only 13 (8%) patients to the chest wall with or without the regional lymph nodes. Node-positive patients were treated with CAF adjuvant chemotherapy and were randomized for whether or no additional Medroxyprogesteroneacetate (MPA). A multivariate analysis was performed on a number of potential prognostic factors. The risk for locoregional recurrence was estimated using the competing risk approach. RESULTS: After a median period of 7.5 years 28 patients developed a locoregional recurrence. The cumulative incidence of loco-regional recurrence at 10 years was 17%. Bcl-2 and p53 were found to be independent factors predicting locoregional recurrence, whereas a trend was found for MIB-1. Increased Bcl-2 as well as p53 expression were associated with a decreased risk, whereas the increased presence of MIB-1 was associated with an increased risk. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that molecular markers of apoptosis as well as proliferation provide additional information for the risk of locoregional recurrence after modified radical mastectomy. If confirmed, these markers may play a role in the selection of appropriate locoregional adjuvant treatment after primary surgery.

MIB-1 labelling index is an independent prognostic marker in primary breast cancer.

The proliferative activity of a tumour is considered to be an important prognostic factor in primary breast cancer. We have investigated the prognostic value of the MIB-1 labelling index in 341 patients with primary breast cancer and compared the results with the S-phase fraction in 220 patients of the same cohort. All patients were treated in one hospital and had a median follow-up of 128 months. No correlation between MIB-1 labelling and S-phase fraction could be demonstrated. MIB-1 had prognostic value for disease-free survival in the whole group of patients (P < 0.001) and in the node-negative subgroup (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, MIB-1 was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.004) besides axillary lymph node status (P = 0.001). In univariate analysis high S-phase fraction was associated with decreased overall survival (P = 0.04); however, not in multivariate analysis. Moreover, S-phase fraction had a borderline prognostic significance for post-relapse survival in multivariate analysis (P= 0.08). Thus, in conclusion, the growth fraction of a tumour as determined by the MIB-1 labelling index is an important prognostic factor in patients with primary breast cancer.

CD44v6 is not a prognostic factor in primary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: CD44 is an adhesion molecule and represents a highly variable family of isoforms. The isoform CD44v6 has been associated with metastasis formation and poor prognosis in animal models and human colon cancer. Results of studies in primary breast cancer are relatively small and contradictory. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The immunohistochemical expression of CD44v6 was studied in a series of 338 patients with primary breast tumours, uniformly staged and treated in a single center with a long median follow-up of 128 months. The prognostic significance of CD44v6 as well as the correlation with several clinicopathological features were analysed. RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen of 338 (64.8%) of the breast cancer were CD44v6-positive (> 5% of tumour cells with positive staining). CD44v6 expression had no value for prognosticating disease-free or overall survival at this or any other cut-off point. CONCLUSION: CD44v6 expression is not a prognostic factor in primary breast cancer.

pS2 is an independent prognostic factor for post-relapse survival in primary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The pS2 protein is involved in the maintenance of the integrity of the gastrointestinal tract. In breast cancer pS2 can be demonstrated in at least half of the tumors and probably reflects the functional status of ER. Several features make it likely that pS2 is involved in growth regulation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have investigated the value of immunohistochemical pS2 determination as a prognostic factor in 339 breast cancer patients with long follow-up from one hospital. RESULTS: A prognostic role for pS2 could not be demonstrated considering disease-free and overall survival, although in pS2-negative tumors a trend for less locoregional relapse was found. However, in multivariate analysis pS2 showed independent prognostic value for post-relapse survival. CONCLUSIONS: PS2 is an independent prognostic factor for post-relapse survival, most likely because it is a predictive factor for response to systemic therapy.

Relevance of the expression of bcl-2 in combination with p53 as a prognostic factor in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Both the proto-oncogene bcl-2 and the tumour suppressor gene p53 are involved in the regulation of apoptosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have investigated the prognostic value of the immunohistochemical expression of p53 and bcl-2 separately and in combination in a group of 345 breast cancer patients from one hospital with a long median follow-up of more than 10 years. RESULTS: Bcl-2 expression was not a prognostic factor. p53 was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (p = 0.005) and for post-relapse survival (p = 0.006). Looking at bcl-2/p53 subgroups in the bcl-2 positive subgroup there was a large difference in both disease-free and overall survival between p53 negative and p53 positive patients. In the bcl-2 negative subgroup the p53 status was not a prognostic factor at all. CONCLUSIONS: p53 is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival and post-relapse survival. However, p53 status is only important in the bcl-2 positive subgroup.

Microvessel density in unknown primary tumors.

Unknown primary tumors (UPT) are characterized by early and widespread metastasis. There is a strong indication that angiogenesis measured as microvessel density (MVD) correlates with the incidence of metastases in several solid tumors. The objective of this study was to compare MVD in liver metastases of UPT with MVD in known primaries and in liver metastases of colon and breast tumors and to investigate the prognostic significance of MVD in UPT. The clinical data and the MVD in liver metastases of 39 consecutive patients with UPT adenocarcinomas were studied. For comparison, MVD in the primary tumor and in liver metastases from known primary adenocarcinomas of the colon (n = 24) and the breast (n = 6) were measured. Most of the pathological material was obtained by needle biopsy. MVD was determined on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded histological sections of liver metastases, using the CD34 and von Willebrand Factor (vWF) antibodies and immunocytochemistry. The association of MVD with age, gender, number of metastases and tumor differentiation was assessed in the UPT population. The prognostic value of clinical variables and of MVD on survival was estimated by univariate and multivariate regression analysis. There was no difference between the MVD in liver metastases of UPT and known primaries. The MVD counts in the primary tumors of colon and breast were, however, significantly higher than in the metastases. MVD counts correlated well between anti-CD34 and anti-vWF. Within the UPT population there was no association between MVD and age, gender, number of metastases and tumor differentiation. The MVD was the only prognostic factor for survival in univariate analysis. High MVD was correlated with short survival. In the multivariate analysis, the number of metastases, tumor differentiation, therapy and MVD were all prognostic indicators for survival.