Algorithmic Midline Approach to Perineal Urethrostomy is Associated With Long-term Success and High Patient Satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess surgical success and patient-reported outcomes of perineal urethrostomy via midline approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Charts of patients undergoing primary perineal urethrostomy between May 2008 and June 2022 were reviewed. Background characteristics were assessed; success was defined as freedom from re-intervention. Patient-reported outcome measures were assessed using a cross-sectional phone survey. Several validated questionnaires were used to assess lower urinary tract symptoms, quality of life, and erectile dysfunction. RESULTS: Among 1768 urethroplasties performed over the study period, 103 patients (5.8%) underwent midline perineal urethrostomy. Surgery was successful in 95.1% of cases (98/103); 5 patients (4.9%) required re-intervention at a median of 8.7 months. Post-operative complications occurred in 5.8% of cases (6/103) and were both mild and self-limited. Forty-nine patients (47.6%) were reached via phone survey at a median of 61 months post-operatively. Some questions were not answered by all patients. Most patients (42/49, 86%) were satisfied or very satisfied with surgical results, and 82% (40/49) reported an improvement in their overall health. Most patients (31/41, 76%) were unbothered by sitting to urinate. Although 20% of patients (10/49) reported post-operative urinary symptoms that interfered "a lot" with their daily life, only 3 (6%) of these patients reported dissatisfaction with the outcome. Regarding sexual function, 64% (27/42) reported indifference to or increased satisfaction with sexual encounters vs before surgery. The rate of de novo erectile dysfunction was 24% (12/49). CONCLUSION: The midline approach to perineal urethrostomy provides excellent, durable success rates with high levels of patient satisfaction.

Current opinions on the management of prolonged ischemic priapism: does penoscrotal decompression outperform corporoglanular tunneling?

Prolonged ischemic priapism presents a treatment challenge given the difficulty in achieving detumescence and effects on sexual function. To evaluate current practice patterns, an open, web-based multi-institutional survey querying surgeons' experience with and perceived efficacy of tunneling maneuvers (corporoglanular tunneling and penoscrotal decompression), as well as impressions of erectile recovery, was administered to members of societies specializing in male genital surgery. Following distribution, 141 responses were received. Tunneling procedures were the favored first-line surgical intervention in the prolonged setting (99/139, 71.2% tunneling vs. 14/139, 10.1% implant, p < .001). Although respondents were more likely to have performed corporoglanular tunneling than penoscrotal decompression (124/138, 89.9% vs. 86/137, 62.8%, p < .001), penoscrotal decompression was perceived as more effective among those who had performed both (47.3% Very or Extremely Effective for penoscrotal decompression vs. 18.7% for corporoglanular tunneling; p < .001). Many respondents who had performed both tunneling procedures felt that most regained meaningful sexual function after either corporoglanular tunneling or penoscrotal decompression (33/75, 44.0% vs. 33/74, 44.6%, p = .942). While further patient-centered investigation is warranted, this study suggests that penoscrotal decompression may outperform corporoglanular tunneling for prolonged priapism, and that recovery of sexual function may be higher than previously thought after tunneling procedures.