Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatrics ; 147(1)2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32788269

RESUMO

A 16-year-old white boy with a history of chronic lung disease of prematurity, cough-variant asthma, and incidental lung nodules presented to the emergency center in spring 2020 with acute onset dry cough, shortness of breath, and fever. An initial history, gathered from his mother because of the patient's respiratory distress, revealed no recent travel. However, his mother is a health care worker at a hospital, and sick contacts included ongoing contact with a friend with cold-like symptoms. He had a variety of animals at home, including a dog, cats, fish, rodents, and reptiles. He had a history of vaping tobacco products >6 months ago. Fever and respiratory symptoms were associated with fatigue, chest tightness, abdominal pain, and myalgias. On examination, he was ill appearing and had tachycardia, tachypnea, borderline hypoxia with an oxygen saturation of 91% on room air, diminished breath sounds at the lung bases, and unremarkable abdominal examination results. A chest radiograph was consistent with the lung examination, revealing bilateral lower lobe hazy infiltrates. He showed initial improvement for 48 hours with antibiotics, intravenous fluid resuscitation, oxygen via nasal cannula, albuterol, and prednisone. Subsequently, he worsened with persistent high fever, increasing respiratory distress with pulmonary findings, and severe persistent epigastric pain, which added a layer of diagnostic complexity. As this patient's clinical course evolved and further history became available, pulmonary medicine and infectious diseases services were consulted to guide diagnostic evaluation and treatment of this patient early in the era of coronavirus disease 2019.


Assuntos
Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , COVID-19 , Tosse/diagnóstico por imagem , Febre/diagnóstico por imagem , Vaping/efeitos adversos , Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/etiologia , Adolescente , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagem , COVID-19/genética , Tosse/etiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Febre/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Vaping/patologia
2.
J Hosp Med ; 14(2): 101-104, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30785417

RESUMO

The role of the urinalysis (UA) in the management of young, febrile infants is controversial. To assess how frequently infants are treated for urinary tract infection (UTI) despite having normal UA values and to compare the characteristics of infants treated for UTI who have positive versus negative UAs, we reviewed 20,570 wellappearing febrile infants 7-60 days of age evaluated at 124 hospitals in the United States who were included in a national quality improvement project. Of 19,922 infants without bacteremia and meningitis, 2,407 (12.1%) were treated for UTI, of whom 2,298 (95.5%) had an initial UA performed. UAs were negative in 337/2,298 (14.7%) treated subjects. The proportion of infants treated for UTI with negative UAs ranged from 0%-35% across hospitals. UA-negative subjects were more likely to have respiratory symptoms and less likely to have abnormal inflammatory markers than UA+ subjects, indicating that they are mounting less of an inflammatory response to their underlying illness and/or might have contaminated specimens or asymptomatic bacteriuria.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/urina , Urinálise/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/urina , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Melhoria de Qualidade , Urinálise/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...