Readmission to the intensive care unit after cardiac surgery: a single-center experience with 7105 patients.

AIM: Identification of patients at high risk for readmission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery is paramount. We evaluated the clinical characteristics of readmitted patients and identified perioperative prognostic variables for ICU readmission. METHODS: A total of 7105 patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2007 and 2010 and discharged after a primary stay in the ICU were reviewed retrospectively. Of these, 7.8% (554) patients were readmitted. The reasons for readmission and postoperative course were analyzed. Perioperative risk factors for readmission were determined by multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Mortality of patients after readmission was 13.6% compared with 0.2% without recidivism (P<0.0001). Mean length of stay in hospital of patients requiring readmission was 24.9 ± 19.1 days and significantly longer compared to all other patients 12.3±8.4 days (P<0.0001). The main reasons for readmission were respiratory failure (39.0%) and cardiovascular instability (26.2%). Complex cardiac surgery, aortic surgery and extended stay in the ICU were the most powerful variables to predict ICU readmission. CONCLUSION: ICU readmission was related to complex surgery and associated with impaired outcome. Respiratory complications were the most common reasons for readmission. Predictive renal and pulmonary risk factors indicate the need of preoperative preconditioning and patient selection.

Intra-aortic balloon pump implantation does not affect long-term survival after isolated CABG in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is an established therapy to support patients with heart failure during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The impact of the timing of IABP on the hospital course and on follow-up is of particular clinical interest. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between the time of IABP implantation and its impact on early, mid- and long-term survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent emergent CABG for NSTEMI and STEMI. METHODS: A total of 472 patients with AMI (NSTEMI and STEMI) underwent emergency CABG at our institution; 158 of them additionally received IABP support. Fifty-seven (36 %) patients received preoperative and 101 (64 %) patients underwent intraoperative IABP implantation. Endpoints were in-hospital und follow-up (mean duration 37 ± 28 months) survival. RESULTS: Overall in-hospital mortality was 17.1 % (n = 27): 17.6 % (n = 10) in the preoperative group and 16.8 % (n = 17) in the intraoperative group ( P = ns). Mid- and long-term survival rates were comparable for both groups 78.6 % vs. 73.7 %, 71.4 % vs. 68.7 % and 64.3 % vs. 54.6 % at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively ( P = ns). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that CABG with IABP support in high-risk patients with AMI can be performed with acceptable in-hospital and long-term survival rates. The decision for IABP placement should consider the preoperative clinical condition and the intraoperative course of each patient. IABP placement does not appear to affect the long-term outcome after isolated CABG in patients with AMI.

Coronary surgery for acute coronary syndrome: which determinants of outcome remain?

BACKGROUND: The mortality risk associated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after acute myocardial infarction remains controversial. The objective of the present study was therefore to analyze the outcome and predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients (pts) referred to CABG with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2003 and May 2005, a total of 3,127 pts underwent primary isolated CABG at our institution, including 220 pts with ACS. Out of these, unstable angina pectoris was present in 88 pts (group I), 97 pts (group II) had non-ST-elevation infarction, whereas 35 pts (group III) had ST-elevation infarction. Clinical data, in-hospital morbidity and mortality were recorded and studied retrospectively. RESULTS: Overall in-hospital mortality was 6.4% (n = 14) in the complete cohort, being 2.2% in group I (n = 2), 9.2% in group II (n = 9) and 8.5% (n = 3) in group III (P < 0.05). Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses identified age, NYHA, ejection fraction < 45%, catecholamine support, cardiogenic shock, renal disease and the additive EuroSCORE > 10 (P < 0.0001) as significant predictors related to in-hospital mortality. The mean time from the onset of symptoms to revascularization differed significantly between survivors (5.1 +/- 2.7 h) and no survivors (11.4 +/- 3.2 h) (P < 0.0007) in the STEMI group. Preoperative cTnI did not provide any prognostic information. CONCLUSION: CABG in pts with ACS can be performed with good clinical results. The clinical outcome is particular depending on the different groups of ACS. Therefore an individual risk stratification of each pts in ACS is necessary. The time interval of 6 h seems to be crucial as prognostic variable in the STEMI-group.

Coronary reoperation with and without cardiopulmonary bypass.

Redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is still associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared to primary operation. Myocardial protection is one of the key issues in redo on pump CABG and is still a matter of debate. Off pump redo CABG seems to be an attractive alternative as native coronary blood flow remains and cross clamping of the aorta is avoided. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the outcome of redo CABG with and without CPB. From 1/1998 to 5/2004 redo CABG was performed in 195 patients (pts): 162 male (83.1%) and 33 female (16.9%) pts, age 66 +/- 9 years. In 160 pts, CPB with isolated antegrade myocardial protection was used for redo CABG. Off pump redo CABG was performed in 35 pts (30 male (85.7%) and 5 female (14.3%), age 67 +/- 8 years). Perioperative overall mortality rate was 3.6% (n = 7) and comparable in both groups (on pump 3.8% versus off pump 2.9%; p = 0.90), as well as perioperative myocardial infarction, intraaortic balloon pump implantation rate and secondary morbidity. Complete revascularization was achieved in 139 pts (86.9%) after on pump CABG and in 17 pts (48.6%) of the off pump group (p < 0.01). The average number of grafts was significantly higher in the on pump group (2.8 +/- 0.78 versus 1.6 +/- 0.6; p = 0.04).Furthermore, 20 pts (12.5%) in the on pump group died during follow-up (50 +/- 16 months). Five pts (25.0%) died due to cardiac reasons. In the off pump group 3 pts (8.6%) died during follow-up (44 +/- 13 months), noncardiac related. Overall survival was 83.8% in the on pump group and 88.6% in the off pump group (p = 0.92). On pump redo CABG and off pump redo CABG can be safely performed with low mortality and morbidity. Off pump redo CABG might be limited due to incomplete revascularization.