A structured accelerated versus control rehabilitation pathway after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstrings demonstrates earlier improvement in physical outcomes without increasing graft laxity: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether an accelerated rehabilitation pathway could enhance strength and functional symmetry after ACLR, without affecting laxity. DESIGN: Randomized Controlled Trial. SETTING: Private rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: 44 patients randomized to an 'Accelerated' (n = 22) or 'Control' (n = 22) rehabilitation intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Graft laxity (primary outcome), isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength, hop tests, surveys, sport participation, re-injuries and re-operations. RESULTS: No knee laxity differences (p > 0.05) were observed. A significantly greater (p = 0.006) percentage of Accelerated (77.3%) versus Control (59.1%) patients were participating in Level 1 or 2 pivoting sports at 12 months. Greater limb symmetry indices were observed in the Accelerated group for knee extensor strength at 6 (p < 0.0001), 12 (p = 0.010) and 24 (p = 0.005) months, as well as the triple hop at 6 (p = 0.015) and 9 (p = 0.008) months, and the triple crossover hop at 6 (p < 0.0001) and 9 (p = 0.009) months. One ipsilateral re-tear was observed (Control group, 17 months). No differences (p˃0.05) existed in surveys apart from the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) score, better (p = 0.001) in the Accelerated group at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated rehabilitation produced earlier improvement in strength and hop LSIs, without increasing graft laxity.

Isometric dynamometry, dependent on knee angle, is a suitable alternative to isokinetic dynamometry when evaluating quadriceps strength symmetry in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Knee extensor strength deficits increase re-injury risk following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study investigated whether isometric strength testing methods are a suitable alternative to isokinetic assessment for identifying knee extensor strength asymmetry. METHODS: This study recruited 22 patients at 9-12 months after ACLR and 22 healthy controls. The single hop for distance (SHD) and knee extensor strength via isokinetic (60°/s and 120°/s) and isometric (positions of 90°, 60° and 30° of flexion, from full knee extension) methods were assessed. Absolute scores (normalized to body weight) and limb symmetry indices (LSIs) were calculated, with t-tests employed for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: The SHD LSI was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than both isokinetic speeds and the 30° isometric position. No significant LSI differences (p > 0.01) existed within isokinetic or isometric test conditions. In ACLR patients, only the 60°/s isokinetic condition was significantly lower (p = 0.005) than the 60° isometric condition. When normalized to body weight, the operated limb in ACLR patients was significantly weaker than the non-operated limb during peak isokinetic strength testing at 60°/s (p = 0.001) and 120°/s (p = 0.010), as well as isometric testing at 30° (p = 0.009). Compared with controls, ACLR patients demonstrated significantly lower (p < 0.01) mean LSIs across most measures. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of knee extensor strength via isometric methods appears suitable in the absence of isokinetic testing equipment, though consideration of test angle (30° and 90° knee angles better detect asymmetries similar to isokinetic testing) is important.

A randomised trial comparing two rehabilitation approaches following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation contributes to post-operative success following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; however, randomised trials comparing the effectiveness of rehabilitation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are lacking. This study sought to determine if early, active mobilisation targeting the deltoid and the external rotator muscles, would exhibit greater improvements in post-operative outcomes compared to a delayed and deltoid-focused mobilisation programme. METHODS: Patients scheduled for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were randomly assigned to either an early active or delayed active rehabilitation group. Patient-reported outcomes for pain and function were assessed pre-surgery and at 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Objective measures (Constant Score, range of motion, isometric strength) were assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (63 shoulders) underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. There were no significant interaction effects or between-group differences for any patient-reported outcomes or objective measures at 3, 6 or 12 months post-surgery. However, significantly better (p = 0.019) active arm flexion was observed in the early active group at three months post-surgery. Significantly more patients in the early active group reported improvement in patient-reported function that reached minimal clinically important difference from three to six months post-surgery (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Early, active rehabilitation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is safe and effective, and may have early clinical benefits over a conservative, delayed mobilisation programme. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 1b. Trial registered 15 June 2016 at www.anzctr.org.au (ACTRN12616000779471).

Isokinetic torque analysis demonstrates deficits in knee flexor and extensor torque in patients at 9-12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, despite peak torque symmetry.

BACKGROUND: Lower limb strength asymmetry is associated with re-injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study investigated limb symmetry indices (LSIs) during isokinetic knee extensor and flexor assessment after ACLR. METHODS: Overall, 25 patients underwent isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength assessment, 9-12 months after ACLR with a semitendinosus autograft. While patients were included if they presented with peak knee extensor (PKET) and flexor (PKFT) torque LSIs ≥ 90%, LSIs were calculated at designated points throughout the isokinetic torque range of motion, including: 15°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 75° (from 90° of knee flexion) during PKET and 15°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 75° (from full knee extension) during PKFT. T-tests investigated limb differences for PKET and PKFT, as well as at the final 75° assessment point during knee extension and flexion, between: (1) males and females, (2) those that did, or did not, undergo meniscal surgery, and (3) those undergoing ACLR on their dominant or non-dominant limb. RESULTS: Significant differences between limbs were observed for PKET at 15° (p = 0.040) and 75° (p = 0.002), and for PKFT at 60° (p = 0.001) and 75° (p < 0.0001). No comparative differences (p > 0.05) were seen based on gender, meniscal surgery or whether ACLR was on the dominant or non-dominant limb. CONCLUSION: Despite 100% of patients demonstrating PKET and PKFT LSIs ≥ 90%, LSI differences existed at designated points throughout the knee extensor and flexor torque range of motion. Analysis of torques throughout full range should be considered in future studies, as comparison of isolated peak measures miss strength deficits.

Knee extensor strength, hop performance, patient-reported outcome and inter-test correlation in patients 9-12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Hop performance and isokinetic knee extensor strength (IKES) asymmetry are associated with re-injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study investigated deficits after ACLR, and which hop tests are most correlated with IKES and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: 50 patients were assessed 9-12 months after ACLR using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and ACL Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scores. Peak IKES and eight hop tests were assessed: single (SHD), triple (THD) and triple crossover (TCHD) hop for distance, 6 m timed hop (6MTH), single medial (MHD) and single lateral (LHD) hop for distance, single countermovement jump (SLCMJ) and timed speedy hop (SHT). The percentage of patients with limb symmetry indices (LSIs) < 90% was reported. Pearson's correlations investigated the correlation between PROMs, IKES and hop LSIs. RESULTS: The majority (80%) of patients had IKES LSIs < 90%. While 12-14% of patients demonstrated LSIs < 90% for the SHD, 6MTH, THD and TCHD, 52-80% demonstrated LSIs < 90% for the other hop tests. The IKES LSI was significantly different (p < 0.05) from all hop LSIs, besides the SLCMJ (p = 0.638). Large correlations were only observed between the IKES LSI and the SLCMJ (r = 0.82), MHD (r = 0.71) and LHD (r = 0.53). The SLCMJ, MHD and IKES LSIs demonstrated the largest significant correlations with the IKDC (r = 0.51-0.53) and ACL-RSI (r = 0.38-0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Hop tests such as the MHD and SLCMJ may present a more practical alternative to quantifying peak IKES, especially in the absence of more sophisticated testing equipment. While not surrogates as such, these selective hop measures may better inform the clinician as to whether significant underlying quadriceps deficits are still present throughout the post-operative rehabilitation period.

Which Hop Tests Can Best Identify Functional Limb Asymmetry in Patients 9-12 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Employing a Hamstrings Tendon Autograft?

BACKGROUND: Hop tests are commonly employed to evaluate functional limb symmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). PURPOSE: To investigate the ability of eight hop tests to identify functional limb asymmetry in patients after ACLR. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. METHODS: Fifty patients were assessed 9-12 months following ACLR. Functional performance on both the operated and non-operated limb was assessed via eight hop tests, assessed in a randomised order. These included the: single (SHD), triple (THD) and triple crossover (TCHD) hop for distance, 6m timed hop (6MTH), single medial (MHD) and single lateral (LHD) hop for distance, single countermovement jump (SLCMJ) and timed speedy hop (TSHT). Differences in Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) across hop tests were compared, while Pearson's correlations were undertaken to investigate the significance and strength of the association between hop test LSIs. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed across hop LSIs (p<0.0001). Mean LSIs for the SHD (95.0%), 6MTH (95.0%), THD (96.1%) and TCHD (95.3%) were ≥90% and significantly greater (p<0.05) than the MHD (87.3%), LHD (87.5%), SLCMJ (83.4%) and TSHT (86.5%), which were all <90%. The LSI for the SLCMJ was significantly lower (p<0.05) than all other hop tests. While significant correlations existed across the majority of hop LSIs, the strongest correlations existed between the SHD, THD and TCHD (r=0.70-0.80), and lowest correlations between the TSHT and the other hop tests (r=0.26-0.49). CONCLUSIONS: The LHD, MHD and TSHT, as well as the SLCMJ in particular, were best able to demonstrate functional limb asymmetry in patients following ACLR. These hop measures should be incorporated into hop test batteries, if the purpose is to detect the presence of lingering functional deficits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Current Perspectives of the Australian Knee Society on Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: The importance of rehabilitation and evaluation prior to return to sport (RTS) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been reported. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to investigate current perspectives of Australian orthopedic surgeons on rehabilitation and RTS evaluation. DESIGN: Survey. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Australian Knee Society. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A 14-question survey was disseminated to Australian Knee Society members (orthopedic surgeons) to investigate (1) preferred graft choice, (2) estimated retear rate, (3) importance of preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, and (4) preferred timing of RTS and evaluation prior to RTS discharge. RESULTS: Of all 85 Australian Knee Society members contacted, 86% (n = 73) responded. Overall, 66 respondents (90.4%) preferentially used hamstring tendon autografts. All surgeons estimated their retear rate to be ≤15%, with 31 (42.5%) <5%. Twenty-eight surgeons (38.4%) reported no benefit in preoperative rehabilitation. The majority of surgeons (82.2%-94.5%) reported that postoperative rehabilitation was important within various periods throughout the postoperative timeline. Most surgeons did not permit RTS until ≥9 months (n = 56, 76.7%), with 17 (23.3%) allowing RTS between 6 and 9 months. The most highly reported considerations for RTS clearance were time (90.4%), functional capacity (90.4%), and strength (78.1%). Most commonly, knee strength and/or function was assessed via referral to a preferred rehabilitation specialist (50.7%) or with the surgeon at their practice (11.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This survey revealed variation in beliefs and practices surrounding rehabilitation and RTS evaluation. This is despite the current evidence demonstrating the benefit of preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, as well as the emerging potential of RTS assessments consisting of strength and functional measures to reduce reinjury rates.

Current perspectives of Australian therapists on rehabilitation and return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A survey.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate views and practices of Australian therapists on rehabilitation and return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). DESIGN: Survey-based study. SETTING: Online survey platform. PARTICIPANTS: Australian Physiotherapists and Accredited Exercise Physiologists (n = 223). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 1) perceived benefit, timing and frequency of rehabilitation, 2) timing of RTS and information on RTS evaluation and discharge criteria. RESULTS: Therapists preferred to consult patients for the first time at 1-4 days (27.8%), ≤7 days (25.6%) or 7-14 days (30.5%) post-surgery. Within the first 6 weeks, 82.1% of therapists preferred patient visitation 1-2 times per week. Between 3 and 6 months, therapists mainly recommended less frequent visitation with a focus on home exercises. While 22.0% and 53.8% of therapists were willing to discharge patients for sport at 6-9 and 9-12 months, respectively, 22.9% preferred 12-18 months. Common RTS considerations were functional capacity (98.7%), strength (87.0%), lower limb and trunk mechanics (96.0%) and psychological readiness (87.9%). Knee strength was evaluated via manual muscle testing (33.0%), hand held (26.7%) and isokinetic (11.8%) dynamometry. For functional evaluation, 84.3% of therapists employed a hop battery (≥2 hop tests). CONCLUSIONS: This survey revealed variation in beliefs and practices surrounding rehabilitation and RTS evaluation in Australian therapists.

Patient Characteristics and Predictors of Return to Sport at 12 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The Importance of Patient Age and Postoperative Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Preventing and mitigating the risk of reinjury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) rest on variables including age, surgical restoration of knee stability, adequate physical function, and thorough and complete postoperative rehabilitation, but to what degree these factors influence return to sport is unclear. PURPOSE: To investigate factors predictive of return to sport 12 months after ACLR. The factors specifically evaluated were strength, hop function, self-reported knee function, patient age, and quality of postoperative rehabilitation. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This study evaluated 113 patients approximately 12 months after ACLR using a rehabilitation grading tool, the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, and a return-to-sport battery consisting of maximal isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength and 4 functional hop tests. Mann-Whitney U tests and chi-square analyses were used to determine differences between patients who had or had not returned to sport. A subsequent binary logistic hierarchical regression determined the factors predictive of a patient's return to sport. In those patients who had returned to sport, relationships between either age or level of rehabilitation and passing the return-to-sport battery were also investigated. RESULTS: Complete rehabilitation (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 7.95; P = .009), age ≤25 years (adjusted OR, 3.84; P = .024), and higher IKDC scores (P < .001) were predictive of return to sport at 12 months. In participants who had returned to sport, 21% passed the return-to-sport battery compared with only 5% who did not. Of those who had returned to sport, 37% who underwent complete rehabilitation passed the return-to-sport battery as opposed to 5% who underwent incomplete rehabilitation. In patients aged ≤25 years, only 48% underwent complete rehabilitation, despite having returned to sport. Additionally, in this group of patients, 40% underwent complete rehabilitation and passed the physical performance battery as opposed to only 4% who did not undergo complete rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Younger patients and higher subjective IKDC scores were predictive of return to sport. Patients who completed 6 months of rehabilitation incorporating jumping and agility tasks had a higher rate of return to sport, suggesting that postoperative rehabilitation is important in predicting return to sport. Specialists and physical therapists alike should stress the importance of thorough postoperative rehabilitation and adequate neuromuscular strength and function to patients whose goals are to return to sport.

COMPARISON OF THE 'BACK IN ACTION' TEST BATTERY TO STANDARD HOP TESTS AND ISOKINETIC KNEE DYNAMOMETRY IN PATIENTS FOLLOWING ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION.

BACKGROUND: Limb symmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may be evaluated using maximal strength and hop tests, which are typically reported using Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) which may overestimate function. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the Back in Action (BIA) test battery to standard hop and muscle strength tests used to determine readiness to return to sport (RTS). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. METHODS: Over two test sessions, 40 ACLR patients were assessed at a mean 11.3 months post-surgery. Initially, participants completed the 6 m timed hop and the single, triple and triple crossover hops for distance, and isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength assessment. The second session involved completion of the BIA battery, including stability tests, single and double leg countermovement jumps (CMJ), and plyometric, speedy jump, and quick feet tests. Pass rates for test batteries were statistically compared, including the BIA, a four-hop battery (≥90% LSI in every one of the four hop tests) and a combined 4-hop and strength battery (≥90% LSI in every one of the four hop tests, as well as ≥90% for both peak knee extensor and flexor strength). LSI differences between the four standard hop tests and the BIA single limb functional tests (the single limb CMJ and the speedy jump test) were evaluated. RESULTS: Significantly less participants passed the BIA battery (n = 1, 2.5%), compared with the four-hop test battery (n = 27, 67.5%) (p<0.001) and the four-hop test and isokinetic strength battery (n = 17, 42.5%) (p<0.001). Collectively, LSI's for the standard hop tests were significantly higher than the BIA functional single limb tests (difference = 12.9%, 95% CI: 11.1% to 14.6%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The BIA test battery appears to include some single limb functional tests that are more physically challenging than standard hop and isokinetic strength tests, highlighted by the significantly lower mean LSI's during the single limb BIA tests and the lower pass rate when employing the BIA protocol. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, case series.

Strength and functional symmetry is associated with post-operative rehabilitation in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To investigate strength and functional symmetry during common tests in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and its association with post-operative rehabilitation. METHODS: At a median 11.0 months post-surgery (range 10-14), 111 ACLR patients were assessed. A rehabilitation grading tool was employed to evaluate the duration and supervision of rehabilitation, as well as whether structured jumping, landing and agility exercises were undertaken. Patients completed the Noyes Activity Score (NSARS), maximal isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength assessment, and a 4-hop test battery. Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) were calculated, presented for the entire group and also stratified by activity level. ANOVA evaluated differences between the operated and unaffected limbs across all tests. Correlations were undertaken to assess the relationship between post-operative rehabilitation and objective test LSIs. RESULTS: The unaffected limb was significantly better (p < 0.0001) than the operated limb for all tests. Only 52-61 patients (47-55%) demonstrated LSIs ≥ 90% for each of the hop tests. Only 34 (30.6%) and 61 (55.0%) patients were ≥ 90% LSI for peak quadriceps and hamstring strength, respectively. Specifically in patients actively participating in jumping, pivoting, cutting, twisting and/or turning sports, 21 patients (36.8%) still demonstrated an LSI < 90% for the single hop for distance, with 37 patients (65.0%) at < 90% for peak knee extension strength. Rehabilitation was significantly associated with the LSIs for all tests. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation was significantly correlated with limb symmetry, and lower limb symmetry was below recommended criterion for many community-level ACLR patients, including those already engaging in riskier activities. It is clear that many patients are not undertaking the rehabilitation required to address post-operative strength and functional deficits, and are being cleared to return to sport (or are returning on their own accord) without appropriate evaluation and further guidance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

EXERCISE REHABILITATION IN THE NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ROTATOR CUFF TEARS: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.

UNLABELLED: The incidence of rotator cuff tears increases with age, with full-thickness rotator cuff tears present in approximately 25% of individuals in their sixties, and more than 50% of those in their eighties. While surgery is considered an effective treatment, recurrent tears at the insertion site are common, especially with degenerative tears, which are frequent in the older population. More recently, there has been increasing interest in exercise rehabilitation and physical therapy as a means to manage partial and full thickness tears of the rotator cuff by addressing weakness and functional deficits. Recent studies have suggested that patients opting for physical therapy have demonstrated high satisfaction, an improvement in function, and success in avoiding surgery. When considering the increasing rate of shoulder surgery and the associated economic and social burden rotator cuff surgery places on both the patient and the health care system, non-surgical management such as physical therapy and exercise may, in selected cases, be a treatment alternative to surgical repair. The purpose of this clinical commentary is to provide an overview of rotator cuff pathology and pathogenesis, and to present an evidence-based case for the role of conservative rehabilitation in the management of rotator cuff injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5.

Early postoperative repair status after rotator cuff repair cannot be accurately classified using questionnaires of patient function and isokinetic strength evaluation.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated if patients with an intact tendon repair or partial-thickness retear early after rotator cuff repair display differences in clinical evaluations and whether early tendon healing can be predicted using these assessments. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 60 patients at 16 weeks after arthroscopic supraspinatus repair. Evaluation included the Oxford Shoulder Score, 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, visual analog scale for pain, 12-item Short Form Health Survey, isokinetic strength, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Independent t tests investigated clinical differences in patients based on the Sugaya MRI rotator cuff classification system (grades 1, 2, or 3). Discriminant analysis determined whether intact repairs (Sugaya grade 1) and partial-thickness retears (Sugaya grades 2 and 3) could be predicted. RESULTS: No differences (P < .05) existed in the clinical or strength measures. Although discriminant analysis revealed the 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand produced a 97% true-positive rate for predicting partial thickness retears, it also produced a 90% false-positive rate whereby it incorrectly predicted a retear in 90% of patients whose repair was intact. The ability to discriminate between groups was enhanced with up to 5 variables entered; however, only 87% of the partial-retear group and 36% of the intact-repair group were correctly classified. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in clinical scores existed between patients stratified by the Sugaya MRI classification system at 16 weeks. An intact repair or partial-thickness retear could not be accurately predicted. Our results suggest that correct classification of healing in the early postoperative stages should involve imaging.

Do postoperative platelet-rich plasma injections accelerate early tendon healing and functional recovery after arthroscopic supraspinatus repair? A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Tendon-bone healing after rotator cuff repair directly correlates with a successful outcome. Biological therapies that elevate local growth-factor concentrations may potentiate healing after surgery. PURPOSE: To ascertain whether postoperative and repeated application of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to the tendon repair site improves early tendon healing and enhances early functional recovery after double-row arthroscopic supraspinatus repair. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A total of 60 patients underwent arthroscopic double-row supraspinatus tendon repair. After randomization, half the patients received 2 ultrasound-guided injections of PRP to the repair site at postoperative days 7 and 14. Early structural healing was assessed with MRI at 16 weeks, and cuff appearances were graded according to the Sugaya classification. Functional scores were recorded with the Oxford Shoulder Score; Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; visual analog scale for pain; and Short Form-12 quality-of-life score both preoperatively and at postoperative weeks 6, 12, and 16; isokinetic strength and active range of motion were measured at 16 weeks. RESULTS: PRP treatment did not improve early functional recovery, range of motion, or strength or influence pain scores at any time point after arthroscopic supraspinatus repair. There was no difference in structural integrity of the supraspinatus repair on MRI between the PRP group (0% full-thickness retear; 23% partial tear; 77% intact) and the control group (7% full-thickness retear; 23% partial tear; 70% intact) at 16 weeks postoperatively (P = .35). CONCLUSION: After arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair, image-guided PRP treatment on 2 occasions does not improve early tendon-bone healing or functional recovery.

Guidelines for the early restoration of active knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty: implications for rehabilitation and early intervention.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between active knee flexion at initial (1-2 wk) and final (7 wk) outpatient visits after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to develop a guide for the expected progression of knee flexion in the subacute postoperative phase. DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of patients (N=108) who underwent TKA between December 2007 and August 2012. INTERVENTION: TKA followed by a standardized, 5-week outpatient rehabilitation program (2 sessions per week) immediately after hospital discharge. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Active knee flexion was recorded on the patient's first outpatient visit (1-2 wk) and then biweekly throughout the patient's 5-week outpatient rehabilitation program. RESULTS: Active knee flexion at initial (1-2 wk) and final (7 wk) outpatient visits were significantly correlated (r=.86, P<.001). Mean active knee flexion significantly improved (P<.001) across all patients from 90.4° at initial outpatient visit to 110° at final outpatient visit. At 7 weeks postsurgery, a value of 100° was determined as the cut-off point for an acceptable active knee flexion, which corresponded with 80° of active knee flexion at initial outpatient presentation at 1 to 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Active knee flexion at the initial outpatient visit exhibits a strong correlation with knee flexion at 7 weeks after TKA. These knee flexion guidelines may allow for the provision of individualized rehabilitation, allow practitioners to provide patients with realistic goals of progression throughout the subacute phase, and allow the early identification of patients at risk for poor long-term outcomes who may benefit from further intensive care or other early intervention.

Does an unloader brace reduce knee loading in normally aligned knees?

BACKGROUND: Unloading knee braces often are used after tibiofemoral articular cartilage repair. However, the experimental basis for their use in patients with normal tibiofemoral alignment such as those undergoing cartilage repair is lacking. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of varus and valgus adjustments to one commercially available unloader knee brace on tibiofemoral joint loading and knee muscle activation in populations with normal knee alignment. METHODS: The gait of 20 healthy participants (mean age 28.3 years; body mass index 22.9 kg/m(2)) was analyzed with varus and valgus knee brace conditions and without a brace. Spatiotemporal variables were calculated as were knee adduction moments and muscle activation during stance. A directed cocontraction ratio was also calculated to investigate the relative change in the activation of muscles with medial (versus lateral) moment arms about the knee. Group differences were investigated using analysis of variance. The numbers available would have provided 85% power to detect a 0.05 increase or decrease in the knee adduction moment (Nm/kg*m) in the braced condition compared with the no brace condition. RESULTS: With the numbers available, there were no differences between the braced and nonbraced conditions in kinetic or muscle activity parameters. Both varus (directed cocontraction ratio 0.29, SD 0.21, effect size 0.95, p = 0.315) and valgus (directed cocontraction ratio 0.28, SD 0.24, effect size 0.93, p = 0.315) bracing conditions increased the relative activation of muscles with lateral moment arms compared with no brace (directed cocontraction ratio 0.49, SD 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Results revealed inconsistencies in knee kinetics and muscle activation strategies after varus and valgus bracing conditions. Although in this pilot study the results were not statistically significant, the magnitudes of the observed effect sizes were moderate to large and represent suitable pilot data for future work. Varus bracing increased knee adduction moments as expected; however, they produced a more laterally directed muscular activation profile. Valgus bracing produced a more laterally directed muscular activation profile; however, it increased knee adduction moments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When evaluating changes in knee kinetics and muscle activation together, this study demonstrated conflicting outcomes and questions the efficacy for the use of unloader bracing for people with normally aligned knees such as those after articular cartilage repair.

Randomized trial investigating the efficacy of manual lymphatic drainage to improve early outcome after total knee arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) in the early postoperative period after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to reduce edema and pain and improve knee range of motion. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Private hospital and functional rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of patients (N=43; 53 knees) scheduled for TKA. INTERVENTION: MLD (vs no MLD) on days 2, 3, and 4 postoperatively. Both groups underwent conventional, concomitant physical therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical assessment was undertaken pre- and postoperatively prior to and after the designated postoperative MLD sessions (days 2, 3, and 4) and at 6 weeks postsurgery. This included active knee flexion and extension range of motion, lower limb girths (ankle, midpatella, thigh, and calf), and knee pain using a numeric rating scale and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. RESULTS: A significant group effect was observed for active knee flexion, with post hoc tests demonstrating a significantly greater active knee flexion in the MLD group when compared with the control (no MLD) group at the final measure prior to hospital discharge (day 4 postsurgery) and at 6 weeks postsurgery. There were no further group effects observed for the remaining patient-reported and functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: MLD in the early postoperative stages after TKA appears to improve active knee flexion up to 6 weeks postsurgery, in addition to conventional care.

Mobile vs. fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: A randomized study on short term clinical outcomes and knee kinematics.

The literature contains limited yet controversial information regarding whether a fixed or a mobile bearing implant should be used in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This randomized study was to further document the performance and comparison of the two designs. Fifty-six knees in 48 patients (mean age of 72 years) undergoing medial UKA were randomized into a fixed bearing (Miller/Galante) or a mobile bearing (Oxford) UKA. The 2 year clinical outcomes (clinical scores), radiographic findings, and weight bearing knee kinematics (assessed using RSA) were compared between the two groups. The mobile bearing knees displayed a larger and an incrementally increased tibial internal rotation (4.3 degrees, 7.6 degrees, 9.5 degrees vs. 3.0 degrees, 3.0 degrees, 4.2 degrees respectively at 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees of knee flexion) compared to the fixed ones. The medial femoral condyle in the mobile bearing knees remained 2 mm from the initial position vs. a 4.2 mm anterior translation in the fixed bearing knees during knee flexion. The contact point in the mobile bearing implant moved 2 mm posteriorly vs. a 6 mm anterior movement in the other group. The mobile bearing knees had a lower incidence of radiolucency at the bone implant interface (8% vs. 37%, p < 0.05). The incidence of lateral compartment OA and progression of OA at patello-femoral joint were equal. No differences were found regarding Knee Society Scores, WOMAC, and SF-36 scores (p > 0.05). This study indicates that mobile bearing knees had a better kinematics, a lower incidence of radiolucency but not yet a better knee function at 2 years.