Ultrasound Assessment of Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries in a Pediatric Population.

OBJECTIVE: To determine sensitivity and specificity for anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (AiTFL) integrity and tibiofibular clear-space (TFCS) cut-off points for dynamic evaluation using ultrasound (US) in a pediatric population. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care university-affiliated pediatric hospital patients between the ages of 12 and 18 sustaining acute ankle trauma with syndesmotic injury. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were assigned to the syndesmotic injury protocol that included a standardized MRI and US. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament integrity for static assessment and TFCS measurements for dynamic assessment on US. For dynamic assessment, the distance between the distal tibia and fibula was first measured in neutral position and then in external rotation for each ankle. The US results on AiTFL integrity were compared with MRI, considered as our gold standard. Optimal cut-off points of TFCS values were determined with receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-six participants were included. Mean age was 14.8 years (SD = 1.3 years). Sensitivity and specificity for AiTFL integrity were 79% and 100%, respectively (4 false negatives on partial tears). For dynamic assessment, the cut-off points for the differences in tibiofibular distance between the 2 ankles in 1) neutral position (TFCS N I-U ) and 2) external rotation (TFCS ER I-U ) were 0.2 mm (sensitivity = 83% and specificity = 80%) and 0.1 mm (sensitivity = 83% and specificity = 80%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Static US could be used in a triage context as a diagnostic tool for AiTFL integrity in a pediatric population as it shows good sensitivity and excellent specificity.

Development and validation of a French-language cross-cultural adaptation of the Pedi-IKDC Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: The Pedi-IKDC is an English-language, knee-specific, paediatric questionnaire used by orthopaedic surgeons around the world as a valuable patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). The objective of this study was thus to extend the applicability of the Pedi-IKDC to French-speaking Canadian patients, for both clinical practice and research, by developing a French-language cross-cultural adaptation of the original version. HYPOTHESIS: The French adaptation of the Pedi-IKDC is valid and reliable for evaluating French-speaking children with knee conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Pedi-IKDC was translated to French by a panel of orthopaedic surgeons then back-translated by a professional translator. The original English version and the back-translation were compared to assess their similarity and confirm the faithfulness of the French translation. The validity of the French version was then tested at a major paediatric hospital in French-speaking Canada, in 203 children, including 163 with knee pain and 40 without knee symptoms. Internal consistency, construct validity, and discriminant capacity of the French version were assessed. RESULTS: Internal consistency of the Pedi-IKDC adaptation was excellent (Cronbach's alpha, 0.934 in the knee-pain group). Construct validity was robust, with all nine hypotheses adapted from the original Pedi-IKDC article demonstrating strong (n=7) or moderate (n=2) correlations (p<0.001). The evaluation of discriminant capacity identified no statistically significant score differences according to most of the respondent characteristics (body mass index, age group, type of diagnosis, and type of treatment). However, scores differed significantly between females and males. DISCUSSION: The French-language cross-cultural adaptation of the Pedi-IKDC obtained using a universally recognized method for translating PROMs demonstrated good performance, with psychometric properties similar to those of the original Pedi-IKDC and of its Danish, Italian, and Russian adaptations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Are outdoor playgrounds the real culprit for elbow fractures in children? A lesson learned from COVID-19 sanitary measures.

BACKGROUND: The association between elbow fractures and outdoor playgrounds has always been anecdotal. We sought to determine the impact of closing outdoor playgrounds and other play areas during the COVID-19 lockdown on elbow fractures in a pediatric population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all elbow fractures from a single pediatric referral hospital between 2016 and 2020 for the months of April and May. The months chosen corresponded to the COVID-19 lockdown during which outdoor playgrounds were closed. Inclusion criteria were elbow fracture diagnosis based on radiography and age younger than 18 years. Fracture type, where the injury occurred and the mechanism of injury were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 370 fractures were reported, with an average of 83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 83-84) per year for 2016-19 and only 36 recorded in 2020. The average annual number of fractures before 2020 was 17 (95% CI 16-17) for schools, and 33 (95% CI 31-34) for outdoor playgrounds, including 22 (95% CI 21-24) falls from playground structures. No fracture was reported in schools in 2020, and only 3 were reported from outdoor playgrounds (including 1 associated with falling from playground structures). CONCLUSION: We found an association between elbow fractures in a pediatric population and outdoor playground accessibility, but also with indoor public locations. Our findings emphasize the importance of safety measures in those facilities.

Parents can reliably and accurately detect trunk asymmetry using an inclinometer smartphone app.

PURPOSE: An inclinometer smartphone application has been developed to enable the measurement of the angle of trunk inclination (ATI) to detect trunk surface asymmetry. The objective was to determine the reliability and validity of the smartphone app in the hands of non-professionals. METHODS: Three non-professional observers and one expert surgeon measured maximum ATI twice in a study involving 69 patients seen in the spine clinics to rule out scoliosis or for regular follow-up (10-18 y.o., Cobb [0°-58°]). Observers were parents not familiar with scoliosis screening nor use of an inclinometer. They received training from a 4-minute video. Intra and inter-observer reliability was determined using the generalizability theory and validity was assessed from intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), agreement with the expert on ATI measurements using Bland-Altman analysis, and correct identification of the threshold for consultation (set to ≥6° ATI). RESULTS: Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability coefficients were excellent ϕ = 0.92. The standard error of measurement was 1.5° (intra-observer, 2 measurements) meaning that a parent may detect a change of 4° between examinations 95% of the time. Comparison of measurements between non-professionals and the expert resulted in ICC varying from 0.82 [0.71-0.88] to 0.84 [0.74-0.90] and agreement on the decision to consult occurred in 83 to 90% of cases. CONCLUSION: The use of a smartphone app resulted in excellent reliability, sufficiently low standard error of measurement (SEM) and good validity in the hands of non-professionals. The device and the instructional video are adequate means to allow detection and regular examination of trunk asymmetries by non-professionals.