Rapid renutrition improves health status in severely malnourished inpatients with AN - score-based evaluation of a high caloric refeeding protocol in severely malnourished inpatients with anorexia nervosa in an intermediate care unit.

OBJECTIVE: Refeeding syndrome is a feared complication of refeeding patients with anorexia nervosa. There are now a number of controlled studies showing that refeeding with an initial high calorie count is more beneficial than cautious refeeding and is safe under continuous monitoring. However, there have yet not been studies in severe anorexia nervosa. METHOD: We present an observational study in two different samples. The first sample consists of those 1075 out of a total of 3230 patients with anorexia nervosa treated in our hospital within 4 years for whom a complete admission laboratory was available and who had an age of at least 18 years at admission. A risk score was calculated from the number of pathological laboratory values out of 12 parameters indicating either refeeding syndrome or health hazards related to malnutrition. The second sample was obtained from a special ward for patients with eating disorders medically at-risk. During the period in question, 410 patients with anorexia nervosa were treated there. 142 patients had a BMI of 13 or less and at the same time a complete data set with the mentioned 12 laboratory parameters at admission and weekly in the following 4 weeks after admission. RESULTS: The risk represented by the laboratory parameters is significantly and negatively correlated to BMI and much higher for the group of patients with a BMI below 13 than for those with a higher BMI (χ2 sig < 0.000). The 142 patients in the special care unit gain an average of more than 4.1 kg within 4 weeks on the high-calorie diet. With this rapid weight gain, the risk score decreases highly significantly. Neither hypophosphatemia nor rhabdomyolysis is found under phosphate substitution. Hyperhydration occurred often, which manifests itself in the drop in haematocrit by the second week. DISCUSSION: Under thorough medical surveillance, supplementation of phosphate and thiamine, and substitution of electrolytes whenever necessary rapid renutrition appeared to be save even in extremely malnourished inpatients with anorexia nervosa. As measured by the laboratory values, the health status of the severely malnourished patients improves significantly on a high-calorie diet. Except for hyperhydration, there was no evidence of a refeeding syndrome.

Practice-Based Evidence and Clinical Guidance to Support Accelerated Re-Nutrition of Patients With Anorexia Nervosa.

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is characterized by underweight, and the primary goal of treatment is weight restoration. Treatment approaches (ie, hospitalization for weight recovery vs for medical stabilization) and settings (ie, medical/pediatric or psychiatric units) for patients with AN vary between and also within countries. Several specialized eating disorder units worldwide have established high-caloric refeeding (HCR) protocols for patients with AN. In observational studies, HCR shortens hospital stays and increases initial weight gain, the latter being associated with a favorable long-term prognosis. However, clinicians may still remain reluctant to accept this approach for fear of medical complications of HCR, including the risk of refeeding syndrome (RS).1 Research is building toward the development of evidence-based recommendations for safe and effective re-nutrition of underweight patients with AN. This focused review was based on clinical experience and describes 3 different protocols for nutritional management devised by experts from 3 different parts of the world (Australia, Germany, and the United States), in medical refeeding of patients with AN who have established HCR in their clinical units. In addition, and in order to understand energy requirements, empirical data on energy turnover of patients with AN from former metabolic studies are presented. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study reporting on HCR in a cohort of severely malnourished adolescents with AN (ie, with a mean body mass index [BMI] of <15 kg/m2). Therefore, to provide information about the treatment of extremely malnourished patients with AN, we included a recently published HCR protocol for adults with a BMI of <13 kg/m2.2.

Medical management of eating disorders: an update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Eating disorders are associated with numerous medical complications. The aim of this study was to review recent progress in improving the medical management of patients with eating disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: With close medical monitoring and electrolyte supplementation, accelerated refeeding protocols improve weight restoration without increasing the risk of refeeding syndrome. Olanzapine improves weight restoration better than placebo, without leading to adverse metabolic effects seen in individuals not in starvation. Alterations of the gut microbiome in anorexia nervosa have been demonstrated, but their clinical relevance remains unclear. SUMMARY: Medical complications of eating disorders may facilitate the first contact with health professionals and treatment initiation. Medical complications of anorexia nervosa generally occur due to starvation, malnutrition and their associated physiological effects, whereas medical complications of bulimia nervosa are generally due to purging behaviors. Most medical complications in patients with binge eating disorder are secondary to obesity. Most medical complications of eating disorders can be effectively treated with nutritional management, weight normalization and the termination of purging behaviors. In summary, eating disorders are associated with many medical complications that have to be carefully assessed and managed as early as possible to improve long-term outcomes.

Lactobacillus Acidophilus/Bifidobacterium Infantis Probiotics Are Beneficial to Extremely Low Gestational Age Infants Fed Human Milk.

Objective: To evaluate the nutrition-related effects of prophylactic Lactobacillus acidophilus/Bifidobacterium infantis probiotics on the outcomes of preterm infants <29 weeks of gestation that receive human milk and/or formula nutrition. We hypothesize that human-milk-fed infants benefit from probiotics in terms of sepsis prevention and growth. METHODS: We performed an observational study of the German Neonatal Network (GNN) over a period of six years, between 1 January, 2013 and 31 December, 2018. Prophylactic probiotic use of L. acidophilus/B. infantis was evaluated in preterm infants <29 weeks of gestation (n = 7516) in subgroups stratified to feeding type: (I) Exclusively human milk (HM) of own mother and/or donors (HM group, n = 1568), (II) HM of own mother and/or donor and formula (Mix group, n = 5221), and (III) exclusive exposure to formula (F group, n = 727). The effect of probiotics on general outcomes and growth was tested in univariate models and adjusted in linear/logistic regression models. RESULTS: 5954 (76.5%) infants received L. acidophilus/B. infantis prophylactically for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Probiotic use was associated with improved growth measures in the HM group (e.g., weight gain velocity in g/day: effect size B = 0.224; 95% CI: 2.82-4.35; p < 0.001) but not in the F group (effect size B = -0.06; 95% CI: -3.05-0.28; p = 0.103). The HM group had the lowest incidence of clinical sepsis (34.0%) as compared to the Mix group (35.5%) and the F group (40.0%). Only in the Mix group, probiotic supplementation proved to be protective against clinical sepsis (OR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.59-0.79; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our observational data indicate that the exposure to L. acidophilus/B. infantis probiotics may promote growth in exclusively HM-fed infants as compared to formula-fed infants. To exert a sepsis-preventive effect, probiotics seem to require human milk.

Media Stories on NICU Outbreaks Lead to an Increased Prescription Rate of Third-Line Antibiotics in the Community of Neonatal Care.

BACKGROUND Between 2010 and 2012, 3 outbreaks of nosocomial infections in German neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) attracted considerable public interest. Headlines on national television channels and in newspapers had important consequences for the involved institutions and a negative impact on the relationship between families and staff in many German NICUs. OBJECTIVE To determine whether NICU outbreaks reported in the media influenced provider behavior in the community of neonatal care and led to more third-line antibiotic prescribing. DESIGN Observational cohort study. METHODS To investigate secular trends, we evaluated data for very-low-birth-weight infants (VLBWIs, birth weight <1,500 g) enrolled in the German Neonatal Network (GNN) between 2009 and 2014 (N=10,253). For outbreak effects, we specifically analyzed data for VLBWIs discharged 6 months before (n=2,428) and 6 months after outbreaks (n=2,508). RESULTS The exposure of all VLBWIs to third-line antibiotics increased after outbreaks (19.4% before vs 22.5% after; P=.007). This trend particularly affected male infants (4.6% increase; P=.005) and infants with a birth weight between 1,000 and 1,499 g (3.5% increase; P=.001) In a logistic regression analysis, month of discharge as linear variable of time was associated with increased exposure to third-line antibiotics (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.009-1.014; P<.001), and discharge within the 6-month period after outbreak reports independently contributed to this long-term trend (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.017-1.270; P=.024). CONCLUSIONS Media reports directly affect medical practice, eg, overuse of third-line antibiotics. Future communication and management strategies must be based on objective dialogues between the scientific community and investigative journalists. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:924-930.

Sharp-device injuries to hospital staff nurses in 4 countries.

OBJECTIVE: To compare sharp-device injury rates among hospital staff nurses in 4 Western countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Acute-care hospital nurses in the United States (Pennsylvania), Canada (Alberta, British Columbia, and Ontario), the United Kingdom (England and Scotland), and Germany. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 34,318 acute-care hospital staff nurses in 1998-1999. RESULTS: Survey-based rates of retrospectively-reported needlestick injuries in the previous year for medical-surgical unit nurses ranged from 146 injuries per 1,000 full-time equivalent positions (FTEs) in the US sample to 488 injuries per 1,000 FTEs in Germany. In the United States and Canada, very high rates of sharp-device injury among nurses working in the operating room and/or perioperative care were observed (255 and 569 injuries per 1,000 FTEs per year, respectively). Reported use of safety-engineered sharp devices was considerably lower in Germany and Canada than it was in the United States. Some variation in injury rates was seen across nursing specialties among North American nurses, mostly in line with the frequency of risky procedures in the nurses' work. CONCLUSIONS: Studies conducted in the United States over the past 15 years suggest that the rates of sharp-device injuries to front-line nurses have fallen over the past decade, probably at least in part because of increased awareness and adoption of safer technologies, suggesting that regulatory strategies have improved nurse safety. The much higher injury rate in Germany may be due to slow adoption of safety devices. Wider diffusion of safer technologies, as well as introduction and stronger enforcement of occupational safety and health regulations, are likely to decrease sharp-device injury rates in various countries even further.

How can the practice nurse be more involved in the care of the chronically ill? The perspectives of GPs, patients and practice nurses.

BACKGROUND: A well established "midlevel" of patient care, such as nurse practitioners and/or physician assistants, exits in many countries like the US, Canada, and Australia. In Germany, however there is only one kind of profession assisting the physician in practices, the practice nurse. Little is known about the present involvement of practice nurses in patients' care in Germany and about the attitudes of GPs, assistants and patients concerning an increased involvement. The aim of our study was to get qualitative information on the extent to which practice nurses are currently involved in the treatment of patients and about possibilities of increased involvement as well as on barriers of increased involvement. METHODS: We performed qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 20 GPs, 20 practice nurses and 20 patients in the Heidelberg area. The interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and content-analysed with ATLAS.ti. RESULTS: Practice nurses are only marginally involved in the treatment of patients. GPs as well as patients were very sceptical about increased involvement in care. Patients were sceptical about nurses' professional background and feared a worsening of the patient doctor relationship. GPs also complained about the nurses' deficient education concerning medical knowledge. They feared a lack of time as well as a missing reimbursement for the efforts of an increased involvement. Practice nurses were mostly willing to be more involved, regarding it as an appreciation of their role. Important barriers were lack of time, overload with administrative work, and a lack of professional knowledge. CONCLUSION: Practice nurses were only little involved in patient care. GPs were more sceptical than patients regarding an increased involvement. One possible area, accepted by all interviewed groups, was patient education as for instance dietary counselling. New treatment approaches as the chronic care model will require a team approach which currently only marginally exists in the German health care system. Better medical education of practice nurses is indispensable, but GPs also have to accept that they cannot fulfil the requirement of future care alone.

Impact of age, health locus of control and psychological co-morbidity on patients' preferences for shared decision making in general practice.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore if patients' preferences to be involved in decision making correlates with reasons for encounter, psychological or demographic characteristics and with the physicians' estimation of the patients' preferred communication styles. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-four patients in general practice completed a questionnaire, which included the 'Autonomy Preference Index' (API), 'health locus of control' and 'hospital anxiety and depression'. The physicians documented the diagnoses and estimated the patients' preference for an autonomous, paternalistic or shared decision communication style. RESULTS: The preference for involvement varied across the reason for encounter (range 36.6-50.6), but this effect is explained by the patients' age (p<0.01). The participation preferences and the external and internal health locus of control declined with age whereas depression scores rose (p<0.01). The physicians estimation corresponded with patient API scores (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: It must be questioned if the preference for involvement is really a stable characteristic. The physicians were able to estimate the preferred communication style of their patients presumably on the basis of the patients' age and education. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It appears that not every situation in general practice requires SDM, though different communication styles could be useful if adapted to the individual situation.

Rationale, design and conduct of a comprehensive evaluation of a primary care based intervention to improve the quality of life of osteoarthritis patients. The PraxArt-project: a cluster randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN87252339].

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) has a high prevalence in primary care. Conservative, guideline orientated approaches aiming at improving pain treatment and increasing physical activity, have been proven to be effective in several contexts outside the primary care setting, as for instance the Arthritis Self management Programs (ASMPs). But it remains unclear if these comprehensive evidence based approaches can improve patients' quality of life if they are provided in a primary care setting. METHODS/DESIGN: PraxArt is a cluster randomised controlled trial with GPs as the unit of randomisation. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive evidence based medical education of GPs on individual care and patients' quality of life. 75 GPs were randomised either to intervention group I or II or to a control group. Each GP will include 15 patients suffering from osteoarthritis according to the criteria of ACR. In intervention group I GPs will receive medical education and patient education leaflets including a physical exercise program. In intervention group II the same is provided, but in addition a practice nurse will be trained to monitor via monthly telephone calls adherence to GPs prescriptions and advices and ask about increasing pain and possible side effects of medication. In the control group no intervention will be applied at all. Main outcome measurement for patients' QoL is the GERMAN-AIMS2-SF questionnaire. In addition data about patients' satisfaction (using a modified EUROPEP-tool), medication, health care utilization, comorbidity, physical activity and depression (using PHQ-9) will be retrieved. Measurements (pre data collection) will take place in months I-III, starting in June 2005. Post data collection will be performed after 6 months. DISCUSSION: Despite the high prevalence and increasing incidence, comprehensive and evidence based treatment approaches for OA in a primary care setting are neither established nor evaluated in Germany. If the evaluation of the presented approach reveals a clear benefit it is planned to provide this GP-centred interventions on a much larger scale.