Correction: Long-term Follow-up and Safety of Patients after an Upfront Therapy with Letrozole for Early Breast Cancer in Routine Clinical Care - The PreFace Study.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-2238-3153.].

Integration of Pathological Criteria and Immunohistochemical Evaluation for Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Diagnosis: Recommendations From the European Lobular Breast Cancer Consortium.

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most frequent type of breast cancer (BC) and its peculiar morphology is mainly driven by inactivation of CDH1, the gene coding for E-cadherin cell adhesion protein. ILC-specific therapeutic and disease-monitoring approaches are gaining momentum in the clinic, increasing the importance of accurate ILC diagnosis. Several essential and desirable morphologic diagnostic criteria are currently defined by the World Health Organization, the routine use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for E-cadherin is not recommended. Disagreement in the diagnosis of ILC has been repeatedly reported, but interpathologist agreement increases with the use of E-cadherin IHC. In this study, we aimed to harmonize the pathological diagnosis of ILC by comparing 5 commonly used E-cadherin antibody clones (NCH-38, EP700Y, Clone 36, NCL-L-E-cad [Clone 36B5], and ECH-6). We determined their biochemical specificity for the E-cadherin protein and IHC staining performance according to type and location of mutation on the CDH1 gene. Western blot analysis on mouse cell lines with conditional E-cadherin expression revealed a reduced specificity of EP700Y and NCL-L-E-cad for E-cadherin, with cross-reactivity of Clone 36 to P-cadherin. The use of IHC improved interpathologist agreement for ILC, lobular carcinoma in situ, and atypical lobular hyperplasia. The E-cadherin IHC staining pattern was associated with variant allele frequency and likelihood of nonsense-mediated RNA decay but not with the type or position of CDH1 mutations. Based on these results, we recommend the indication for E-cadherin staining, choice of antibodies, and their interpretation to standardize ILC diagnosis in current pathology practice.

Long-term Follow-up and Safety of Patients after an Upfront Therapy with Letrozole for Early Breast Cancer in Routine Clinical Care - The PreFace Study.

Introduction: Adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) should include an aromatase inhibitor (AI). Especially patients with a high recurrence risk might benefit from an upfront therapy with an AI for a minimum of five years. Nevertheless, not much is known about the patient selection for this population in clinical practice. Therefore, this study analyzed the prognosis and patient characteristics of postmenopausal patients selected for a five-year upfront letrozole therapy. Patients and Methods: From 2009 to 2011, 3529 patients were enrolled into the adjuvant phase IV PreFace clinical trial (NCT01908556). Postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive BC patients, for whom an upfront five-year therapy with letrozole (2.5 mg/day) was indicated, were eligible. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and safety in relation to patient and tumor characteristics were assessed. Results: 3297 patients started letrozole therapy. The majority of patients (n = 1639, 57%) completed the five-year treatment. 34.5% of patients continued with endocrine therapy after the mandated five-year endocrine treatment. Five-year DFS rates were 89% (95% CI: 88-90%) and five-year OS rates were 95% (95% CI: 94-96%). In subgroup analyses, DFS rates were 83%, 84% and 78% for patients with node-positive disease, G3 tumor grading, and pT3 tumors respectively. The main adverse events (any grade) were pain and hot flushes (66.8% and 18.3% of patients). Conclusions: The risk profile of postmenopausal BC patients selected for a five-year upfront letrozole therapy showed a moderate recurrence and death risk. However, in subgroups with unfavorable risk factors, prognosis warrants an improvement, which might be achieved with novel targeted therapies.

Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-FAPI Versus 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Various Malignancies.

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) and 18F-labeled FDG PET for the detection of various tumors, we performed a head-to-head comparison of both imaging modalities across a range of tumor entities as part of our ongoing 68Ga-FAPI PET observational trial. Methods: The study included 115 patients with 8 tumor entities who received imaging with 68Ga-FAPI for tumor staging or restaging between October 2018 and March 2022. Of those, 103 patients received concomitant imaging with 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET and had adequate lesion validation for accuracy analysis. Each scan was evaluated for the detection of primary tumor, lymph nodes, and visceral and bone metastases. True or false positivity and negativity to detected lesions was assigned on the basis of histopathology from biopsies or surgical excision, as well as imaging validation. Results: 68Ga-FAPI PET revealed higher accuracy than 18F-FDG PET in the detection of colorectal cancer (n = 14; per-patient, 85.7% vs. 78.6%; per-region, 95.6% vs. 91.1%) and prostate cancer (n = 22; per-patient, 100% vs. 90.9%; per-region, 96.4% vs. 92.7%). 68Ga-FAPI PET and 18F-FDG PET had comparable per-patient accuracy in detecting breast cancer (n = 16, 100% for both) and head and neck cancers (n = 10, 90% for both modalities). 68Ga-FAPI PET had lower per-patient accuracy than 18F-FDG PET in cancers of the bladder (n = 12, 75% vs. 100%) and kidney (n = 10, 80% vs. 90%), as well as lymphoma (n = 9, 88.9% vs. 100%) and myeloma (n = 10, 80% vs. 90%). Conclusion: 68Ga-FAPI PET demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy than 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and prostate cancer, as well as comparable diagnostic performance for cancers of the breast and head and neck. Accuracy and impact on management will be further assessed in an ongoing prospective interventional trial (NCT05160051).

Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab in Patients With Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 study, addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly increased pathologic complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS) vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer. Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes for patients enrolled in East/Southeast Asia (Asia) in KEYNOTE-522. Design, Setting, and Participants: KEYNOTE-522, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial, enrolled 1174 patients between March 7, 2017, and September 13, 2018. For interim EFS and overall survival (OS) analyses (data cutoff, March 23, 2021), median follow-up was 39.8 months (range, 30.4-46.9 months) for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and 40.8 months (range, 30.1-46.9 months) for placebo plus chemotherapy. Data cutoff for pCR analysis was September 24, 2018. This secondary analysis included adults enrolled in Asia with newly diagnosed, previously untreated, nonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer (tumor stage T1c and nodal stage N1-2 or tumor stage T2-4 and nodal stage N0-2) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, regardless of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Intervention: Patients were randomized 2:1 to 4 cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) or placebo plus carboplatin and paclitaxel and another 4 cycles of pembrolizumab or placebo plus doxorubicin or epirubicin and cyclophosphamide before surgery. After definitive surgery, patients received pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for 9 cycles or until recurrence or unacceptable toxic effects. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was pCR (no evidence of primary tumor after neoadjuvant therapy or carcinoma in situ after neoadjuvant therapy and no regional lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant therapy) at the time of definitive surgery and EFS. Results: A total of 216 of 1174 randomized patients (all female; median [range] age, 46.0 [24.0-71.0] years) were from Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Singapore (136 in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 80 in the placebo plus chemotherapy group). Of these patients, 104 (76.5%) in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 60 (75.0%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group had a tumor PD-L1 combined positive score of 1 or greater. Pathologic complete response was 58.7% (95% CI, 46.7%-69.9%) with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and 40.0% (95% CI, 26.4%-54.8%) with placebo plus chemotherapy; benefit was observed regardless of PD-L1 status. Thirteen patients (9.6%) in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 20 patients (25.0%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group had EFS events (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.71). The 36-month EFS rate was 91.2% (95% CI, 85.0%-94.9%) with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and 77.2% (95% CI, 66.3%-85.0%) with placebo plus chemotherapy. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 109 patients (80.1%) receiving pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and 64 patients (81.0%) receiving placebo plus chemotherapy. Conclusions and Relevance: In this subgroup analysis of patients enrolled in Asia in KEYNOTE-522, neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab led to clinically meaningful improvements in pCR and EFS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. These findings support the use of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab as a standard-of-care therapy for patients in Asian countries with early triple-negative breast cancer. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03036488.

AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2023.

The Breast Committee of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (German Gynecological Oncology Group, AGO) presents the 2023 update of the evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer (mBC).

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2023.

Background: Each year the interdisciplinary Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO), German Gynecological Oncology Group Breast Committee on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer provides updated state-of-the-art recommendations for early and metastatic breast cancer. Summary: The updated evidence-based treatment recommendation for early and metastatic breast cancer has been released in March 2023. Key Messages: This paper concisely captures the updated recommendations for early breast cancer chapter by chapter.

Designing clinical trials based on modern imaging and metastasis-directed treatments in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer: a consensus recommendation from the EORTC Imaging and Breast Cancer Groups.

Breast cancer remains the most common cause of cancer death among women. Despite its considerable histological and molecular heterogeneity, those characteristics are not distinguished in most definitions of oligometastatic disease and clinical trials of oligometastatic breast cancer. After an exhaustive review of the literature covering all aspects of oligometastatic breast cancer, 35 experts from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Imaging and Breast Cancer Groups elaborated a Delphi questionnaire aimed at offering consensus recommendations, including oligometastatic breast cancer definition, optimal diagnostic pathways, and clinical trials required to evaluate the effect of diagnostic imaging strategies and metastasis-directed therapies. The main recommendations are the introduction of modern imaging methods in metastatic screening for an earlier diagnosis of oligometastatic breast cancer and the development of prospective trials also considering the histological and molecular complexity of breast cancer. Strategies for the randomisation of imaging methods and therapeutic approaches in different subsets of patients are also addressed.

Autologous Reconstruction After Failed Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Multifactorial Outcome Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Failure of an implant-based breast reconstruction often requires a change to an autologous procedure (salvage autologous breast reconstruction [Salv-ABR]). The aim of this study was to compare surgical and patient-reported outcomes of Salv-ABR to immediate or delayed-immediate ABR (I/DI-ABR), which has hardly been addressed in the existing literature. METHODS: All patients undergoing Salv- or I/DI-ABR between January 2014 and December 2020 were asked to participate in this study. Complication rates, the aesthetic outcome (5-point Likert scale), and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and -BR23, Breast-Q, Center for Epidemiology Studies Depression Scale) were compared between both procedures. RESULTS: Seventy patients participated in the study (Salv-ABR: n = 23; mean ± SD age, 53.5 ± 9.1 years; follow-up, 28.6 ± 18.5 month; I/DI-ABR: n = 45, mean ± SD age: 50.2 ± 7.3 years; follow-up, 32.8 ± 18.5 month). Main indication for Salv-ABR was a major capsular contracture (n = 14 [60.1%]). Early unplanned reoperation rates were significantly increased in the Salv-ABR (56.5% vs 14.9%; P < 0.01). Patients with I/DI-ABR showed a significantly improved overall aesthetic outcome (2.7 ± 0.9 vs 3.3 ± 0.7; P < 0.01) and scored significantly higher in several subscales of EORTC QLQ-C30/BR23 (Global Health Status, Role Functioning, Body Image; P < 0.05) and the Breast-Q (Psychosocial Well-being, Satisfaction with Breast; P < 0.05) compared with patients with Salv-ABR. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage ABR is associated with a higher complication rate, compromised aesthetic outcome, and quality of life compared with I/DI-ABR. This should be considered and discussed with the patient when planning any kind of reconstructive breast surgery.

PRECYCLE: multicenter, randomized phase IV intergroup trial to evaluate the impact of eHealth-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment on quality of life in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib and an aromatase inhibitor or palbociclib and fulvestrant.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and quality of life (QoL) are key criteria for therapy selection in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In hormone receptor positive (HR +) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2 -) MBC, addition of targeted oral agents such as everolimus or a cycline-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitor (e.g., palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib) to endocrine therapy substantially prolongs progression-free survival and in the case of a CDK 4/6i also overall survival. However, the prerequisite is adherence to therapy over the entire course of treatment. However, particularly with new oral drugs, adherence presents a challenge to disease management. In this context, factors influencing adherence include maintaining patients' satisfaction and early detection/management of side effects. New strategies for continuous support of oncological patients are needed. An eHealth-based platform can help to support therapy management and physician-patient interaction. METHODS: PreCycle is a multicenter, randomized, phase IV trial in HR + HER2 - MBC. All patients (n = 960) receive the CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib either in first (62.5%) or later line (37.5%) together with endocrine therapy (AI, fulvestrant) according to national guidelines. PreCycle evaluates and compares the time to deterioration (TTD) of QoL in patients supported by eHealth systems with substantially different functionality: CANKADO active vs. inform. CANKADO active is the fully functional CANKADO-based eHealth treatment support system. CANKADO inform is a CANKADO-based eHealth service with a personal login, documentation of daily drug intake, but no further functions. To evaluate QoL, the FACT-B questionnaire is completed at every visit. As little is known about relationships between behavior (e.g., adherence), genetic background, and drug efficacy, the trial includes both patient-reported outcome and biomarker screening for discovery of forecast models for adherence, symptoms, QoL, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). DISCUSSION: The primary objective of PreCycle is to test the hypothesis of superiority for time to deterioration (TTD) in terms of DQoL = "Deterioration of quality of life" (FACT-G scale) in patients supported by an eHealth therapy management system (CANKADO active) versus in patients merely receiving eHealth-based information (CANKADO inform). EudraCT Number: 2016-004191-22.

The effect of denosumab on disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) of breast cancer patients with neoadjuvant treatment: a GeparX translational substudy.

BACKGROUND: Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the bone marrow are observed in about 40% at primary diagnosis of breast cancer and predict poor survival. While anti-resorptive therapy with bisphosphonates was shown to eradicate minimal residue disease in the bone marrow, the effect of denosumab on DTCs, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, is largely unknown. The recent GeparX clinical trial reported that denosumab, applied as an add-on treatment to nab-paclitaxel based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), did not improve the patient's pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Herein, we analyzed the predictive value of DTCs for the response to NACT and interrogated whether neoadjuvant denosumab treatment may eradicate DTCs in the bone marrow. METHODS: A total of 167 patients from the GeparX trial were analyzed for DTCs at baseline by immunocytochemistry using the pan-cytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3. Initially DTC-positive patients were re-analyzed for DTCs after NACT ± denosumab. RESULTS: At baseline, DTCs were observed in 43/167 patients (25.7%) in the total cohort, however their presence did not predict response to nab-paclitaxel based NACT (pCR rates: 37.1% in DTC-negative vs. 32.6% DTC-positive; p = 0.713). Regarding breast cancer subtypes, the presence of DTCs at baseline was numerically associated with response to NACT in TNBC patients (pCR rates: 40.0% in DTC-positive vs. 66.7% in DTC-negative patients; p = 0.16). Overall, denosumab treatment did not significantly increase the given DTC-eradication rate of NACT (NACT: 69.6% DTC-eradication vs. NACT + denosumab: 77.8% DTC-eradication; p = 0.726). In TNBC patients with pCR, a numerical but statistically non-significant increase of DTC-eradication after NACT + denosumab was observed (NACT: 75% DTC-eradication vs. NACT + denosumab: 100% DTC-eradication; p = 1.00). CONCLUSION: This is the first study worldwide, demonstrating that neoadjuvant add-on denosumab over a short-term period of 24 months does not increase the DTC-eradication rate in breast cancer patients treated with NACT.

The Partner Perspective on Autologous and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Partner involvement in the decision-making process concerning breast reconstruction (BR) after a breast cancer diagnosis may be very supportive for the patient. So far, no study evaluates partner satisfaction with the outcome after BR and the relationship to patient satisfaction. The aim of this study was to assess and compare partner satisfaction of BR with autologous tissue (ABR) and prosthetic implants (IBR), respectively, and compare it to patient-reported outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing ABR and IBR between January 2014 and December 2020 were asked to participate with their partners. Patient and partner satisfaction with breast reconstruction, overall outcome as well as patient's perceived and self-reported psychosocial well-being were evaluated using the Breast-Q and a modified partner questionnaire, respectively. RESULTS: Fifty-three couples participated (IBR: n=30, ABR: n = 23). Patient and partner satisfaction with breast (r = 0.552), outcome (r = 0.465) as well as patient's perceived and self-report psychosocial well-being (r = 0.495) were highly correlated with partners scoring significantly higher (p<0.001). In terms of partner satisfaction, both reconstructive procedures achieved satisfactory results. ABR scored higher in terms of softness of breast and how natural the breast feels to touch whereas IBR was rated superior evaluating the breast size. CONCLUSION: Both reconstructive procedures achieve satisfactory results in terms partner satisfaction whereas patient's psychosocial well-being was highly overestimated by their partners. Hence, partner inclusion in the regular psycho-oncological support might further sensitize them of the high psychological burden of a breast cancer diagnosis and therefore stabilize patients private support system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

De-Escalated Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab-Emtansine With or Without Endocrine Therapy Versus Trastuzumab With Endocrine Therapy in HR+/HER2+ Early Breast Cancer: 5-Year Survival in the WSG-ADAPT-TP Trial.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is standard of care in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (EBC), irrespective of the hormone receptor status. Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1), antibody-drug conjugate, is highly effective in HER2+ EBC; however, no survival data are available for de-escalated antibody-drug conjugate-based neoadjuvant therapy without conventional chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the WSG-ADAPT-TP (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01779206) phase II trial, 375 centrally reviewed patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2+ EBC (clinical stage I-III) were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of T-DM1 with or without endocrine therapy (ET) or trastuzumab + ET once every 3 weeks (ratio 1:1:1). Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) omission was allowed in patients with pathologic complete response (pCR). In this study, we report the secondary survival end points and biomarker analysis. Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were analyzed. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, two-sided log-rank statistics, and Cox regression models stratified for nodal and menopausal status. P values < .05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: T-DM1, T-DM1 + ET, and trastuzumab + ET induced similar 5-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS; 88.9%, 85.3%, 84.6%; Plog-rank = .608) and overall survival rates (97.2%, 96.4%, 96.3%; Plog-rank = .534). Patients with pCR versus non-pCR had improved 5-year iDFS rates (92.7% v 82.7%; hazard ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.85]). Among the 117 patients with pCR, 41 did not receive ACT; 5-year iDFS rates were similar in those with (93.0% [95% CI, 84.0 to 97.0]) and without ACT (92.1% [95% CI, 77.5 to 97.4]; Plog-rank = .848). Translational research revealed that tumors with PIK3CA wild type, high immune marker expression, and luminal-A tumors (by PAM50) had an excellent prognosis with de-escalated anti-HER2 therapy. CONCLUSION: The WSG-ADAPT-TP trial demonstrated that pCR after 12 weeks of chemotherapy-free de-escalated neoadjuvant therapy was associated with excellent survival in HR+/HER2+ EBC without further ACT. Despite higher pCR rates for T-DM1 ± ET versus trastuzumab + ET, all trial arms had similar outcomes because of mandatory standard chemotherapy after non-pCR. WSG-ADAPT-TP demonstrated that such de-escalation trials in HER2+ EBC are feasible and safe for patients. Patient selection on the basis of biomarkers or molecular subtypes may increase the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy-free HER2-targeted approaches.

Fibroblast-Activation Protein PET and Histopathology in a Single-Center Database of 324 Patients and 21 Tumor Entities.

We present an overview of our prospective fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) registry study across a 3-y period, with head-to-head comparison of tumor uptake in 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET, as well as FAP immunohistochemistry. Methods: This is an interim analysis of the ongoing 68Ga-FAPI PET prospective observational trial at our department. Patients who underwent clinical imaging with 68Ga-FAPI PET between October 2018 and October 2021 were included. Tracer uptake was quantified by SUVmax for tumor lesions and by SUVmean for normal organs. PET tumor volume (40% isocontour) and tumor-to-background ratios were calculated. Correlation between SUVmax and FAP staining in tissue samples was analyzed. Results: In total, 324 patients with 21 different tumor entities underwent 68Ga-FAPI imaging; 237 patients additionally received 18F-FDG PET. The most common tumor entities were sarcoma (131/324, 40%), pancreatic cancer (67/324, 21%), and primary tumors of the brain (22/324, 7%). The mean primary tumor SUVmax was significantly higher for 68Ga-FAPI than 18F-FDG among pancreatic cancer (13.2 vs. 6.1, P < 0.001) and sarcoma (14.3 vs. 9.4, P < 0.001), and the same was true for mean SUVmax in metastatic lesions of pancreatic cancer (9.4 vs. 5.5, P < 0.001). Mean primary tumor maximum tumor-to-background ratio was significantly higher for 68Ga-FAPI than 18F-FDG across several tumor entities, most prominently pancreatic cancer (14.7 vs. 3.0, P < 0.001) and sarcoma (17.3 vs. 4.7, P < 0.001). Compared with 18F-FDG, 68Ga-FAPI showed superior detection for locoregional disease in sarcoma (52 vs. 48 total regions detected) and for distant metastatic disease in both sarcoma (137 vs. 131) and pancreatic cancer (65 vs. 57), respectively. Among 61 histopathology samples, there was a positive correlation between 68Ga-FAPI SUVmax and overall FAP immunohistochemistry score (r = 0.352, P = 0.005). Conclusion: 68Ga-FAPI demonstrates higher absolute uptake in pancreatic cancer and sarcoma, as well as higher tumor-to-background uptake along with improved tumor detection for pancreatic cancer, sarcoma, and other tumor entities when compared with 18F-FDG. 68Ga-FAPI is a new tool for tumor staging with theranostic potential.

AGO Recommendations for the Surgical Therapy of Breast Cancer: Update 2022.

The recommendations of the AGO Breast Committee on the surgical therapy of breast cancer were last updated in March 2022 (www.ago-online.de). Since surgical therapy is one of several partial steps in the treatment of breast cancer, extensive diagnostic and oncological expertise of a breast surgeon and good interdisciplinary cooperation with diagnostic radiologists is of great importance. The most important changes concern localization techniques, resection margins, axillary management in the neoadjuvant setting and the evaluation of the meshes in reconstructive surgery. Based on meta-analyses of randomized studies, the level of recommendation of an intraoperative breast ultrasound for the localization of non-palpable lesions was elevated to "++". Thus, the technique is considered to be equivalent to wire localization, provided that it is a lesion which can be well represented by sonography, the surgeon has extensive experience in breast ultrasound and has access to a suitable ultrasound device during the operation. In invasive breast cancer, the aim is to reach negative resection margins ("no tumor on ink"), regardless of whether an extensive intraductal component is present or not. Oncoplastic operations can also replace a mastectomy in selected cases due to the large number of existing techniques, and are equivalent to segmental resection in terms of oncological safety at comparable rates of complications. Sentinel node excision is recommended for patients with cN0 status receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after completion of chemotherapy. Minimally invasive biopsy is recommended for initially suspect lymph nodes. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients with initially 1 - 3 suspicious lymph nodes and a good response (ycN0) can receive the targeted axillary dissection and the axillary dissection as equivalent options.

Autologous vs. implant-based breast reconstruction after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy-A deeper insight considering surgical and patient-reported outcomes.

Introduction: Autologous (ABR) and implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) represent the most common procedures after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy. This cross-sectional study is a comprehensive analysis of ABR and IBR considering surgical and patient-reported outcomes. Patients and methods: Eligible patients underwent breast reconstruction (ABR and IBR) after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy between January 2014 and December 2020. Outcome parameters included quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC - QLQ30, BR23, Breast-Q, CES-D), complication rates, aesthetic result, and breast sensitivity. Results: 108 patients participated in the study (IBR: n = 72, age 48.9 ± 9.9 years; ABR: n = 36, age: 46.6 ± 7.3 years). Mean follow-up was 27.1 ± 9.3 (IBR) and 34.9 ± 20.5 (ABR), respectively. IBR patients suffered significantly more often from major complications (30.6% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.01), while ABR patients underwent secondary procedures significantly more often to improve the aesthetic result (55.6% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.004). Unilateral reconstructions revealed superior aesthetic results in ABR (n.s.), while in bilateral reconstruction IBR tended to score higher (n.s.). Scar evaluation resulted in a better result of IBR in both categories (p < 0.01). Breast sensitivity was severely impaired in both groups. The Breast-Q revealed a significantly higher "patient satisfaction with breast" after ABR (p = 0.033), while the other QoL-tests and subscales showed no significant differences between the two procedures. Conclusion: ABR is associated with a higher patient satisfaction despite the high probability of secondary procedures to improve the aesthetic outcome, whereas IBR-patients suffer more often from major complications. Furthermore, the laterality of reconstruction should be included in the individual decision-making process.

AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2022.

The Breast Committee of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (German Gynecological Oncology Group, AGO) presents the 2022 update of the evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer.

AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2022.

Introduction: The AGO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, German Gynecological Oncology Group) Task Force on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer as an interdisciplinary team consists of specialists from gynecological oncology, pathology, diagnostic radiology, medical oncology, and radiation oncology with a special focus on breast cancer. Methods: The updated evidence-based treatment recommendation 2022 for early breast cancer (EBC) and metastatic breast cancer of the AGO Task Force has been released. Results and Conclusion: This paper captures the update of EBC.

Endocrine Therapy Response and 21-Gene Expression Assay for Therapy Guidance in HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: To our knowledge, WSG-ADAPT-HR+/HER2- (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01779206; n = 5,625 registered) is the first trial combining the 21-gene expression assay (recurrence score [RS]) and response to 3-week preoperative endocrine therapy (ET) to guide systemic therapy in early breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Baseline and postendocrine Ki67 (Ki67post) were evaluated centrally. In the endocrine trial, all patients received exclusively ET: patients with pathologic regional lymph node status (pN) 0-1 (ie, 0-3 involved lymph nodes) entered control arm if RS ≤ 11 and experimental arm if RS12-25 with ET response (Ki67post ≤ 10%). All other patients (including N0-1 RS12-25 without ET response) received dose-dense chemotherapy (CT) followed by ET in the CT trial. Primary end point of the endocrine trial was noninferiority of 5-year invasive disease-free survival (5y-iDFS) in experimental (v control) arm; secondary end points included distant DFS, overall survival, and translational research. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat population comprised 2,290 patients (n = 1,422 experimental v n = 868 control): 26.3% versus 34.6% premenopausal and 27.4% versus 24.0% pN1. One-sided 95% lower confidence limit of the 5y-iDFS difference was -3.3%, establishing prespecified noninferiority (P = .05). 5y-iDFS was 92.6% (95% CI, 90.8 to 94.0) in experimental versus 93.9% (95% CI, 91.8 to 95.4) in control arm; 5-year distant DFS was 95.6% versus 96.3%, and 5-year overall survival 97.3% versus 98.0%, respectively. Differences were similar in age and nodal subgroups. In N0-1 RS12-25, outcome of ET responders (ET alone) was comparable with that of ET nonresponders (CT) for age > 50 years and superior for age ≤ 50 years. ET response was more likely with aromatase inhibitors (mostly postmenopausal) than with tamoxifen (mostly premenopausal): 78.1% versus 41.1% (P < .001). ET response was 78.8% in RS0-11, 62.2% in RS12-25, and 32.7% in RS > 25 (n = 4,203, P < .001). CONCLUSION: WSG-ADAPT-HR+/HER2- demonstrates that guiding systemic treatment by both RS and ET response is feasible in clinical routine and spares CT in pre- and postmenopausal patients with ≤ 3 involved lymph nodes.

The impact of anthracyclines in intermediate and high-risk HER2-negative early breast cancer-a pooled analysis of the randomised clinical trials PlanB and SUCCESS C.

BACKGROUND: Anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-taxane-containing chemotherapy (AC-T) is the standard of care in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative early breast cancer (EBC), but recent studies suggest omission of anthracyclines for reduced toxicity without compromising efficacy. METHODS: Based on individual patient data (n = 5924) pooled from the randomised Phase III trials PlanB and SUCCESS C, we compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between intermediate to high-risk HER2-negative EBC-patients treated with either six cycles of docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC6) or an AC-T regime using univariable and adjusted multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: AC-T conferred no significant DFS or OS advantage in univariable (DFS: hazard ratio (HR) for TC vs. AT 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-1.24, P = 0.57; OS: HR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.80-1.26, P = 1.00) and adjusted multivariable analysis (DFS: HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86-1.19, P = 0.91; OS: HR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.77-1.22, P = 0.79). Patients receiving TC6 had significantly fewer grade 3-4 adverse events. Exploratory subgroup analysis showed that AC-T was associated with significantly better DFS and OS in pN2/3 patients, specifically in those with lobular histology. CONCLUSION: For most patients with HER2-negative EBC, AC-T is not associated with a survival benefit compared to TC6. However, patients with lobular pN2/pN3 tumours seem to benefit from anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.