Proximal humeral nail for treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in the elderly population: effective and safe in experienced hands.

BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) remains controversial. Although commonly recommended for less comminuted PHFs, the outcomes of treatment with proximal humerus nailing (PHN) are more equivocal. The purpose of this study was to report on radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PHN fixation of 3- and 4-part PHFs at minimum one-year follow-up. Our hypothesis was that the findings would demonstrate satisfactory radiographic and clinical outcomes, with low rates of complications and revision surgeries. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2016, 121 patients with comminuted, low-energy, osteoporotic, PHFs underwent fixation via Targon PHN (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany). Of these, 60 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this analysis (mean age 72; range 65-85). All completed a minimum 1-year follow-up (range 12.5-82 months). Patients with 3-part PHFs were compared to patients with 4-part PHFs. Clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes were assessed at postoperative visits. Patient reported outcomes included pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). Radiographic union and revision and complication rates were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 37 (62%) fractures were classified as Neer 3 and 23 (38%) were classified as Neer 4. Both groups achieved similar postoperative range of motion. Patients with 3-part fractures reported significantly lower postoperative pain (0.76 ± 1.8 vs. 1.65 ± 2.2, p = 0.0047). Patients with 3-part fractures reported significantly better ASES scores (82.4 ± 19.2 vs. 70.8 ± 21.9, p = 0.02) and non-statistically significant higher SST scores (8.4 ± 3.2 vs. 7.43 ± 3.8, p = 0.14). Adequate fracture union was achieved in 53 fractures (88.3%). Three patients (5%) had varus malunion or greater tuberosity displacement, one (1.7%) had mechanical failure, and three (5%) had radiographic evidence of avascular necrosis. Between groups, there was no difference in failure rates. CONCLUSION: Proximal humeral nails can successfully be used by experienced surgeons in fixation of comminuted and displaced proximal humeral fractures in selected patients with osteoporosis. While patients with both 3- and 4-part fractures demonstrate fracture union with satisfactory outcomes, patients with 3-part fractures demonstrate significantly higher postoperative functional scores.

Extra-peritoneal pressure packing without external pelvic fixation: A life-saving stand-alone surgical treatment.

PURPOSE: Traditional maneuvers aim to decrease retroperitoneal bleeding in hemodynamically unstable multi-trauma patients with unstable pelvic fractures, are reportedly successful in approximately only 50%. The life-saving effect of extra-peritoneal pressure packing (EPPP) is based on direct compression and control of both venous and arterial retroperitoneal bleeders. This study describes the safety and efficacy of emergent EPPP employment, as a stand-alone surgical treatment, that is, carried out without external pelvic fixation or emergent angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all hemodynamic unstable, multi-trauma patients with mechanically unstable pelvic fractures treated by the EPPP technique at our medical center between the years 2005 and 2011. Survival rates, clinical, and physiological outcomes were followed prospectively. RESULTS: Twenty-five of the 181 pelvic fracture patients had biomechanically unstable fractures that required surgical fixation. Fourteen of those 25 patients had deteriorating hemodynamic instability from massive pelvic bleeding which was resistant to resuscitation, and they underwent EPPP, as a stand-alone treatment. The procedure successfully achieved hemodynamic stability in all 14 patients and obviated the early mortality associated with massive pelvic bleeding. Three of these patients eventually succumbed to their multiple injuries. CONCLUSION: Implementation of EPPP improved all measured physiological outcome parameters and survival rates of hemodynamically unstable multi-trauma patients with unstable pelvic fractures in our trauma center. It provided the unique advantage of directly compressing the life-threatening retroperitoneal bleeders by applying direct pressure and causing a tamponade effect to stanch venous and arterial pelvic blood flow and obviate the early mortality associated with massive pelvic bleeding.