Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Prosthodont ; 27(4): 311-9, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25010873

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of palatal brushing in the treatment of denture stomatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After screening 143 individuals with a potential diagnosis of denture stomatitis, 48 patients (mean age: 66.0 ± 11.2 years) were enrolled in a two-center phase 1 clinical trial with a one-group pretest/posttest design. The intervention of interest was manual palatal brushing after each meal and before bedtime. Clinical and microbiologic examinations were performed at baseline and 1 and 3 months after treatment. Additional data were obtained using a validated questionnaire. The primary and secondary outcomes were the remission of denture stomatitis and diminution of Candida colony-forming units (CFUs), respectively. Descriptive and nonparametric statistical tests were conducted to analyze the data. RESULTS: At the 3-month follow-up, denture stomatitis was completely cured in 10.4% of the participants, and 70.8% of denture wearers showed improvement in the clinical signs of denture stomatitis. There was a significant reduction in the area and severity of the palatal inflammation (P < .0001). The effect size ranged from medium to large (0.34 to 0.54) depending on the classification used for the diagnosis of denture stomatitis. A significant reduction in the number of Candida CFUs isolated from the palatal mucosa and dentures (P ≤ .05) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that palatal brushing is an effective treatment of denture stomatitis.


Assuntos
Prótese Total Superior , Mucosa Bucal , Palato , Estomatite sob Prótese/prevenção & controle , Escovação Dentária/métodos , Idoso , Candida/classificação , Candida/isolamento & purificação , Candida albicans/isolamento & purificação , Candida glabrata/isolamento & purificação , Candida tropicalis/isolamento & purificação , Candidíase Bucal/prevenção & controle , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Placa Dentária/microbiologia , Higienizadores de Dentadura/uso terapêutico , Prótese Total Superior/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Mucosa Bucal/microbiologia , Higiene Bucal/métodos , Palato/microbiologia , Estomatite sob Prótese/classificação , Estomatite sob Prótese/microbiologia , Escovação Dentária/instrumentação , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Dent ; 42(2): 99-106, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24316341

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of antifungal therapy with any other alternative methods used for the treatment of denture stomatitis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched, complemented by hand searching, until the first week of January 2013. STUDY SELECTION: Included studies consisted of randomized clinical trials published in English or French, which compared antifungals with any other alternative or placebo, used for the treatment of denture stomatitis. The remission of clinical signs of denture stomatitis, and the reduction in Candida colony counts were considered as the clinical and microbiological outcomes, respectively. Random effects models were used to conduct the statistical analyses. RESULTS: From 233 identified articles, a total of 15 manuscripts on 14 randomized controlled trials were included in systematic review and 8 in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant difference between antifungal treatment and disinfection methods was found for both clinical (OR=0.7; 95% CI: 0.32-1.36; Z=-1.14; p=0.256) and microbiological (OR=0.8; 95% CI: 0.26-2.5; Z=-0.35; p=0.724) outcomes. The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference between an antifungal and a placebo for the microbiological outcome (OR=0.32; 95% CI: 0.12-0.89; Z=-2.2; p=0.028), favouring the antifungals. However, there was no statistically significant difference between antifungal and placebo for the clinical outcome (OR=0.2; 95% CI: 0.04-1.04; Z=-1.9; p=0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Disinfection agents, antiseptic mouthwashes, natural substances with antimicrobial properties, microwave disinfection and photodynamic therapy could be suggested as an adjunct or alternative to antifungal medications in the treatment of denture stomatitis.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Estomatite sob Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Candidíase Bucal/tratamento farmacológico , Candidíase Bucal/terapia , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Desinfecção/métodos , Humanos , Placebos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estomatite sob Prótese/microbiologia , Estomatite sob Prótese/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Int J Dent ; 2013: 498305, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23737789

RESUMO

An adequate dentition is of importance for well-being and life quality. Despite advances in preventive dentistry, edentulism is still a major public health problem worldwide. In this narrative review, we provide a perspective on the pathways that link oral to general health. A better understanding of disease indicators is necessary for establishing a solid strategy through an organized oral health care system to prevent and treat this morbid chronic condition.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA