Preclinical evaluation of liposome-supported peritoneal dialysis for the treatment of hyperammonemic crises.

Liposome-supported peritoneal dialysis (LSPD) with transmembrane pH-gradient liposomes was previously shown to enhance ammonia removal in cirrhotic rats and holds promise for the treatment of hyperammonemic crises-associated disorders. The main objective of this work was to conduct the preclinical evaluation of LSPD in terms of pharmacokinetics, ammonia uptake, and toxicology to seek regulatory approval for a first-in-human study. The formulation containing citric acid-loaded liposomes was administered intraperitoneally at two different doses once daily for ten days to healthy minipigs. It was also tested in a domestic pig model of hyperammonemia. The pharmacokinetics of citric acid and 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine was linear following intraperitoneal administration of medium and high dose. There was no systemic accumulation following daily doses over ten days. The systemic exposure to phospholipids remained low. Furthermore, the liposome-containing peritoneal fluid contained significantly higher ammonia levels than the liposome-free control, demonstrating efficient ammonia sequestration in the peritoneal space. This was indeed confirmed by the ability of LSPD to decrease plasmatic ammonia levels in artificially induced hyperammonemic pigs. LSPD was well tolerated, and no complement activation-related pseudoallergy reactions were observed. The safety profile, the linear pharmacokinetics of citric acid following repeated administrations of LSPD as well as the linear dose-dependent ammonia sequestration in the peritoneal space provide a strong basis for the clinical investigation of LSPD.

Liposome-supported peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of severe hyperammonemia: An investigation on potential interactions.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) performed with transmembrane pH-gradient liposomes was reported to efficiently remove ammonia from the body, representing a promising alternative to current standard-of-care for patients with severe hepatic encephalopathy. In this study, we further characterized the properties of liposome-supported peritoneal dialysis (LSPD) by 1) assessing its in-use stability in the presence of ascitic fluids from liver-disease patients; 2) investigating its interactions with drugs that are commonly administered to acute-on-chronic liver failure patients; and 3) analyzing the in vivo extraction profile of LSPD. We found that LSPD fluid maintained its in vitro ammonia uptake capability when combined with ascitic fluids. The co-incubation of selected drugs (e.g., beta-blockers, antibiotics, diuretics) with LSPD fluids and ammonia resulted in limited interaction effects for most compounds except for two fluoroquinolones and propranolol. However, considering the experimental set-up, these results should be interpreted with caution and confirmatory drug-drug interaction studies in a clinical setting will be required. Finally, metabolite-mapping analysis on dialysates of LSPD-treated rats revealed that the liposomes did not remove important metabolites more than a conventional PD fluid. Overall, these findings confirm that LSPD is a potentially safe and effective approach for treating hyperammonemic crises in the context of acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Lack of significant effect of bilastine administered at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses and concomitantly with ketoconazole on ventricular repolarization: results of a thorough QT study (TQTS) with QT-concentration analysis.

The effect of bilastine on cardiac repolarization was studied in 30 healthy participants during a multiple-dose, triple-dummy, crossover, thorough QT study that included 5 arms: placebo, active control (400 mg moxifloxacin), bilastine at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses (20 mg and 100 mg once daily, respectively), and bilastine 20 mg administered with ketoconazole 400 mg. Time-matched, triplicate electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded with 13 time points extracted predose and 16 extracted over 72 hours post day 4 dosing. Four QT/RR corrections were implemented: QTcB; QTcF; a linear individual correction (QTcNi), the primary correction; and a nonlinear one (QTcNnl). Moxifloxacin was associated with a significant increase in QTcNi at all time points between 1 and 12 hours, inclusively. Bilastine administration at 20 mg and 100 mg had no clinically significant impact on QTc (maximum increase in QTcNi, 5.02 ms; upper confidence limit [UCL] of the 1-sided, 95% confidence interval, 7.87 ms). Concomitant administration of ketoconazole and bilastine 20 mg induced a clinically relevant increase in QTc (maximum increase in QTcNi, 9.3 ms; UCL, 12.16 ms). This result was most likely related to the cardiac effect of ketoconazole because for all time points, bilastine plasma concentrations were lower than those observed following the supratherapeutic dose.

Comparison of semiautomated and fully automated methods for QT measurement during a thorough QT/QTc study: variability and sample size considerations.

This study compares the ability of 2 semiautomated methods with a fully automated method for QT measurement to minimize the sample size required to detect a moxifloxacin effect and exclude a placebo effect in a thorough QT/QTc study. The fully automated and 1 of 2 semiautomated methods used a global QT measurement in 12 leads, whereas the other semiautomated method used a tangent method on single lead raw complexes. Mean QTcF intervals were greater when measured on a global QT electrocardiogram than on raw complexes, but the mean magnitudes of DeltaQTcF were similar for all methods. The 3 methods detected a statistically significant increase in QTcF for moxifloxacin compared to placebo and were able to exclude a placebo effect on QTcF in all 62 participants. However, due to a smaller variability, the semiautomated methods allowed these detections with fewer than 20 participants, whereas the fully automated required at least 27 participants.