Pharmacogenomics of drug-metabolizing enzymes: a recent update on clinical implications and endogenous effects.

Interindividual differences in drug disposition are important causes for adverse drug reactions and lack of drug response. The majority of phase I and phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) are polymorphic and constitute essential factors for the outcome of drug therapy. Recently, both genome-wide association (GWA) studies with a focus on drug response, as well as more targeted studies of genes encoding DMEs have revealed in-depth information and provided additional information for variation in drug metabolism and drug response, resulting in increased knowledge that aids drug development and clinical practice. In addition, an increasing number of meta-analyses have been published based on several original and often conflicting pharmacogenetic studies. Here, we review data regarding the pharmacogenomics of DMEs, with particular emphasis on novelties. We conclude that recent studies have emphasized the importance of CYP2C19 polymorphism for the effects of clopidogrel, whereas the CYP2C9 polymorphism appears to have a role in anticoagulant treatment, although inferior to VKORC1. Furthermore, the analgesic and side effects of codeine in relation to CYP2D6 polymorphism are supported and the influence of CYP2D6 genotype on breast cancer recurrence during tamoxifen treatment appears relevant as based on three large studies. The influence of CYP2D6 polymorphism on the effect of antidepressants in a clinical setting is yet without any firm evidence, and the relation between CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers and suicide behavior warrants further studies. There is evidence for the influence of CYP3A5 polymorphism on tacrolimus dose, although the influence on response is less studied. Recent large GWA studies support a link between CYP1A2 polymorphism and blood pressure as well as coffee consumption, and between CYP2A6 polymorphism and cigarette consumption, which in turn appears to influence the lung cancer incidence. Regarding phase II enzyme polymorphism, the anticancer treatment with mercaptopurines and irinotecan is still considered important in relation to the polymorphism of TPMT and UGT1A1, respectively. There is a need for further clarification of the clinical importance and use of all these findings, but the recent research in the field that encompasses larger studies and a whole genome perspective, improves the possibilities be able to make firm and cost-effective recommendations for drug treatment in the future.

Epigenomics and interindividual differences in drug response.

Epigenomics is a rapidly growing field. New developments in epigenetics, such as the recently described modified cytosine variants (e.g., 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, 5hmC) and an arsenal of novel noncoding forms of RNA, can be applied in the area of drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Epigenetic aberrations can affect drug treatment by modulating the expressions of key genes involved in the metabolism and distribution of drugs as well as drug targets, thereby contributing to interindividual variation in drug response. These epigenetic alterations, along with the epigenetic profiles of circulating nucleic acids, have great potential to be used as biomarkers for personalized therapy, particularly in the treatment of cancer. In this review we present an update of pharmacoepigenetics with respect to epigenetic regulation of ADME genes (genes related to drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) and drug targets, and we illustrate how this information can be used for predicting interindividual variations in drug response.

Downregulation of drug transport and metabolism in mice bearing extra-hepatic malignancies.

There is increasing evidence of a systemic inflammatory response associated with malignancy, which may have an impact on both drug disposition and resistance to cytotoxic therapy. The impact of inflammation on drug disposition was studied in mice bearing a number of common tumour xenografts. C57BL/6 mice were inoculated with tumour xenografts. Hepatic expressions of Cyp3a and drug transporters were analysed at the mRNA, protein and functional levels (Cyp3a only). Circulating serum cytokines and the hepatic expression of acute phase proteins (APPs) were measured. Intratumoral levels of multidrug resistance genes were determined. Tumour xenografts elicited an inflammatory response that coincided with repression in hepatic Cyp3a11 activity and the expression of a number of hepatic drug transporters. With tumour growth, a progressive reduction in hepatic Cyp3a11 mRNA expression was seen. Conversely, an increase in the hepatic APP expression and circulating interleukin (IL)-6 levels was observed. Furthermore, a correlation was seen between increased intratumoral expression of the multidrug resistance gene, Mdr1a, and levels of circulating IL-6. Malignancy results in reduced hepatic drug disposition that correlates with an associated inflammatory response. Reduction of inflammation may improve the clinical outcome for patients receiving chemotherapeutic agents that undergo hepatic metabolism.