Combination therapy with novel agents for acute myeloid leukaemia: Insights into treatment of a heterogenous disease.

The treatment landscape of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is evolving rapidly. Venetoclax in combination with intensive chemotherapy or doublets or triplets with targeted or immune therapies is the focus of numerous ongoing trials. The development of mutation-targeted therapies has greatly enhanced the treatment armamentarium, with FLT3 inhibitors and isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors improving outcomes in frontline and relapsed/refractory (RR) AML, and menin inhibitors showing efficacy in RR NPM1mut and KMT2A-rearranged AML. With so many new drugs approved, the number of potential combinatorial approaches to leverage the maximal benefit of these agents has increased dramatically, while at the same time introducing clinical challenges, such as key preclinical and clinical data supporting the development of combinatorial therapy, how to optimally combine or sequence these novel agents, how to optimise dose and duration to maintain safety while enhancing efficacy, the optimal duration of therapy and the role of measurable residual disease in decision-making in both intensive and low-intensity therapy settings. In this review, we will outline the evidence leading to the approval of key agents in AML, their on-label current approvals and how they may be optimally combined in a safe and deliverable fashion to further improve outcomes in AML.

BRAF mutation in myeloid neoplasm: incidences and clinical outcomes.

The presence of BRAF mutation in hematological malignancies, excluding Hairy cell leukemia, and its significance as a driver mutation in myeloid neoplasms (MNs) remains largely understudied. This research aims to evaluate patient characteristics and outcomes of BRAF-mutated MNs. Among a cohort of 6667 patients, 48 (0.7%) had BRAF-mutated MNs. Notably, three patients exhibited sole BRAF mutation, providing evidence supporting the hypothesis of BRAF's role as a driver mutation in MNs. In acute myeloid leukemia, the majority of patients had secondary acute myeloid leukemia, accompanied by poor-risk cytogenic and RAS pathway mutations. Although the acquisition of BRAF mutation during disease progression did not correlate with unfavorable outcomes, its clearance through chemotherapy or stem cell transplant exhibited favorable outcomes (median overall survival of 34.8 months versus 10.4 months, p = 0.047). Furthermore, G469A was the most frequently observed BRAF mutation, differing from solid tumors and hairy cell leukemia, where V600E mutations were predominant.

Outcomes and genetic dynamics of acute myeloid leukemia at first relapse.

Patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (rAML) experience dismal outcomes. We performed a comprehensive analysis of patients with rAML to determine the genetic dynamics and survival predictive factors. We analyzed 875 patients with newly diagnosed AML who received intensive treatment (IT) or low-intensity treatment (LIT). Of these patients, 197 experienced subsequent rAML. Data was available for 164 patients, with a median time from CR/CRi to relapse of 6.5 months. Thirty-five of the 164 patients (21%) experienced relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). At relapse mutations in genes involved in pathway signaling tended to disappear, whereas clonal hematopoiesis-related mutations or TP53 tended to persist. Patients with normal karyotypes tended to acquire cytogenetic abnormalities at relapse. Patients treated with IT had a higher emergence rate of TP53 mutations (16%), compared to patients treated with LIT (1%, P = 0.009). The overall response rates were 38% and 35% for patients treated with salvage IT or LIT, respectively. Seventeen patients (10%) underwent alloSCT after salvage therapy. The median overall survival (OS) duration after relapse was 5.3 months, with a 1-year OS rate of 17.6%. Complex karyotype (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.14, P < 0.001), a KMT2A rearrangement (HR = 3.52, P = 0.011), time in remission < 12 months (HR = 1.71, P = 0.011), and an elevated white blood cell count at relapse (HR = 2.38, P = 0.005) were independent risk factors for OS duration. More effective frontline and maintenance therapies are warranted to prevent rAML.

Combination of dasatinib and venetoclax in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The dual inhibition of the BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase and BCL-2 could potentially deepen the response rates of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of dasatinib and venetoclax. METHODS: In this phase 2 trial, patients with CML-CP or accelerated phase (clonal evolution) received dasatinib 50 mg/day for three courses; venetoclax was added in course 4 for 3 years. The initial venetoclax dose was 200 mg/day continuously but reduced later to 200 mg/day for 14 days, and to 100 mg/day for 7 days per course once a molecular response (MR)4.5 was achieved. After 3 years of combination, patients were maintained on single-agent dasatinib. The primary end point was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months of combination. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were treated. Their median age was 46 years (range, 23-73). By 12 months of combination, the MMR, MR4, and MR4.5 rates were 86%, 53%, and 45%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 42 months, the 4-year event-free and overall survival rates were 96% and 100%, respectively. Outcomes with the combination were comparable to historical outcomes with single-agent dasatinib (cumulative 12-months MMR rate of 79% with both strategies). The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 22% with the combination and 11% with single-agent dasatinib (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with dasatinib and venetoclax was safe and effective in CML-CP. The cumulative response rates with the combination were similar to those with single-agent dasatinib. Further follow-up is needed to evaluate the rates of durable deep molecular response and treatment-free remission.

Characteristics and outcomes of acute myeloid leukaemia patients with baseline CD7 expression.

Targeted therapy development for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) requires an understanding of specific expression profiles. We collected flow cytometry data on 901 AML patients and recorded aberrant CD7 expression on leukaemic blasts. 263 (29.2%) had blasts positive for CD7. CD7+ AML was more likely to be adverse risk (64.6% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.0074) and less likely to be favourable risk (15.2% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.0074) by European LeukemiaNet 2022 criteria. Overall survival was inferior (11.9 [95% CI, 9.7-15.9] vs. 19.0 months [95% CI, 16.1-23.0], p = 0.0174). At relapse, 30.4% lost and 19.0% gained CD7, suggesting moderate instability over time.

BRG1/BRM inhibitor targets AML stem cells and exerts superior preclinical efficacy combined with BET or menin inhibitor.

ABSTRACT: BRG1 (SMARCA4) and BRM (SMARCA2) are the mutually exclusive core ATPases of the chromatin remodeling BAF (BRG1/BRM-associated factor) complexes. They enable transcription factors/cofactors to access enhancers/promoter and modulate gene expressions responsible for cell growth and differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) stem/progenitor cells. In AML with MLL1 rearrangement (MLL1r) or mutant NPM1 (mtNPM1), although menin inhibitor (MI) treatment induces clinical remissions, most patients either fail to respond or relapse, some harboring menin mutations. FHD-286 is an orally bioavailable, selective inhibitor of BRG1/BRM under clinical development in AML. Present studies show that FHD-286 induces differentiation and lethality in AML cells with MLL1r or mtNPM1, concomitantly causing perturbed chromatin accessibility and repression of c-Myc, PU.1, and CDK4/6. Cotreatment with FHD-286 and decitabine, BET inhibitor (BETi) or MI, or venetoclax synergistically induced in vitro lethality in AML cells with MLL1r or mtNPM1. In models of xenografts derived from patients with AML with MLL1r or mtNPM1, FHD-286 treatment reduced AML burden, improved survival, and attenuated AML-initiating potential of stem-progenitor cells. Compared with each drug, cotreatment with FHD-286 and BETi, MI, decitabine, or venetoclax significantly reduced AML burden and improved survival, without inducing significant toxicity. These findings highlight the FHD-286-based combinations as a promising therapy for AML with MLL1r or mtNPM1.

Oral decitabine and cedazuridine plus venetoclax for older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: a phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Hypomethylating agents combined with venetoclax are effective regimens in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Decitabine and cedazuridine (ASTX727) is an oral formulation of decitabine that achieves equivalent area-under-curve exposure to intravenous decitabine. We performed a single centre phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ASTX727 plus venetoclax. METHODS: This study enrolled patients with newly diagnosed (frontline treatment group) acute myeloid leukaemia who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (aged ≥75 years, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status of 2-3, or major comorbidities) or relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. Being aged 18 years or older and having an ECOG performance status of 2 or less were requirements for the relapsed or refractory disease treatment cohort, without any limits in the number of previous lines of therapy. Treatment consisted of ASTX727 (cedazuridine 100 mg and decitabine 35 mg) orally for 5 days and venetoclax 400 mg orally for 21-28 days in 28-day cycles. The primary outcome was overall response rate of ASTX727 plus venetoclax. Living patients who have not completed cycle one were not evaluable for response. Safety was analysed in all patients who started treatment. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04746235) and is ongoing. The data cutoff date for this analysis was Sept 22, 2023. FINDINGS: Between March 16, 2021, and Sept 18, 2023, 62 patients were enrolled (49 frontline and 13 relapsed or refractory) with a median age of 78 years (IQR 73-82). 36 (58%) were male; 53 (85%) were White, 4 (6%) Black, 2 (3%) Asian and 3 (5%) other or did not answer. 48 (77%) of 62 patients were European LeukemiaNet 2022 adverse risk, 24 (39%) had antecedent myelodysplastic syndromes, 12 (19%) had previously failed a hypomethylating agent, ten (16%) had therapy-related acute myeloid leukaemia, and 11 (18%) had TP53 mutations. The median follow-up time was 18·3 months (IQR 8·8-23·3). The overall response rate was 30 (64%) of 47 patients (95% CI 49-77) in frontline cohort and six (46%) of 13 patients (19-75) in relapsed or refractory cohort. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events were febrile neutropenia in 11 (18%) of 62 patients, pneumonia in eight (13%), respiratory failure in five (8%), bacteraemia in four (6%), and sepsis in four (6%). Three deaths occurred in patients in remission (one sepsis, one gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and one respiratory failure) and were potentially treatment related. INTERPRETATION: ASTX727 plus venetoclax is an active fully oral regimen and safe in most older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Our findings should be confirmed in larger multicentric studies. FUNDING: MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant, Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Moon Shot, Leukemia SPORE, Taiho Oncology, and Astex Pharmaceuticals.

Outcome of Patients With Relapsed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has improved significantly since the introduction of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) as APL therapies. The optimal therapy for APL relapse is believed to require autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) based on historical experience. STUDY AIMS: To evaluate the outcome of patients with relapsed APL before and after the era of ATRA-ATO. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 61 patients with relapsed APL treated from November 1991 to June 2023; 31 patients (51%) received modern therapy with the combination of ATRA and ATO with and without idarubicin and gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO). RESULTS: Overall, 56 patients (92%) achieved CR after the first salvage therapy; 20 patients received SCT (10 autologous SCT;10 allogeneic SCT). With a median follow-up time of 138 months, the median survival durations were 32 months and 164 months with historical therapy vs. modern (ATRA-ATO) therapy (P = .035); the 5-year survival rates were 44% vs. 71%. With a 10-month landmark analysis, the median survival durations were 102 months vs. not reached, and the 5-year survival rates were 57% and 70% without SCT vs. with SCT (P = .193). The survival benefit with SCT was more prominent in the historical therapy era. However, patients who received the modern combination therapy of ATRA-ATO with and without idarubicin and GO had similar outcomes without vs. with SCT (P = .848). CONCLUSION: The combination of ATRA-ATO (+/- GO and idarubicin) is a highly effective salvage therapy in relapsed APL. The use of SCT may not be needed after first relapse-second remission but may be considered in subsequent relapses.

Therapy-related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia does not have the high-risk features of a therapy-related neoplasm.

Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs) arise after exposure to cytotoxic therapies and are associated with high-risk genetic features and poor outcomes. We analyzed a cohort of patients with therapy-related chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (tCMML; n = 71) and compared its features to that of de novo CMML (dnCMML; n = 461). Median time from cytotoxic therapy to tCMML diagnosis was 6.5 years. Compared with dnCMML, chromosome 7 abnormalities (4% vs. 13%; P = .005), but not complex karyotype (3% vs. 7%; P = .15), were more frequent in tCMML. tCMML was characterized by higher TP53 mutation frequency (4% vs. 12%; P = .04) and lower NRAS (6% vs 22%, P =0.007) and CBL (4% vs 12%, P =0.04) mutation frequency. Prior therapy with antimetabolites (OR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.05-1.42]; P = .01) and mitotic inhibitors (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.06-1.44]; P = .009) was associated with NF1 and SETBP1 mutations while prior mitotic inhibitor therapy was associated with lower TET2 mutation frequency (OR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.55-0.92]; P = .01). Although no differences in median overall survival (OS) were observed among tCMML and dnCMML (34.7 months vs 35.9 months, P = .26), multivariate analysis for OS revealed that prior chemotherapy was associated with increased risk of death (HR 1.76 [95% CI, 1.07-2.89]; P = .026). Compared to a cohort of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome, tCMML had lower TP53 mutation frequency (12% vs 44.4%, P <.001) and less unfavorable outcomes. In summary, tCMML does not exhibit the high-risk features and poor outcomes of t-MNs.

Reduced dose azacitidine plus venetoclax as maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia following intensive or low-intensity induction: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute myeloid leukaemia have high rates of relapse, especially if they are unable to complete standard consolidation strategies or allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). The phase 3 QUAZAR AML-001 study showed an overall survival benefit with oral azacitidine maintenance. The BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax is highly active in acute myeloid leukaemia and synergistic with azacitidine. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low dose azacitidine plus venetoclax as maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia. METHODS: We performed a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the USA. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with a WHO 2016 diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia in complete remission or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery following intensive or low-intensity induction and not immediately eligible for HSCT. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status had to be 3 or less. Patients were assigned to maintenance therapy with azacitidine 50 mg/m2 intravenously or subcutaneously for 5 days and venetoclax 400 mg orally for 7 days or 14 days. The primary outcome was relapse-free survival. The study was closed early due to slow accrual. All patients were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04062266). FINDINGS: Between Sept 26, 2019, and Oct 26, 2022, 35 patients were enrolled, of whom 25 (71%) were assigned to cohort 1 following intensive induction and ten (29%) to cohort 2 following low-intensity induction. Of 35 patients, 18 (51%) were male and 17 (49%) were female. The median age was 55 years (IQR 41-62). The median number of cycles given was 9 (IQR 2-22) and median follow-up time was 23·3 months (IQR 9·0-30·0). The median relapse-free survival was not reached (95% CI 20·2 to not calculable) in the full cohort, not reached (29·1 to not calculable) in cohort 1, and 30·3 months (16·5 to not calculable) in cohort 2. The 2-year relapse-free survival was 65% (95% CI 50-85) in the full cohort, 71% (53-94) in cohort 1, and 52% (27-100) in cohort 2. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n=6), lung infection (n=4), leukopenia (n=4), and neutropenia (n=3). No deaths occurred during maintenance therapy. INTERPRETATION: Low dose azacitidine plus venetoclax is a feasible maintenance strategy in acute myeloid leukaemia following intensive and low-intensity induction. FUNDING: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, MDS/AML Moon Shot, Genentech.

First-in-human study of JNJ-67571244, a CD33 × CD3 bispecific antibody, in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) outcomes remain poor. A targeted cluster of differentiation (CD)33 × CD3 bispecific antibody, JNJ-67571244, was assessed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety and tolerability, and preliminary clinical activity in patients with r/rAML or r/rMDS. This first-in-human, open-label, phase I, dose-escalation/dose-expansion study included patients with r/rAML or r/rMDS who were ineligible for or had exhausted standard therapeutic options. JNJ-67571244 was administered intravenously or subcutaneously using step-up dosing until ≥1 discontinuation condition was met. Outcomes included safety/tolerability, preliminary clinical activity, and systemic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The study was terminated after evaluating 10 dose-escalation cohorts (n = 68) and before starting dose-expansion. Overall, 11 (16.2%) patients experienced ≥1 dose-limiting toxicity; all experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE; treatment related: 60 [88.2%]); and 64 (94.1%) experienced ≥1 TEAE of Grade ≥3 toxicity (treatment related: 28 [41.2%]). Although some patients had temporary disease burden reductions, no responses were seen. JNJ-67571244 administration increased multiple cytokines, which coincided with incidence of cytokine release syndrome, infusion-related reactions, and elevated liver function tests. A prolonged step-up strategy was tested to improve tolerability, though this approach did not prevent hepatotoxicity. T-cell activation following treatment suggested target engagement but did not correlate with clinical activity. Safely reaching the projected exposure level for JNJ-67571244 efficacy was not achieved, thus MTD and RP2D were not determined.

Cytogenetic and Molecular Associations with Outcomes in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Treated with Hypomethylating Agents plus Venetoclax.

PURPOSE: Hypomethylating agents (HMA) combined with venetoclax are an emerging therapeutic strategy for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS). The cytogenetic and molecular factors associated with outcomes with this combination for HR-MDS are incompletely understood. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We pooled patient data from 3 prospective trials evaluating HMA-venetoclax in HR-MDS to study associations between cytogenetic and molecular factors and overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time-to-event endpoints. Univariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression (for ORR) or the Cox proportional hazards model (for OS and EFS) were used to identify associations between clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular factors and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients (52 HMA-naïve, 28 HMA-failure) were included. ORR was 90% in HMA-naïve and 57% in HMA-failure. Median OS was 28.2 and 8.3 months in HMA-naïve and HMA-failure, respectively. Median EFS was 17.9 and 5.5 months in HMA-naïve and HMA-failure, respectively. In addition, 24/52 (46%) of the HMA-naïve and 3/28 (11%) of the HMA-failure patients proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Factors associated with inferior outcomes were prior HMA failure, complex cytogenetics, trisomy 8, TP53 mutations, and RAS pathway mutations. Mutations in RNA splicing, DNA methylation, and ASXL1 appeared favorable. Blast percentage was not predictive of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of cytogenetic and molecular alterations may help identify which patients with HR-MDS benefit the most from venetoclax.

Safety and long-term survival results of the addition of inotuzumab ozogamicin to the conditioning regimen of allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A single-center phase 1,2 trial.

Here we report on the first prospective study evaluating the safety and long-term survival when an escalating dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) (0.6, 1.2, or 1.8 mg/m2 on day 13) was added to one alkylator-containing conditioning regimen in patients with relapsed CD22 (+) lymphoid malignancies who were candidates for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Twenty-six patients were enrolled. Six (23%) of these patients entered the phase 1 study: four were treated at an INO dose of 0.6 mg/m2 and two at dose of 1.2 mg/m2. None of these patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. The remaining 20 (77%) patients entered the phase 2 part of the study at the maximum dose of 1.8 mg/m2. One patient developed VOD; this patient had received nivolumab immediately before HSCT while simultaneously experiencing hyperacute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). Treatment-related mortality (TRM) at 5 years was 12%. With a median follow-up of 48.7 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 84% and 80%, respectively. Compared with a historical cohort who received same conditioning for HSCT but without INO (n = 56), the INO group showed no significant differences in incidence of liver toxicity, engraftment time, TRM, or risk of acute GVHD. Patients with lymphoma who received INO had a trend for a better 5-year OS (93% versus 68%) and PFS (93% versus 58%) than those in the control group. In conclusion, our results showed that INO is safe with no increased risk of VOD when combined with one alkylator-containing regimen of HSCT.

Oral decitabine plus cedazuridine and venetoclax in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia: a single-centre, phase 1/2 study.

BACKGROUND: Hypomethylating agents are approved in higher-riskmyelodysplastic syndromes. The combination of a hypomethylating agent with venetoclax is standard of care in acute myeloid leukaemia. We investigated the safety and activity of the first totally oral combination of decitabine plus cedazuridine and venetoclax in patients with higher-risk-myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. METHODS: We did a single-centre, dose-escalation and dose-expansion, phase 1/2, clinical trial. Patients with treatment-naive higher-risk-myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (risk level categorised as intermediate-2 or higher by the International Prognostic Scoring System) with excess blasts (>5%). Treatment consisted of oral decitabine 35 mg plus cedazuridine 100 mg on days 1-5 and venetoclax (variable doses of 100-400 mg, day 1 to 14, 28-day cycle). The primary outcomes were safety for the phase 1 part and the overall response for the phase 2 part of the study. The trial is ongoing and this analysis was not prespecified. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04655755, and is currently enrolling participants. FINDINGS: Between Jan 21, 2021, and Jan 20, 2023, we enrolled 39 patients (nine in phase 1 and 30 in phase 2). The median age was 71 years (range 27-94), 28 (72%) patients were male, and 11 (28%) were female. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and the recommended phase 2 dose was established as oral decitabine 35 mg plus cedazuridine 100 mg for 5 days and venetoclax (400 mg) for 14 days. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (33 [85%] of 39), neutropenia (29 [74%]), and febrile neutropenia (eight [21%]). Four non-treatment-related deaths occurred on the study drugs due to sepsis (n=2), lung infection (n=1), and undetermined cause (n=1). The median follow-up time was 10·8 months (IQR 5·6-16·4). The overall response rate was 95% (95% CI 83-99; 37/39). 19 (49%) patients proceeded to hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. INTERPRETATION: This early analysis suggests that the combination of oral decitabine plus cedazuridine with venetoclax for higher-risk-myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia is safe in most patients, with encouraging activity. Longer follow-up will be needed to confirm these data. FUNDING: MD Anderson Cancer Center, MDS/AML Moon Shot, Genentech/AbbVie, and Astex Pharmaceuticals.

Targetable genetic abnormalities in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia across age groups.

Incidence of potential targetable genetic abnormalities by age in AML.

Azacitidine, Venetoclax, and Gilteritinib in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed or Refractory FLT3-Mutated AML.

PURPOSE: Azacitidine plus venetoclax is a standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed AML who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy. However, FLT3 mutations are a common mechanism of resistance to this regimen. The addition of gilteritinib, an oral FLT3 inhibitor, to azacitidine and venetoclax may improve outcomes in patients with FLT3-mutated AML. METHODS: This phase I/II study evaluated azacitidine, venetoclax, and gilteritinib in two cohorts: patients with (1) newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy or (2) relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated AML (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04140487). The primary end points were the maximum tolerated dose of gilteritinib (phase I) and the combined complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate (phase II). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled (frontline [n = 30]; relapsed/refractory [n = 22]). The recommended phase II dose was gilteritinib 80 mg once daily in combination with azacitidine and venetoclax. In the frontline cohort, the median age was 71 years and 73% of patients had an FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutation. The CR/CRi rate was 96% (CR, 90%; CRi, 6%). Sixty-five percent of evaluable patients achieved FLT3-ITD measurable residual disease <5 × 10-5 within four cycles. With a median follow-up of 19.3 months, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) have not been reached and the 18-month RFS and OS rates are 71% and 72%, respectively. In the relapsed/refractory cohort, the CR/CRi rate was 27%; nine additional patients (41%) achieved a morphologic leukemia-free state. The most common grade 3 or higher nonhematologic adverse events were infection (62%) and febrile neutropenia (38%), which were more frequent in the relapsed/refractory cohort. CONCLUSION: The combination of azacitidine, venetoclax, and gilteritinib resulted in high rates of CR/CRi, deep FLT3 molecular responses, and encouraging survival in newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML. Myelosuppression was manageable with mitigative dosing strategies.