Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 9(10): e108048, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25314641

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We sought to develop placental growth factor as a predictive pharmacodynamic biomarker for motesanib efficacy as first-line therapy in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Placental growth factor was evaluated at baseline and study week 4 (after 3 weeks treatment) in an exploratory analysis of data from a randomized phase 2 study of motesanib 125 mg once daily plus carboplatin/paclitaxel and in a prespecified analysis of data from a randomized, double-blind phase 3 study of motesanib 125 mg once daily plus carboplatin/paclitaxel vs placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (MONET1). Associations between fold-change from baseline in placental growth factor and overall survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: In the phase 2 study, serum placental growth factor increased from baseline a mean 2.8-fold at study week 4. Patients with ≥2.2-fold change from baseline in placental growth factor (n = 18) had significantly longer overall survival than those with <2.2-fold change (n = 19; 22.9 vs 7.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.12-0.74; P = 0.009). Consequently, placental growth factor was investigated as a pharmacodynamic biomarker in the phase 3 MONET1 study. There was no association between log-transformed placental growth factor fold-change from baseline to week 4 (continuous variable) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.79-1.22; P = 0.868). MONET1 did not meet its primary endpoint of overall survival. Likewise, median overall survival was similar among patients with ≥2.0-fold change in placental growth factor (n = 229) compared with <2.0-fold change (n = 127; 14.8 vs 13.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.67-1.15, P = 0.340). CONCLUSIONS: Our results illustrate the challenges of successfully translating phase 2 biomarker results into phase 3 studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00460317, NCT00369070.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Proteínas da Gravidez/sangue , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Niacinamida/administração & dosagem , Oligonucleotídeos , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Efeito Placebo , Fator de Crescimento Placentário , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Curva ROC , Taxa de Sobrevida
2.
J Virol Methods ; 123(2): 171-8, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15620399

RESUMO

This study was conducted to assess the performance of the Abbott laboratories LCx HCV RNA Quantitative Assay (LCx assay) in the clinical setting. Four clinical laboratories measured LCx assay precision, specificity, and linearity. In addition, a method comparison was conducted between the LCx assay and the Roche HCV Amplicor Monitor, version 2.0 (Roche Monitor 2.0) and the Bayer VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 Assay (Bayer bDNA 3.0) quantitative assays. For precision, the observed LCx assay intra-assay standard deviation (S.D.) was 0.060-0.117 log IU/ml, the inter-assay S.D. was 0.083-0.133 log IU/ml, the inter-lot S.D. was 0.105-0.177 log IU/ml, the inter-site S.D. was 0.099-0.190 log IU/ml, and the total S.D. was 0.113-0.190 log IU/ml. The specificity of the LCx assay was 99.4% (542/545; 95% CI, 98.4-99.9%). For linearity, the mean pooled LCx assay results were linear (r=0.994) over the range of the panel (2.54-5.15 log IU/ml). A method comparison demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.881 between the LCx assay and Roche Monitor 2.0, 0.872 between the LCx assay and Bayer bDNA 3.0, and 0.870 between Roche Monitor 2.0 and Bayer bDNA 3.0. The mean LCx assay result was 0.04 log IU/ml (95% CI, -0.08, 0.01) lower than the mean Roche Monitor 2.0 result, but 0.57 log IU/ml (95% CI, 0.53, 0.61) higher than the mean Bayer bDNA 3.0 result. The mean Roche Monitor 2.0 result was 0.60 log IU/ml (95% CI, 0.56, 0.65) higher than the mean Bayer bDNA 3.0 result. The LCx assay quantitated genotypes 1-4 with statistical equivalency. The vast majority (98.9%, 278/281) of paired LCx assay-Roche Monitor 2.0 specimen results were within 1 log IU/ml. Similarly, 86.6% (240/277) of paired LCx assay and Bayer bDNA 3.0 specimen results were within 1 log, as were 85.6% (237/277) of paired Roche Monitor 2.0 and Bayer specimen results. These data demonstrate that the LCx assay may be used for quantitation of HCV RNA in HCV-infected individuals.


Assuntos
Hepacivirus/genética , RNA Viral/sangue , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/métodos , Virologia/métodos , DNA Viral/análise , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/classificação , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas/métodos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas/normas , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas/estatística & dados numéricos , RNA Viral/genética , Padrões de Referência , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/normas , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/estatística & dados numéricos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Viremia/tratamento farmacológico , Viremia/virologia , Virologia/normas , Virologia/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...