Clinical comparison of isolator, Septi-Chek, nonvented tryptic soy broth, and direct agar plating combined with thioglycolate broth for diagnosing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is a life-threatening complication of cirrhotic ascites. Optimal patient management depends on the isolation of the causal organism from ascitic fluid. To evaluate culture techniques for the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, we prospectively compared three blood culture system, the Isolator system, a lysis-centrifugation system, the Septi-Chek system, a biphasic culture system, and a nonvented tryptic soy broth system, all inoculated at the bedside, and our standard method of direct inoculation of specimens after transport to the laboratory onto agar plates and into thioglycolate broth. The results showed that the Septi-Chek and nonvented tryptic soy broth systems each recovered statistically significantly more pathogens than either the Isolator system (P = 0.0084) or the standard method (P = 0.00098). The Isolator system recovered more pathogens than the standard plate method, but this difference was not statistically significant. Both the Isolator system and the standard plate method recovered more contaminating microorganisms than the Septi-Chek or nonvented tryptic soy broth system. The Isolator system required the most processing time compared with the processing times required by any other method.

Non-A, non-B fulminant hepatitis is also non-E and non-C.

OBJECTIVES: to define the roles of the hepatitis C and E viruses (HCV and HEV) in non-A, non-B (NANB) fulminant hepatitis. METHODS: we utilized the polymerase chain reaction to amplify HCV and HEV RNA sequences and assays to detect antibodies to HCV and HEV in the acute phase sera of eight presumed viral NANB and seven nonviral NANB fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) patients. RESULTS: none of the 15 patients had detectable HCV or HEV RNA or elevated HCV and IgM-HEV antibody titers in their acute phase sera. Three patients, all with features of autoimmune hepatitis, had raised IgG-HEV antibody titers. Due to the possibility of serologically undetectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in fulminant hepatitis patients, we performed polymerase chain reaction amplification of HBV genomic DNA in acute phase sera of the presumed viral NANB FHF patients and subsequently found no evidence of HBV DNA. CONCLUSIONS: we did not find evidence implicating HCV or HEV in presumed viral NANB FHF or as agents contributing to or causing the liver failure in nonviral NANB FHF patients with autoimmune hepatitis, drug-induced hepatotoxicity, or halothane hepatotoxicity.

Prevalence of peritonitis and the ascitic fluid protein concentration among chronic liver disease patients.

The prevalence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) or its variants, bacterascites (BA), and culture-negative neutrocytic ascites (CNNA), may vary depending on the underlying liver disease and protein content of ascites. In this study, we compared the frequency of peritonitis (SBP, BA, CNNA) upon admission in alcoholic (ALD), cholestatic (CLD), and hepatocellular liver disease (HLD); determined the relationship between Child's class and prevalence of peritonitis; and assessed ascitic total protein as a risk factor for peritonitis. Between January 1989 and April 1991, 113 consecutive patients were admitted with chronic liver disease and ascites (49, ALD; 22, CLD; and 42, HLD). All had admission paracentesis. SBP was defined as polymorphonuclear cell count (PMN) > or = 250 mm3 with a positive culture, BA as PMN < 250/mm3 and positive culture, and CNNA as PMN > or = 250/mm3 with negative culture. No patients with obvious intraabdominal source for infection (i.e., secondary peritonitis) were included in the analysis. The prevalence of peritonitis was 8/113 (7%); four patients had SBP, one BA, and three CNNA. The occurrence of peritonitis was independent of the type of liver disease (ALD, 8%; CLD, 9%; HDL, 5%). Neither ascitic fluid total protein nor the severity of liver disease (Child's class) predicted the occurrence of peritonitis. We conclude that the occurrence of peritonitis is unrelated to the type of liver disease, and severity of liver disease did not predict the presence of peritonitis. Also, ascitic fluid total protein < 1.0 g/dl may not be a sensitive predictor of risk of peritonitis.

Beyond 1 year after liver transplantation.

We retrospectively reviewed the long-term results in 46 patients who survived at least 1 year after liver transplantation. Only one death has occurred, and one patient has required retransplantation. Biochemical liver function tests showed median values in the normal range, except for mild elevation of serum gamma-glutamyltransferase. In patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, these test results were completely normal. A liver biopsy 1 year after transplantation disclosed normal histologic findings in 31 patients (67%). The other patients had either transient (acute rejection) or stable (chronic rejection) abnormalities, except for two patients with progressive graft dysfunction attributable to chronic rejection. A clinically significant vascular anastomotic abnormality was noted in one patient who had hepatic artery thrombosis. Late bile duct complications occurred in 15% of patients, all of whom had a satisfactory outcome after surgical or radiologic intervention. Cyclosporine-related nephrotoxicity and hypertension each occurred in 67% of patients; however, conversion to a low-dose cyclosporine-azathioprine regimen yielded stabilization of renal function after the first postoperative year, and hypertension has been easily controlled medically. Diabetes necessitating insulin treatment developed in three patients. The body weight of the study patients had increased by a median of 6.5 kg at 1 year but stabilized thereafter. Subjective well-being and satisfaction with life were reported by 91% of the patients. Of the 46 patients, 26 were employed, 16 were homemakers, and only 4 did not work, 2 because of transplant-related medical problems. Thus, we conclude that liver transplantation rehabilitates patients with end-stage liver disease and enhances their quality of life.