Outcomes of patients with hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic strictures undergoing endoscopic and percutaneous treatment.

Background and study aims The increase in hepaticojejunostomies has led to an increase in benign strictures of the anastomosis. Double balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (DBE-ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) are treatment options; however, there is lack of long-term outcomes, with no consensus on management. We performed a retrospective study assessing the outcomes of patients referred for endoscopic management of hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic strictures (HJAS). Patients and methods All consecutive patients at a tertiary institution underwent endoscopic intervention for suspected HJAS between 2009 and 2021 were enrolled. Results Eighty-two subjects underwent DBE-ERCP for suspected HJAS. The technical success rate was 77 % (63/82). HJAS was confirmed in 41 patients. The clinical success rate for DBE-ERCP ± PTBD was 71 % (29/41). DBE-ERCP alone achieved clinical success in 49 % of patients (20/41). PTBD was required in 49 % (20/41). Dual therapy was required in 22 % (9/41). Those with liver transplant had less technical success compared to other surgeries (72.1 % vs 82.1 % P  = 0.29), less clinical success with DBE-ERCP alone (40 % vs 62.5 % P  = 0.16) and required more PTBD (56 % vs 37.5 % P  = 0.25). All those with ischemic biliopathy (n = 9) required PTBD for clinical success, required more DBE-ERCP (4.4 vs 2.0, P = 0.004), more PTBD (4.7 vs 0.3, P  < 0.0001), longer treatment duration (181.6 vs 99.5 days P  = 0.12), and had higher rates of recurrence (55.6 % vs 30.3 % P  = 0.18) compared to those with HJAS alone. Liver transplant was the leading cause of ischemic biliopathy (89 %). The overall adverse event rate was 7 %. Conclusions DBE-ERCP is an effective diagnostic and therapeutic tool in those with altered gastrointestinal anatomy and is associated with low complication rates.

Narrow band imaging versus white light for detecting sessile serrated lesion: A prospective randomized multicenter study.

Objectives: Colonoscopy is the gold standard diagnostic test used to detect early colorectal lesions and prevent colorectal carcinoma. Narrow band imaging (NBI) is an imaging technique that provides improved image resolution of the mucosa during endoscopy. Whether NBI improves the detection of sessile serrated lesion (SSL) is controversial-our aim was to assess this during routine colonoscopy. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Patients underwent colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or symptoms. They were randomized to either high-definition white light (HD-WL) or NBI in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was SSL detection rate. Secondary outcomes were adenoma detection rate (ADR) and polyp detection rate (PDR). Results: A total of 400 patients were randomized to NBI (N = 200) or HD-WL (N = 200). The total colonoscopy time was slightly longer in the NBI group compared to HD-WL (median time 14 vs. 12 min, p = 0.033). There were no statistically significant differences in SSL detection rate (7.5% NBI vs. 8.0% HD-WL; p = 0.852), ADR (41.0% NBI vs. 37.5% HD-WL; p = 0.531), or PDR (61.0% NBI vs. 54.0% HD-WL; p = 0.157) between the two groups. No significant predictors of SSL detection were found on univariable or multivariable analysis. Increasing age and increased withdrawal time were an independent predictors of polyp detection and increasing age was also an independent predictor of adenoma detection on multivariable analysis. Conclusion: In the hands of experienced colonoscopists, NBI does not improve SSL detection compared to HD-WL. Withdrawal time and patient age remain important factors for polyp and adenoma detection.

Current endoscopic closure techniques for the management of gastrointestinal perforations.

Acute gastrointestinal perforations occur either from spontaneous or iatrogenic causes. However, particular attention should be made in acute iatrogenic perforations as timely diagnosis and endoscopic closure prevent morbidity and mortality. With the increasing use of diagnostic endoscopy and advances in therapeutic endoscopy worldwide, the endoscopist must be able to recognize and manage perforations. Depending on the size and location of the defect, a variety of endoscopic clips, stents, and suturing devices are available. This review aims to prepare and guide the endoscopist to use the right tools and techniques for optimal patient outcomes.

Portal biliopathy: multidisciplinary management and outcomes of treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Portal biliopathy (PB) is a rare condition in which portal hypertension because of extrahepatic portal vein obstruction can lead to biliary abnormalities, with some patients developing obstructive jaundice. At present, there is no international consensus on the management of PB. We present the experience of an Australian tertiary referral hospital with the diagnosis and management of PB, and compare this with reported international experience. METHODS: The records of nine patients presenting with PB between June 2003 and March 2012 were reviewed and analysed. RESULTS: All patients had portal hypertension because of portal vein thrombosis, with seven patients showing cavernous transformation of the portal vein. Biliary abnormality presented with jaundice (3/9), abdominal pain (2/9) or without symptoms (3/9). All patients developed a cholestatic pattern of liver function tests (LFTs). First-line endoscopic management was employed in 7 of 8 symptomatic patients. Four patients required endoscopic management alone (sphincterotomy alone (1/9), single stent (2/9), repeated stent changes (1/9) ), while four required second-line surgical intervention (portosystemic shunt (1/9), bilioenteric anastomosis (3/9) ). All patients were well, with stable LFTs, at median 18-month follow-up, with two patients undergoing regular stent changes, and the remainder requiring no further intervention. CONCLUSION: PB can be managed successfully with endoscopic therapy as the first-line option, but a multidisciplinary approach is necessary, with second-line surgical intervention often required. We recommend a management algorithm similar to that presented in the UK PB literature, and confirm that bilioenteric anastomosis can be performed successfully without prior portal decompression.

Advances in modern enteroscopy therapeutics.

Advances in modern enteroscopy have been largely due to endoscope development but also through the improved availability of endoscopic accessories along with improved understanding in their application. Device assisted enteroscopy began with the double balloon system in 2001 and was quickly followed by single balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy. These tools revolutionised deep small bowel endoscopy and allowed for the delivery of virtually all known therapeutic endoscopy intervention to almost all segments of the small bowel. This review covers the types of interventions in regards to indications, methods and their safety profiles as well as reviewing the various device assisted endoscopes available and their attributes.

Meta-analysis of narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection.

BACKGROUND: At colonoscopy, missed adenomas have been well documented at approximately 22%. The challenge is in reducing this miss rate. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) has been extensively evaluated in prospective, randomized, controlled studies for polyp detection. Sample-size calculations show us that these studies may be underpowered, and hence a meta-analysis is required. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether use of NBI enhances the detection of adenomas. DESIGN: Meta-analyses were conducted of 7 studies using NBI for adenoma detection rate. MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases were searched by using a combination of the following terms: "colonoscopy," "NBI," and "electronic chromoendoscopy." PATIENTS: There was a total of 2936 patients in the NBI studies. INTERVENTIONS: Prospective, randomized trials of NBI versus standard white-light colonoscopy (WLC) were conducted. We excluded spray chromoendoscopy studies and studies of inflammatory bowel disease and polyposis syndromes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Adenoma and polyp detection rates and the number of polyps and adenomas detected per person. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the overall adenoma detection rate with the use of NBI or WLC (36% vs 34%; P = .413 [relative risk 1.06; 95% CI, 0.97-1.16]), and there was no statistically significant difference in polyp detection rate by using NBI or WLC (37% vs 35%; P = .289 [relative risk 1.22; 95% CI, 0.85-1.76]). When the number of adenomas and polyps per patient was analyzed, no significant difference was found between NBI and WLC (0.645 vs 0.59; P = .105 and 0.373 vs 0.348; P = .139 [weighted mean difference 0.19; 95% CI, ∞0.06 to 0.44], respectively). LIMITATION: Variability in NBI studies can reduce the accuracy of this analysis. CONCLUSIONS: NBI did not increase adenoma or polyp detection rates.

Modified technique of high-resolution ultrasonography of the normal cervical esophagus.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To study a modified technique of neck ultrasound for the visualization of cervical esophagus using a high-resolution and high frequency linear transducer in normal subjects. METHODS: Consecutive control subjects were patients who underwent abdominal sonography for other diseases and had no past or current history of dysphagia or esophageal disorders. The thyroid gland was used as a transducer window to obtain images. We used a slightly flexed neck position with the head turned 45 degrees to the opposite side while scanning the neck on either side. RESULTS: One-hundred subjects were scanned and their age range was 10-74 years (male:female ratio 1:1). In 36% of cases it was difficult to visualize the right lateral 2/3rd in the traditional scanning position of the neck. This improved to 2% with the modified neck position. All patients had the left window visualized with both neck positions. The transverse diameter, anterior-posterior diameter and wall thickness measures were all significantly greater with the modified technique. All patients tolerated the procedure with no reported discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: This modified technique provides superior views of the cervical esophagus, particularly from the right window, in almost all patients. Normal parameters using ultrasound have now been established.

A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent improvement in techniques and patient selection, post-ERCP pancreatitis remains the most frequent and dreaded complication of ERCP. Recent studies suggest that pretreatment with glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) may prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis and improve cannulation success. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of transdermal GTN on ERCP cannulation success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 318 patients (mean age 62 years, 61% women) were randomized to either active (n = 155) or placebo (n = 163) arms. INTERVENTIONS: Active patch (GTN) versus placebo patch. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Cannulation time and success. Post-ERCP pancreatitis rates. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the active or placebo arms for the following: successful initial cannulation (96.8% vs 98.8%), deep cannulation (96.1% vs 98.8%), time to successful cannulation, use of guidewire (27% vs 25%) or needle knife (13% vs 13%), and post-ERCP pancreatitis (7.4% of placebo patients and 7.7% active patients). Multivariate analysis identified women, younger patients, pancreatogram, number of attempts on papilla, and poor pancreatic-duct emptying after opacification as risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Transdermal GTN did not reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis in any of the identified high-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Transdermal GTN did not improve the rate of success in ERCP cannulation or prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in either average or high-risk patient groups.

Impact of endoscopic intervention in 100 patients with suspected postcholecystectomy bile leak.

BACKGROUND: Bile leak is a recognized complication of cholecystectomy. Endoscopic intervention is widely accepted as a treatment for this complication, but the optimal form is not well defined. METHODS: An ERCP database was reviewed retrospectively to identify all cases of bile leak related to cholecystectomy. Patient records and endoscopy reports were reviewed, and structured telephone interviews were conducted to collect data. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (61 women, 39 men; mean age, 53 [17] years) with suspected postcholecystectomy bile leak were referred for ERCP. Cholecystectomy was commenced laparoscopically in 83 patients (with an open conversion rate of 30%). The most common symptoms were pain (n = 62) and fever (n = 37). Cholangiography was obtained in 96 patients. A leak was identified in 80/96 patients, the most common site being the cystic-duct stump (48), followed by ducts of Luschka (15), the T-tube site (7), and other sites (10). Treatment included stent insertion alone (40), sphincterotomy alone (18), combination stent/sphincterotomy (31), none (6), and other (1). Three patients with major bile-duct injuries were excluded from the analysis. Endoscopic therapy was unsuccessful in 7 patients (6 in the sphincterotomy alone group; p = 0.001). Four patients underwent surgery subsequent to ERCP to control the leak. All 4 were in the sphincterotomy alone group ( p = 0.001). Post-ERCP pancreatitis developed in 4 patients (3 mild, 1 moderate). CONCLUSIONS: The optimal endoscopic intervention for postcholecystectomy bile leak should include temporary insertion of a biliary stent.

A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope is believed to have theoretical advantages over the standard colonoscope, however a systematic evaluation of this instrument in routine clinical practice involving adult patients is lacking. METHODS: Consecutive patients (blinded) undergoing colonoscopy in an outpatient endoscopy center by one of 4 experienced colonoscopists had the procedure performed with a standard colonoscope (n=384) or pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope (n=413). Failure to negotiate the sigmoid colon within 10 minutes was regarded as a failure and, if suitable, the patient was crossed over to colonoscopy with the alternative instrument. RESULTS: Median (95% CI) time to the cecum was significantly faster in the pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope group (odds ratio 5.0: 95% CI[4.7,5.3] minutes) compared with the standard colonoscope group (odds ratio 5.5: 95% CI[5.2,5.8] minutes, p=0.01). There were 22 failures overall (2.8%), 14 in the standard colonoscope group (3.6%) and 8 in the pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope group (1.9%; p=0.1). With regard to the 14 failures in the standard colonoscope group, colonoscopy was attempted with the pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope in 13 and completed successfully in 12 (92%). The pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope was superior in cases of severe stenosing diverticular disease; two of 27 examinations with the pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope were rated as failed vs. 12 of 18 with the standard colonoscope (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intubation time was faster with the pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, but use of this instrument was not associated with a superior cecal intubation rate compared with the standard colonoscope. However, in patients with severe stenosing diverticular disease, the intubation rate with the pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope was superior.