Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Aflibercept Biosimilar (P041) Compared with Originator Product in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the noninferiority of biosimilar aflibercept (P041, CinnaGen) to the originator aflibercept (AFL, Regeneron) in terms of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. DESIGN: This was a phase Ш, 52-week, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, and active control trial involving eyes in a 1:1 ratio. SUBJECTS: Patients with active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration randomized into the 2 groups of P041 and AFL. METHODS: Patients received an injection of aflibercept every 4 weeks for 3 doses, followed by administration every 8 weeks up to week 48. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the noninferiority analysis of eyes maintaining vision at week 52. Secondary outcomes included the changes in visual acuity and retinal thickness, safety evaluation, and immunogenicity during the study. RESULTS: In total, 168 eyes of 168 patients were included. At week 52, the proportion of patients maintaining vision was 94.44% in the P041 group compared with 94.52% in the AFL group. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference of maintaining vision from baseline did not exceed the predefined noninferiority margin of 10% (difference, -0.0008; 95% CI, -0.074 to 0.074; P = 0.98). Secondary outcomes indicated similar results in both arms (all P > 0.05). Safety measured outcomes and immunogenicity were similar between the 2 study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Biosimilar aflibercept was noninferior to AFL in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Other efficacy and safety findings also indicated the similarity of 2 products. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Comparative immunogenicity and safety of SpikoGen®, a recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein vaccine in children and young adults: An immuno-bridging clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: SpikoGen® is a recombinant subunit spike protein ectodomain vaccine manufactured in insect cells and formulated with the novel polysaccharide-based Advax-CpG55.2 adjuvant. This study aimed to compare the immunogenicity and safety of SpikoGen® vaccine in children, adolescents and young adults. METHODS: This was a non-randomized, three-arm, open-label, parallel-group, immuno-bridging, non-inferiority trial to compare the immunogenicity and safety of a primary course of two intramuscular doses of SpikoGen® vaccine in children aged 5 to < 12 years, adolescents aged 12 to < 18 years and young adults aged 18 to 40 years. Children 5-12 years received a half dose of 12.5 µg spike protein, whereas the other groups received the full vaccine dose. Vaccine immunogenicity was evaluated via assessment of serum anti-spike and neutralizing antibodies 14 days after the second dose. Solicited adverse events were recorded for 7 days after each vaccination. Safety assessments including serious adverse events were continued through six months after the second dose in children and adolescents. RESULTS: Two weeks after the second dose, seroconversion rates for neutralizing antibody levels were not significantly different for children (59.50 %), adolescents (52.06 %) and adults (56.01 %). The 95 % confidence interval of the difference in seroconversion rates between children and adults was within the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 10 % (-12 % to 5 %). SpikoGen® vaccine was well tolerated in all age groups with the most common solicited adverse events being injection site pain and fatigue which were generally transient and mild. CONCLUSION: SpikoGen® vaccine was shown to be safe, well tolerated and immunogenic in children as young as 5 years of age, with non-inferior responses to those seen in adults. The Iranian FDA authorisation of SpikoGen® vaccine is now extended down to 5 years of age.

Assessing the gene expression of the adenosine 5'-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and its relation with the IL-6 and IL-10 plasma levels in COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysregulation and excessive inflammation are implicated in the pathogenesis of the highly infectious disease of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by a newly emerging coronavirus (i.e., severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2; SARS-CoV-2). The adenosine 5'-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), an energy sensor regulating the metabolic pathways in diverse cells, exerts a regulatory role in the immune system. This study aims to examine the mRNA expression level of AMPK and the plasma levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-10 cytokines in patients with different grades of COVID-19. METHODS: Peripheral blood was collected from 60 patients with COVID-19 (Moderate, severe, and critical). The plasma levels of IL-6 and IL-10 were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the mRNA expression level of AMPK was determined using real-time PCR. RESULTS: The results showed that the plasma levels of IL-6 increased significantly in critical and severe patients compared to moderate cases of COVID-19 (P < 0.001). Moreover, IL-10 plasma concentrations were significantly higher in critical and severe cases than in moderate cases of COVID-19 (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). Also, the gene expression of AMPK was meaningfully enhanced in critical patients relative to moderate and severe cases of COVID-19, in order (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). There was a positive association between AMPK gene expression and plasma levels of IL-6 and IL-10 (P = 0.006, r = 0.348, P = 0.028, r = 0.283, respectively). CONCLUSION: Increasing AMPK gene expression is likely a necessary effort of the immune system to inhibit inflammation in critical COVID-19. However, this effort seems to be inadequate, probably due to factors that induce inflammation, like erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and IL-6.

Efficacy and Safety of a Biosimilar Liraglutide (Melitide®) Versus the Reference Liraglutide (Victoza®) in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Liraglutide effectively controls blood glucose level and reduces body weight. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a biosimilar liraglutide (Melitide®; CinnaGen, Tehran, Iran) to the reference liraglutide (Victoza®; Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: In this phase 3 clinical noninferiority trial, adult patients with inadequately controlled T2DM and with hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) levels of 7-10.5% on at least two oral glucose-lowering drugs with stable doses for at least 3 months were randomized to receive Melitide® (n = 150) or Victoza® (n = 150) 1.8 mg/day for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was assessment of the noninferiority of Melitide® to Victoza® in terms of change in HbA1C level with a prespecified margin of 0.4%. The secondary outcomes were the assessment of additional efficacy parameters (including the proportion of patients achieving HbA1C levels of < 7%), the incidence of adverse events, and immunogenicity. RESULTS: Of the 300 participants enrolled in this study, 235 were included in the per-protocol analysis (112 in the Melitide® group and 123 in the Victoza® group). The mean (standard deviation) changes in HbA1C were - 1.76% (1.22) in the Melitide® group and - 1.59% (1.31) in the Victoza® group. The upper limit of the 95% one-sided confidence interval (CI) of the mean difference between Melitide® and Victoza® in lowering HbA1C was lower than the predefined margin (mean difference - 0.18, 95% CI - 0.5 to 0.15). Similar findings were obtained with the intention-to-treat analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two study arms regarding the proportion of patients achieving HbA1C < 7% (p = 0.210), other efficacy parameters (p > 0.05), and reported adverse events (p = 0.916). Furthermore, none of the patients developed anti-liraglutide antibodies. CONCLUSION: The biosimilar liraglutide (Melitide®) was noninferior in efficacy and comparable in safety when compared with the reference liraglutide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03421119.

Safety and Discontinuation Rate of Dimethyl Fumarate (Zadiva®) in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: An Observational Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the real-world safety and discontinuation rate of Zadiva® (generic product of dimethyl fumarate (DMF)) in Iranian patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), supplementing existing clinical evidence from randomized controlled trials. METHODS: This retrospective observational study evaluated the real-world safety and discontinuation rate of DMF in RRMS patients from Amir A'lam referral hospital's neurology clinic. Data on safety, discontinuation rate, and clinical disease activity were collected retrospectively. The study aimed to assess the discontinuation rate, safety, and reasons for discontinuation, as well as the number of patients experiencing a relapse, MRI activity, and EDSS scores. RESULTS: In total, 142 RRMS patients receiving DMF were included in the study, with 15 discontinuing treatment due to adverse events, lack of efficacy, or pregnancy. Notably, a significant reduction in relapse rates was observed, with 90.8% of patients remaining relapse-free throughout the study period. After 1 year of treatment with Zadiva®, only 17.6% of patients experienced MRI activity, whereas the EDSS score remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important real-world data on the safety and tolerability of Zadiva® in RRMS patients. The results indicate that Zadiva® is generally well tolerated and safe, with a low discontinuation rate due to adverse events or lack of efficacy. These findings suggest that Zadiva® is an effective and safe treatment option for RRMS patients in real-world practice.

Ability of SpikoGen®, an Advax-CpG adjuvanted recombinant spike protein vaccine, to induce cross-neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants.

SpikoGen® vaccine is a subunit COVID-19 vaccine expressed in insect cells comprising recombinant spike protein extracellular domain formulated with Advax-CpG55.2™ adjuvant. A Phase 2 trial was conducted in 400 adult participants randomised 3:1 to receive two intramuscular doses of SpikoGen® vaccine or saline placebo 3 weeks apart. Some Phase 2 trial participants later enrolled in a separate booster study and received a third dose of SpikoGen® vaccine. This stored serum was used to assess the ability of SpikoGen® vaccine to induce cross-neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Sera taken at baseline and 2 weeks after the second vaccine dose from baseline seronegative Phase 2 subjects was evaluated using a panel of spike pseudotype lentivirus neutralisation assays for the ability to cross-neutralise a wide range of SARS-CoV-2 variants, including Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and BA.4/5. Stored samples of subjects who participated in both the 2-dose Phase 2 trial and a third dose booster trial 6 months later were also analysed for changes in cross-neutralising antibodies over time and dose. Two weeks after the second dose, sera broadly cross-neutralised most variants of concern, albeit with titres against Omicron variants being ~10-fold lower. While Omicron titres fell to low levels 6 months after the second vaccine dose in most subjects, they showed a ~20-fold rise after the third dose booster, after which there was only a ~2-3-fold difference in neutralisation of Omicron and the ancestral strains. Despite being based on the ancestral Wuhan sequence, after two doses, SpikoGen® vaccine induced broadly cross-neutralising serum antibodies. Titres then reduced over time but were rapidly restored by a third dose booster. This resulted in high neutralisation including against the Omicron variants. This data supports ongoing use of SpikoGen® vaccine for protection against recent SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants.

Alvopem® (pemetrexed) safety assessment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer or malignant pleural mesothelioma: a post-marketing surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide in both men and women, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the majority (~ 85%) of lung cancers. This post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study aimed to evaluate the safety of Pemetrexed (Alvopem®, NanoAlvand, Iran) in Iranian patients with lung cancer or mesothelioma. METHODS: The present study is an observational, single-center, open-label, and post-authorization study. All eligible non-squamous NSCLC and malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients who received pemetrexed based on the physicians' decision, were enrolled. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients with non-squamous NSCLC [186 patients (93.47%) or MPM (12 patients (6.03%)] were enrolled from March 2016 to February 2020. The most common reported adverse event (AE) was anemia (89.39%), followed by neutropenia (28.79%) and leukopenia (24.75%). The most important grade 3 AEs were anemia and neutropenia, with the incidence rate of 3.54% and 7.58%, respectively. No grade 4 AEs were reported. Moreover, the results of our study showed negative statistically significant correlations between patients' age and mean neutrophil count (r = - 0.17; P = 0.0156) and hemoglobin (r = - 0.16; P = 0.0201) in all six visits. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this open-label, observational PMS showed that Pemetrexed (Alvopem®) is safe in patients with non-squamous NSCLC patients receiving pemetrexed-containing regimens. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04843007) in April 13th, 2021.

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of SpikoGen®, an Advax-CpG55.2-adjuvanted severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein vaccine: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of SpikoGen®, a subunit coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine composed of a recombinant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein with Advax-CpG55.2™ adjuvant. METHODS: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial was conducted on 16 876 participants randomized (3:1) to receive two intramuscular doses of SpikoGen® or a saline placebo 21 days apart. The primary outcome was to assess the efficacy of SpikoGen® in preventing symptomatic COVID-19. Secondary outcomes included safety assessments and evaluation of SpikoGen® vaccine's efficacy in preventing severe COVID-19. The study aimed for 147 COVID-19 symptomatic cases. RESULTS: Overall, 12 657 and 4219 participants were randomized to the SpikoGen® and placebo group and followed for a median of 55 days (interquartile range, 48-60 days) and 51 days (interquartile range, 46-58 days) after 14 days of the second dose, respectively. In the final per-protocol analysis, the number of COVID-19 cases was 247 of 9998 (2.4%) in the SpikoGen® group and 119 of 3069 (3.8%) in the placebo group. This equated to a vaccine efficacy of 43.99% (95% CI, 30.3-55.0%). The efficacy was calculated to be 44.22% (95% CI, 31.13-54.82%) among all participants who received both doses. From 2 weeks after the second dose, 5 of 9998 (0.05%) participants in the SpikoGen® group and 6 of 3069 (0.19%) participants in the placebo group developed severe COVID-19, equating to a vaccine efficacy against severe disease of 77.51% (95% CI, 26.3-93.1%). The SpikoGen® vaccine was well tolerated. DISCUSSION: A 2-dose regimen of SpikoGen® reduced the rate of COVID-19 and severe disease in the wave of the Delta variant.

Immunogenicity and Safety of SpikoGen, an Adjuvanted Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein, as a Heterologous Third Booster Dose in Kidney Transplant Patients: A Single-arm Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Studies have found that immunocompromised patients have suboptimal responses to COVID-19 vaccines, leading to approval of a need for booster doses in this population. SpikoGen® is a subunit recombinant spike protein vaccine combined with Advax-CpG55.2™ adjuvant to protect against COVID-19. Previous clinical trials found this vaccine to be tolerable, immunogenic, and efficacious in reducing the risk of COVID-19, including severe disease. However, the effects of this vaccine have not been assessed in immunocompromised patients. This study sought to assess the immunogenicity and safety of the SpikoGen vaccine as a third booster dose in patients undergoing kidney transplant who were receiving immunosuppressive therapy and had received their primary vaccination based on an inactivated whole virus platform (Sinopharm). METHODS: This single-arm trial was performed with 43 patients undergoing kidney transplant. The participants received a single booster dose of the SpikoGen vaccine 1 to 3 months after primary vaccination with 2 doses of the Sinopharm vaccine. Immunogenicity assessments were performed at baseline and 30 days after the booster dose. The primary outcomes were seroconversion rates of anti-S1 and surrogate virus neutralizing antibodies. Safety outcomes included the incidence of solicited and unsolicited adverse events in the 7 days and 1 month after the booster dose, respectively. FINDINGS: The SpikoGen vaccine induced positive humoral and cellular responses 30 days after the booster dose in those patients who were seropositive or seronegative after 2 primary doses of the Sinopharm vaccine. Thirty days after the SpikoGen vaccine booster, seroconversion rates were 35.29% (95% CI, 19.75%-53.51%) to anti-S1 and 29.41% (95% CI, 13.27%-46.57%) to surrogate neutralizing antibodies. The most common local and systemic reported solicited adverse events were injection site pain and fatigue, which were largely mild and transient. No serious adverse events were reported. IMPLICATIONS: A single booster dose of SpikoGen vaccine given 1 to 3 months after primary vaccination with 2 doses of Sinopharm vaccine induced positive humoral and cellular immune responses in immunosuppressed patients undergoing renal transplant, thereby achieving spike antibody levels predictive of protection. This study was performed as a single-center study, and it will be important for future large multicenter studies to extend these results to other immunocompromised patient groups.

Comparing efficacy and safety of P013, a proposed pertuzumab biosimilar, with the reference product in HER2-positive breast cancer patients: a randomized, phase III, equivalency clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading reason for cancer-related death among women. Neoadjuvant treatment with dual-HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) blockade has shown promising effects in this regard. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a proposed pertuzumab biosimilar with the reference pertuzumab. METHODS: This randomized, phase III, multicenter, equivalency clinical trial was conducted on chemotherapy-naive women with HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive six cycles of either P013 (CinnaGen, Iran) or the originator product (Perjeta, Roche, Switzerland) along with trastuzumab, carboplatin, and docetaxel every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified by cancer type (operable, locally advanced, inflammatory) and hormone receptor status. The primary endpoint was breast pathologic complete response (bpCR). Secondary endpoints included comparisons of total pCR, overall response rate (ORR), breast-conserving surgery (BCS), safety, and immunogenicity. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen patients were randomized to treatment groups. bpCR rate in the per-protocol population was 67.62% in the P013 and 71.57% in the reference drug groups. Based on bpCR, P013 was equivalent to the reference pertuzumab with a mean difference of - 0.04 (95% CI: - 0.16, 0.09). Secondary endpoints were also comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed biosimilar P013 was equivalent to the reference product in terms of efficacy. The safety of both medications was also comparable.

A randomized, double-blind, phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of TA4415V (a proposed Trastuzumab biosimilar) and Herceptin (Trastuzumab reference product) in HER2-positive early-stage breast Cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: This study compared efficacy and safety of TA4415V, a trastuzumab biosimilar, with reference trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2-positive) early-stage breast cancer treated in the neoadjuvant setting in Iran. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive neoadjuvant TA4415V or reference trastuzumab concurrently with docetaxel (TH phase) for 4 cycles after treatment with 4 cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC phase). Chemotherapy was followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was the comparison of pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the per-protocol population. Secondary endpoints included comparisons of overall response rate (ORR), breast-conserving surgery (BCS), safety, and immunogenicity. RESULTS: Ninety-two participants were analyzed in the per-protocol population (TA4415V, n = 48; reference trastuzumab, n = 44). The pCR rates were 37.50% and 34.09% with TA4415V and reference drug, respectively. The 95% CI of the estimated treatment outcome difference (- 0·03 [95% CI - 0.23 to 0.16]) was within the non-inferiority margin. No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups for other efficacy variables in the ITT population: ORR (89.13% vs. 83.33%; p = 0.72) and BCS (20.37% vs. 12.96%; p = 0.42) in the TA4415V and reference drug group, respectively. At least one grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 27 (50%) patients in the TA4415V group versus 29 (53.70%) in the reference trastuzumab group (p = 0.70). The decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), as an adverse event of special interest (AESI) for trastuzumab, was compared between treatment groups in TH phase. Results demonstrated an LVEF decrease in 7 (12.96%) and 9 (16.67%) patients in TA4415V and reference trastuzumab groups, respectively (p = 0.59). Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were not detected in any samples of groups. CONCLUSIONS: Non-inferiority for efficacy was demonstrated between TA4415V and Herceptin based on the ratio of pCR rates in HER2-positive early breast cancer patients. In addition, ORR and BCS, as secondary endpoints, were not significantly different. Safety profile and immunogenicity were also comparable between the two groups.

Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of PegaGen® (pegfilgrastim) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a post-marketing surveillance study.

PURPOSE: Phase IV clinical trials are required to evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of drugs. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of once-per-cycle administration of PegaGen® (pegfilgrastim, CinnaGen, Iran) in cancer patients. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter, prospective, real-world, post-marketing surveillance study, patients with any type of cancer receiving chemotherapy regimens with a high risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) were included if they were prescribed pegfilgrastim for FN prophylaxis. The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety and the secondary objective was to assess the effectiveness of pegfilgrastim in the prevention of FN in cancer patients. RESULTS: A total of 654 patients (51.73 ± 15.12 years of age) were enrolled and 3615 cycles of pegfilgrastim injections were recorded. The most common malignancies among the study patients were breast cancer (n = 192, 29.36%), lymphoma (n = 131, 20.03%), and gastric cancer (n = 65, 9.94%). The median (Q1, Q3) number of pegfilgrastim cycles per patient was 6 (4, 7). A single 6 mg dose was injected in 99.17% of the cycles. A total number of 816 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 246 patients (37.62%). Bone pain was recorded in 141 patients (21.56%) and in 440 cycles (12.17%). Among all patients, 45 patients (6.88%) experienced FN 51 times, and FN frequency was 1.4% among cycles. Moreover, 14 (2.14%) patients were hospitalized following FN. Antibiotics were administered to 24 patients (3.67%) for FN treatment. CONCLUSION: The results from this post-marketing surveillance study support the safety and effectiveness of PegaGen® used for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced FN in patients with various types of cancer and treatment regimens. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04460079.

The effects of memantine on the serum concentrations of matrix metalloproteinases and neurologic function of patients with ischemic stroke.

Memantine was suggested as a promising treatment for stroke due to its neuroprotective property and efficacy in reducing ischemic brain injury and improving post-ischemic neurological recovery. This pilot, open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted to investigate the impact of memantine on serum concentrations of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 and MMP-9, as neuronal damage biomarkers, and neurologic function evaluated by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS) and Barthelindex(BI) in patients with ischemic stroke. Admitted patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke were assessed for eligibility, and eligible patients were randomized to the intervention or control group. Enrolled patients in the intervention group received 20 mg memantine every 8 h for five days and then 20 mg daily for three months. Both groups managed with the standard treatments. From 77 randomized patients, 29 participants in the control group and 24 patients in the intervention group completed the study. Data showed that the increase in the serum concentrations of MMP-9 within the first 5 days of the study was significantly lower in the intervention group (P = 0.005). This effect of memantine on the MMP-2 was not significant (P = 0.448). memantine also could significantly improve the neurologic function of the patients according to NIHSS (P < 0.0001) and BI (P = 0.002) during hospitalization and after that. In conclusion, memantine could be considered as a neuroprotective agent in patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke, based on its significant effects on reducing brain damage and improving neurologic function of the patients.

Study of the neuroprotective effects of memantine in patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke.

Ischemic stroke is amongst the top four causes of mortality and the leading cause of disability in the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a high dose memantine on neurological function of patients with ischemic stroke. In a randomized, 2 armed, open-label study, patients with mild to moderate cerebral thromboembolic event (CTEE) who admitted to Imam Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran, during preceding 24 hours, entered the study. Patients allocated in two study groups of memantine (as add-on therapy) and control. All patients were managed based on the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) guidelines. Patients in memantine group received conventional treatment plus memantine 20 mg TID. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was determined and recorded daily. The primary objective was comparison of the changes in NIHSS in the study groups at day 1 and day 5 of intervention. Significance level of p<0.05 was considered for statistical analysis. Patients were randomly allocated in control (15 women and 14 men, age 70.78 ± 10.92 years) and memantine (16 women and 8 men, age 73.33 ± 9.35 years) groups. There were no significant differences in age and sex distribution of two study groups as well as in comorbidities and concurrent drugs. NIHSS changes were significantly different between control (1.24 ± 0.96) and memantine group (2.96 ± 0.1), (p < 0.0001). Our results reveal that memantine added to standard treatment of CTEE could result in a remarkable decrease in the NIHSS confirming improvement of the neurological function of the patients.

Increasing the number of adverse drug reactions reporting: the role of clinical pharmacy residents.

Detection of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in hospitals provides an important measure of the burden of drug related morbidity on the healthcare system. Spontaneous reporting of ADRs is scare and several obstacles to such reporting have been identified formerly. This study aimed to determine the role of clinical pharmacy residents in ADR reporting within a hospital setting. Clinical pharmacy residents were trained to report all suspected ADRs through ADR-reporting yellow cards. The incidence, pattern, seriousness, and preventability of the reported ADRs were analyzed. During the period of 12 months, for 8559 patients, 202 ADR reports were received. The most frequently reported reactions were due to anti-infective agents (38.38%). Rifampin accounted for the highest number of the reported ADRs among anti-infective agents. The gastro-intestinal system was the most frequently affected system (21.56%) of all reactions. Fifty four of the ADRs were reported as serious reactions. Eighteen of the ADRs were classified as preventable. Clinical pharmacy residents' involvement in the ADR reporting program could improve the ADR reporting system.