Better actual 10-year renal transplant outcomes of 80% reduced cyclosporine exposure with sirolimus base therapy compared with full cyclosporine exposure without or with concomittant sirolimus treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Retrospective analysis of 10-year outcomes of sirolimus (SRL) plus varying exposure to cyclosporine (CsA) in combination therapy for renal transplantation. METHODS: Univariate, multivariate, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses of 10-year outcomes of 167 subjects treated with full exposures to CsA/SRL/steroid versus 233 with CsA/no SRL/steroid who were generally enrolled in randomized trials versus 192 patients prescribed 80% reduced CsA exposure adjunctive to SRL baseline therapy with steroid withdrawal (groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). RESULTS: Groups 1 and 3 showed greater 1-year graft survivals (GS) than group 2 (93% and 94% vs 86%; P=.05, particularly when mean SRL C0≥10.5; P=.02); fewer acute rejection episodes (11% and 19% vs 40%; P<.001) and more frequent success of steroid withdrawal (47% and 66% vs 27%; P<.0001). Group 3 versus 1 displayed a higher mean glomerular filtration rate using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula: 56 versus 49 (P=.02) and 53 versus 41 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (P<.001) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. The 10-year GS among group 1 subjects was predicted by a ≥59 mL/min per 1.73 m2 at 1 year using ROC. Multivariate analysis showed factors predictive of 10-year GS among group 1 to include living donor source (P=.004), younger recipient age (P=.02), and fewer HLA-mismatches (P=.02). For group 3, the adverse factors were lower MDRD (P=.01); hypercholesterolemia (P=.01), and advanced donor age (P=.02). Group 3 versus 1 subjects displayed fewer skin tumors (2.6% vs 7.1%; P=.04), sepsis bouts (3.6% vs 9%; P=.04), and herpes virus infection (10% vs. 23%; P=.002), but more urinary tract infections (64% vs 53%; P=.04) and wound problems (43.7% vs 25.1%; P<.0001). CONCLUSION: An 80% reduction of de novo CsA exposure in combination with SRL engendered improved renal function as well as better graft survival at 10 years compared with patients treated with full CsA exposures with or without SRL co-therapy.

Fifty years in the vineyard of transplantation: looking back.

The past 5 decades have documented remarkable advances in basic knowledge and clinical expertise in transplantation. The first 12 years of this half century of my participation in the enterprise were consumed with the isolation, chemical characterization, and application of histocompatibility antigens purified from mouse, guinea pig, and human tissues, demonstrating that their specificity was based on unique amino acid sequences in protein structures. Initial unsuccessful attempts to use native molecules to induce tolerance in rat renal or heart transplantation models were followed by limited success when they were administered with a brief perioperative course of cyclosporine (CsA). Production of allochimeric constructs of class I major histocompatibility complex molecules bearing donor-type amino acid substitutions into the host-type C-terminal portion of the α1 helix yielded tolerogens whose activity was not dependent on conditioning with CsA or total lymphoid irradiation (TLI). The allochimeric molecules serve as altered peptide ligands that induce an aberrant T-cell signal 1 response producing transplantation tolerance. The potent activity of CsA in this experimental model was extended to clinical settings. Pharmacologic tools were employed to explore intra- and interindividual variations in drug exposure leading to the development of a better drug formulation. However, the intrinsic nephrotoxicity of CsA necessitated marked 80% reductions in de novo drug exposure as were achieved by exploiting the synergistic pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions of CsA with sirolimus. The final decade in this 50-year experience includes editorship of this journal with marked changes in its direction. These experiences have afforded insights into future avenues for preclinical exploration and therapeutic drug development.

New-onset diabetes after renal transplantation: diagnosis, incidence, risk factors, impact on outcomes, and novel implications.

OBJECTIVE: New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a multifactorial, complex metabolic disorder associated with impaired long-term graft function, reduced recipient survival, and increased risks of cardiovascular disease and infectious complications. The impact of NODAT is generally underestimated partly due to the inconsistent criteria that have been previously used for its diagnosis and to the generally short observation periods. The aim of this article was to review the recent literature on NODAT and to highlight the novel implications. FINDINGS: The 2010 American Diabetes Association guidelines provide useful, simplified criteria to unify the diagnosis including application of hemoglobin A1C levels. We sought to establish the impact of various modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors. A vast number of papers have examined the effects of immunosuppressive medications on the development of NODAT: Neither calcineurin inhibitor nor sirolimus (SRL) or steroids seems to be innocent of contributing to it. Immunosuppressants account for 74% of the occurrence of NODAT. Among modifiable risk factors, obesity is independent and significant, with great prevalence in the population. In additional to lifestyle modifications, the role of bariatric surgery (BS) either before or after transplantation is highlighted herein as a strategy to reduce disease in the view of the results among overweight, nontransplanted patients. SUMMARY: Because of the strong association between high glucose values in the early posttransplant period and the development of NODAT, the condition must be recognized early after (or even before) transplantation by intensive screening. Patients at risk for NODAT must modify appropriate risk factors and particularly undergo pretransplant planning and/or posttransplant adjustment individualizing immunosuppressive therapy to mitigate the risk of this serious complication.

Sirolimus therapy predisposes to new-onset diabetes mellitus after renal transplantation: a long-term analysis of various treatment regimens.

PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis evaluated the impacts of sirolimus (SRL), cyclosporine (CsA), and steroids (S) on the occurrence, treatment, and complications of new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT). METHODS: We compared 4 groups: group 1, SRL plus full-exposure CsA/S (n = 118); group 2, full-exposure CsA/S/no SRL ± antiproliferative drug (n = 141); group 3, SRL plus reduced CsA exposure/S (n = 212); and group 4, no SRL/full-exposure CsA/S ± antiproliferative drug (n = 43). RESULTS: NODAT rates reflected the level of CsA exposure; at 10 years 54% versus 30% for groups 1 versus 2 (P = .0001); at 5 years 30% versus 21% for Groups 3 versus 4 (P = .3); 81% of cases were detected within 1 year. The lower NODAT rate in group 3 reflected a benefit of reduced CsA exposure (P = .02; hazard ratio (HR), 1.006). Group 1 showed higher CsA (P = .0001) and lower SRL concentrations (P = .016) versus group 3. CsA exposure closely correlating with NODAT among group 1 (P = .0001) was the major difference between groups 1 and 3 (P = .04; HR, 0.97). Differences in steroid treatment did not play a significant role in NODAT. Comparing groups 1 and 2, SRL was an independent risk factor for NODAT (P = .004; HR, 3.5). CONCLUSIONS: Our 10-year experience revealed SRL to be an etiologic agent for NODAT, displaying interactive, possibly pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic effects with concomitant CsA in combination treatment.

Frontiers in immunosuppression.

Because of the pleiotropic toxicities of available immunosuppressants, new approaches have employed agents that seek to mitigate nephrotoxicity. Phase III trials of belatacept, a conjugate of cytotoxic lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and immunoglobulin that seeks to block T-cell activation signal 2, displayed significantly improved renal allograft function among standard (but much less so, among extended) criteria donor kidneys. However, there was no evident protection against chronic processes. Indeed, the study arm experienced an increased incidence of acute rejection episodes and posttransplant lymphoproliferative diseases. A Phase II trial of sotrastaurin, a nonselective protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor that may exert effects on signals 1 and 2, showed little benefit on renal graft function with an excess of acute rejection episodes, tachycardia, and serious infections when used as base therapy in combination with mycophenolate sodium and steroids after withdrawal of tacrolimus (TRL) treatment at 3 months. Phase II trials of tasocitimib, a putative blocker of Janus kinase (Jak)3-mediated transduction of signal 3, produced improved renal allograft function compared with TRL-based therapy. However, treated patients showed prominent inhibition of Jak 2, a widely distributed mediator of growth and differentiation signals in a variety of tissues, thereby engendering increased rates of infections and serious diseases. Major advances in this enterprise might be achieved with the discovery of agents that more specifically target intermediates selective for lymphoid cells: For example, lymphocyte cell kinase (lck; signal 1), CTLA-4 itself (signal 2), or Jak 3 (signal 3). Preliminary work in animal models supports these avenues for future drug development.

Addition of induction therapy offsets the hazard of marked calcineurin minimization among renal transplant recipients treated with sirolimus.

AIMS: We sought to examine the improvement in renal function with preserved immunosuppression consequent to reducing de novo cyclosporine (CsA) doses combined with sirolimus and induction antibody treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 408 renal recipients treated de novo with CsA-sirolimus included 91 patients who received high (> 5); 125, medium (2.5-5.0); or 192, low CsA doses (< 2.5 mg/kg/day) together with induction antibody among 5, 48 and 68% of subjects, respectively. At 2 years we excluded 21 (23), 30 (24) and 49 (25%) subjects who experienced the composite end-point, yielding 70 (71), 95 (76) and 143 (74%) cases, whose mean de novo CsA C2 values were 725, 400 and 306 ng/ml; for all cohorts, sirolimus C0 = 10-15 de novo and 8-12 ng/ml during maintenance treatment. The primary end-point--mean 4-year GFR by aMDRD--ascribed "0" to patients who experienced death or graft loss after 2 years. RESULTS: Although low-dose subjects were older (p = 0.008) and heavier (p < 0.001) with grafts exposed to longer cold ischemia times (p < 0.001), they displayed greater GFR: 64.8 versus 48.4 among the high and 54.1 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in the medium dose arms (p = 0.002). Polychotomous logistic regression revealed significant GFR predictors to be CsA dose (p = 0.015) and younger donor age (p < 0.001). Between 2 and 4 years, the incidences of the composite end-point were 17, 14 and 16%; including 13, 10 and 11% rejections. CONCLUSION: 80% reduction in de novo CsA exposure with antibody induction improved renal function at 4 years compared with 50 or 66% reductions.

Bortezomib successfully reverses early recurrence of light-chain deposition disease in a renal allograft: a case report.

Light-Chain Deposition Disease (LCDD) frequently recurs after renal transplantation, displaying a pernicious course. Herein we have described a 39-year-old Caucasian man with a history of immunoglobulin G-kappa multiple myeloma who failed two chemotherapy regimens, but ultimately responded to the combination of thalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation 3 years prior to transplantation, during which time he showed no evidence of persistent or recurrent disease. At 3 days following spousal living related renal transplantation, he displayed a rapid deterioration of renal function requiring dialysis therapy. This episode failed to respond to empiric antirejection therapy including anti-thymocyte globulin, plasmapheresis, and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. Increasing evidence suggested recurrence of LCDD, including positive immunofluorescence staining of basement membranes and vessels for kappa light chains as well as free kappa light chains in his urine and serum. Following suspension of sirolimus, he was initiated on and responded to bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2)) with discontinuation of dialysis within 3 weeks and progressively improving renal function. His maintenance therapy, in addition to six 2-week-long cycles of bortezomib separated by 1-week rest periods, includes cyclosporine (50 mg twice daily), prednisone (10 mg daily), and curcumin (9 g daily). In sum, bortezomib rescue therapy salvaged a spousal renal transplant afflicted with recurrent LCDD.

Current approaches to the use of sirolimus in renal transplantation.

Sirolimus, a macrolide with immunosuppressive properties, was introduced into clinical practice a decade ago. The optimal use of this drug remains controversial: It displays a wide range of organ and tissue toxicities owing to the critical role of its therapeutic site- the kinase mammalian target of rapamycin-in the signal transduction pathways of numerous cytokines, growth factors, hormones, and nutrients. However, it displays unique, recognized benefits for renal transplant recipients: synergistic interactions with cyclosporine and possibly tacrolimus, allowing marked reduction in exposure to the calcineurin inhibitor; reduction in the frequency of posttransplant malignancies, particularly lymphomas, Kaposi sarcomas, and hypernephromas; and modest nephrotoxicity in comparison with calcineurin inhibitors. Because of its inhibitory effects on endothelial and smooth muscle cell proliferation, sirolimus may be a useful tool to dampen chronic vasculo-obliterative processes that attenuate graft survival. With increasing experience with the drug, the true potential of sirolimus will be realized to be a critical element in the immunosuppressive matrix.

FTY720 and everolimus in de novo renal transplant patients at risk for delayed graft function: results of an exploratory one-yr multicenter study.

This exploratory, multicenter, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of FTY720, as a part of an immunosuppressive regimen, in combination with everolimus and steroids in de novo renal transplant recipients at increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF). Patients received FTY720 (5 mg) and everolimus (4 mg) 2-12 h pre-transplantation, followed by 2.5 mg/d FTY720 and concentration-controlled everolimus (4-8 ng/mL) post-transplant for 12 months. Induction therapy was prohibited. After enrollment of 56 of the planned 200 patients between 2000 and 2002, the recruitment was terminated. The primary endpoint, rate of graft loss, or death at three months was 15.4% and the biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 42.3%. Death or graft loss at 12 months in the DGF and non-DGF arms was 36.0% and 25.9%, respectively. The mean estimated creatinine clearance at three months was 63 and 55 mL/min in the non-DGF and DGF groups, respectively, while at 12 months it was 56 mL/min in both the groups. Although there was no comparator arm, the results from this exploratory study (compared with data from other phases II and III trials) indicated no apparent benefits of FTY720-based regimens for prevention of acute rejection and preservation of renal function in renal transplant recipients at high risk of DGF.

Living donor kidney transplantation without transmission of multiple sclerosis after 10 years.

We report the case of a successful renal transplant for over 10 years from a living donor with a history of multiple sclerosis.

The ruby anniversary: forty years of publication of Transplantation Proceedings - the first decade: the flowering of immunology and immunogenetics.

The fortieth-ruby-anniversary of publication of Transplantation Proceedings chronicles the major developments in this field of expanding scientific and clinical importance. The first decade of publication included seminal findings in immunogenetics of the major histocompatibility complex-HLA-A, -B, -C, and -D-and immunology of induction and expression of alloimmunity from single cell to mammalian organisms. Initial dissections of destructive versus acceptance mechanisms toward allografts revealed cytotoxic versus suppressive/enhancing cell-mediates and humoral vectors. Initial clinical successes revealed technical accomplishments that warranted broader application of this technology as described in the second decade of the Proceedings-the advent of cyclosporine.

Impact of rituximab therapy for treatment of acute humoral rejection.

INTRODUCTION: Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) is associated with a greater incidence of allograft loss because traditional approaches - pulse steroid or anti-lymphocyte antibodies are usually ineffective. This retrospective analysis documented the benefit of rituximab administration in addition to plasmapheresis (PP). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data from 54 kidney transplant patients treated for AMR between 2001 and 2006, including 26 patients who received PP plus rituximab (Group A), versus 28 subjects who underwent PP without rituximab (Group B). Only patients whose serum IgG levels were below normal values received intravenous gamma globulin (IVIG). In addition to clinical and demographic variables we evaluated graft/patient survivals at two years post-diagnosis, Banff classification of rejections, serum creatinine and calculated GFR values at baseline, rejection, resolution as well as three, six, 12 and 24 months thereafter. RESULTS: The demographic features of the cohorts showed no significant differences. The two-year graft survival for patients treated with rituximab plus PP was 90%, significantly better than 60% in the PP cohort (p = 0.005). Upon multivariate analysis administration of rituximab was the most significant factor (>or= 0.009); whereas, IVIG also produced a useful effect (p = 0.05). Neither the mean (>or= 0.42) nor the slope (p = 0.25) of GFR values showed a significant difference among salvaged kidneys over 24 months after completion of AMR treatment. The rates and types of infectious complications at three and six months did not show significant differences or impact on graft survival. CONCLUSION: Addition of rituximab improved the outcomes of PP treatment of antibody mediated rejection episodes.

Fifteen years of clinical studies and clinical practice in renal transplantation: reviewing outcomes with de novo use of sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine.

Over the course of 15 years the use of sirolimus, a macrocyclic lactone, has evolved from an adjunct to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to the foundation of therapy due to the drug's unique properties: First, it displays synergistic pharmacodynamic interactions with CNI. Even among high immunologic risk patients, this regimen attenuates the risk of acute allograft rejection episodes when used in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Indeed >80% reduction in CNI exposure de novo yields better long-term renal function than full cyclosporine (CsA) doses, a useful tradeoff, despite the augmented occurrence of lymphoceles and impaired wound healing. Second, by inhibiting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), it exerts profound anti-neoplastic effects reducing the incidence and mediating the regression of tumors displaying PTEN-deletions and/or Akt-activations in transplant and non-transplant patients. Third, it is relatively non-nephrotoxic although it may exacerbate that property of CNI agents. Fourth, it allows prompt withdrawal of steroid therapy. Fifth, it displays reduced rates of cytomegalovirus, and BK virus infections. The major adverse reactions can generally be controlled with countermeasure therapy. Myelosuppressive effects, which tend to be transient (unless sirolimus is combined with mycophenolic acid), are readily amenable to treatment with granulocyte colony stimulating factor for leukopenia, interleukin 11 for thrombocytopenia and erythropoietin for anemia. Combinations of statins and fibrates represent effective countermeasure therapy for hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia, respectively. Idiosyncratic reactions include hypoxemic pulmonary toxicity, refractory edema and diarrhea. Thus, sirolimus represents the vanguard of a new class of maintenance agents for immunosuppression.

The impact of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to mycophenolate sodium among renal transplant recipients on a sirolimus-based regimen.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the benefits of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to mycophenolic acid sodium (MPS) among renal transplant patients on sirolimus-based immunosuppression. METHODS: Alternate renal transplant recipients who were converted from MMF to MPS immediately (group A, n = 21) or 90 days thereafter (group B, n = 19) completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) questionnaires at days 90 and 180. Similarly, at the completion of the study 20 members of groups A plus B (converted to MPS) and 19 patients who initially declined to participate (continuous MMF) completed the questionnaires. RESULTS: At 90 days after conversion, members of group A showed fewer responses to "feeling unwell" and to flatulence, which regressed in group B at 180 days, although more persons in the latter cohort complained of bloating. The average scores of cohort A on the GIQLI at day 180 were significantly better than those at day 90. Compared with a control cohort of continuous MMF treatment, members of cohorts A plus B showed lower incidences of diarrhea, dysphagia, and eructations but greater incidences of constipation and not feeling fit. CONCLUSION: Conversion from MMF to MPS offers subjective benefits for patients on maintenance therapy with mycophenolic acid in combination with sirolimus.

Case report: successful treatment of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder and quiescence of dermatomyositis with rituximab and sirolimus.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) remains one of the most important complications of intensive immunosuppressive therapy. A 65-year-old Caucasian woman received a primary en bloc kidney transplant from a deceased 2-year-old donor. After antithymocyte globulin induction she was treated with a maintenance regimen including cyclosporine and mycophenylate mofetil (MMF). She had a history of recurrent dermatomyositis, suggesting a flawed immune system. After a benign course for 9 months and after an increase in MMF from 2 to 3 g daily, she presented with pneumonia owing to Candida albicans, which was responsive to antibiotics, as was the PTLD. Persistent fever led to a diagnosis of PTLD. The immunosuppressive regimen was converted to sirolimus (SRL) and rituximab, with over 90% necrosis of the neoplasm at 1 month. However, owing to concern at exploration, the allografts were extirpated. This case documented the benefit of the rituximab-SRL combination to treat PTLD while maintaining dermatomyositis in remission.

Selective corticosteroid and calcineurin-inhibitor withdrawal after pancreas-kidney transplantation utilizing thymoglobulin induction and sirolimus maintenance therapy.

Of 25 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) recipients treated with thymoglobulin induction, sirolimus and reduced-dose cyclosporine (CsA), 18 low-immune responders (non-African-Americans, PRA < 30%) were withdrawn from prednisone on post-transplant day 5, whereas seven high-immune responders continued on prednisone. Most high- and low-immune responder recipients were converted from CsA to mycophenolic acid (MPA) at six months post-transplantation. At a mean follow-up of 28 +/- 10 months, two pancreas grafts were lost to pancreatitis. There were no patient or kidney graft losses, but one acute rejection episode. At 28 +/- 11 months, all 18 low-responder recipients remain steroid-free. Twenty recipients (14 low and six high-immune responders) were converted from CsA to MPA. During conversion, immune response was monitored by Flow-PRA and T-cell stimulation (Cylex) assays. Nineteen of 20 recipients displayed a post-conversion PRA of 0%, whereas one highly sensitized patient expressed a post-conversion PRA of 67%. Fifty-eight percent of individual T-cell stimulation scores were in the hypo-responsive range. Twelve of 18 low-immune responders are both steroid and CsA-free at a mean follow-up of 17 +/- 13 months, whereas five of seven high-immune responders remain CsA-free at a mean follow-up of 11 +/- 10 months. These data suggest that thymoglobulin induction with combined sirolimus and CsA maintenance therapy permits immunosuppression minimization in selected SPK recipients.

Frontiers in immunosuppression.

Immunosuppressive therapy has relied on tailoring combinations of relatively nonselective drugs to individual patient tolerance. The next steps in the development of small molecule agents are to define and to develop selective inhibitors of cascades unique to T cells. This selectivity would minimize the inherent toxicity associated with drug therapy. Two targets identified at present are lymphoid cell kinase (lck; Signal 1) and Janus kinase 3 (Jak3; Signal 3). Although preliminary data support the immunosuppressive efficacy of putative antagonists, it is not clear that they are sufficiently selective for the target molecule as opposed to other kinases. Another novel approach to immunosuppression seeks to promote lymphoid cell sequestration in nodes through agonistic effects on sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors. Due to the availability of specific assays and high through put analysis of molecular candidates, the next decade should witness a panoply of new agents.

Statins benefit outcomes of renal transplant recipients on a sirolimus-cyclosporine regimen.

BACKGROUND: Statins offer a strategy to address dyslipidemia commonly experienced by immunosuppressed transplant recipients. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study of 325 recipients (mean posttransplant follow-up of over 6 years; 75.0+/-26.0 months) correlated four adverse outcomes-biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes, biopsy-confirmed chronic rejection/allograft nephropathy, graft loss, or death-with demographic and posttreatment variables. Patients were treated with a combination of sirolimus (SRL), cyclosporine (CsA), and various durations of steroids. Statins were prescribed for 259/325 (79%) recipients whose serum cholesterol exceeded 240 mg/dL and discontinued when the creatine phosphokinase increased fivefold (3.4%) or the liver function, threefold (3.0%) above normal. RESULTS: Upon univariate (hazard ratio [HR] 0.16; P<.001) and multivariate analysis (HR 0.38; P=.02), statins were markedly protective against acute rejection episodes. They reduced occurrence of chronic nephropathy/chronic rejection (HR 0.60; P=.03 and HR 0.52; P=.01, respectively). Incidences of graft loss were diminished (HR 0.26; P<.001 and HR 0.49; P=.01, respectively). Finally, the mortality rate was decreased (HR 0.21, P=.001 and HR 0.26, P=.01, respectively). Upon multivariate analysis, a reduced incidence of acute rejection was correlated with greater exposure to SRL (HR 0.78, P=.016) and CsA (HR 0.39; P=.006). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated compelling effects of statins against all adverse outcomes among patients treated with SRL-based, CsA-containing regimens. The profoundly dyslipidemic properties of SRL may explain these unique findings compared with previous studies on patients treated with CsA-based regimens.